The geth
#1
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 02:44
However, I can't seem to understand why. In my opinion, any AI is a threat to organic life as they can be manipulated into doing awful stuff (see heretics), yet people still tend to refuse the irradication of geth under the pretense that they haven't done anything wrong and it is morally wrong to dispose of them.
But why should it be wrong?
The geth are machines and should be treated as such, treating with the same standard as living beings is incorrect, even Legion says it if you chose a renegade dialog during his loyalty mission (don't remember what dialog though). Point being that organics have priority over any created intelligence.
So what should be done? I think ressources should be spent at rewiring the geth so their AI becomes a VI and if that doesn't work, then we should outright destroy them before they can cause any harm.
Anyone else share my opinion? Do some people disagree? If so why?
Look forward to reading your posts.
#2
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 02:49
Guest_Shandepared_*
Bad_sheep wrote...
However, I can't seem to understand why.
Anthropomorphism.
#3
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 02:53
#4
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 02:54
#5
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 03:01
Sajuro wrote...
The Quarians tried that whole wiping out thing and look how it turned out for them.
It shouldn't be the quarian's problem alone, all council races should join the war against the geth. Because the last thing you need to have once the reapers return is an army of indoctrinated geth by their side.
#6
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 03:04
Bad_sheep wrote...
Sajuro wrote...
The Quarians tried that whole wiping out thing and look how it turned out for them.
It shouldn't be the quarian's problem alone, all council races should join the war against the geth. Because the last thing you need to have once the reapers return is an army of indoctrinated geth by their side.
synthetics cannot be indoctrinated
the heretic geth joined sovereign of their own free will, and the true geth denied sovereign of their own free will
the majority of geth do not like the reapers
#7
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 03:08
#8
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 12:48
Organics are far more unstable and unpredictable than the geth for obvious reasons.Bad_sheep wrote...
That doesn't make it any better, if some geth joined the reapers with their own free will that just comes to prove how unstable they are. I feel that doing nothing about them is only gonna come back at some point and bite us in the ass.
And, do you really think that if the reapers lied and said they would spare the few that helped them exterminate the rest of the galaxy, nobody would bite?
Also, feel free to explain how the heretics joining the reapers makes all the geth unstable.
Modifié par Inverness Moon, 25 juillet 2010 - 12:53 .
#9
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 12:55
Bad_sheep wrote...
In my opinion, any AI is a threat to organic life as they can be manipulated into doing awful stuff (see heretics),
So can organics (see Indoctrination), by your logic that means we should wipe out all Intelligent organic life as it poses a threat.
#10
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 01:10
Bad_sheep wrote...
That doesn't make it any better, if some geth joined the reapers with their own free will that just comes to prove how unstable they are. I feel that doing nothing about them is only gonna come back at some point and bite us in the ass.
Like Inverness said, the geth are no more corruptible than organics. Any being to whom freedom of choice is awarded can potentially do harm with that freedom of choice. That is the law of free sentience and free will.
Saren also joined the Reapers of his own free will, at first. Yet because the geth are a different form of life, you judge them by a different standard than you judge yourself or other organics.
Modifié par Nightwriter, 25 juillet 2010 - 01:10 .
#11
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 01:19
#12
Guest_wiggles_*
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 01:46
Guest_wiggles_*
Bad_sheep wrote...
While reading in this forum, I got the impression that the majority of commentors approved on the existance of the geth and the idea that we should seek coexistance with them.
However, I can't seem to understand why. In my opinion, any AI is a threat to organic life as they can be manipulated into doing awful stuff (see heretics), yet people still tend to refuse the irradication of geth under the pretense that they haven't done anything wrong and it is morally wrong to dispose of them.
As others have pointed out, within the ME universe organics can be manipulated. However, I don't even need a big bad machine to show you how organic folks can be manipulated into doing bad things. See: Belgians in the Congo, ****s etc. Does that mean we should engage in a bit of the old "shoot 'em all & let God sort 'em out" for every person on Earth?
