KLUME777 wrote...
dont know if this has been said but,
Why are ther no ogres with no horns?
How do you know there aren't?
KLUME777 wrote...
dont know if this has been said but,
Why are ther no ogres with no horns?
rolson00 wrote...
in response to David Gaider comments i think the guy was on about continuity as long as there is a reason why explained(and i think they have told us that there is a reason in the game) people will be happy.
Biotic Budah wrote...
As Nancy Grace would say "BS". I realize as a writer you feel ownership of the game, but in your rebuttal there on the first page of this thread it's almost like you're saying "It's my game and I'll do what I want with it, NYAH!" Go eat a snickers bar, you're starting to sound like a diva.
I understand wanting to be creative, but for example, we meet Mr. Spock from planet Vulcan. He has pointy ears. On another episode we meet another Vulcan, but this guy wears pimp clothes and calls himself A pimp named Slickback. Some Vulcans are scientists, others are pimps. Sounds crazy huh? Given what most geeks know about vulcans.
Putting horns on a race that had no indication of having them is just plain wacky. Sten was not the only Qunari we met in the game. What about Jarvy and Tenanga at the Pearl? Or the other assorted Qunari mercenaries through out? Not a doggone one had horns! What's next? Deadpool gonna have optic bla........oh. I mean Indiana Jones gonna be battling alien......no, wait, wait...I know, 10 foot dwarves!
The point is you are already making a big creative change by dictating the race of our character for one example. I think the Qunari are hardcore enough given the dialogue and backstory for the Qunari, but to explain that some Qunari have horns, some do not, that dog just don't hunt son. All I gotta say is, you better have a pretty dang good story and even better game play or you risk alienating your core fan base.
Modifié par David Gaider, 04 août 2010 - 03:09 .
If that's meant to be a comparison between what's going on here in these forums and being "reviewed" by stakeholders, it's an interesting take on things-- I'll give you that.Woodstock-TC wrote...
it really must be a delight to work in the gaming industry :-)
I just imagine holding that kind of speech to our stakeholders at the next review.
True, though not everyone who was a fan of DAO is going to enjoy DA2. I think that's a given-- we're making a lot of changes, and they're not going to be to everyone's liking. That's true between any sequel-- you're going to win some new fans and lose some old ones, and that's probably doubly true when you make changes to the "formula". Everyone's free to declare what they do or don't like and what they'd prefer to see (like we could stop them), but treating it like it's a broken promise is, I think, taking that a bit too far.Sable Rhapsody wrote...
Devs make changes all the time, and they're largely for the better, and we the fanbase largely indulge in some wankage before most of us get over it and just enjoy the game.
BrotherWarth wrote...
David Gaider, your responses really do come off as uncaring towards Origins fans. Yeah, you make the games and we just play them. But we're your bosses. I don't know if you're familiar with Gene Simmons'(of KISS fame) philosophy on his career and his fans, but he calls concert-goers and album-purchasers "the bosses." He knows that the fan base dictates whether or not he gets payed. And he's been massively successful, in part, because he understands this. You may see it as your world to change as you will, but we decide if you get to change it at all. With our wallets. Something to consider at least.