Mass Effect: Retribution makes choices canon?
#1
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 02:27
#2
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 02:31
#3
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 02:33
#4
Guest_mashavasilec_*
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 02:34
Guest_mashavasilec_*
if this is true i guess it saves me money and time for reading this "book"
but is this true?
#5
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 02:34
You can't expect your choice to effect the mass marketing of the game and it's various outlets. It's not cannon as far as your story is concerned. It's not cannon as far as my story is concerned, but it is what the developers believed would have happened if we, the players and our myriad view points and beliefs were not an issue.
They really should just retract that whole "There is no cannon version of Mass Effect" statement. It spawns these kinds of some what justified complaints.
#6
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 02:34
BlackyBlack wrote...
Anderson is an Admiral no matter what. Perhaps, Adina is councilor only in his absence
Just so we're clear, all this information is coming from Aria, and we all know about her one rule, so lets not try and break it by tip-toeing around the evidence.
#7
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 02:40
#8
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 02:42
Matdeception wrote...
This is a rather ridiculous topic. Given what choices effect ME2, and the various playstyles of the people who play, they can't create a comic that will reflect all their players choices. If they did that, we'll be dealing with a thousand different Redemption comics, like "Redemption; I nuked Ashley and Wrex ate a bullet on Virmire' to 'Redemption, Council sux, but I wanted to do the Asari counciler so I let em live. Also, kaidan ate a nuke.'
You can't expect your choice to effect the mass marketing of the game and it's various outlets. It's not cannon as far as your story is concerned. It's not cannon as far as my story is concerned, but it is what the developers believed would have happened if we, the players and our myriad view points and beliefs were not an issue.
They really should just retract that whole "There is no cannon version of Mass Effect" statement. It spawns these kinds of some what justified complaints.
They had done a great job so far trying to keep the mass marketing material such as the books and comics as neutral as possible never really commenting on what choices you made in game. And at first mention of Admiral Anderson in the book, I assumed we would be alright because Mr. Karpyshyn even went on to explain that even though Anderson was in still in the military he was now more involved with the political workings on the Citadel. The problem came in when they actually decided to use the word Councillor. They could have gotten away with not revealing Shepard choice...
#9
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 02:48
REShepard wrote...
Matdeception wrote...
This is a rather ridiculous topic. Given what choices effect ME2, and the various playstyles of the people who play, they can't create a comic that will reflect all their players choices. If they did that, we'll be dealing with a thousand different Redemption comics, like "Redemption; I nuked Ashley and Wrex ate a bullet on Virmire' to 'Redemption, Council sux, but I wanted to do the Asari counciler so I let em live. Also, kaidan ate a nuke.'
You can't expect your choice to effect the mass marketing of the game and it's various outlets. It's not cannon as far as your story is concerned. It's not cannon as far as my story is concerned, but it is what the developers believed would have happened if we, the players and our myriad view points and beliefs were not an issue.
They really should just retract that whole "There is no cannon version of Mass Effect" statement. It spawns these kinds of some what justified complaints.
They had done a great job so far trying to keep the mass marketing material such as the books and comics as neutral as possible never really commenting on what choices you made in game. And at first mention of Admiral Anderson in the book, I assumed we would be alright because Mr. Karpyshyn even went on to explain that even though Anderson was in still in the military he was now more involved with the political workings on the Citadel. The problem came in when they actually decided to use the word Councillor. They could have gotten away with not revealing Shepard choice...
Provided they used that word (I refuse to dig up the comics and check), then I'll have to ultimately agree there. But surely you can see the stupidity of it. As things stands, using the word 'Counciler' seems to be taboo, I wonder what word will be next?
"HAI GUYS! I'M A COLLECTER OF FINE WINES..." splat!
