Aller au contenu

Photo

(RETRIBUTION) Who else felt really really bad for Aria?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
109 réponses à ce sujet

#76
Nerevar-as

Nerevar-as
  • Members
  • 5 375 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Nerevar-as wrote...

Then there´s Cerberus ignoring completely individual rights of everybody they want. There´s a point where intentions no longer justify actions. To quote Adama, one must be also be worthy of survival (letting Cain live was not the best action to take that route however - thanks for Gina). Even with the galaxy at stake, Cerberus + Repaer technology may cross that line.


...you're complaining about Cerberus ignroing individual rights. You, Shepard, Citadel Spectre, institutionally enabled to kill anyone, torture anyone, do just about anything so long as it completes the mission.




Which I choose not to do. With enough persuasion I even avoid killing Burke... eh...Jeong in Feros. In fact a point in ME1 (which is referenced also in LotSB) is Council looking the other side with Specters unless they screw up royally. Specters as they are now is another wrong.

#77
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages
The issue isn't you. It's the Council.



Cerberus is a group of voluntary criminals-******-vigilantees (highly subjective ones, but self-appointed none the less) who accept that they have to break the law to get what they want, and step past it to do what they feel necessary. They already violate your rights because they're already criminals.



The Council legalizes murder, extortion, and torture done in its name through the Spectres. Two thirds of the Council continue to employ universal biological warfare against a species they are not at war with, and the Turian Heirarchy is an imperialist military state which conducts what we consider war crimes as a matter of military policy. Not only is this far more widespread than Cerberus's abuses, this is considered the ideal status quo to be sustained.



If your objection with working with a group is on the grounds that they violate civil and human rights, at least don't go to a far worse abuser by default.

#78
Asheer_Khan

Asheer_Khan
  • Members
  • 1 551 messages
"Whoever from you is without sin should throw first stone".

#79
DanaScu

DanaScu
  • Members
  • 355 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...
Cerberus has had, what, two, maybe three known rogue projects? Teltin, Overlord, and Shepard's Lazarus? One of which was always under Shepard's control in the first place?


Do you count the rachni that escaped from Cerberus control and shipped themselves out on the cargo ships, wiping out one Marine listening post and almost wiping out the second? They did wipe out the miners on the planet. The Cerberus operative says they should have been treating them like prisoners of war instead of animals.

Which project was under Shepard's control? If you're referring to Lazarus, being dead at first, and, at a later date, unconscious/in a coma while getting cybernetic implants, new bones, new muscles, new eyes and whatever else they needed to do kinda rules out Shepard being in control of anything. No matter how badass Shep is, "meat and tubes" on an operating table isn't giving orders to anyone. After Shepard is woken by Miranda, Miranda is giving orders, then Jacob. I doubt Shepard had much influence over Wilson selling out Cerberus to the SB.

When you follow up Kahoku's information in ME you break up three more installations, one of which has Kahoku's body. I count those as failed Cerberus experiments. And the Exogeni terminal you can hack, where the scientist is concerned over the samples they gave to some group called Cerberus. I think Shepard cleans that mess up as well.

As far as I can tell [haven't read the books] any project that becomes known, along with whatever atrocities the scientists have committed conveniently becomes "rogue", so TIM can claim he didn't know about it. He allegedly gave orders to shut down Teltin, or says he did; after the kids rebelled and the scientists were killed. Shepard doesn' t hear about it until after Jack's bomb wipes Teltin off the map. Why he bothers to tell you Teltin is destroyed in the mission brief I don't know; Jack's bomb looks like it cleared the jungle off half the planet. He is far more annoyed that there was any evidence left for you to find before Jack blew it up. He is disappointed if you take Archer's brother away; not that he was being tortured in the first place, but because you'll set back the project. Too bad about the autistic kid, but we're doing this for *humanity*. 

From what is seen in the games, he really doesn't care what his people do, as long as they get results. And destroy evidence so he can claim they went rogue if the usual happens and Shepard or someone has to come in and clean up the mess.

Wrex and Aleena; did you listen to what happened with the two of them? Cerberus fighting on the Flotilla with unarmed civilians. Aleena and Wrex heading to a space station filled with pirates and mercs. From the wiki, since I didn't remember the exact words :
Due to the respect of each other's skills, Wrex and Aleena agreed to battle it out. Aleena chose an old salarian space station overrun with mercenaries and pirates
as their battleground, so no one who got in their way could be classed
as an innocent bystander. Wrex pursued Aleena through the space station
for days, until he ran out of ammunition and had to kill several
mercenaries to obtain their weapons.
Finally, when all the others on the station had fled or been
killed, Wrex trapped Aleena in the medical bay, while she attempted to
heal her wounds. As Wrex began to break in, he realised the station's
core was about to go critical and just managed to escape before the
facility was reduced to vapour. There was no apparent way Aleena could
have escaped, but Wrex received a cheerful message from her, simply
reading "Better luck next time..."


It is splitting hairs, but I don't see that as being the same as when Cerberus wants someone or something, and doesn't care about the collateral damage to unarmed defenseless civilians/colonists, like Horizon.

#80
Nerevar-as

Nerevar-as
  • Members
  • 5 375 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

The issue isn't you. It's the Council.

Cerberus is a group of voluntary criminals-******-vigilantees (highly subjective ones, but self-appointed none the less) who accept that they have to break the law to get what they want, and step past it to do what they feel necessary. They already violate your rights because they're already criminals.

The Council legalizes murder, extortion, and torture done in its name through the Spectres. Two thirds of the Council continue to employ universal biological warfare against a species they are not at war with, and the Turian Heirarchy is an imperialist military state which conducts what we consider war crimes as a matter of military policy. Not only is this far more widespread than Cerberus's abuses, this is considered the ideal status quo to be sustained.

If your objection with working with a group is on the grounds that they violate civil and human rights, at least don't go to a far worse abuser by default.


The Council goal isn´t trying to stomp everyone else because of a fatalistic and unrealistic view of the galaxy. Cerberus existed before he Reapers were revealed. That in ME2 it is a necessary evi isn´t a vindication, it is another evidence of the Council failings.

#81
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages

Nerevar-as wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

The issue isn't you. It's the Council.

Cerberus is a group of voluntary criminals-******-vigilantees (highly subjective ones, but self-appointed none the less) who accept that they have to break the law to get what they want, and step past it to do what they feel necessary. They already violate your rights because they're already criminals.

The Council legalizes murder, extortion, and torture done in its name through the Spectres. Two thirds of the Council continue to employ universal biological warfare against a species they are not at war with, and the Turian Heirarchy is an imperialist military state which conducts what we consider war crimes as a matter of military policy. Not only is this far more widespread than Cerberus's abuses, this is considered the ideal status quo to be sustained.

If your objection with working with a group is on the grounds that they violate civil and human rights, at least don't go to a far worse abuser by default.


The Council goal isn´t trying to stomp everyone else because of a fatalistic and unrealistic view of the galaxy. Cerberus existed before he Reapers were revealed. That in ME2 it is a necessary evi isn´t a vindication, it is another evidence of the Council failings.

The Council simply stomps everyone else because they want to enforce their dominance (Yes, the d-word.), except in the rare cases it's too much trouble (the Terminus). The stomps may come in various forms, but it's always to enforce their will: fines, political ham-stringing, even military force. Nothing really suggests Cerberus is going to conquer, oppress, or attack the other races either: they have far more reasons not to start a war, such as the cost to humanity verus the gains.

Cerberus only exists because one third of the Council stomps hard as a matter of policy, and another third has a history for even crueler stomps. Call it fatalistic, but it isn't an unrealistic or unjustified viewpoint.

#82
Ser Isely

Ser Isely
  • Members
  • 89 messages

MrnDvlDg161 wrote...

jbblue05 wrote...

MrnDvlDg161 wrote...

Is the game even remotely following the books or are the books following the game?


Mass Effect 1 was influenced by Revelation
Mass Effect 2 had one side mission related to Ascension rescuing the Quarian and their is few dialogue about Cerberus infiltrating the Flotilla
I'm guessing Ascension is going to play a bigger role in an dlc, expansion, or ME3
Mass Effect 3 has to be heavily influenced by Retribution because of Grayson, Cerberus, and the Turians


Only reason I ask is because a lot of people putting merit in what they read fortelling future events and I'm going to also gusss that average gammers didn't bother reading the novels. So how many future events became true in any of the DLC's and/or games of ME1 and ME2?  Seems to me that the games can change on behest of some group meeting at Bio Ware over coffee and doughnuts thus vaporising everyone's guesses.




