Aller au contenu

Photo

Archers should have their own class.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
75 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Rapidiul

Rapidiul
  • Members
  • 698 messages
Because it's unfair such magnificent style doesn't have their own class. Thay should have more bonuses (by gear/enchantment), etc.

Discuss.

Modifié par Rapidiul, 30 juillet 2010 - 09:53 .


#2
Saibh

Saibh
  • Members
  • 8 071 messages
...



...



I...



You're trolling, right?

#3
UndercoverDoctor

UndercoverDoctor
  • Members
  • 1 294 messages

Saibh wrote...

...

...

I...

You're trolling, right?

Your troll sensing skills are terrible.

#4
SDNcN

SDNcN
  • Members
  • 1 181 messages

Rapidiul wrote...

Because it's unfair such magnificent style doesn't have their own class. Thay should have more bonuses (by gear/enchantment), etc.

Discuss.


I don't really see how an archer is divorced enough from the warrior and rogue base classes that it couldn't fit under either one as a weapon style. Maybe an archery focused specialization would work?

#5
Rubbish Hero

Rubbish Hero
  • Members
  • 2 830 messages
I always liked that thing Legolas does when he stabs an orc with his arrow via a  melee attack, they should really steal that.

Modifié par Rubbish Hero, 30 juillet 2010 - 10:05 .


#6
Arttis

Arttis
  • Members
  • 4 098 messages
I agree Archers should be their own class.That specialize in archery skills.

They should have access to half of the DW skills in-exchange for their extra archery skills.

Warriors Will have a bonus to melee.

Rogue will have a bonus to DW.

Mages will be mages.

#7
UndercoverDoctor

UndercoverDoctor
  • Members
  • 1 294 messages

Rubbish Hero wrote...

I always liked that thing Legolas does when he stabs an orc with his arrow via a  melee attack, they should really steal that.

Blessing swords too, right? derp.

#8
Rubbish Hero

Rubbish Hero
  • Members
  • 2 830 messages

UndercoverDoctor wrote...

Rubbish Hero wrote...

I always liked that thing Legolas does when he stabs an orc with his arrow via a  melee attack, they should really steal that.

Blessing swords too, right? derp.


Why you attempt to belittle me for having super idea?
What have you done for society lately beyond spreading soul destroying narcissism?

#9
Arttis

Arttis
  • Members
  • 4 098 messages
I believe stabbing with an arrow should be a finisher for archers killing someone close up.

#10
UndercoverDoctor

UndercoverDoctor
  • Members
  • 1 294 messages

Rubbish Hero wrote...

UndercoverDoctor wrote...

Rubbish Hero wrote...

I always liked that thing Legolas does when he stabs an orc with his arrow via a  melee attack, they should really steal that.

Blessing swords too, right? derp.


Why you attempt to belittle me for having super idea?
What have you done for society lately beyond spreading soul destroying narcissism?


Stealing ideas isn't something I would be proud of.

#11
Arttis

Arttis
  • Members
  • 4 098 messages
WHy not?

#12
Rubbish Hero

Rubbish Hero
  • Members
  • 2 830 messages

UndercoverDoctor wrote...

Rubbish Hero wrote...

UndercoverDoctor wrote...

Rubbish Hero wrote...

I always liked that thing Legolas does when he stabs an orc with his arrow via a melee attack, they should really steal that.

Blessing swords too, right? derp.


Why you attempt to belittle me for having super idea?
What have you done for society lately beyond spreading soul destroying narcissism?


Stealing ideas isn't something I would be proud of.


You were not proud when you learned to ride a bike, walk, speak English and cook?
All these are idea's passed on. Stab arrow in face like ride bike.

Modifié par Rubbish Hero, 30 juillet 2010 - 10:19 .


#13
AllThatJazz

AllThatJazz
  • Members
  • 2 758 messages

Rubbish Hero wrote...

I always liked that thing Legolas does when he stabs an orc with his arrow via a  melee attack, they should really steal that.


I think that's a good idea, being able to stab with arrows or clobber with bows. Wouldn't do as much damage as melee, obviously, but it can't always technically be possible to draw a bow at point blank range, and stabbing in the eye with an arrow would be a nice variation on just pulling out a dagger. Technically difficult to implement, though.



And, yes, it might be derivative, but these days, what isn't? :whistle:

On the topic subject, though, er, I can't see there being enough archery related skills for its own main class. Think a specialisation is just fine, personally.

Modifié par AllThatJazz, 30 juillet 2010 - 10:41 .


#14
Arttis

Arttis
  • Members
  • 4 098 messages
Be proud to accomplish and create but do not be proud of stealing an idea.

#15
Saibh

Saibh
  • Members
  • 8 071 messages

UndercoverDoctor wrote...

Saibh wrote...

...

...

I...

You're trolling, right?

Your troll sensing skills are terrible.


I know. I can't help it. It's a good thing, dammit, I believe in the inherent honesty of people! Not exactly a smart thing, but a good thing.

#16
Bobad

Bobad
  • Members
  • 2 946 messages
I really like this idea but think it would work better as a specialization.

#17
Rapidiul

Rapidiul
  • Members
  • 698 messages
I think it just doesn't make sense, neither warriors or rogues should have archery skills.

A speacialization would be good, too, but I think Bioware should show some love to archers :(

#18
_purifico_

_purifico_
  • Members
  • 306 messages
Well, maybe not another class, but I would really love some archer specialization (maybe not in DA2 but in some new add-on if we'll be having one), because in dao you had nothing to chose from if you went this way. Basicly you had to chose a specialization based on the initial bonus it gave, not on the talents it provided.

#19
AntiChri5

AntiChri5
  • Members
  • 7 965 messages
A full class?



Seriously?

#20
Arttis

Arttis
  • Members
  • 4 098 messages

AntiChri5 wrote...

A full class?

Seriously?

Yes seriously.

#21
Vaeliorin

Vaeliorin
  • Members
  • 1 170 messages

_purifico_ wrote...
Well, maybe not another class, but I would really love some archer specialization (maybe not in DA2 but in some new add-on if we'll be having one), because in dao you had nothing to chose from if you went this way. Basicly you had to chose a specialization based on the initial bonus it gave, not on the talents it provided.

That's not entirely true.  Warriors got some nice bonuses from Champion (+attack/defense and an AoE knockdown are useful) and Spirit Warrior (for 2000+ crits :devil:).  Templar wasn't bad either, really (as it gave additional ranged abilities, including, of course, a stun.)  Rogue had Duelist (+attack/defense and the auto-crit could be applied to bows if you switched weapons, activated it, then switched back to a bow) and Bard (Bard was good for anyone, really.)  Ranger and Legion Scout also had useful bonuses for archers.

That's not to say I wouldn't like to see some more archer specific specializations (I really would) but it's not as if none of the specializations in DA were any good for an archer.

#22
GodWood

GodWood
  • Members
  • 7 954 messages

AntiChri5 wrote...

A full class?

Seriously?

Why is this such a tabboo topic?

#23
Arttis

Arttis
  • Members
  • 4 098 messages
I think we should have an staple archer specialization.Hopefully we can get 2 extra for more general specs.Still have choice and archery love.

#24
SirOccam

SirOccam
  • Members
  • 2 645 messages
I wouldn't go so far as to say a brand new class, but it would be nice if specializations meant more than a couple additional abilities.

#25
obnoxiousgas

obnoxiousgas
  • Members
  • 482 messages
Um, I'm not quite sure about archers having their own class, especially when there are points in the game that you're encouraged to have ranged weapons, but maybe a specialisation focused entirely on archery skills so people can develop it a bit more?