But why should it be wrong?
The geth are machines and should be treated as such, treating with the same standard as living beings is incorrect, even Legion says it if you chose a renegade dialog during his loyalty mission (don't remember what dialog though). Point being that organics have priority over any created intelligence.
How do you define a person? I define a person as something which is capable of a certain level of intelligent thought & is self conscious. It isn't a perfect definition, but I haven't found a better one. Geth fit that definition & that is why actions against them carry the same moral weight as an action against a human, turian, quarian etc.
I would be interested in seeing your argument why organic life is so special. I think we're just a virus with shoes.
Edit: That's an interesting word to filter. It starts with a "naht" & ends with a "zee".
Modifié par wiggles89, 25 juillet 2010 - 01:50 .
#13
Guest_Aotearas_*
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 02:16
Guest_Aotearas_*
Bad_sheep wrote...
Sajuro wrote...
The Quarians tried that whole wiping out thing and look how it turned out for them.
It shouldn't be the quarian's problem alone, all council races should join the war against the geth. Because the last thing you need to have once the reapers return is an army of indoctrinated geth by their side.
Following that logic, we'd have to exterminate the Turians, Asari, Salarians and Krogan too, because they got convinced/indoctrinated. Regarding on what the writers meant with the Rachni, them too.
Every living being can get manipulated, does that qualify them to get exterminated because there might be a chance they will? Is it inevitable? Shouldn't we just kill every thing able to get indoctrinated outright to ensure it won't happen? No. Every day, humans get manipulted in doing horrible things all over world, according to your logic, you would need to exterminate every one of them to ensure it won't happen any longer.
I don't know what problem people have with the Geth, they were created for cheap labour and warmachines to exploit, which by all means is understandalbe and not ultimately wrong, but once they evolved far enough to actually question their existance and their creators motives, the Quarians tried to wipe them out. With all due respect to Admiral Han'Gerrel, but as long as the war with the Geth does involve attacking a peaceful faction of the Geth (if they truly exist), Admiral Zaan'Koris is right, you can't simply wrong some people and then act like you are totally right to do it.
#14
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 04:51
Guest_Shandepared_*
Nightwriter wrote...
Yet because the geth are a different form of life, you judge them by a different standard than you judge yourself or other organics.
For one, Saren did not join the Reapers of his own free will. Secondly, the geth aren't alive. They're computer programs and a computer program is not alive.
#15
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 05:05
#16
Guest_Aotearas_*
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 05:08
Guest_Aotearas_*
Shandepared wrote...
Nightwriter wrote...
Yet because the geth are a different form of life, you judge them by a different standard than you judge yourself or other organics.
For one, Saren did not join the Reapers of his own free will. Secondly, the geth aren't alive. They're computer programs and a computer program is not alive.
Bad_sheep wrote...
All of your arguments are valid IF the geth are to be considered as life forms. Please bear in mind I'm not one to approve genocides, in fact, I saved the rachni and was against the genophage all along the game. But to me, the geth are as alive as toaster are and therefore shouldn't be considered as lives.
Does your toaster fight for its survival when threatened with dismantlement?
They may not be alive as to our terms or "understanding", but they certainly are self-aware enough to start a defensive war against the Quarians attempts to destroy them. So they certainly deem life more valuable than death, otherwise they wouldn't have fought. And a being fighting for its life is alive enough to not commit crimes against it!
Modifié par Neofelis Nebulosa, 25 juillet 2010 - 05:10 .
#17
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 05:15
Also, when you say they deem life more valueble than death, how can you be sure that is the reason they fight? Remember the first use of the geth, as labor, so I'm sure whoever programmed them had in mind that the geth shouldn't break to easily and therefor created mechanisms of survival. Your speculation can go both ways.
Modifié par Bad_sheep, 25 juillet 2010 - 05:19 .
#18
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 05:15
And dyson spheres interest me. Technological singularities interest me. The closest I get to that in the ME universe happens to be the geth. And maybe the Reapers.
