New DLC Announced: Lair of the Shadowbroker
#3051
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 12:54
#3052
Guest_jernex_*
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 12:56
Guest_jernex_*
#3053
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 12:59
PoliteAssasin wrote...
darknoon5 wrote...
NO UAwesomeName wrote...
Sheesh quick aren't you?
I agree there isn't any real reason to have weapons, but I can hope.
And Polite, a few extra weapons won't take much time to add in.
I never said that. If anything Weapons would be the easiest thing to imlement. You make a model, create a particle effect, script it, animate it, your done. I just don't want to see like 20 weapon packs over the course of the next year or so. We have enough weapons already. Especially if you have the Blackstorm and Collector Assault Rifle. We just got the Arc Projector, the Kassa Locust, we're getting a new AR, SG, and HP. Do we really need more firepower?
-Polite
We don't need more guns. We need more variety.
#3054
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 01:04
KainrycKarr wrote...
PoliteAssasin wrote...
darknoon5 wrote...
NO UAwesomeName wrote...
Sheesh quick aren't you?
I agree there isn't any real reason to have weapons, but I can hope.
And Polite, a few extra weapons won't take much time to add in.
I
never said that. If anything Weapons would be the easiest thing to
imlement. You make a model, create a particle effect, script it, animate
it, your done. I just don't want to see like 20 weapon packs over the
course of the next year or so. We have enough weapons already.
Especially if you have the Blackstorm and Collector Assault Rifle. We
just got the Arc Projector, the Kassa Locust, we're getting a new AR,
SG, and HP. Do we really need more firepower?
-Polite
We don't need more guns. We need more variety.
But variety goes hand in hand with more weaponry.
The
more weapon acquisition methods, the greater the depth of the game...
now if the "weapons" as just given to you without any effort as the last
few DLC's then yes they dont add any "variety" or "depth" to the game.
DLC's
should allow you to acquire the weapons, not just give you the
weapons, even if is just a short mission. Not just give you the
incissisor rifle, but maybe a short quest a a few firefight to get it,
fighting an... overrun illium police station or what not.
if is a geth shotgun, from a geth dropship or soemthing of the sort.
Like
the normal, game, weapons should be acquire, otherwise it looses the
purpose of having more weapons if they are all available, always at any
given time.
Now if you got them already, and you replay the game with
the carry on safe file the the mission should still be there, but the
weapona already avialable.
Came up with a saying , maybe it has weight.... reward without quest is not very fun, just as a quest wihtou reward.
Modifié par Spartas Husky, 31 juillet 2010 - 01:07 .
#3055
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 01:11
#3056
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 01:12
ThemFlashlight-headedThings wrote...
Yes and by 2185 he will employ everyone and can "fire" people with the same pretext that velarn dismisses various claims.
#3057
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 01:14
Spartas Husky wrote...
KainrycKarr wrote...
PoliteAssasin wrote...
darknoon5 wrote...
NO UAwesomeName wrote...
Sheesh quick aren't you?
I agree there isn't any real reason to have weapons, but I can hope.
And Polite, a few extra weapons won't take much time to add in.
I
never said that. If anything Weapons would be the easiest thing to
imlement. You make a model, create a particle effect, script it, animate
it, your done. I just don't want to see like 20 weapon packs over the
course of the next year or so. We have enough weapons already.
Especially if you have the Blackstorm and Collector Assault Rifle. We
just got the Arc Projector, the Kassa Locust, we're getting a new AR,
SG, and HP. Do we really need more firepower?
-Polite
We don't need more guns. We need more variety.
But variety goes hand in hand with more weaponry.
The
more weapon acquisition methods, the greater the depth of the game...
now if the "weapons" as just given to you without any effort as the last
few DLC's then yes they dont add any "variety" or "depth" to the game.
DLC's
should allow you to acquire the weapons, not just give you the
weapons, even if is just a short mission. Not just give you the
incissisor rifle, but maybe a short quest a a few firefight to get it,
fighting an... overrun illium police station or what not.
if is a geth shotgun, from a geth dropship or soemthing of the sort.
Like
the normal, game, weapons should be acquire, otherwise it looses the
purpose of having more weapons if they are all available, always at any
given time.
Now if you got them already, and you replay the game with
the carry on safe file the the mission should still be there, but the
weapona already avialable.
Came up with a saying , maybe it has weight.... reward without quest is not very fun, just as a quest wihtou reward.
Yea, you completely misunderstand. We don't *need* more guns - but we DO need more variety OF guns.
Each gun, of each class of gun, should have distinct advantages and disadvantages in relation to other guns of it's class.
I.E. give a reason to have one squadmate use a vindicator, while another uses an avenger.
right now, there is no reason, as it is a clear-cut evolution of guns through the game.
Modifié par KainrycKarr, 31 juillet 2010 - 01:14 .
#3058
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 01:17
Modifié par xlI ReFLeX lIx, 31 juillet 2010 - 01:19 .
#3059
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 01:19
#3060
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 01:27
xlI ReFLeX lIx wrote...
I can't wait to kick some Shadow Broker behind with Liara by my side!
How do you have the audacity to post something that doesn't antagonistically contradict someone else's opinion
#3061
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 01:46
ThemFlashlight-headedThings wrote...
xlI ReFLeX lIx wrote...
I can't wait to kick some Shadow Broker behind with Liara by my side!
How do you have the audacity to post something that doesn't antagonistically contradict someone else's opinion
What are you talking about of course he did!
#3062
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 01:51
TelexFerra wrote...
ThemFlashlight-headedThings wrote...
xlI ReFLeX lIx wrote...
