Aller au contenu

Photo

[Poll] Will you Boycott DA2?


498 réponses à ce sujet

#151
Gandalf-the-Fabulous

Gandalf-the-Fabulous
  • Members
  • 1 298 messages

David Gaider wrote...

Gandalf-the-Fabulous wrote...
That does sound pretty cool but does this also mean that depending on the narrator's opinion of Hawke (there are multiple narrators arent there? Or is it just Varric?) we may not see the true story? Also if we are seeing the story from a narrator's point of view and not Hawke's wouldnt it be much harded for the player to define Hawke's personality? For instance a narrator that really hates Hawke would tell a tale that paints him as an **** that likes to kick puppies but would leave out the part where Hawke gives the poor orphan boy a coin to buy a hot meal.

I think the point is that it's up to the player to determine the tale that Varric tells, and how he paints the hero. There are elements where the nature of the unreliable narrator comes into play, but I'm leery to get into that at present. Occasional exaggeration isn't meant to replace the fact that, at it's heart, Varric's tale is a true one.

...OR IS IT?

Sorry, had to do that. B)


I must admit that does sound pretty cool but for some reason I think I can see how the character creator is going to work and I am reminded of ME2 (not saying that it is a bad thing). For some reason I can see Cassandra asking what Hawke looked like and Varric reconstructing the face from memory and then the game shifting to the character creation screen.

Also I really like the idea that you arent actually playing as Hawke but rather the man who tells his story, it is an interesting concept and I cant wait to see more.

#152
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

Gandalf-the-Fabulous wrote...
Also I really like the idea that you arent actually playing as Hawke but rather the man who tells his story, it is an interesting concept and I cant wait to see more.


I like the idea of it myself, unfortunately I dislike it as well because of the entire idea that what's being told might not be true. It be a little insulting to reach the ending of the game to find out none of it happened! :P

#153
Toroi

Toroi
  • Members
  • 58 messages
I find the looking back and having a narrator as rather a unique approach to the game. I'm rather curious to see how it plays out. I love a good story and am hoping to find one in DA2.



As for boycott polls, isn't it like about 3+months premature to even be thinking about that sort of thing? I haven't even seen a trailer yet. I know very very little about the game, so how could I possibly want to boycott it already. In fact, I'm rather hoping its a lot of fun and I'll want to buy it.



Once I know more about the game, I might actually have positive and/or negative comments about it, but there just isn't enough info out there for me to say yet. In fact, I just don't get all the negative comments. Its like complaining that dinner is going to taste awful when your mother is just opening the fridge - you don't even know what she's going to make yet!



My take on it is that if you really don't like a feature, make a thread and say why and what you'd rather see. If enough people feel the same way, the devs might even pay attention. Making a random thread to boycott the game doesn't exactly tell anyone what you don't like and is the sort of thing that gets ignored completely.



Cheers


#154
atheelogos

atheelogos
  • Members
  • 4 554 messages

David Gaider wrote...

Gandalf-the-Fabulous wrote...
That does sound pretty cool but does this also mean that depending on the narrator's opinion of Hawke (there are multiple narrators arent there? Or is it just Varric?) we may not see the true story? Also if we are seeing the story from a narrator's point of view and not Hawke's wouldnt it be much harded for the player to define Hawke's personality? For instance a narrator that really hates Hawke would tell a tale that paints him as an **** that likes to kick puppies but would leave out the part where Hawke gives the poor orphan boy a coin to buy a hot meal.

Occasional exaggeration isn't meant to replace the fact that, at it's heart, Varric's tale is a true one.

...OR IS IT?

Sorry, had to do that. B)

You ASS! lol jk jk ^_^;)

#155
atheelogos

atheelogos
  • Members
  • 4 554 messages

Gandalf-the-Fabulous wrote...

David Gaider wrote...

