Modifié par chapa3, 22 juillet 2010 - 07:26 .
How many people here are pro-cerberus?
#26
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:25
#27
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:25
Guest_Shandepared_*
Simpfan wrote...
How would you feel if a group of uppity people showed up, demanded things they hadnt earned, when things got tough allowed your government to be killed while they saved themselves, and then placed themselves in the new government that was rebuilt after?
I wouldn't be so arrogant to claim that species must "earn" its place anywhere. Everyone has the right to whatever they can grab and hold on to. Nothing more, nothing less. Humanity took power because it could and it holds onto power because it can.
#28
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:26
not the cost of anyone of any species period... minimum to zero casualties of anyone...Caesar914 wrote...
I agree with the advancement of humanity but not at the cost of other species.
#29
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:27
#30
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:27
Shandepared wrote...
Simpfan wrote...
How would you feel if a group of uppity people showed up, demanded things they hadnt earned, when things got tough allowed your government to be killed while they saved themselves, and then placed themselves in the new government that was rebuilt after?
I wouldn't be so arrogant to claim that species must "earn" its place anywhere. Everyone has the right to whatever they can grab and hold on to. Nothing more, nothing less. Humanity took power because it could and it holds onto power because it can.
And that sort of attitude is why aliens are hostile to you
#31
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:32
Shandepared wrote...
I wouldn't be so arrogant to claim that species must "earn" its place anywhere. Everyone has the right to whatever they can grab and hold on to. Nothing more, nothing less. Humanity took power because it could and it holds onto power because it can.
I agree with the logic, just you must also factor in relationships with other species. How you earn power can be the difference between lasting peace and violent war.
#32
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:36
I like TIM very much as a character, and while he sold me on the need for someone to protect humanities interest, I still think he takes it too far. I read all his little reports after missions and didn't appreciate a lot of his "observations." He's constantly working behind my back which means I can't trust him.
As for human dominance, I don't care so much about conflicts with asari, turians, and salarians because I figure they can take care of themselves and are never truly threatened. But I do have a problem with bullying the Krogans (my favorite species), Quarians, Elcor, Volus (even if they're kinda a joke), etc. I'm big on self determination and humanity or any other species can't make decisions for everyone else.
#33
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:37
I don't want to be ungrateful... They gave me new life, new ship and a promiscuous secretary.
#34
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:39
Guest_Shandepared_*
chapa3 wrote...
I agree with the logic, just you must also factor in relationships with other species. How you earn power can be the difference between lasting peace and violent war.
Of-course, however I don't think Udina and the Alliance are stupid enough to seize power without being certain they can avoid war. As I suspected, they were correct. In the immediate wake of the geth attack the Alliance was seen as a hero, even despite the loss of the Council. Beyond that the losses suffered by the Citadel fleet ensured that the Alliance was needed, and this is what is important. The other races can hate us all they want but that doesn't matter because they need us.
Korea, Japan, Europe, Saudi Arabia... none of their populaces are particularly fond of American military bases. However they don't storm our forces there and kick them out because the more pragmatic people in their governmetns know that they're better off with us there. It is the same in Mass Effect. The aliens need us to protect the Citadel and the rest of the Citadel space.
By the time they've rebuilt humanity will have risen even stronger and the only way to displace us would be a costly war, a war that they would have to start. Try selling that to the public, a major interstellar war that could take years, cost billions of credits, and do great damage to the galaxy. Try selling this to a public that hasn't seen a major war in over a thousand years and was humiliated by their most recent military engagement.
#35
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:40
I think you and I are the only people on this website that understand that joke in your post.Alpha-Centuri wrote...
I'm pro human, not pro-cerberus. I told garrus at the collector base that I knew TIM would double-cross me. I stuck it to him at the end, and I plan on taking my servicesto South Beachback to the Alliance.
Modifié par Freakaz0idx, 22 juillet 2010 - 07:40 .
#36
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:40
#37
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:41
:?major plothole... that's like agent smith taking credit for Neo's coming back to lifeness when he's the one who killed him...Rzepik2 wrote...
My Shepard supports Cerberus.
I don't want to be ungrateful... They gave me new life, new ship and a promiscuous secretary.
#38
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:42
Spornicus wrote...
Cerberus gets the job done. 'Nuff said.
#39
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:43
#40
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:47
Cerberus wants humans to be the dominant force in the galaxy, etc. That does not necessarily have to come at the expense of other species, so I see nothing wrong with it.MadCat221 wrote...
One would have to be as naive as the paragonic players they accuse that of to not see that Cerberus's goals are thinly veiled human supremism.
#41
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:48
Modifié par Cerberus Operative Ashley Williams, 22 juillet 2010 - 07:48 .
#42
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:49
Cerberus, major casualties now, Alliance, ridiculous casualties later. Pick your poison.FuturePasTimeCE wrote...
Spornicus wrote...
Cerberus gets the job done. 'Nuff said.with major casualties and coincidences...
#43
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:50
Guest_Shandepared_*
Cerberus Operative Ashley Williams wrote...
If humans don't look out for themselves, no one will.
Well said.
#44
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:51
Bad comparison. TIM doesn't want to kill Shepard, he wants to cooperate. Well, unless you will blow up the base.FuturePasTimeCE wrote...
:?major plothole... that's like agent smith taking credit for Neo's coming back to lifeness when he's the one who killed him...Rzepik2 wrote...
My Shepard supports Cerberus.
I don't want to be ungrateful... They gave me new life, new ship and a promiscuous secretary.
Modifié par Rzepik2, 22 juillet 2010 - 08:04 .
#45
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:54
But see, that is a weakness. If for the rest of the Council species, it is a numbers game with more dreadnoughts meaning more power, then the human thing to do would be to change the rules of the game.chapa3 wrote...
Actually, and also according to the Treaty of Farixen, which limit the number of dreadnaughts each nation can build, the Turians, Salarians, and Asari combined, with their dreadnaught superiority (and their colony and outpost superiority), as well as the tech superiority of the STGs, humanity isn't exactly that powerful compared to others. Its more like America, England, Russia, and Brazil in terms of economy and military. If even two of the council races could mobilize against another race, they could win with moderate losses.
Back during World War II, having a lot of troops, tanks, etc. meant something, up until we invented the nuke. The Alliance or Cerberus needs to do something that makes the number of dreadnoughts the rest of the council species have irrelevant.
#46
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:57
Guest_Shandepared_*
Inverness Moon wrote...
Back during World War II, having a lot of troops, tanks, etc. meant something, up until we invented the nuke. The Alliance or Cerberus needs to do something that makes the number of dreadnoughts the rest of the council species have irrelevant.
We've already done that with our carriers and stealth frigates.
#47
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 07:59
Shandepared wrote...
We've already done that with our carriers and stealth frigates.
The stealth frigates were co-designed with the Turians if I recall correctly. Maybe for those that saved the collectors base, that could be their "nuke".
#48
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 08:01
Freakaz0idx wrote...
I think you and I are the only people on this website that understand that joke in your post.Alpha-Centuri wrote...
I'm pro human, not pro-cerberus. I told garrus at the collector base that I knew TIM would double-cross me. I stuck it to him at the end, and I plan on taking my servicesto South Beachback to the Alliance.
Wrong crowd
Cerberus Operative Ashley Williams wrote...
If humans don't look out for themselves, no one will.
I certainly agree. But there is a line to be drawn between a shadow ops group that amount to terrorists, and another structure like the Alliance, which by its very nature of existing is pro-human.
#49
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 08:02
Exactly what I was thinking.chapa3 wrote...
The stealth frigates were co-designed with the Turians if I recall correctly. Maybe for those that saved the collectors base, that could be their "nuke".
Carriers and stealth frigates aren't nearly enough to change the game.
Modifié par Inverness Moon, 22 juillet 2010 - 08:02 .
#50
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 08:02
Cerberus Operative Ashley Williams wrote...
I am very pro-Cerberus. A group of people has to take care of their own. Humans were not allowed an embassy and eventually a spot/lead on the council because of their great inter-special relations. They were given respect because they demanded it by military and economic strength. All species will view themselves as more important than others no matter how much they want to deny it. Every species is in it for themselves so I find it self-destructive not to support a group pushing for advancement of my own species. If humans don't look out for themselves, no one will.
Well said.
People forget that international organizations are in place primarily to further the goals of the individual members in as peaceful a solution as possible. The same applies for intergalatic organizations. The asari, salarians, and turians are merely trying to get as close as they can to furthering their own aims without having to go into open war to do it. They don't care about the volus, the batarians, the hanar, the drell, the elcor, or any other species out there that is in Citadel Space but not an actual member of the council. These species aren't Council races because they allow themselves to sit there and play to the tune of the Council that doesn't even really care about them. Humanity was only different because it showed it's political, military, and economic might to the Council head on and made the Council realize that if they didn't listen, it could result in open war.
Cerberus is doing the exact samething that the Council is doing for humanity once we become members after the first game, the only difference is that solutions will take a lot less time when coming from Cerberus because Cerberus doesn't mind if it gets its hand dirty. It doesn't have to concern itself with political and diplomatic resolutions that the Alliance has to handle. Solutions from Cerberus are more direct and more efficient.
I support Cerberus.





Retour en haut




