soteria wrote...
And this is why I say there's an underlying sexist current against women in your argument. I never said anything about "more iconic males representing classes." I never mentioned gender at all, beyond "if Bioware uses a spear-wielding male warrior and a sword and board female warrior as game icons..." I'm not making that parallel (I said "people"), but you just did, I suppose. Neither the EA press release nor the DA2 homepage explicitly mentioned that you can play a male character, either, by the way--gender never came up. Why is the male dominance assumed? How do you expect to change society's perceptions and the way games are marketed if your own perceptions haven't changed?
And no, I don't buy that "Hawke" is a guy's name, any more than Smith, Torres, or Verner is a guy's name.
Alright, I apologize for putting words into your mouth--you didn't actually say you'd rather see a male archer or anything, but what you
did was to compare there being a lack of iconic archers with there not being a femHawke. I already made my point on why it's so completely different. " Why shouldn't Bioware also market an iconic mage, archer, rogue, etc?"
That's a pretty demeaning question, for reasons already stated.
"Why is the male dominance assumed?"
Dude, the developers openly
acknowledge male dominance. Word to the wise, if you want your arguments to seem more reasonable, don't start by denying the problem.
And...
http://www.behindthe...com/name/vernerIt is actually a male name. If you were to name your daughter "Hawke", people would look at you funny...well, funnier than naming your son "Hawke", that is.

"Amell" isn't a name that sounds masculine or feminine--but any "cool" sounding name tends to range on masculinity. I wouldn't change Hawke's name, don't get me wrong, and I don't see anything bad with it--but I'd just like you to see the other points.