Gandalf-the-Fabulous wrote...
That does sound pretty cool but does this also mean that depending on the narrator's opinion of Hawke (there are multiple narrators arent there? Or is it just Varric?) we may not see the true story? Also if we are seeing the story from a narrator's point of view and not Hawke's wouldnt it be much harded for the player to define Hawke's personality? For instance a narrator that really hates Hawke would tell a tale that paints him as an **** that likes to kick puppies but would leave out the part where Hawke gives the poor orphan boy a coin to buy a hot meal.

I think the point is that it's up to the player to determine the tale that Varric tells, and how he paints the hero. There are elements where the nature of the unreliable narrator comes into play, but I'm leery to get into that at present. Occasional exaggeration isn't meant to replace the fact that, at it's heart, Varric's tale is a true one.

...OR IS IT?

Sorry, had to do that. B)

Also I really like the idea that you arent actually playing as Hawke but rather the man who tells his story, it is an interesting concept and I cant wait to see more.

Me too!! This type of narrative is truly new for me and I must say that I can't wait to dive in.:o:D

Modifié par atheelogos, 25 juillet 2010 - 07:40 .


#156
Zaftikins

Zaftikins
  • Members
  • 9 messages
You know, the last time I saw a "boycott [game]" it was for Modern Warfare 2 on the PC...and yet...



Everyone in that group was playing MW2 the first day it came out.

#157
BLunted

BLunted
  • Members
  • 271 messages
I have no plans to "boycott" DA2...but if it's no good, i just simply won't get it.

#158
asaiasai

asaiasai
  • Members
  • 1 391 messages
I think Mr.Gaider has spent alot of his time that he should be spending on making DA2 defending it from jumped conclusions and knee jerk reactions. I do appreciate your time to do so Mr. Gaider. There are different things about DAO that everyone here likes or dislikes. The problem for Bioware is do they cater to a disfunctional group such as we are who for the most part can not even agree to disagree on anything or just try to read between the lines concerning the stuff that fans like and dislike and throw in alot of artistic creativity to make a game from that. This seems alot of ways is exactly what they are doing, of which not everything i agree with but hey that is life a series of compromises all strung together.



Truth is that from what i have seen here on these boards the people who make games at Bioware really try to keep thier fingers on the pulse of thier fans, which is far more than can be said for other game studios. Is DA2 going to be different from DAO? It has to be or DA2 becomes another DAO having been there, done that, with a few tee shirts scattered about the fan base, the fans will take them to task for that. I think Mr. Gaider has a pretty god damn good understanding of his fan base, and is a hell of a lot more diplomatic than i would ever be, of course pissing off your customers in not a sound bussiness plan, but hey they are human, seriously sometimes you folks get to me and i am an unrepentant a55hole, the worst kind. For people who seem to be emotionally invested in thier art and nothing is more apparent than that from Mr. Gaider's multiple replies in this forum. The only real concern i think which has been addressed to my satisfaction is, like the warden am i going to be able to with Hawke write my own story as i choose because the writers are going to get out of my way and let me do just that, using a world incorporating my wardens decisions. What more can you ask for that is the prime element that made DAO's bones.



Until such a time as Bioware ME2s me with the DA franchise, go nuts Mr. Gaider i got your back both here, at my local retailer and the Bioshop the later 2 places being most important. Stay true to what made DAO so good, player choice, moral ambiguity, strong story, make me love my Hawke as i do my wardens and you got a repeat. I am seriously rooting for you Mr. Gaider as a true fan of the series your success is MY success.



Asai

#159
atheelogos

atheelogos
  • Members
  • 4 554 messages

David Gaider wrote...

DaringMoosejaw wrote...
...What I was actually saying is that I think these guys are just jabbering for the hell of it and I think your commercial success is all I'd need to see that their complaining was unwarranted and that the sky really is not falling. I guess I'm a little too good at seeming neutral! Hah.

I actually already pre-ordered the thing.

Oh.

Well that's better than thinking someone was wishing actual failure on us. Thanks. :innocent:

Will there be characters like Shale in the game that have a similar sense of humor. I ask because there are very few games out there that can make me lol. I mean really some of the things she said made me pause so I could get all my laughs out. :lol::) I mean really who doesn't find this funny "And... do try not to get swallowed whole. If the beast were to fly
about afterwards and poop it out, irony would dictate that it would land
on me. I couldn't take it."

