18 réponses à ce sujet

[adi4444]

"they criticize Origins for looking too much like Lord of the Rings, so now they just mimic 300, Conan and He-Man with a samurai twist? It doesn't look terrible, it just looks absolutely nothing like the world they created in Origins. Visual consistency is not a bad thing..."

if you ask me i prefer lord of the rings than some action cartoon bulsh-it

i sew the reamek of the dark spewn what an ugly graphics its nice for kids under 17...not for a squel

Modifié par adi4444, 24 juillet 2010 - 11:09 .

[adi4444]

.

Modifié par adi4444, 24 juillet 2010 - 11:08 .

[BlackyBlack]

How about you learn to spell first ?

[Brockololly]

slimgrin wrote...

I don't understand why so many people are up in arms over graphics in DA2 when DA:O was not known for it's graphics in the first place.

The problem is that BioWare is making the graphics a major marketing point for DA2. I didn't have a problem with them in DAO, but I'm less than impressed with the art style and technical side of the graphics thus far in DA2.

But in all fairness, its really early on and the Comic Con people seem to agree that it looks good in motion.

[Zayle79]

Firstly, if you want to be taken seriously, use grammar.  Just a bit of...friendly...advice.

Secondly, I found the new art style to relatively unique and ultimately a nice change from a generic fantasy setting.  Visual consistency?  Well, the game is in a new setting, so that gives BioWare an excuse to change whatever they want to.  Besides, if they made every facet of the game exactly as it was in Origins, nothing would be improved.

Thirdly, that could've been a new and as-of-yet unseen type of darkspawn, which could be a nice change from Origins' Genlocks and Hurlocks, and it's an early build, so they might look entirely different later.

Modifié par Zayle79, 24 juillet 2010 - 11:15 .

[gkryzano]

I've seen early pics from other Bioware games and they certainly looked terrible, I'm sure that DA2 just needs a little more work. Render the characters, make the animations, then make it look pretty.

[adi4444]

BlackyBlack wrote...

How about you learn to spell first ?

sorry for my bad english its not my first lunguge but that not the point in her!!
the point is that this game will be action phantazy cartoon game

and a lot of peaple just exept it..
i prefer the graphic of dao than a better cartoon graphic its make this game looks like  a game for under 17 years old...

[BlackyBlack]

You've only seen a few previews that say mostly nothing and the previews said COMBAT IN THE PC VERSION IS MOSTLY UNCHANGED

[Aratham Darksight]

slimgrin wrote...

I don't understand why so many people are up in arms over graphics in DA2 when DA:O was not known for it's graphics in the first place.

Stylized art is just not manly enough, apparently. Playing a game that doesn't strive towards photorealism is threatening to people's self-image.

[Zayle79]

adi4444 wrote...
i prefer the graphic of dao than a better cartoon graphic its make this game looks like  a game for under 17 years old...

So the only mature fantasy art style is the one that's been used more than any other?

[Sable Rhapsody]

Aratham Darksight wrote...

slimgrin wrote...

I don't understand why so many people are up in arms over graphics in DA2 when DA:O was not known for it's graphics in the first place.

Stylized art is just not manly enough, apparently. Playing a game that doesn't strive towards photorealism is threatening to people's self-image.

*snicker*  Yes, color is not manly!  In order to be manlier, the art must be darker!  And browner!  And the textures must be shinier and bumpier!

[adi4444]

Zayle79 wrote...

Firstly, if you want to be taken seriously, use grammar.  Just a bit of...friendly...advice.

Secondly, I found the new art style to relatively unique and ultimately a nice change from a generic fantasy setting.  Visual consistency?  Well, the game is in a new setting, so that gives BioWare an excuse to change whatever they want to.  Besides, if they made every facet of the game exactly as it was in Origins, nothing would be improved.

Thirdly, that could've been a new and as-of-yet unseen type of darkspawn, which could be a nice change from Origins' Genlocks and Hurlocks, and it's an early build, so they might look entirely different later.

if they want to improve the graphics than improve the graphic of dao
dont make a new cartoon look i dont like the style of this its dont look good it looks like japanise finale phantazy style thats unique?

[filetemo]

Aratham Darksight wrote...

slimgrin wrote...

I don't understand why so many people are up in arms over graphics in DA2 when DA:O was not known for it's graphics in the first place.

Stylized art is just not manly enough, apparently. Playing a game that doesn't strive towards photorealism is threatening to people's self-image.

that is not the problem, the real problem is I and others suspect that the "spiky" design is tailor made for consoles so they have to render less polygons, thus screwing high end pc users like me

Modifié par filetemo, 24 juillet 2010 - 11:19 .

[Aratham Darksight]

filetemo wrote...

Aratham Darksight wrote...

slimgrin wrote...

I don't understand why so many people are up in arms over graphics in DA2 when DA:O was not known for it's graphics in the first place.

Stylized art is just not manly enough, apparently. Playing a game that doesn't strive towards photorealism is threatening to people's self-image.

that is not the problem, the real problem is I and others suspect that the "spiky" design is tailor made for consoles so they have to render less polygons, thus screwing high end pc users like me

So you say, but the OP is clearly motivated by other concerns.

[Anathemic]

slimgrin wrote...

I don't understand why so many people are up in arms over graphics in DA2 when DA:O was not known for it's graphics in the first place.

Because USUALLY if not ALL THE TIME the graphics of the sequel to a game is generally better. Take Starcraft for instance, Starcraft original and Starcraft: Brood War wasn't known for graphics but still Blizzard had the sense to update the graphics for Starcraft 2. Whereas DA:O the graphics so far are surperior to DA2's

[Zayle79]

adi4444 wrote...
if they want to improve the graphics than improve the graphic of dao
dont make a new cartoon look i dont like the style of this its dont look good it looks like japanise finale phantazy style thats unique?

Is it that you can't read english, or that you just skimmed my post then posted an argument?  I said that BioWare wanted to improve the art style, not the graphics.  Whether or not the character models have infinity-and-one triangles or not, their style will be different.  And in BioWare's opinion, better. 

And...lolwut?  Final Fantasy?  Which one?  X?  XII?  They are, for the most part, different, and none are like Dragon Age 2.

[Seagloom]

We already have a thread discussing the very article you quoted. Please put your two cents in there. Thank you.