How many people here are pro-cerberus?
#1
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 06:30
Finally how many people don't want to see humanity as the dominant power in the galaxy and why?
#2
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 06:33
Although I don't believe in the Asari dominance that the pre-council represented as well.
#3
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 06:33
#4
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 06:33
#5
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 06:38
Anyway, enough Volus tangent,,,
So no, I myself, am not pro-human or agree with Cerberus and its goal.
#6
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 06:40
#7
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 06:41
Unfortunately, they're the only ones besides Shepard's crew taking the Reaper threat seriously.
Modifié par MadCat221, 22 juillet 2010 - 06:41 .
#8
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 06:42
Guest_Shandepared_*
Cerberus all the way.
#9
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 06:44
#10
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 06:45
Shandepared wrote...
I support Cerberus completely. Prior to playing Mass Effect 2, especially after reading Ascension, I was skeptical that they were of any benefit to humanity. I thought they might be more of a menace and I was angry that they might have squandered any hopes humanity had for forming an alliance with the Migrant Fleet. However after meeting the Illusive Man and seeing how well Cerberus handled the mission to stop the Collectors, as well as learning about their involvement in the Normandy, I changed my mind.
Cerberus all the way.
What about the other sapient species in the galaxy?
#11
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 06:47
That's what I like about Cerberus, too. As Jacob put it, they don't write down reports and wait for politicians and whatnot to act, "we just go and find it". I just really don't trust Timmy, who happens to be the head of Cerberus. That's all.Shandepared wrote...
I support Cerberus completely. Prior to playing Mass Effect 2, especially after reading Ascension, I was skeptical that they were of any benefit to humanity. I thought they might be more of a menace and I was angry that they might have squandered any hopes humanity had for forming an alliance with the Migrant Fleet. However after meeting the Illusive Man and seeing how well Cerberus handled the mission to stop the Collectors, as well as learning about their involvement in the Normandy, I changed my mind.
Cerberus all the way.
Modifié par FieryPhoenix7, 22 juillet 2010 - 06:47 .
#12
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 06:53
"Unacceptable methods, unacceptable goals"
Why would I want humans to rule the galaxy? The current council isn't exactly perfect (I would add a rotating seat for the other races...elcor, hanar, etc.), but better than a human tyranny.
#13
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 06:59
FieryPhoenix7 wrote...
That's what I like about Cerberus, too. As Jacob put it, they don't write down reports and wait for politicians and whatnot to act, "we just go and find it". I just really don't trust Timmy, who happens to be the head of Cerberus. That's all.Shandepared wrote...
I support Cerberus completely. Prior to playing Mass Effect 2, especially after reading Ascension, I was skeptical that they were of any benefit to humanity. I thought they might be more of a menace and I was angry that they might have squandered any hopes humanity had for forming an alliance with the Migrant Fleet. However after meeting the Illusive Man and seeing how well Cerberus handled the mission to stop the Collectors, as well as learning about their involvement in the Normandy, I changed my mind.
Cerberus all the way.
Too many human supremacists in the org, and Spectres can do Carte Blanche as well, with tacit government backing too... when they're not members of a species new to the galactic scene with an expansionist and entitlement complex.
Cerberus is a group of amoral operatives led by an aging vice-addled playboy who likes pretending he's supercool black ops brains.
Modifié par MadCat221, 22 juillet 2010 - 07:00 .
#14
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:01
My feelings about Cerberus are selective depending on the project. Personally I think the good they did by bringing back Shepard outweighed all the bad (imho) they had done up until then.Shandepared wrote...
I support Cerberus completely. Prior to playing Mass Effect 2, especially after reading Ascension, I was skeptical that they were of any benefit to humanity. I thought they might be more of a menace and I was angry that they might have squandered any hopes humanity had for forming an alliance with the Migrant Fleet. However after meeting the Illusive Man and seeing how well Cerberus handled the mission to stop the Collectors, as well as learning about their involvement in the Normandy, I changed my mind.
Cerberus all the way.
I think it would be smart to work with them to stop the reapers, and not tell TIM to stuff it and run off like the paragons who put their personal feelings about TIM above the mission to stop the reapers.
What about them?MadCat221 wrote...
What about the other sapient species in the galaxy?
Modifié par Inverness Moon, 22 juillet 2010 - 07:02 .
#15
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:06
Inverness Moon wrote...
My feelings about Cerberus are selective depending on the project. Personally I think the good they did by bringing back Shepard outweighed all the bad (imho) they had done up until then.Shandepared wrote...
I support Cerberus completely. Prior to playing Mass Effect 2, especially after reading Ascension, I was skeptical that they were of any benefit to humanity. I thought they might be more of a menace and I was angry that they might have squandered any hopes humanity had for forming an alliance with the Migrant Fleet. However after meeting the Illusive Man and seeing how well Cerberus handled the mission to stop the Collectors, as well as learning about their involvement in the Normandy, I changed my mind.
Cerberus all the way.
I think it would be smart to work with them to stop the reapers, and not tell TIM to stuff it and run off like the paragons who put their personal feelings about TIM above the mission to stop the reapers.What about them?MadCat221 wrote...
What about the other sapient species in the galaxy?
One would have to be as naive as the paragonic players they accuse that of to not see that Cerberus's goals are thinly veiled human supremism.
Modifié par MadCat221, 22 juillet 2010 - 07:08 .
#16
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:08
Guest_Shandepared_*
MadCat221 wrote...
What about the other sapient species in the galaxy?
Not my concern.
MadCat221 wrote...
Cerberus is a group of amoral operatives led by an aging vice-addled playboy who likes pretending he's supercool black ops brains.
Spectres are a group of amoral operatives lead by an aging cabal of self-serving nationalist asari, salarians, and turians who give their agents the freedom to murder and steal under the vague mandate that they "protect galactic stability". The Spectres are the chief defenders of an oppressive government that lords itself over multiple species that are given no vote or say in how that government operates or in the decisions it makes. The Council rules by force, not by consent.
With all of that being true how can you possibly argue that Cerberus and human dominance are somehow worse? At least human dominance would serve humanity, unlike the neglectful Council.
#17
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:11
Shandepared wrote...
MadCat221 wrote...
What about the other sapient species in the galaxy?
Not my concern.MadCat221 wrote...
Cerberus is a group of amoral operatives led by an aging vice-addled playboy who likes pretending he's supercool black ops brains.
Spectres are a group of amoral operatives lead by an aging cabal of self-serving nationalist asari, salarians, and turians who give their agents the freedom to murder and steal under the vague mandate that they "protect galactic stability". The Spectres are the chief defenders of an oppressive government that lords itself over multiple species that are given no vote or say in how that government operates or in the decisions it makes. The Council rules by force, not by consent.
With all of that being true how can you possibly argue that Cerberus and human dominance are somehow worse? At least human dominance would serve humanity, unlike the neglectful Council.
Well, for starters, we can see that Human dominance is worse because of the far heavier police state the Citadel is in when the council dies. Question Avina? Hands on your heads and wait for C-Sec. Not so with the Council still alive.
Unless you're okay with facist police states?
And how is the Council better despite all those failings you listed? They have a better feel for galactic affairs than the humans. Who have been on the scene for all of twenty five years. Humans are all high and mighty all because they bloodied the nose of the big kid on the block, who was gearing up to deliver an even bigger whomping in response.
Modifié par MadCat221, 22 juillet 2010 - 07:14 .
#18
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:12
Guest_Shandepared_*
MadCat221 wrote...
Well, for starters, we can see that Human dominance is worse because of the far heavier police state the Citadel is in when the council dies. Question Avina? Hands on your heads and wait for C-Sec. Not so with the Council still alive.
Unless you're okay with facist police states?
That's only on the Citadel and the Citadel is primarily populated by aliens, hostile aliens at that, and not humans.
#19
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:15
:unsure:that's like having a problem with canada... toronto or montreal having more canadians than americans... duhShandepared wrote...
MadCat221 wrote...
Well, for starters, we can see that Human dominance is worse because of the far heavier police state the Citadel is in when the council dies. Question Avina? Hands on your heads and wait for C-Sec. Not so with the Council still alive.
Unless you're okay with facist police states?
That's only on the Citadel and the Citadel is primarily populated by aliens, hostile aliens at that, and not humans.
:wizard:more blue aien strippers for me then...
#20
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:15
Shandepared wrote...
MadCat221 wrote...
Well, for starters, we can see that Human dominance is worse because of the far heavier police state the Citadel is in when the council dies. Question Avina? Hands on your heads and wait for C-Sec. Not so with the Council still alive.
Unless you're okay with facist police states?
That's only on the Citadel and the Citadel is primarily populated by aliens, hostile aliens at that, and not humans.
Gee, I wonder why they're hostile?
Timmay made a similar comment, and I just so wanted a Paragon interrupt to reach through the QEC and dope slap his funky contact lenses out for that.
Modifié par MadCat221, 22 juillet 2010 - 07:22 .
#21
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:15
#22
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:18
Shandepared wrote...
MadCat221 wrote...
Well, for starters, we can see that Human dominance is worse because of the far heavier police state the Citadel is in when the council dies. Question Avina? Hands on your heads and wait for C-Sec. Not so with the Council still alive.
Unless you're okay with facist police states?
That's only on the Citadel and the Citadel is primarily populated by aliens, hostile aliens at that, and not humans.
How would you feel if a group of uppity people showed up, demanded things they hadnt earned, when things got tough allowed your government to be killed while they saved themselves, and then placed themselves in the new government that was rebuilt after?
#23
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:19
:huh:glad i'm a elf/vulcan in the future...^_^Barquiel wrote...
anti-cerberus
"Unacceptable methods, unacceptable goals"
Why would I want humans to rule the galaxy? The current council isn't exactly perfect (I would add a rotating seat for the other races...elcor, hanar, etc.), but better than a human tyranny.
:whistle:humans are naturally "ulterioristically questionable" ... putting their own personal agenda/interest ahead of stuff very important... can't fully trust some.
B)elves deserve a council seat of the Lord of the Rings in futuristic space (example they had problems in the lord of the rings thanks to one power hungry human man keeping the ring by the way)...
Modifié par FuturePasTimeCE, 22 juillet 2010 - 07:25 .
#24
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:23
:huh:sounds like some native american, christerpher columbus **** in space the way you put it... :?I believe they could have saved both the council+humans at the same time... saving the council = greater trust amongst other alien races across the galaxy, saving a group of your species would to have a well familiarized reputation of amongst them within immediate human contact... why not both (being appreciated by your species, aswell as having the trust of other species/alliens across the galaxy with whatever relationship/dealings)?...Simpfan wrote...
Shandepared wrote...
MadCat221 wrote...
Well, for starters, we can see that Human dominance is worse because of the far heavier police state the Citadel is in when the council dies. Question Avina? Hands on your heads and wait for C-Sec. Not so with the Council still alive.
Unless you're okay with facist police states?
That's only on the Citadel and the Citadel is primarily populated by aliens, hostile aliens at that, and not humans.
How would you feel if a group of uppity people showed up, demanded things they hadnt earned, when things got tough allowed your government to be killed while they saved themselves, and then placed themselves in the new government that was rebuilt after?
#25
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:23





Retour en haut