Shale really had the best jokes, Alistair comes next, then Anders even Sten had a few good zingers from time to time

And I know you can't talk about plot, but maybe you can talk about their personalities, without giving to much away of course. For example Hawke's sister or the dwarf. What kind of sense of humor do they have, what do they believe in, what are some of the things they care about?
Also for some strange reason I have a feeling that Varric is going to be an over the top kind of character but in a good and entertaining  way. Am I right in assuming this?

#160
BLunted

BLunted
  • Members
  • 271 messages

asaiasai wrote...

I think Mr.Gaider has spent alot of his time that he should be spending on making DA2 defending it from jumped conclusions and knee jerk reactions. I do appreciate your time to do so Mr. Gaider. There are different things about DAO that everyone here likes or dislikes. The problem for Bioware is do they cater to a disfunctional group such as we are who for the most part can not even agree to disagree on anything or just try to read between the lines concerning the stuff that fans like and dislike and throw in alot of artistic creativity to make a game from that. This seems alot of ways is exactly what they are doing, of which not everything i agree with but hey that is life a series of compromises all strung together.

Truth is that from what i have seen here on these boards the people who make games at Bioware really try to keep thier fingers on the pulse of thier fans, which is far more than can be said for other game studios. Is DA2 going to be different from DAO? It has to be or DA2 becomes another DAO having been there, done that, with a few tee shirts scattered about the fan base, the fans will take them to task for that. I think Mr. Gaider has a pretty god damn good understanding of his fan base, and is a hell of a lot more diplomatic than i would ever be, of course pissing off your customers in not a sound bussiness plan, but hey they are human, seriously sometimes you folks get to me and i am an unrepentant a55hole, the worst kind. For people who seem to be emotionally invested in thier art and nothing is more apparent than that from Mr. Gaider's multiple replies in this forum. The only real concern i think which has been addressed to my satisfaction is, like the warden am i going to be able to with Hawke write my own story as i choose because the writers are going to get out of my way and let me do just that, using a world incorporating my wardens decisions. What more can you ask for that is the prime element that made DAO's bones.

Until such a time as Bioware ME2s me with the DA franchise, go nuts Mr. Gaider i got your back both here, at my local retailer and the Bioshop the later 2 places being most important. Stay true to what made DAO so good, player choice, moral ambiguity, strong story, make me love my Hawke as i do my wardens and you got a repeat. I am seriously rooting for you Mr. Gaider as a true fan of the series your success is MY success.

Asai


I don't think you have to worry about the series being a sucess. I think it's safe to say Bioware has enough fanboys to ensure that they at least break even on DA2. Hell, Gaider could defecate in a box and stamp it DA2 and it would sell a million copies from fanboys alone.

With the early impressions that DA is being tailored for the ADD generation, sales will most likely be through the roof!

#161
SoR82

SoR82
  • Members
  • 296 messages
I will be honest I do not like what I have seen so far infact many of the thngs i downright hate.... but still it is far to early for me to make any informed decesion regarding whether or not I will purchase. My main worry is loosing the .... feel of dragon age they preserve that then I guess it could still be okay...... ill just have to censor it in my head everytime someone says that ridicoulous name.

#162
atheelogos

atheelogos
  • Members
  • 4 554 messages
Also I saw that Zach Hanks was in the first game and after watching warden's fall I see that he was horribly under used. I mean really it was damn near criminal that he didn't get larger roles. I want to know if this problem has been rectified?

And for those that do know who I'm talking about check out these vids.
www.youtube.com/watch

#163
Guest_Puddi III_*

Guest_Puddi III_*
  • Guests

asaiasai wrote...

I think Mr.Gaider has spent alot of his time that he should be spending on making DA2 defending it from jumped conclusions and knee jerk reactions.