The Books are part of the "canon" ME universe they are very vague when telling of events that could have multiple outcomes in the games but then really the choices from part 1 had very little effect on part 2.
Like for instance in Retribution they use, cerberus salvages some tech from the collector base and thats how they turn Grayson into an indoctrinated Saren like thing. That means its of little use if you destroy the base cerberus will still get there hands on reaper stuff...

#83
przemichal

przemichal
  • Members
  • 249 messages
I think they have this tech from derelict Reaper actually.

#84
Nerevar-as

Nerevar-as
  • Members
  • 5 375 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Nerevar-as wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

The issue isn't you. It's the Council.

Cerberus is a group of voluntary criminals-******-vigilantees (highly subjective ones, but self-appointed none the less) who accept that they have to break the law to get what they want, and step past it to do what they feel necessary. They already violate your rights because they're already criminals.

The Council legalizes murder, extortion, and torture done in its name through the Spectres. Two thirds of the Council continue to employ universal biological warfare against a species they are not at war with, and the Turian Heirarchy is an imperialist military state which conducts what we consider war crimes as a matter of military policy. Not only is this far more widespread than Cerberus's abuses, this is considered the ideal status quo to be sustained.

If your objection with working with a group is on the grounds that they violate civil and human rights, at least don't go to a far worse abuser by default.


The Council goal isn´t trying to stomp everyone else because of a fatalistic and unrealistic view of the galaxy. Cerberus existed before he Reapers were revealed. That in ME2 it is a necessary evi isn´t a vindication, it is another evidence of the Council failings.

The Council simply stomps everyone else because they want to enforce their dominance (Yes, the d-word.), except in the rare cases it's too much trouble (the Terminus). The stomps may come in various forms, but it's always to enforce their will: fines, political ham-stringing, even military force. Nothing really suggests Cerberus is going to conquer, oppress, or attack the other races either: they have far more reasons not to start a war, such as the cost to humanity verus the gains.

Cerberus only exists because one third of the Council stomps hard as a matter of policy, and another third has a history for even crueler stomps. Call it fatalistic, but it isn't an unrealistic or unjustified viewpoint.


Let´s agree to disagree in this.

My main problem with Cerberus? Its absolute ruler never listens to whatever conscience he has left. Hope to be able to put Miranda in charge in ME3, at least she showed concern about the HR department.

#85
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages

DanaScu wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...
Cerberus has had, what, two, maybe three known rogue projects? Teltin, Overlord, and Shepard's Lazarus? One of which was always under Shepard's control in the first place?


Do you count the rachni that escaped from Cerberus control and shipped themselves out on the cargo ships, wiping out one Marine listening post and almost wiping out the second? They did wipe out the miners on the planet. The Cerberus operative says they should have been treating them like prisoners of war instead of animals.

As a rogue project? No. Why would I? It was a failed project, but the Major was detailing where they went wrong.

Which project was under Shepard's control? If you're referring to Lazarus, being dead at first, and, at a later date, unconscious/in a coma while getting cybernetic implants, new bones, new muscles, new eyes and whatever else they needed to do kinda rules out Shepard being in control of anything. No matter how badass Shep is, "meat and tubes" on an operating table isn't giving orders to anyone. After Shepard is woken by Miranda, Miranda is giving orders, then Jacob. I doubt Shepard had much influence over Wilson selling out Cerberus to the SB.

The Lazarus cell also includes the Normandy 2 ship and crew. Lazarus shifted with Shepard.

When you follow up Kahoku's information in ME you break up three more installations, one of which has Kahoku's body. I count those as failed Cerberus experiments. And the Exogeni terminal you can hack, where the scientist is concerned over the samples they gave to some group called Cerberus. I think Shepard cleans that mess up as well.

What does this have to do with a rogue project?

How the super-soldier project failed, except in that Shepard blew them up, is never really asserted. We're never told that the program was unfeasible, impossible, or that they had given up. We don't even know the specifics of what they were trying to do, or what their progress and results were. There's no grounds to call it a success, but to say it failed is equally baseless.

As far as I can tell [haven't read the books] any project that becomes known, along with whatever atrocities the scientists have committed conveniently becomes "rogue", so TIM can claim he didn't know about it. He allegedly gave orders to shut down Teltin, or says he did; after the kids rebelled and the scientists were killed. Shepard doesn' t hear about it until after Jack's bomb wipes Teltin off the map. Why he bothers to tell you Teltin is destroyed in the mission brief I don't know; Jack's bomb looks like it cleared the jungle off half the planet. He is far more annoyed that there was any evidence left for you to find before Jack blew it up. He is disappointed if you take Archer's brother away; not that he was being tortured in the first place, but because you'll set back the project. Too bad about the autistic kid, but we're doing this for *humanity*. 

(From start to end.)

Can't say I ever heard anything like that about public = rogue. TIM doesn't even deny atrocities.

The support that Teltin was rogue comes not from TIM, but from the researchers own mouth. Same with Overlord.

Where you get that he was greatly annoyed about the remains of Teltin escapes me. The mission summaries* are rather dry as it is, and noting that the last clean out crew wasn't thorough is a valid thing to note.

Overlord's ending email is a matter of personal projection onto the tone. TIM, after all, freely admits Archer crossed a line. But TIM has always been a forward thinker, and what happened in the past can't be changed, so choices should focus on future effects.


*Which, to my knoweldge, are not for Shepard's eyes, but completely authentic glances at Cerberus's analysis.

From what is seen in the games, he really doesn't care what his people do, as long as they get results. And destroy evidence so he can claim they went rogue if the usual happens and Shepard or someone has to come in and clean up the mess.

In the games, the only place we 'clean up' are Teltin and Overlord. Both of which admit on their own that they were rogue, not post-revelation falling on their swords to save TIM.

Wrex and Aleena; did you listen to what happened with the two of them? Cerberus fighting on the Flotilla with unarmed civilians. Aleena and Wrex heading to a space station filled with pirates and mercs. From the wiki, since I didn't remember the exact words :
Due to the respect of each other's skills, Wrex and Aleena agreed to battle it out. Aleena chose an old salarian space station overrun with mercenaries and pirates
as their battleground, so no one who got in their way could be classed
as an innocent bystander. Wrex pursued Aleena through the space station
for days, until he ran out of ammunition and had to kill several
mercenaries to obtain their weapons.
Finally, when all the others on the station had fled or been
killed, Wrex trapped Aleena in the medical bay, while she attempted to
heal her wounds. As Wrex began to break in, he realised the station's
core was about to go critical and just managed to escape before the
facility was reduced to vapour. There was no apparent way Aleena could
have escaped, but Wrex received a cheerful message from her, simply
reading "Better luck next time..."


It is splitting hairs, but I don't see that as being the same as when Cerberus wants someone or something, and doesn't care about the collateral damage to unarmed defenseless civilians/colonists, like Horizon.

Cerberus wasn't attacking for the purpose of collateral: that ship of innocents and civilians was also housing a (more or less) valid military objective. The rules of war don't shield military targets if you surround them by civilians.

I'm afraid your point about Aria isn't connecting here: are mercs suddenly invalid even though they had nothing to do with the fight? Cerberus targeted a inhabitated space ship because that's where they had to go. Areia (Aleena) didn't have to go to the station.

If you're really going to argue that Horizon was the worse move, you're two steps from a monster given what the alternative was.

#86
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages

Nerevar-as wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Nerevar-as wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

The issue isn't you. It's the Council.

Cerberus is a group of voluntary criminals-******-vigilantees (highly subjective ones, but self-appointed none the less) who accept that they have to break the law to get what they want, and step past it to do what they feel necessary. They already violate your rights because they're already criminals.

The Council legalizes murder, extortion, and torture done in its name through the Spectres. Two thirds of the Council continue to employ universal biological warfare against a species they are not at war with, and the Turian Heirarchy is an imperialist military state which conducts what we consider war crimes as a matter of military policy. Not only is this far more widespread than Cerberus's abuses, this is considered the ideal status quo to be sustained.

If your objection with working with a group is on the grounds that they violate civil and human rights, at least don't go to a far worse abuser by default.


The Council goal isn´t trying to stomp everyone else because of a fatalistic and unrealistic view of the galaxy. Cerberus existed before he Reapers were revealed. That in ME2 it is a necessary evi isn´t a vindication, it is another evidence of the Council failings.

The Council simply stomps everyone else because they want to enforce their dominance (Yes, the d-word.), except in the rare cases it's too much trouble (the Terminus). The stomps may come in various forms, but it's always to enforce their will: fines, political ham-stringing, even military force. Nothing really suggests Cerberus is going to conquer, oppress, or attack the other races either: they have far more reasons not to start a war, such as the cost to humanity verus the gains.

Cerberus only exists because one third of the Council stomps hard as a matter of policy, and another third has a history for even crueler stomps. Call it fatalistic, but it isn't an unrealistic or unjustified viewpoint.


