Best-selling==Majority likes it==makes a lot of money==Companies make similar stuffVandrayke wrote...
lol
best-selling does not equal best-quality, but the two are not mutually exclusive. And something that you don't like is not necessarily "inferior;" it might just be targeted at people who like different stuff. Which doesn't make you any more sophisticated or whatever than them. Just different
Modifié par BlackyBlack, 26 juillet 2010 - 02:33 .
BlackyBlack wrote...
Best-selling==Majority likes it==makes a lot of moneyVandrayke wrote...
lol
best-selling does not equal best-quality, but the two are not mutually exclusive. And something that you don't like is not necessarily "inferior;" it might just be targeted at people who like different stuff. Which doesn't make you any more sophisticated or whatever than them. Just different
tez19 wrote...
his views are sickly and and comments ailing.
bibad are you my number 1 fan? you comment on every post i make or are just an ignoramus who needs a hobby.
Doesn't matter. A lot of people complained about the combat system and this way it will attract new customers that never would have bought it if it remained the same systemLord Gremlin wrote...
2. Dragon Age has no direct competitors. They all are very old PC games. There is Witcher (which is **** in many departments), but 1 competitor is not that much.
there is no such word as ignoramous i am afraid.Bobad wrote...
tez19 wrote...
his views are sickly and and comments ailing.
bibad are you my number 1 fan? you comment on every post i make or are just an ignoramus who needs a hobby.
His views subjected to yours may appear so, to you.
Yes, I am your number 1 fan, and is the the mispelling of ignoramous intentional irony?
I've played on PS3 and I must say this combat system doesn't need radical change. It needs more polished controls on PS3 and better animations.BlackyBlack wrote...
Doesn't matter. A lot of people complained about the combat system and this way it will attract new customers that never would have bought it if it remained the same systemLord Gremlin wrote...
2. Dragon Age has no direct competitors. They all are very old PC games. There is Witcher (which is **** in many departments), but 1 competitor is not that much.
BlackyBlack wrote...
Doesn't matter. A lot of people complained about the combat system and this way it will attract new customers that never would have bought it if it remained the same systemLord Gremlin wrote...
2. Dragon Age has no direct competitors. They all are very old PC games. There is Witcher (which is **** in many departments), but 1 competitor is not that much.
Nope. I suppose DAO maybe sold a little bit more than ME2 but only from all three systems combined. Don't forget ME2 was released on 2 systems, while DAO on 3Amyntas wrote...
Do we even have reliable numbers on how many copies of ME2 and DA have been sold?
Funny thing is, the things he complains about the most in his RPG reviews usually get solved in the sequel (ME2, Witcher 2 etc). Of course, he'll find something else to complain about, but that's why he's so funnyAlainNagel wrote...
I saw Yatzee's review of DAO again yesterday and actually it looks like most of what he complained about is getting solved in DA2. So a careful "Yeah!" here.
Modifié par BlackyBlack, 26 juillet 2010 - 02:54 .
Guest_Kordaris_*
Agreed completely. The question is-at what point they decide they want to make more money while keeping connect to their old games and RPG. You can make some money, and you can make a lot of money. Since they were bought by EA...well I am sure you will be able to think about what their choices are.BlackyBlack wrote...
It may come as a surprise to some of you, but BioWare doesn't exist to fulfill a small vocal minority's wishes. It's a company who's main purpose is to make money
Well the majority of gamers aren't RPG gamers. That is true. Perhaps EA is trying to make Bioware gradually gain target market that will be made of vast majority of players that prefer Modern Warfare 2 and God of War.and to do that they need to appease the majority of gamers, not the RPG elitists (also known as the biggest whiners in the world
DAO presentation is better-because it allows more choices and outcomes.on't really care whether you prefer ME or DAO (or which story), but you've got to admit the presentation is much better in ME because it's more cinematic.
If sales are everything, then why make an RPG at all instead of FPS shooter? Of course the way things are going ME2 was almost like a shooter, and I guess ME3 will be even more, while DA2 will be more similiar to combat games.Avatar isn't the best selling movie ever 'cos of its story, it's the presentation that matters. And ME2 sold more than DAO
But Dragon Age 1 has it, and thus this is a very weak argument. Character customisation was the element that made Dragon Age so great.Complete character customization has NEVER been what defines an RPG. Planescape: Torment, The Witcher, JRPGs none of those have character customization.
Not really, corporations like making money. Most people prefer having enjoyable life. I for example prefer being unemployed rather than work in a ****ty job that hurts my dignity. Some women want easy big money from prostitution, while most don't...and so on. Making money isn't everything to people. Of course I mean people, not corporate drones and execs.Anyway, back to my point in the topic. If you had a choice whether to make a lot of money or huge sh!tload of money, would YOU really choose otherwise? I may be wrong, but I think that PEOPLE LIKE MONEY
Modifié par Kordaris, 26 juillet 2010 - 02:58 .
tez19 wrote...
bobad you not gona reply?
'ignoramous'
LOL
you are a funny one bobad with silly made up words to throw about.
Lord Gremlin wrote...
1. Dragon Age sold much more than Mass Effect 2.
2. Dragon Age has no direct competitors. They all are very old PC games. There is Witcher (which is **** in many departments), but 1 competitor is not that much.
Bobad wrote...
tez19 wrote...
bobad you not gona reply?
'ignoramous'
LOL
you are a funny one bobad with silly made up words to throw about.
LOL
Yeah you got me there, I was labouring under a serious misapprehension and using that to try and make you look foolish, however it turns out that I am the fool.
Well done sir and damn my obviously poor education.
Modifié par Addai67, 26 juillet 2010 - 03:03 .
Guest_imported_beer_*
Guest_Kordaris_*
imported_beer wrote...
When I lived in [_____], there was a restaurant that served heart Southern fare. It was delicious, it was authentic, and it was all the things people loved about Southern food. If they love Southern food.
(...)
The die hard fans cribbed and complained and whined and even protested outside one weekend. But a small group of grumpy old timers cannot keep a company successful. Something they have a hard time comprehending.
Modifié par Kordaris, 26 juillet 2010 - 03:15 .
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