I may be wrong, but I think Gaider mentioned before that he just posts here in his free time. Priestly might give him the switch again if he's caught wasting time here during work hours. :devil:

Modifié par filaminstrel, 25 juillet 2010 - 08:06 .


#164
atheelogos

atheelogos
  • Members
  • 4 554 messages

SoR82 wrote...

I will be honest I do not like what I have seen so far infact many of the thngs i downright hate.... but still it is far to early for me to make any informed decesion regarding whether or not I will purchase. My main worry is loosing the .... feel of dragon age they preserve that then I guess it could still be okay...... ill just have to censor it in my head everytime someone says that ridicoulous name.

Yeah I hear but at the same time how much have you really seen? Just a few pics of concept art and some pre alpha screens. Really not much to go on.

Modifié par atheelogos, 25 juillet 2010 - 08:09 .


#165
SoR82

SoR82
  • Members
  • 296 messages
perhaps i should have wrote "read and seen"? I am aware what we have seen is early but it is still enough to give me pause, where as before these announcements I had hit the preorder button the second it popped up on my favoured site.

#166
Shepard Lives

Shepard Lives
  • Members
  • 3 883 messages

GurkBoll wrote...

Just curious of how the hardcore fans feel

http://social.biowar...895/polls/8475/


Just how does wanting to boycott DA2 make you a "hardcore" fans? Are "hardcore" fans supposed to be conservative, purist zealots?

Can they not be, for instance, fans who, despite disliking what scarce info we have gotten so far, decide to *gasp* have faith in the developers, or at least reserve their judgment until more info is released?

You guys are a bunch of elitist fools who cannot stand the fact that the game is (apparently!) going slightly more mainstream, not because you won't enjoy the game, but because when it comes out you will not be Keepers Of The Sacred Dragon Age Lore any longer. Basing yourself on a Comic-Con demo and two shoddy reviews.
And to voice your irrational complaints you write an ever-expanding slew of threads that all say the same goddamn things, polluting and suffocating the forum like an oil spill in the Pacific Sea.

If you want to be pessimistic, so be it. But I refuse to see the forum in this state. Form a group, create a giant thread, anything that allows other forumites to avoid the omnipresent poison that you guys spread everywhere.

#167
Kranaos

Kranaos
  • Members
  • 77 messages
A poll like this would be better once we have more information about the game. Especially since we only have a handful of screenshots and some concept art.

#168
MerinTB

MerinTB
  • Members
  • 4 688 messages

David Gaider wrote...

MerinTB wrote...
Apply your logic one level more, David, and please don't (and I'm not saying you are, but still be careful) group all people who are concerned with the loudest voices complaining.
You are trying to walk a delicate edge here, and I appreciate it.  But you do often come across as if you are essentially, despite often saying that everyone is entitled to their opinions or like adages, dismissing all concerned people as being part of some internet phenomenom that occurs every time a piece of any kind of news hits a forum.  To counter with another aphorism (though turned on its head), you make it seem like all you can do is see the forest for the trees.


I can't stress enough that negative criticism is not ignored. We'll read it-- I read it quite often, in fact. Some of it I'll even take to heart if it's expressed thoughtfully enough. Isn't that part of the reason for having a forum like this? You have the opportunity to convince each other, and maybe once in a while a dev, of your opinion.

A lot of times the angriest people aren't trying to be convincing, however. They're simply repeating their broadcast over and over and over again... which is great. All the power to them, right? All I'm saying is that when the forums get "up in arms" about something it shouldn't necessarily be taken as a revolution in progress. That's how it seems, at times. You'll get people running around going omg there are negative posts on the forums! as if that were the end of the world.

Chances are there are some very legitimate concerns in there (like there is now) and perhaps some of those people will even eventually give up and walk away and decide not to buy the game after all. Completely their right. But that doesn't mean that there aren't other people who enjoy the game, and that while I don't want to generalize peoples' reactions it is indeed not the end of the world. It never is.

