The Witcher -> Dragon Age II
#976
Posté 22 août 2010 - 09:56
#977
Posté 22 août 2010 - 09:57
RageGT wrote...
AndrahilAdrian wrote...
I'm not saying the witcher series doesn't have a kickass story. However, DA2 will probably have one as well (Bioware only failed once), and DA2 also has party based tactical gameplay, which the witcher lacks.
Failed Once? And yet that is their best ever game delivered ever? Have you tried any of the amazing worlds created or adapted from literature to such "one time fail"? The OC was just like a demo of what could be done..
http://nwn.wikia.com...gory:Gameworlds
From
what I can remember, (besides maybe the Mass Effect series) Bioware has just
been rehashing the same story outline for many years now. Gaiders writing is
looked upon on these forums like he's some hero when in reality, Dragon Age is
pretty vanilla when it comes to a narrative based on Mages, Dwarves, and Elves.
Everything is just kind of bland, and not very unique. Even the novel Gaider
wrote was complete trash. Actually, Reviewer Crowshaw explains the tiredness of
the story better than I can. Copy/paste Link below...
http://www.escapistm...gon-Age-Origins
That being said, I do hope DA2 does turn out well. (Even
though, judging by the previews, graphics, and gameplay its looking less likely) Good RPG's are few and far between,
I guess we'll just wait and see.
Modifié par MintyCool, 22 août 2010 - 10:00 .
#978
Posté 22 août 2010 - 10:08
But do any of those user created stories match the epicness of mass effect or Dragon Age? I get that NWN was great value for money, and it had fun multiplayer for people into D&D, but in terms of quality I found it severely lacking. In short, Neverwinter Nights blew. :innocent:RageGT wrote...
AndrahilAdrian wrote...
I'm not saying the witcher series doesn't have a kickass story. However, DA2 will probably have one as well (Bioware only failed once), and DA2 also has party based tactical gameplay, which the witcher lacks.
Failed Once? And yet that is their best ever game delivered ever? Have you tried any of the amazing worlds created or adapted from literature to such "one time fail"? The OC was just like a demo of what could be done..
http://nwn.wikia.com...gory:Gameworlds
Thanks for the link though, I appreciate the thought.
Modifié par AndrahilAdrian, 22 août 2010 - 10:09 .
#979
Posté 22 août 2010 - 10:11
This is the DA2 forum so i think enough has been said about the witcher.
#980
Posté 22 août 2010 - 10:21
AndrahilAdrian wrote...
But do any of those user created stories match the epicness of mass effect or Dragon Age? I get that NWN was great value for money, and it had fun multiplayer for people into D&D, but in terms of quality I found it severely lacking. In short, Neverwinter Nights blew. :innocent:RageGT wrote...
AndrahilAdrian wrote...
I'm not saying the witcher series doesn't have a kickass story. However, DA2 will probably have one as well (Bioware only failed once), and DA2 also has party based tactical gameplay, which the witcher lacks.
Failed Once? And yet that is their best ever game delivered ever? Have you tried any of the amazing worlds created or adapted from literature to such "one time fail"? The OC was just like a demo of what could be done..
http://nwn.wikia.com...gory:Gameworlds
Thanks for the link though, I appreciate the thought.
Well, there are always the well established epic stories that some PW used as background. LotR, Zelda, Ultima, etc.
And a DM'ed event in a LotR hardcore roleplay PW could really make many of us go very emotional. Like doing a courier mission for the Captain of Gondor or being summoned by the Lady of the Galadhrim (particularly when you're an Elf born in Caras Galadhon, like my RageBow) to be assigned a misson deep inside Mordor.
But nothing will ever beat the fight against Sauron inside the forge of Orodruin when a slaying evil arrow of mine hit the damn thing and he rolled a 1 in his save roll and poof! I would pay anything to see the face of the DM controlling him! Of course he was mad. Next day those arrows were banned from the server! =)
"Nei Ragebow Elvenwyn, taruro lestad ar Elrondur! Auta enna i leo, Saurondur!"
Modifié par RageGT, 22 août 2010 - 10:22 .
#981
Posté 22 août 2010 - 10:27
fchopin wrote...
In my opinion if you people want to talk about the witcher you should go to the witcher forums.
This is the DA2 forum so i think enough has been said about the witcher.
You're loco! Have you any idea how much DA:O I've discussed in Risen or Gothic forums? Usually defending it against lame fanatism.
And this thread is to discuss good stuff of TW that might suit a game like DA2. So if you have nothing to add... and believe me, we do talk about the Witcher in the Witcher forums.
#982
Posté 22 août 2010 - 10:40
MintyCool wrote...
From
what I can remember, (besides maybe the Mass Effect series) Bioware has just
been rehashing the same story outline for many years now. Gaiders writing is
looked upon on these forums like he's some hero when in reality, Dragon Age is
pretty vanilla when it comes to a narrative based on Mages, Dwarves, and Elves.
Everything is just kind of bland, and not very unique. Even the novel Gaider
wrote was complete trash. Actually, Reviewer Crowshaw explains the tiredness of
the story better than I can. Copy/paste Link below...
http://www.escapistm...gon-Age-Origins
Well, that Zero Punctuation guy does not only talk way too much but also really says NOTHING. Let me summarize his "review":
It´s just the plain old prejudice against gamers... He probably didn´t even PLAY DAO before spewing that bullsh!t.DAO is a fantasy game. If you´re a nerd without friends you´ll like it. Otherwise you should have sex instead.
And yes, the story of DAO IS rather bland... But the dialogue is great, and so are Gaider´s novels, which were actually better than some of the "great Fantasy Bestsellers" that are thrown on the market about monthly.
#983
Posté 22 août 2010 - 10:49
Tirigon wrote...
MintyCool wrote...
From
what I can remember, (besides maybe the Mass Effect series) Bioware has just
been rehashing the same story outline for many years now. Gaiders writing is
looked upon on these forums like he's some hero when in reality, Dragon Age is
pretty vanilla when it comes to a narrative based on Mages, Dwarves, and Elves.
Everything is just kind of bland, and not very unique. Even the novel Gaider
wrote was complete trash. Actually, Reviewer Crowshaw explains the tiredness of
the story better than I can. Copy/paste Link below...
http://www.escapistm...gon-Age-Origins
Well, that Zero Punctuation guy does not only talk way too much but also really says NOTHING. Let me summarize his "review":It´s just the plain old prejudice against gamers... He probably didn´t even PLAY DAO before spewing that bullsh!t.DAO is a fantasy game. If you´re a nerd without friends you´ll like it. Otherwise you should have sex instead.
And yes, the story of DAO IS rather bland... But the dialogue is great, and so are Gaider´s novels, which were actually better than some of the "great Fantasy Bestsellers" that are thrown on the market about monthly.
OK so the darkspawn were generic orcs. And the Morrigan ending sucked. But that doesn't mean the whole story was bland. I found the relationship between the chantry and the circle interesting, and the "elves as second class citizens" concept was a nice skewer of the holier-than-thou elves normally found in Tolkien derivatives. But what really made the story for me was Loghain and his motivations, the romantic subplots (there, I said it), and the bittersweet ending. Dragon Age had more going for it than just good writing.
#984
Guest_slimgrin_*
Posté 22 août 2010 - 11:37
Guest_slimgrin_*
fchopin wrote...
In my opinion if you people want to talk about the witcher you should go to the witcher forums.
This is the DA2 forum so i think enough has been said about the witcher.
Bioware has nothing to fear from CD Projekt red. They are the senior developer, and have been gracious enough thus far because I think they are confident in their abilities. CD Projekt and Bioware are among the few RPG devs left making story-based games. Let this thread be.
#985
Posté 23 août 2010 - 12:05
Ditto. Sadly, DA2 was the must buy for me. But as I hve learned about both games TW2 is a definite pre-order and DA2 is meh, wait and see.RageGT wrote...
Exactly! But TW2 I'm getting as soon as I can. DA2 I'll have to try first.
#986
Posté 23 août 2010 - 12:17
You obviously have not had much exposure to other fanasy writings. TW had literally everything that you just mentioned years before DAO. Now, I liked both games, but originality was not DAO's strong suit (and that was OK with me. I enjoyed the familiarity of the game).AndrahilAdrian wrote...
OK so the darkspawn were generic orcs. And the Morrigan ending sucked. But that doesn't mean the whole story was bland. I found the relationship between the chantry and the circle interesting, and the "elves as second class citizens" concept was a nice skewer of the holier-than-thou elves normally found in Tolkien derivatives. But what really made the story for me was Loghain and his motivations, the romantic subplots (there, I said it), and the bittersweet ending. Dragon Age had more going for it than just good writing.
Modifié par Zanderat, 23 août 2010 - 12:18 .
#987
Posté 23 août 2010 - 12:27
slimgrin wrote...
Bioware has nothing to fear from CD Projekt red. They are the senior developer, and have been gracious enough thus far because I think they are confident in their abilities. CD Projekt and Bioware are among the few RPG devs left making story-based games. Let this thread be.
As you wish.
#988
Posté 23 août 2010 - 12:29
Zanderat wrote...
You obviously have not had much exposure to other fanasy writings. TW had literally everything that you just mentioned years before DAO. Now, I liked both games, but originality was not DAO's strong suit (and that was OK with me. I enjoyed the familiarity of the game).AndrahilAdrian wrote...
OK so the darkspawn were generic orcs. And the Morrigan ending sucked. But that doesn't mean the whole story was bland. I found the relationship between the chantry and the circle interesting, and the "elves as second class citizens" concept was a nice skewer of the holier-than-thou elves normally found in Tolkien derivatives. But what really made the story for me was Loghain and his motivations, the romantic subplots (there, I said it), and the bittersweet ending. Dragon Age had more going for it than just good writing.
I'm not saying those ideas haven't been used before, just that they're not as overused as some other fantasy concepts. Dragon Age wasn't trying to reimagine the fantasy genre, but that doesn't make it bland. But your'e right, the witcher had a more interesting setting. However, Dragon Age's vastly superior writing, gameplay, characters, voice acting, and all-round production value make it the better game in my book.
#989
Posté 23 août 2010 - 12:43
Hmm. "Vastly superior writing, gameplay, characters, voice acting, and all-round production value"? I think not.AndrahilAdrian wrote...
Zanderat wrote...
You obviously have not had much exposure to other fanasy writings. TW had literally everything that you just mentioned years before DAO. Now, I liked both games, but originality was not DAO's strong suit (and that was OK with me. I enjoyed the familiarity of the game).AndrahilAdrian wrote...
OK so the darkspawn were generic orcs. And the Morrigan ending sucked. But that doesn't mean the whole story was bland. I found the relationship between the chantry and the circle interesting, and the "elves as second class citizens" concept was a nice skewer of the holier-than-thou elves normally found in Tolkien derivatives. But what really made the story for me was Loghain and his motivations, the romantic subplots (there, I said it), and the bittersweet ending. Dragon Age had more going for it than just good writing.
I'm not saying those ideas haven't been used before, just that they're not as overused as some other fantasy concepts. Dragon Age wasn't trying to reimagine the fantasy genre, but that doesn't make it bland. But your'e right, the witcher had a more interesting setting. However, Dragon Age's vastly superior writing, gameplay, characters, voice acting, and all-round production value make it the better game in my book.
TW had some bugs on intitial launch. The devs, to their credit, kept at it and The Enhanced Edition of TW is easily as polished as DAO.
#990
Posté 23 août 2010 - 12:51
#991
Posté 23 août 2010 - 12:53
/shrugs
#992
Posté 23 août 2010 - 12:58
Zanderat wrote...
Hmm. "Vastly superior writing, gameplay, characters, voice acting, and all-round production value"? I think not.AndrahilAdrian wrote...
Zanderat wrote...
You obviously have not had much exposure to other fanasy writings. TW had literally everything that you just mentioned years before DAO. Now, I liked both games, but originality was not DAO's strong suit (and that was OK with me. I enjoyed the familiarity of the game).AndrahilAdrian wrote...
OK so the darkspawn were generic orcs. And the Morrigan ending sucked. But that doesn't mean the whole story was bland. I found the relationship between the chantry and the circle interesting, and the "elves as second class citizens" concept was a nice skewer of the holier-than-thou elves normally found in Tolkien derivatives. But what really made the story for me was Loghain and his motivations, the romantic subplots (there, I said it), and the bittersweet ending. Dragon Age had more going for it than just good writing.
I'm not saying those ideas haven't been used before, just that they're not as overused as some other fantasy concepts. Dragon Age wasn't trying to reimagine the fantasy genre, but that doesn't make it bland. But your'e right, the witcher had a more interesting setting. However, Dragon Age's vastly superior writing, gameplay, characters, voice acting, and all-round production value make it the better game in my book.
TW had some bugs on intitial launch. The devs, to their credit, kept at it and The Enhanced Edition of TW is easily as polished as DAO.
vastly superior writing : Gotta go with The Witcher having played both games completely and read books available for both products.
gameplay : Again, The Witcher wins. DA:O was good and the tactics made the group game much better but still wasnt what it could or should be
characters: The Witcher had more interesting characters other then Morrigan. Problem with DA:O characters is they were watered down for Teens rather then living up to their Mature rating for complexidy
voice acting : DA:O wins this (at least refering to english versions). Leliannas song still is a amazing part of DA:O and sounded so good compared to Dandelions horrid singing
all-round production value: The Witcher wins hands down. Day night, weather, better graphics (even though Witcher using a much outdated engine), stronger story (as mentioned), really not a issue!
