PWENER wrote...
BW knows best, but it's a DLC, so I don't expect a big twist or such. I do hope it's someone new and not some stupid rip-off character we've already seen or heard about. Hell, we may not even get to see him or fight him in the DLC. It's a DLC people, there may be people who import to ME3 without playing it, and meeting the Shadow Broker is a pretty big deal in my book. I think he escapes or something and we meet him in ME3 as one of the game's major enemies. That would be more linear and story friendly then importing to ME3 with the Shadow Broker alive and kicking... HELLO, his a major villain, he can't be allowed to live and mess up Shepard's mission in saving the galaxy, he works for the freaking Reapers, and what is the point of killing him now on DLC if I can kill him in ME3 as a more decorated bad guy, and not with: "Hey Shep, TIM here, found the Shadow Broker, wanna take him out for no reason at all (since we can get the mission before Liara tells Shepard about the Shadow Broker trying to sell him to the collectors?".
That wouldn't make any sense.
This is a possibility, but from my perspective I greatly hope not. I'm not sure I see how the Shadow Broker is really a major villain in the Mass Effect Universe. It's been a couple of months since I have read Redemption, but the Shadow Broker was only selling the body of Shepard to the Collectors because A. that is his business and B. in the fourth volume during his dialogue with Liara, I think I recall him mentioning that Shepard is nothing more than a corpse at that time. From this, I am assuming that means the Shadow Broker had no idea that Cerberus was initiating the Lazarus Cell in order to bring Shepard back. I do believe he mentions he was a little curious as to why the Collectors wanted it in the first place, but because it was a corpse thought he might as well make money on it..
Likewise, I wouldn't call him at all a major villain in the story of Mass Effect even for what happened to Feron. Feron was a double-agent and as we know from Mass Effect one, the Shadow Broker doesn't condone traitors (who does?) in his line of work.
Personally, I want the Shadow Broker problem dealt with in a long DLC or an expansion pack instead of Mass Effect 3. There are already enough problems we are likely going to have to sort out in Mass Effect 3 as is, on top of the Reaper threat, and I would prefer the game to flow as well as possible without giving the impression that it's cluttered and Shepard is trying to solve too many problems at one time. Likewise because I see him as more of a minor problem for Shepard's over all goal of stopping the Reapers, I see no reason why they shouldn't deal with him in the DLC. BioWare has stated many times that Mass Effect 3 is going to be different from the first two games because continuity is no longer an issue. It's the end of the trilogy, thus there are literally around a thousand variables they are projecting that will cause everyone's game to be different.
Modifié par DarkSeraphym, 08 août 2010 - 06:42 .