Let´s agree to disagree in this.

What's to disagree with?

The the Council works to ensure and enforce their dominance? That's the role of the spectres.

That the Turians make war crimes a matter of policy? That's a matter of history in Codex and Cerberus daily news.

That the Salarians continue to engage in biowarfare against a species they are not at war with? That's the backstory of Mordin and his assistent.

My main problem with Cerberus? Its absolute ruler never listens to whatever conscience he has left. Hope to be able to put Miranda in charge in ME3, at least she showed concern about the HR department.

Don't confuse your ethics for a conscience. It is very possible to be ethically compelled to do lesser evils for greater goods.

#87
Nerevar-as

Nerevar-as
  • Members
  • 5 375 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...


Nerevar-as wrote...

My main problem with Cerberus? Its absolute ruler never listens to whatever conscience he has left. Hope to be able to put Miranda in charge in ME3, at least she showed concern about the HR department.


Don't confuse your ethics for a conscience. It is very possible to be ethically compelled to do lesser evils for greater goods.


Read Harry Potter? For "greater good" was the slogan of the bad guy before Voldy.

I do believe in necessary evils. Cerberus as it is now is not one.

Feel curious, what do you do in the Overlord DLC?

#88
PWENER

PWENER
  • Members
  • 1 774 messages
I didn't feel bad for Aria. She's a bad guy/criminal REMEMBER! There IS such a thing as KARMA my friends and it's all up in Aria's ass.

Cerberus did what they had to. Although Kai should have been less racist about it I guess. But a witness is a witness after all.

Modifié par PWENER, 27 septembre 2010 - 11:39 .


#89
Ser Isely

Ser Isely
  • Members
  • 89 messages

przemichal wrote...

I think they have this tech from derelict Reaper actually.


Nah, here is a a bit from the book,  pg
8-9

"Shepard-with Cerberus's help-had destroyed the Collector operations."  
(thats sort of ambiguous could mean either wiped out all the Collectors or blew the base up)


"Cerberus had salvaged key pieces of technology from the remains of the Collector operation."
(same thing they either took stuff from the base or what ever was floating around the debris)


Oh also about the original question, I hope for revenge though Aria really has no proof that Cerberus killed her daughter she was led to believe Grayson did it but she she is clever, hopefully she will find out it was Kai. I hope this confrontation will be in part 3 that would be a great confrontation.

#90
Nerevar-as

Nerevar-as
  • Members
  • 5 375 messages

PWENER wrote...

I didn't feel bad for Aria. She's a bad guy/criminal REMEMBER! There IS such a thing as KARMA my friends and it's all up in Aria's ass.

Cerberus did what they had to. Although Kai should have been less racist about it I guess. But a witness is a witness after all.


Her karma was not killing Grayson when she had the chance then. I think you are looking for a different trope her.

And the idea I got as KL killed Liselle for revenge in his squadie. Unless he becomes a Villain Sue, he´s is likely to pay dearly for it in the future. I¨ll even give Aria a cofee cup to put him in.

#91
mopotter

mopotter
  • Members
  • 3 743 messages

przemichal wrote...

I think they have this tech from derelict Reaper actually.


That's what I thought too.

#92
PWENER

PWENER
  • Members
  • 1 774 messages
Even if you destroy the base they manage to retrieve something?

That's my little evil organization. Who's my little supremacist TIMMY? You are!

Modifié par PWENER, 27 septembre 2010 - 11:46 .


#93
Flamewielder

Flamewielder
  • Members
  • 1 475 messages
Neither the Council nor Cerberus represent a perfect paragon or utterly renegade organisation. The Council is only marginally better because they favour diplomatic resolution over the use of Spectres or outright war to resolve conflict. A Paragon may applaud Cerberus' goals but will definitely dissapprove of their methods. A Spectre may be a paragon, but the Council doesn't expect him/her to be one: it's entirely up to the individual. A Renegade can approve of Cerberus' methods (he/she'd do the same in their position) but side with the Alliance and Council anyway (especially if he/she's an alien spectre...

Paragon & Renegade are not absolutes, that's why you have scales for each... Plus you can be utterly renegade in your attitude and still save the galaxy... You can be a hero on either path, only your choices differ; the paragon attempting to play by the rules and favoring diplomacy, the renegade choosing whatever is the most expedient path (with little or no moral consideration involved).

Modifié par Flamewielder, 27 septembre 2010 - 11:48 .