Shepard, in their cool armor that doesn't quite reveal if he is a he, or if she is a she, snorts through an audio box that likewise conceals his.. her... it's true identity. "NO COLLECTOR FOR YOU! ONE YEAR!" as it holsters his weapon of indisernable shape, before leaning over and slapping their non-descript but very real love interest on the rump. "Let's go, you sexy thing you!"
#10
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 02:50
#11
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 03:06
#12
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 03:10
I don't think it's that big a deal either, I mean I'm not going to stop playing the Mass Effect games simply because my choices aren't the "real" choices now. But I was just disappointed because every comic and book up until this point kept the choices that we made vague so that everyone's story of Shepard could fit in to the stories.
@MatDeception
While your taboo example is quite humorous it really doesn't help your argument. I mean, there is a very good reason that the title "Councillor" is considered taboo, it breaks one of the biggest decisions you make at the end of Mass Effect. It'd be the same if Tali was referred to as Tali vas Normandy or Tali vas Neema in a future book or comic. The fact is that they could have easily kept it vague by not using the title Councillor and just implied that both Udina and Anderson were heavily involved in political dealings on the Citadel.
#13
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 03:32
REShepard wrote...
@MatDeception
While your taboo example is quite humorous it really doesn't help your argument. I mean, there is a very good reason that the title "Councillor" is considered taboo, it breaks one of the biggest decisions you make at the end of Mass Effect. It'd be the same if Tali was referred to as Tali vas Normandy or Tali vas Neema in a future book or comic. The fact is that they could have easily kept it vague by not using the title Councillor and just implied that both Udina and Anderson were heavily involved in political dealings on the Citadel.
I get your point, but I think they are going to have to make some choices and just go with it. Otherwise they are going to always have to do stories relegated to the fringes of the universe for fear that they might contradict someone's game.
I mean... Should they avoid ever includingTali or Garrus because they MIGHT have died during the Suicide mission? Those are two of the most popular characters.
#14
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 03:33
I think I'll just follow your reasoning while reading the book.BlackyBlack wrote...
Anderson is an Admiral no matter what. Perhaps, Adina is councilor only in his absence
#15
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 05:16
Edit: Then again, stepping down to become Admiral so that he can back Shepard when the time comes does sound like Anderson.
Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 27 juillet 2010 - 05:28 .
#16
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 05:24
#17
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 05:48
#18
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 05:53
#19
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 05:55
More or less my thoughts. I haven't read the book yet, but that's my conclusion from what everyone is saying.Dave of Canada wrote...
I'm just reading it like if it was Default ME2 Shep.
#20
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 06:30
#21
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 07:01
#22
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 07:04
#23
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 07:12
REShepard wrote...
So about that whole "There is no canon version of Mass Effect" thing...
What about it? The games are played by millions. The books are read by dozens. Why should the books trump the games?
Modifié par Taranatar9, 27 juillet 2010 - 07:13 .
#24
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 07:58
DOYOURLABS wrote...
I just got to that part too, it threw me off. Also, the turian councilor is different, so it's following the "council dies" storyline.
The Turian Councilor isn't different, the Turian Councilor isn't even mentioned in the book, At least not so far as I've read. You're getting Ambassador Oriana confused with the Turian Councilor, hence why titles are in fact important.
I'm going to go with..because the books are written by the lead writer of the games? What is and isn't considered canon is not decided by the amount of viewers or players, its not a democracy. It's decided by the owners of the brand or universe which in this case is BioWare. But it seems that they've chosen to go that route.Taranatar9 wrote...
REShepard wrote...
So about that whole "There is no canon version of Mass Effect" thing...
What about it? The games are played by millions. The books are read by dozens. Why should the books trump the games?
Modifié par REShepard, 27 juillet 2010 - 08:02 .
#25
Posté 27 juillet 2010 - 08:26
There was always a canon Shepard. he's male, his name's John, and he looks like mark Vanderloo.
Some decisions were canonized aswell, they had to be, for players who didn't join the ride until ME2.
It's really not a big deal.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut







