Game Informer: A Look At The Qunari, Evolved
#1401
Posté 08 août 2010 - 01:14
#1402
Posté 08 août 2010 - 01:28
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
I dislike this development.
Heh...someone please tell me, am I still in the Dragon Age forums? Starting to think this is some other game, you know with Greek Gods and minotaurs......with a dash of Mass Effect for extra spice. *shakes head*
#1403
Posté 08 août 2010 - 02:14
While I understand that not everyone will like everything they show us, I'm still surprised at the massive negative reactions it got. Although my opinion on the matter is biased becasue I really like the new side of the Qunari that their showing us.
And in Dragon Age 3 I want the possibility to play a female Qunari! That would be awesome.
#1404
Posté 08 août 2010 - 02:40
SoR82 wrote...
Still better than "oh yes some of them have horns some of them down... oh and some of them break them off because they dont mean anything" and my personal favourite "ogres have horns and they come from qunari broodmothers therefore......"
I've still yet to hear anyone explain why that isn't a satisfactory explanation. It's a natural genetic occurrence. It exists in the real world in goats, sheep, cattle, and buffalo. Some have horns, some do not. There's even a word for it.
What could be a better explanation than something that does actually happen in the real world?
#1405
Posté 08 août 2010 - 03:32
From my pov Nature finds a design that works well in the enviroment they are in, humans and other top end species dont vary in this kind of way as their "base" form is adaptable and works well in most situations, pigmentations vary to allow for different levels of sun strength for example but would some spring horns?
Plus Im not the one that decided an established race needed horns, Im not the one making interesting choices, I somehow feel its not really my place to explain WHY they have horns when they didnt before. Hell if they wish to pay me I will start right now coming up for a reason.
#1406
Posté 08 août 2010 - 04:16
Nope, same species. Just a matter of the dominant/recessive genes for horns. A specimin with no horns, when horns exist as a trait of the species, is "polled". Wikipedia explains it better than I do.SoR82 wrote...
Im not an animal expert or biologist but are these differences not different sub-species? Personally if humans started being born with horns somehow i think there might be some interesting reactions.
True enough that it's not your job to explain it. But if you're going to claim that the explanation is bad then the constructive thing to do is explain why you think that and to offer an alternative.Plus Im not the one that decided an established race needed horns, Im not the one making interesting choices, I somehow feel its not really my place to explain WHY they have horns when they didnt before. Hell if they wish to pay me I will start right now coming up for a reason.
#1407
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Posté 08 août 2010 - 04:53
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
#1408
Posté 08 août 2010 - 06:39
BrotherWarth wrote...
David Gaider, your responses really do come off as uncaring towards Origins fans. Yeah, you make the games and we just play them. But we're your bosses. I don't know if you're familiar with Gene Simmons'(of KISS fame) philosophy on his career and his fans, but he calls concert-goers and album-purchasers "the bosses." He knows that the fan base dictates whether or not he gets payed. And he's been massively successful, in part, because he understands this. You may see it as your world to change as you will, but we decide if you get to change it at all. With our wallets. Something to consider at least.
You can still disobey your boss for making ridiculous requests.
Those ridiculous requests being made by 99% of the "bosses".
Modifié par Casel, 08 août 2010 - 06:40 .
#1409
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Posté 08 août 2010 - 06:45
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Casel wrote...
BrotherWarth wrote...
David Gaider, your responses really do come off as uncaring towards Origins fans. Yeah, you make the games and we just play them. But we're your bosses. I don't know if you're familiar with Gene Simmons'(of KISS fame) philosophy on his career and his fans, but he calls concert-goers and album-purchasers "the bosses." He knows that the fan base dictates whether or not he gets payed. And he's been massively successful, in part, because he understands this. You may see it as your world to change as you will, but we decide if you get to change it at all. With our wallets. Something to consider at least.
You can still disobey your boss for making ridiculous requests.
Those ridiculous requests being made by 99% of the "bosses".
Such as? I don't see 99% of the fan base agreeing on anything, let alone ridiculous requests. Feel free to name some of these ridiculous requests though.
#1410
Posté 08 août 2010 - 06:48
BrotherWarth wrote...
Casel wrote...
BrotherWarth wrote...
David Gaider, your responses really do come off as uncaring towards Origins fans. Yeah, you make the games and we just play them. But we're your bosses. I don't know if you're familiar with Gene Simmons'(of KISS fame) philosophy on his career and his fans, but he calls concert-goers and album-purchasers "the bosses." He knows that the fan base dictates whether or not he gets payed. And he's been massively successful, in part, because he understands this. You may see it as your world to change as you will, but we decide if you get to change it at all. With our wallets. Something to consider at least.
You can still disobey your boss for making ridiculous requests.
Those ridiculous requests being made by 99% of the "bosses".
Such as? I don't see 99% of the fan base agreeing on anything, let alone ridiculous requests. Feel free to name some of these ridiculous requests though.
Maybe 99% was a bit of an exaggeration. It seems like everyone wants DA2 to be the same as the former, a game needs to learn from the original and grow, the racial changes are a great addition, Qunari look more like their own race now.
To be honest, I had no idea the Qunari were even a race, I assumed it was a religion of big headed stale people.
#1411
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Posté 08 août 2010 - 07:06
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Casel wrote...
BrotherWarth wrote...
Casel wrote...
BrotherWarth wrote...
David Gaider, your responses really do come off as uncaring towards Origins fans. Yeah, you make the games and we just play them. But we're your bosses. I don't know if you're familiar with Gene Simmons'(of KISS fame) philosophy on his career and his fans, but he calls concert-goers and album-purchasers "the bosses." He knows that the fan base dictates whether or not he gets payed. And he's been massively successful, in part, because he understands this. You may see it as your world to change as you will, but we decide if you get to change it at all. With our wallets. Something to consider at least.
You can still disobey your boss for making ridiculous requests.
Those ridiculous requests being made by 99% of the "bosses".
Such as? I don't see 99% of the fan base agreeing on anything, let alone ridiculous requests. Feel free to name some of these ridiculous requests though.
Maybe 99% was a bit of an exaggeration. It seems like everyone wants DA2 to be the same as the former, a game needs to learn from the original and grow, the racial changes are a great addition, Qunari look more like their own race now.
To be honest, I had no idea the Qunari were even a race, I assumed it was a religion of big headed stale people.
I honestly don't have a problem with the Qunari being redesigned per se. I just don't like that they look like gargoyles now. And I don't have a problem with DAII not being a continuation of the Warden's story. The biggest event in the Warden's life is behind him/her. That's why Awakening felt a little bland. And I don't have a problem with a different narrative style. What I do have a problem with is changing things that worked well with things that limit us as players. No more origins is a lousy choice. Origins are what attracted a lot of people to the game. Removing a lot of the depth from the character creation is a lousy choice. I like being able to play different races to make the game feel different. And I don't like that Bioware, or at least the devs who post here, seem to have this "It's our world. You're just visiting." attitude towards its fans.
#1412
Posté 08 août 2010 - 07:12
I feel Bioware had to make a decision and this is them sticking by their decision.
#1413
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Posté 08 août 2010 - 07:16
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
#1414
Posté 08 août 2010 - 07:20
BrotherWarth wrote...
But they're doing the same thing they did with ME2. Instead of fixing what needs some fixing they're throwing it out the window just not bothering to replace it. Like the inventory system from ME1. It was clunky and tedious. But instead of making it easier and quicker to use they just got rid of it entirely. OK, some people thought origins were shallow and didn't have an impact on the story after a few hours. So make them deeper and with larger impact. Don't just throw them away. Just because they made a decision doesn't mean they made the right one.
Indeed, and i'm not trying to say they did, but it's too late to go back on their decision.
I personally enjoyed being an Elf.
#1415
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Posté 08 août 2010 - 07:24
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Casel wrote...
BrotherWarth wrote...
But they're doing the same thing they did with ME2. Instead of fixing what needs some fixing they're throwing it out the window just not bothering to replace it. Like the inventory system from ME1. It was clunky and tedious. But instead of making it easier and quicker to use they just got rid of it entirely. OK, some people thought origins were shallow and didn't have an impact on the story after a few hours. So make them deeper and with larger impact. Don't just throw them away. Just because they made a decision doesn't mean they made the right one.
Indeed, and i'm not trying to say they did, but it's too late to go back on their decision.
I personally enjoyed being an Elf.
It's not too late at all. They took 4 years to make Origins. They don't only get a year and a half to make II. I would rather wait for a game that is true to its roots than get a revisionist "meh" game right now.
I was so disappointed with ME2 and I don't want the same thing to happen to DAII.
#1416
Posté 08 août 2010 - 07:28
BrotherWarth wrote...
Casel wrote...
BrotherWarth wrote...
But they're doing the same thing they did with ME2. Instead of fixing what needs some fixing they're throwing it out the window just not bothering to replace it. Like the inventory system from ME1. It was clunky and tedious. But instead of making it easier and quicker to use they just got rid of it entirely. OK, some people thought origins were shallow and didn't have an impact on the story after a few hours. So make them deeper and with larger impact. Don't just throw them away. Just because they made a decision doesn't mean they made the right one.
Indeed, and i'm not trying to say they did, but it's too late to go back on their decision.
I personally enjoyed being an Elf.
It's not too late at all. They took 4 years to make Origins. They don't only get a year and a half to make II. I would rather wait for a game that is true to its roots than get a revisionist "meh" game right now.