#94
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages

Nerevar-as wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...


Nerevar-as wrote...

My main problem with Cerberus? Its absolute ruler never listens to whatever conscience he has left. Hope to be able to put Miranda in charge in ME3, at least she showed concern about the HR department.


Don't confuse your ethics for a conscience. It is very possible to be ethically compelled to do lesser evils for greater goods.


Read Harry Potter? For "greater good" was the slogan of the bad guy before Voldy.

Why stop at Harry Potter? Plenty of people use 'for the greater good'... including the good guys.

You said the Illusive Man never listens to his conscience. Not only is that unverifiable, but his conscience can well drive him to do what he does.

To act as if a conscience is a static set of morals is silly.


Feel curious, what do you do in the Overlord DLC?

Kept it.

See if you can figure out why I did, and why I consider it the lesseer evil to taking the kid away.

#95
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages

Nerevar-as wrote...

PWENER wrote...

I didn't feel bad for Aria. She's a bad guy/criminal REMEMBER! There IS such a thing as KARMA my friends and it's all up in Aria's ass.

Cerberus did what they had to. Although Kai should have been less racist about it I guess. But a witness is a witness after all.


Her karma was not killing Grayson when she had the chance then. I think you are looking for a different trope her.

Or it could be karma from being a criminal overlord.

That to.

And the idea I got as KL killed Liselle for revenge in his squadie. Unless he becomes a Villain Sue, he´s is likely to pay dearly for it in the future. I¨ll even give Aria a cofee cup to put him in.

Fair enough, so long as I could side with him against her.

#96
Nerevar-as

Nerevar-as
  • Members
  • 5 375 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Nerevar-as wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...


Nerevar-as wrote...

My main problem with Cerberus? Its absolute ruler never listens to whatever conscience he has left. Hope to be able to put Miranda in charge in ME3, at least she showed concern about the HR department.


Don't confuse your ethics for a conscience. It is very possible to be ethically compelled to do lesser evils for greater goods.


Read Harry Potter? For "greater good" was the slogan of the bad guy before Voldy.

Why stop at Harry Potter? Plenty of people use 'for the greater good'... including the good guys.

You said the Illusive Man never listens to his conscience. Not only is that unverifiable, but his conscience can well drive him to do what he does.

To act as if a conscience is a static set of morals is silly.


Feel curious, what do you do in the Overlord DLC?

Kept it.

See if you can figure out why I did, and why I consider it the lesseer evil to taking the kid away.


Have a few theories. Just hope you did Overlord before blowing up the Geth heretics. Also think you shouldn´t think of living beings in statistical terms.

#97
PWENER

PWENER
  • Members
  • 1 774 messages
Is it just me or is the racism topic all over this thread???

#98
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages

Nerevar-as wrote...

Have a few theories. Just hope you did Overlord before blowing up the Geth heretics.

Good catch. Before recruiting Legion even. Once you learn of the Geth/Heretic split, and especially after deploying the Heretic virus against them, it becomes much more sensible to not value a near-term anti-geth development.

Also think you shouldn´t think of living beings in statistical terms.

I've heard that.

Then again, I've also heard you should treat people equally,

If you value one person the same as two, you're aren't doing that, and that's a grave disrespect to the people you aren't valuing equally.

My conscience drives me to treat people equally.

Modifié par Dean_the_Young, 28 septembre 2010 - 12:01 .


#99
Asheer_Khan

Asheer_Khan
  • Members
  • 1 551 messages

Have a few theories. Just hope you did Overlord before blowing up the Geth heretics. Also think you shouldn´t think of living beings in statistical terms.




Devoted cerberus follower will always kept him plugged to that machine regardless of Legion's L-mission outcome in name of the "Humanity's greater good".


#100
Nerevar-as

Nerevar-as
  • Members
  • 5 375 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Nerevar-as wrote...

Have a few theories. Just hope you did Overlord before blowing up the Geth heretics.

Good catch. Before recruiting Legion even. Once you learn of the Geth/Heretic split, and especially after deploying the Heretic virus against them, it becomes much more sensible to not value a near-term anti-geth development.

Also think you shouldn´t think of living beings in statistical terms.

I've heard that.

Then again, I've also heard you should treat people equally,

If you value one person the same as two, you're aren't doing that, and that's a grave disrespect to the people you aren't valuing equally.

My conscience drives me to treat people equally.


Read "Small Gods" by Terry Pratchett.