Corker wrote...
Costin_Razvan wrote...
stupidity for refusing to use the greatest weapon the Dwarves ever had in their arsenal.
Funny... the playthrough I preserved the Anvil was the one where Branka locked herself in the Deep Roads and Bhelen wasted men and resources trying to shake her out. He eventually had to give up, leaving a wildcard madwoman with an immortal army at his back door. Doesn't scream "genius plan" to me.
Unless Bhelen losses a dozen dwarves for each Golem Branka produced and gave to him for use ( which I find unlikely ) then yes it is stupidity to destroy the Anvil.
I was being sarcastic. Kal Sharok is miserable because it can't trade with the surface. Orzammar can and Bhelen will be improving it. And to control the army, you have to feed it and better its condition.
Kal Sharok had a smaller army, no Golems and no Legion to aid it against the Darkspawn and you state that they are in a bad situation because of their lack of trade?
What evidence in game supports the claim that having better trade would improve the lives for common dwarves? Oh certainly it improves it for the nobles by them getting Silk, Wood etc. but it seems to me that most of Dwarves in Orzammar eat nug commonly and only the Nobles eat outside food. As for improving their condition...Bhelen already is, by giving them actually legitimate jobs that pay.
If wealth from trade would be something that would solve the Dwarven problems, then why is it that Genitivi proclaims that Orzammar has a vast wealth, and yet they are on the Brink, and why is that?
Because Orzammar is at war, a constant endless war which you cannot end nor can you ignore your enemy. I understand you believe in moderation...but at the end of the day Bhelen is a very radical leader for Orzammar who makes MILITARY reforms. Why the merchants want to support him is unknown and it is only speculation to say that he is going to depend on them as a power base.
Modifié par Costin_Razvan, 14 octobre 2010 - 08:21 .