I loved DA:O btw and was hoping DA2 would be the logical and physical updated version of DA:O rather then what it sounds like we getting. DA:O just doesnt realistically compare to The Witcher (if you played both games completely through). Both had areas that got tedious but The Witcher had by far less moments like that and the streonger story with greater surprises.
#993
Posté 23 août 2010 - 01:13
Kalfear wrote...
characters: The Witcher had more interesting characters other then Morrigan. Problem with DA:O characters is they were watered down for Teens rather then living up to their Mature rating for complexidy
I don't know why Morrigan gets so much praise. She is basically a human version of the Drow Viconia from the Baldur's Gate Series, except you can't influence her in any way. And her dark ritual was a stupid, tacked on twist added right after a perfectly good twist. However, although DA's characters were hardly Tolstoy-worthy, they are the best seen in a video game to date.
Modifié par AndrahilAdrian, 23 août 2010 - 01:20 .
#994
Posté 23 août 2010 - 01:17
For me, it was the way she was voiced.AndrahilAdrian wrote...
Kalfear wrote...
characters: The Witcher had more interesting characters other then Morrigan. Problem with DA:O characters is they were watered down for Teens rather then living up to their Mature rating for complexidy
I don't know why Morrigan gets so much praise. She is basically a human version of the Drow Viconia from the Baldur's Gate Series.
Modifié par Zanderat, 23 août 2010 - 01:17 .
#995
Posté 23 août 2010 - 01:22
I'll give you that one. Although "tis" quickly bugged meZanderat wrote...
For me, it was the way she was voiced.AndrahilAdrian wrote...
I don't know why Morrigan gets so much praise. She is basically a human version of the Drow Viconia from the Baldur's Gate Series.<3
Modifié par AndrahilAdrian, 23 août 2010 - 01:23 .
#996
Posté 23 août 2010 - 01:25
#997
Posté 23 août 2010 - 02:26
NovenseiWarden wrote...
I have to say this thread has gotten me interested in TW2, but it's looking a bit like a button masher (for the combat at least). Usually, this would make me support Bioware more, but when DA2 looks like it's going down the same path... I'll just wait for a gameplay video I guess...
check out the 2 interveiws linked in my signature
TW2 not a button masher unless you want it to be.
CDRed has stated clearly for all to hear, this is a RPG first and formost and options to vary the combat to the players own desire. So yes it can be a button masher at high difficulty or you can play exactly like you did in TW1 on the lower difficulties, your choice completely.
#998
Posté 23 août 2010 - 06:27
#999
Posté 23 août 2010 - 07:37
Right!Cyberfrog81 wrote...
If one sees DA2 as an unavoidable epic fail and Witcher 2 as the second coming... Yeah, that seems odd to me. I still think there is a great chance that both will be awesome. BioWare knows what they are doing - they will probably again deliver a great story with awesome characters. CD Projekt RED have a lot less experience, but on the other hand they have a huge amount of talent, ambition and enthusiasm, and have developed an RPG engine to be perfect for creating the worlds they want to create and telling the stories they want to tell.And obviously we want both games to be awesome, so that there's more RPG goodness for us. Right?
It is an interesting duel. I'm certainly not going to announce the winner just yet.
I cant say its a duel, both games are being made to cater to the same public (with DA2 slightly wider) but I dont think that marketspace/audience isn't big enought for both of them. Personally I want to check out both, and wish them well. Although I'm more intersted in TW2 but that is basically subjective, and tend to change and shift depending on gamers tastes.
I like Geralt, an exceptional character if you ask me, but there are those that simply hate the concept. On the other hand I just can spend hours creating characters! So you can bet all your money MY Hawke wont look like the default one
Witchers amulet could originally detect traces of magic, unnatural phenomena, warn from danger, shield from minor magic effects and so on. I didnt play Batman AA (alcoholic anonymous?), so I dont see the similarities but I can tell you that I dont find it off when I see the medallion effect
Boxing: I like it. Hope its non-obligatory to enter the "ring" and can be done quickly with normal view (like the first guard in the video).
Everything else I see is just great and like an addiction thats craving too soothe its hunger.
Speaking of writing and such..you do know that that putting elves (all high and mighty enigmatic creatures) in the gutter was first done in TW? The world painted all gray, cynical and egoistic with cruelty on top.So far from heroic and high fantasy standards. That is refreshing.
2011 cant come quick enough.
Modifié par hangmans tree, 23 août 2010 - 07:43 .
#1000
Posté 25 août 2010 - 07:36




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