I read your post. I wish I could make you feel better, and I commisserate on the love of the old school RPG's as well. All I can really say is that you should watch for more info as it comes out-- I think there is stuff there you might love (as you suspect). I hope in the end you decide you're open to trying it out.


I understand that you (and others at BioWare / EA / etc, like Victor) read as much as you can and respond as much as you can.
That wasn't really my point, though - it was that despite your best efforts, and I'm not saying you are failing or that you are doing poorly, you seem to many (some of those concerned at least, many being such a subjective word) like you are lumping everyone together.  No matter how much you plead that you are not, that is often how you are seen.
I honestly don't think there is anything you can do about it.
You are right on the level that there are people who just like to complain.  You are right that, as a rule, any sequel to anything will disappoint a percentage of those who loved the first one.
But there are others (I tend to think of myself as one of them) who do everything they can to NOT jump on these kind of bandwagons (and tend to, in general, avoid forums due to this kind of thing) - NWN disappointed despite wanting to love it, I didn't come scream on forums or even join a forum for that matter.  KotOR became a console game, ME was a 360 only game (no PC release date until, wow, yes, there was a PC version despite being told there wouldn't be), and so on for me.  I have no problem with the reality of DLC, with the changes in Awakenings, with the changes (game mechanics) in ME2.

DA2 is, honestly, the first time in my life that I've had this visceral reaction, and for a time after some of the "troubling" (subjective) tidbits of info were released I held back on saying anything at all specifically because I know that 1.) there'd be the "shut up, I think it's great" and "go whine somewhere else, and get a life" jerks trolling the threads AND 2.) at this point there is NOTHING that can really be done about the changes so railing against the developers is not only an exercise in futility it also sets one up to have egg on one's face if you actually like the game when it is released.  I held back.  I finally started reading some threads, and only started posting because I have this knee-jerk reaction of trying to keep debate civil, play devil's advocate and defend those who share similar views as me from people who's idea of debating or discussing involves fallcies (mostly ad hominem attacks and personal incredulity - "I don't understand why X bothers people, I'm fine with X" rhetorical nonsense.)

So I know there's nothing you can really do for me beside help design the best story/game that you know how inside the reality of video games today.  And you are right to point out that I myself am acknowledging that there will be different things, even new things, that I'll most likely enjoy enough that, like ME2, it'll balance out in the end as a positive.

---

A boycott is seriously not the answer to this kind of thing.  It's trite to say, but it is also true - if you don't like the game or what you think the game will be like, don't buy the game.  That isn't to say don't voice your concerns (I know I am) but organizing people to complain about the design of a luxury good just because you would rather it was done more to your liking is just silly.

---

Now as for this guy -

Solid N7 wrote...
If 
you don´t like the change of  DA2 then don´t  buy it period. Stop
whinnig about your obssesion with the roleplaying and how bioware is iin
big conspiracy against all the hardcore pc gamers , really with thread
like this I really  think the worst otakus are the hardcore pc gamers.


Hypocrisy is telling others to stop doing what you yourself are doing.  Here you are whining about me whining.  Capiche?
Then there's the strawman claiming that my positive comment (telling David that something he just shared with us sounded cool), let alone myself in general, promotes or points to a belief in conspiracy theories about BioWare being against pc gamers.  Honestly, if you can't avoid trying to poison the well then you either don't know how to debate or you are uncertain that your views are strong enough to stand on their own.
Finally I resent being included in an ad hominem attack against people voicing concerns over DA2.  BSN is nothing if not a forum for people to talk about BioWare games - it is not like this is the place to go for advice on relationships or how to fix your car - criticizing people for using the forums for what they were created for is actually ironic.  But claiming that everyone who has a problem with the apparent changes to DA2 are hardcore PC gamers, let alone "obsessive PC gamers who never leave home because all they do is play PC games" - (what your use of otaku would mean contextually), is your attempt to insult those you disagree with instead of simply stating your opposing views.
I'd strongly encourage you to become a little more positive, proactive, constructive in your arguments.  These kind of attacks should be reported.