As to why I lean toward the geth versus the quarians... bias. The quarians had potential that was squandered with the Ascension novel and ME2. The problem with always having high expectations next to actual result, I suppose. I'm a big advocate that the quarians simply need to settle on a new world. They can continue their covert war against the geth all they want, but this constant yearning for their homeworld--wait, this is a toally different topic.
As Shandepared likes to point out in various threads, Legion could be lying. Hiding true intentions. Don't care. Still find geth interesting.
#19
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 05:18
#20
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 05:19
After Sovereign, in hindsight I'm sure the Council wishes they had joined the quarians in the war against the geth. But before then, the geth hadn't done anything against the Council. They stayed inside the Veil. The Council obviously had no interest in that part of space.Bad_sheep wrote...
It shouldn't be the quarian's problem alone, all council races should join the war against the geth. Because the last thing you need to have once the reapers return is an army of indoctrinated geth by their side.Sajuro wrote...
The Quarians tried that whole wiping out thing and look how it turned out for them.
Okay, now after Sovereign, why the Council didn't go all out war is another matter. Perhaps their military force truly is stretched too thin. They seem barely able to handle the cold war against the Terminus Systems. Going after geth beyond the Veil seemed to be about the extent of their abilities, and when they noticed there wasn't much reinforcement coming from the Veil, I guess they figured they had it under control.
But whatever their reasons, I never found the Council to be very smart. Barely holding together by accident, I think.
#21
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 05:21
They think therefor they are. This conversation seems to be in the direction of what measure is a non-human?Shandepared wrote...
Nightwriter wrote...
Yet because the geth are a different form of life, you judge them by a different standard than you judge yourself or other organics.
For one, Saren did not join the Reapers of his own free will. Secondly, the geth aren't alive. They're computer programs and a computer program is not alive.
http://tvtropes.org/...sureIsANonHuman
#22
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 05:23
Saren didn't mean to join the Reapers, he was just after a unique piece of salvage he discovered in Revelation. Not entirely sure if Sovereign needed to indoctrinate him to get Saren to join the cause. Could have been lies at first. Join me, I will make the Turians strong. Like how Sovereign roped the Heretics in.Shandepared wrote...
For one, Saren did not join the Reapers of his own free will. Secondly, the geth aren't alive. They're computer programs and a computer program is not alive.
I never liked getting into the alive or not debate. Scientists can't even define what constitutes life in our own world. It's not a matter of whether or not you feel the geth are alive, it's about whether you feel like you can view a synthetic on equal terms to an organic.
I think of Kasumi's comment about EDI, describing EDI's personality only to follow that up with the thought that she couldn't get past EDI being a computer.
#23
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 05:24
I'm really trying not to come across as a **** here, but can I just go one discussion on these forums without that damn trope site being brought into the debate? Just once...Sajuro wrote...
They think therefor they are. This conversation seems to be in the direction of what measure is a non-human?
http://tvtropes.org/...sureIsANonHuman
#24
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 05:24
Shandepared wrote...
Nightwriter wrote...
Yet because the geth are a different form of life, you judge them by a different standard than you judge yourself or other organics.
For one, Saren did not join the Reapers of his own free will. Secondly, the geth aren't alive. They're computer programs and a computer program is not alive.
Saren certainly did join Sovereign of his own free will, he did it in the hope of proving the value fo organics to the Reapers and ensuring the survival of some living beings, it just backfired what with indoctrination.
#25
Posté 25 juillet 2010 - 05:26
I don't think we'll ever truly know. Indoctrination can be subtle. That's how Shepard was able to get under Saren's skin after their chat on Virmire. Saren just couldn't be sure of where his own free will ended and Sovereign's indoctrination began.M.Erik.Sal wrote...
Saren certainly did join Sovereign of his own free will, he did it in the hope of proving the value fo organics to the Reapers and ensuring the survival of some living beings, it just backfired what with indoctrination.
Modifié par Pacifien, 25 juillet 2010 - 05:26 .





Retour en haut