I was so disappointed with ME2 and I don't want the same thing to happen to DAII.
Dragon Age 2 isn't trying to be Origins though, it's an entirely new game, I want to think of it as a spinoff more than a sequel, new characters, new story, different mechanics.
#1417
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Posté 08 août 2010 - 07:34
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
#1418
Posté 08 août 2010 - 07:36
#1419
Posté 08 août 2010 - 07:44
BrotherWarth wrote...
David Gaider, your responses really do come off as uncaring towards Origins fans. Yeah, you make the games and we just play them. But we're your bosses. I don't know if you're familiar with Gene Simmons'(of KISS fame) philosophy on his career and his fans, but he calls concert-goers and album-purchasers "the bosses." He knows that the fan base dictates whether or not he gets payed. And he's been massively successful, in part, because he understands this. You may see it as your world to change as you will, but we decide if you get to change it at all. With our wallets. Something to consider at least.
Sorry, but you don't get to decide what games we make-- only what games you buy. In the larger sense, yes, if what we put out there isn't what enough people want then we'll be in trouble. But that's our gamble to make, I'm afraid.
We listen to our fans and are very interested in what they want-- but we're talking about a much larger group of people with varied interests, much larger than the people who come to these forums. In the end you'll have to decide for yourself if DA2 is what you want, but calling me an uncaring meanie just for saying this is what we're doing-- well, I don't really know what to say about that. I get that you're disappointed, but there's a level of entitlement with what you're saying that maybe you need to think about a little. If that makes me an ogre, then I guess I'm an ogre.
#1420
Posté 08 août 2010 - 08:11
Species are currently defined as living organisms that can inter-breed to produce viable offspring. That makes Elves and Humans the same specie but different sub-specie/race. Same MAY apply yo Qunari and Dwarves.
#1421
Posté 08 août 2010 - 08:14
Though I may often share their concerns, I unabashedly dislike customers of any business who feel fit to express that they are 'the bosses,' let alone 'always right.' I've never seen this from the side of the business (or, for that matter, the artist), yet it still frustrates me immensely. No industry or art is going to progress under that philosophy as some like BrotherWarth see it. You're too soft, Gaider.
#1422
Posté 08 août 2010 - 08:23
Modifié par Grae1923, 08 août 2010 - 08:24 .
#1423
Posté 08 août 2010 - 08:26
Jimmy Fury wrote...
Nope, same species. Just a matter of the dominant/recessive genes for horns. A specimin with no horns, when horns exist as a trait of the species, is "polled". Wikipedia explains it better than I do.SoR82 wrote...
Im not an animal expert or biologist but are these differences not different sub-species? Personally if humans started being born with horns somehow i think there might be some interesting reactions.True enough that it's not your job to explain it. But if you're going to claim that the explanation is bad then the constructive thing to do is explain why you think that and to offer an alternative.Plus Im not the one that decided an established race needed horns, Im not the one making interesting choices, I somehow feel its not really my place to explain WHY they have horns when they didnt before. Hell if they wish to pay me I will start right now coming up for a reason.
You explanation had far more thought and effort than their explanation did which is amusing to say the least. I still dont buy it exactly as it seems silly that we had no inclining of horns etc and they suddnely turns out the majority of the species do infact have them.
Yep I could do that if I wanted but then I hit the problem of trying to explain something I dont buy into. So I aint even gonna try.
#1424
Posté 08 août 2010 - 08:27
SoR82 wrote...
Yes worf didnt but they "explained" it in an enterprise episode.... i belive it was somethignt o do with a virus wiping klingons out so they mixed human dna in and it made them immune but it also meant they had more human genetics for a generation or 2...... lame eh XD. Still better than "oh yes some of them have horns some of them down... oh and some of them break them off because they dont mean anything" and my personal favourite "ogres have horns and they come from qunari broodmothers therefore......"
ah thanks, did not know that.
And qunari cutting of horns without a trace when going abroad has some sense as when they are not in the homeland they might not appear anything else than big people.
#1425
Posté 08 août 2010 - 08:28
BrotherWarth wrote...
But we're your bosses.
Unless you are part of EA, no, you are not.
I don't know if you're familiar with Gene Simmons'(of KISS fame) philosophy on his career and his fans, but he calls concert-goers and album-purchasers "the bosses." He knows that the fan base dictates whether or not he gets payed. And he's been massively successful, in part, because he understands this.
No. You are vastly misinterpreting Simmons words. I also think it is cute that you think David Gaider would not know who KISS is. Simmons just didn't wake up one day with a fanbase. If KISS didn't make good music, do you think people would listen to him? Maybe his "bosses" would be a bunch of thirteen year old pricks. Simmons get paid because people LIKE his music. Please don't get so worked up that you think he means the fans dictate what kind of music he makes.





Retour en haut