I can't wait to kick some Shadow Broker behind with Liara by my side!
How do you have the audacity to post something that doesn't antagonistically contradict someone else's opinion
What are you talking about of course he did!
And so it begins
#3063
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 02:28
ThemFlashlight-headedThings wrote...
TelexFerra wrote...
ThemFlashlight-headedThings wrote...
xlI ReFLeX lIx wrote...
I can't wait to kick some Shadow Broker behind with Liara by my side!
How do you have the audacity to post something that doesn't antagonistically contradict someone else's opinion
What are you talking about of course he did!
And so it begins
There is a hole in your mind!
#3064
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 02:30
TelexFerra wrote...
ThemFlashlight-headedThings wrote...
TelexFerra wrote...
ThemFlashlight-headedThings wrote...
xlI ReFLeX lIx wrote...
I can't wait to kick some Shadow Broker behind with Liara by my side!
How do you have the audacity to post something that doesn't antagonistically contradict someone else's opinion
What are you talking about of course he did!
And so it begins
There is a hole in your mind!
Fixed it up with some N7 armor, oh wait, shouldn't be giving you data about this.
#3065
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 02:36
ThemFlashlight-headedThings wrote...
TelexFerra wrote...
ThemFlashlight-headedThings wrote...
TelexFerra wrote...
ThemFlashlight-headedThings wrote...
xlI ReFLeX lIx wrote...
I can't wait to kick some Shadow Broker behind with Liara by my side!
How do you have the audacity to post something that doesn't antagonistically contradict someone else's opinion
What are you talking about of course he did!
And so it begins
There is a hole in your mind!
Fixed it up with some N7 armor, oh wait, shouldn't be giving you data about this.
Not a Babylon 5 fan I take it
#3066
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 02:37
TelexFerra wrote...
ThemFlashlight-headedThings wrote...
TelexFerra wrote...
ThemFlashlight-headedThings wrote...
TelexFerra wrote...
ThemFlashlight-headedThings wrote...
xlI ReFLeX lIx wrote...
I can't wait to kick some Shadow Broker behind with Liara by my side!
How do you have the audacity to post something that doesn't antagonistically contradict someone else's opinion
What are you talking about of course he did!
And so it begins
There is a hole in your mind!
Fixed it up with some N7 armor, oh wait, shouldn't be giving you data about this.
Not a Babylon 5 fan I take it
???
#3067
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 03:59
KainrycKarr wrote...
Spartas Husky wrote...
KainrycKarr wrote...
PoliteAssasin wrote...
darknoon5 wrote...
NO UAwesomeName wrote...
Sheesh quick aren't you?
I agree there isn't any real reason to have weapons, but I can hope.
And Polite, a few extra weapons won't take much time to add in.
I
never said that. If anything Weapons would be the easiest thing to
imlement. You make a model, create a particle effect, script it, animate
it, your done. I just don't want to see like 20 weapon packs over the
course of the next year or so. We have enough weapons already.
Especially if you have the Blackstorm and Collector Assault Rifle. We
just got the Arc Projector, the Kassa Locust, we're getting a new AR,
SG, and HP. Do we really need more firepower?
-Polite
We don't need more guns. We need more variety.
But variety goes hand in hand with more weaponry.
The
more weapon acquisition methods, the greater the depth of the game...
now if the "weapons" as just given to you without any effort as the last
few DLC's then yes they dont add any "variety" or "depth" to the game.
DLC's
should allow you to acquire the weapons, not just give you the
weapons, even if is just a short mission. Not just give you the
incissisor rifle, but maybe a short quest a a few firefight to get it,
fighting an... overrun illium police station or what not.
if is a geth shotgun, from a geth dropship or soemthing of the sort.
Like
the normal, game, weapons should be acquire, otherwise it looses the
purpose of having more weapons if they are all available, always at any
given time.
Now if you got them already, and you replay the game with
the carry on safe file the the mission should still be there, but the
weapona already avialable.
Came up with a saying , maybe it has weight.... reward without quest is not very fun, just as a quest wihtou reward.
Yea, you completely misunderstand. We don't *need* more guns - but we DO need more variety OF guns.
Each gun, of each class of gun, should have distinct advantages and disadvantages in relation to other guns of it's class.
I.E. give a reason to have one squadmate use a vindicator, while another uses an avenger.
right now, there is no reason, as it is a clear-cut evolution of guns through the game.
oo ok got it. sry
Although the evolution of weapons through the game is the overall objective, I get what your saying, we get to the end without the journey of different ariety of weapons as we reach the top weapons tier.
#3068
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 04:00
Merlin 47 wrote...
Yes....I agree.
In a surprise twist, the Shadow Broker will be Donald Trump!
#3069
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 04:16
#3070
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 04:25
amcnow wrote...
Merlin 47 wrote...
Yes....I agree.
In a surprise twist, the Shadow Broker will be Donald Trump!
lmao, The ****?
#3071
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 05:02
silverhammer08 wrote...
god... please no.Yakko77 wrote...
The Shadow Broker is Bruce Campbell.
Prepare for Awesomeness!!!
Prepare youself... for the AWESOMENESS!!!!
Give his some sugah baby!!!!
#3072
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 05:12
#3073
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 05:24
I don't even know how this remotely makes sence but it would be awsome because nobody ever suspects Canada.
#3074
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 05:32
#3075
Posté 31 juillet 2010 - 05:41
CottonBALL wrote...
No no no, The Shadow Broker is Chuck Norris. xD
Old meme is old.
The Shadow Broker is The Shadow Broker.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