#169
Fraevar

Fraevar
  • Members
  • 1 439 messages
I won't make any decision until I get a detailed look at the PC version - if it's a console port then no, I won't rush out and buy it at launch - we'll see what happens down the line.

#170
SoR82

SoR82
  • Members
  • 296 messages

shepard_lives wrote...

GurkBoll wrote...

Just curious of how the hardcore fans feel

http://social.biowar...895/polls/8475/


Just how does wanting to boycott DA2 make you a "hardcore" fans? Are "hardcore" fans supposed to be conservative, purist zealots?

Can they not be, for instance, fans who, despite disliking what scarce info we have gotten so far, decide to *gasp* have faith in the developers, or at least reserve their judgment until more info is released?

You guys are a bunch of elitist fools who cannot stand the fact that the game is (apparently!) going slightly more mainstream, not because you won't enjoy the game, but because when it comes out you will not be Keepers Of The Sacred Dragon Age Lore any longer. Basing yourself on a Comic-Con demo and two shoddy reviews.
And to voice your irrational complaints you write an ever-expanding slew of threads that all say the same goddamn things, polluting and suffocating the forum like an oil spill in the Pacific Sea.

If you want to be pessimistic, so be it. But I refuse to see the forum in this state. Form a group, create a giant thread, anything that allows other forumites to avoid the omnipresent poison that you guys spread everywhere.


I agree with what you say but im afraid your tone is no more helpful than the DA2 haters your debating with. Though i like the use of the word omnipresent :whistle:. As for the state of the forum im afraid your more than likely stuck with it for a while. Guess you could just not go in threads with titles like this?

#171
BLunted

BLunted
  • Members
  • 271 messages

shepard_lives wrote...

If you want to be pessimistic, so be it. But I refuse to see the forum in this state. Form a group, create a giant thread, anything that allows other forumites to avoid the omnipresent poison that you guys spread everywhere.


FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! lol

while I cannot deny that there are a ton of pessimistic whiners hanging around, there also seems to be no shortage of holier-than-thou kiss-asses either.

Best advice I can give is to find one of the happy circle jerk threads and hang out in there, because there is no sign of it getting any better.

#172
Biotic Budah

Biotic Budah
  • Members
  • 366 messages
I have said this in other threads, DA2 does not seem so much a sequel as it does a spinoff. At least ME2 kept the main character and brought many others back. Does this mean DA2 will be a poor game? No, not at all. Hey, I am hardcore DAO, maxed out my characters twice over and deleted others to make room for more. I want a good sequel to the game. From what I have read it is like going from the NFL to the Canadian Football League or vice versa. Yes they are fundamentally similar, but they aren't really the same. You have the goal of moving the ball down the field and scoring a touchdown, but each league has completely different players to it and rules. This is what we are seeing here with DA2. I really don't see how any of the decisions made in DAO will carry over to DA2 since it is set in a different country. Will I boycott the game because of these differences? No, I won't but to quote Loghain, "Don't spit in my face and tell me its raining". They should have just called it Dragon Age: Free Marches-The Rise of Hawke, then made an actual sequel that had more to do with the first game other than just tossing in Flemeth.

Modifié par Biotic Budah, 25 juillet 2010 - 08:31 .


#173
Inquisitor Recon

Inquisitor Recon
  • Members
  • 11 811 messages
I don't agree with the direction they are going, but I won't boycott it and will probably buy it if the reviews are any good.

#174
Biotic Budah

Biotic Budah
  • Members
  • 366 messages

ReconTeam wrote...

I don't agree with the direction they are going, but I won't boycott it and will probably buy it if the reviews are any good.


I'm losing faithg in reviews anymore. I'd rather see a demo.

#175
Inquisitor Recon

Inquisitor Recon
  • Members
  • 11 811 messages

Biotic Budah wrote...
I'm losing faithg in reviews anymore. I'd rather see a demo.


I hate to say it, but yeah, proper reviewing is a lost art. I mean look at the constant praise of MW2.