Aller au contenu

Photo

The Witcher -> Dragon Age II


1507 réponses à ce sujet

#1476
hangmans tree

hangmans tree
  • Members
  • 2 207 messages

ErichHartmann wrote...

Diablo III will crush both games combined in sales.

I've seen this comment already...are you a bot by any chance? =]

#1477
SirShreK

SirShreK
  • Members
  • 855 messages

hangmans tree wrote...

ErichHartmann wrote...

Diablo III will crush both games combined in sales.

I've seen this comment already...are you a bot by any chance? =]


Does not change the possibility that it may be right.

#1478
ErichHartmann

ErichHartmann
  • Members
  • 4 440 messages

hangmans tree wrote...

ErichHartmann wrote...

Diablo III will crush both games combined in sales.

I've seen this comment already...are you a bot by any chance? =]


Nope, just pointing out which one will be king of the hill.  I'm going to buy all 3 myself.   

#1479
Guest_slimgrin_*

Guest_slimgrin_*
  • Guests

ErichHartmann wrote...

Diablo III will crush both games combined in sales.


This is true. If there is any 'king of the hill' from a sales standpoint, it's Blizzard. I don't care how many people badmouth the Diablo games, they had an enormous impact on the genre.

I'll probably be buying all 3 as well

#1480
DarthCaine

DarthCaine
  • Members
  • 7 175 messages

ErichHartmann wrote...

Diablo III will crush both games combined in sales.

In sales? No doubt.
I personaly loathe hack n slash games. I find them boring, repetative and with barely a story

#1481
Guest_slimgrin_*

Guest_slimgrin_*
  • Guests

DarthCaine wrote...

ErichHartmann wrote...

Diablo III will crush both games combined in sales.

In sales? No doubt.
I personaly loathe hack n slash games. I find them boring, repetative and with barely a story


Look into Divine Divinity. It's Diablo with a soul. 

#1482
Guest_vilnii_*

Guest_vilnii_*
  • Guests
Diablo looks very similar to Torchlight...the DA franchise has a lot more story and lore going for it than those two combined

#1483
EEmotion

EEmotion
  • Members
  • 28 messages
i found the witcher awful the combat system was just.... awful... and since you in combat 1/4 of the game probably i gave up after 2hours...

#1484
Obadiah

Obadiah
  • Members
  • 5 719 messages

Beerfish wrote...

I wish I could have given the Witcher
the chance that it deserves but the combat mechanics were so totally
horrendous for me I just have never gotten far after about 3 do over
attempts.

EEmotion wrote...

i found the witcher awful the combat system was just.... awful... and since you in combat 1/4 of the game probably i gave up after 2hours...

Yup, same here. The voice acting and setting (I have the enhanced version) was awesome (really REALLY loved that first run down castle you start off in), but the combat was just terrible. Hmm, now that I have finished my DA:O playthrough, I think I will give it another shot.

#1485
SirShreK

SirShreK
  • Members
  • 855 messages

vilnii wrote...

Diablo looks very similar to Torchlight...the DA franchise has a lot more story and lore going for it than those two combined


(My meaningful and deep The Good, The Bad and The Ugly reprise).

There are two kinds of people my friend. Those who play games for only one of its aspect or those play games.

You do it for lore. I do it for lore and gameplay. So I distribute points in both. I thought that the gameplay in DA:O was broken and crap. Lore was excellent though. But that's MY personal opinion.

#1486
Guest_slimgrin_*

Guest_slimgrin_*
  • Guests

EEmotion wrote...

i found the witcher awful the combat system was just.... awful... and since you in combat 1/4 of the game probably i gave up after 2hours...


Combat gets more interesting later in the game once you have leveled up and have powerful signs to compliment sword strikes.

Unfortunately, it takes much longer than two hours to really experience anything The Witcher has to offer. Whereas DA gets off to a running start, the Witcher simmers for several hours then things take off when you get into Vizima. 

Still, combat is admittedly not the strong point of the game. Thats why they're totally changing it for the sequel.

#1487
SirShreK

SirShreK
  • Members
  • 855 messages

slimgrin wrote...

EEmotion wrote...

i found the witcher awful the combat system was just.... awful... and since you in combat 1/4 of the game probably i gave up after 2hours...


Combat gets more interesting later in the game once you have leveled up and have powerful signs to compliment sword strikes.

Unfortunately, it takes much longer than two hours to really experience anything The Witcher has to offer. Whereas DA gets off to a running start, the Witcher simmers for several hours then things take off when you get into Vizima. 

Still, combat is admittedly not the strong point of the game. Thats why they're totally changing it for the sequel.


The way to go for Witcher is to level up AArd pretty quickly. It makes you nearly invinsible earlier on and makes combat interesting later. **Even at hardest difficulty.**

#1488
Pedrak

Pedrak
  • Members
  • 1 050 messages

vilnii wrote...

CD Projekt Red is truly putting up a challenge to Bioware in the RPG world.


I wouldn't go that far. Image IPB CD Projekt made one very good CRPG. BioWare made, how many? 7-8, not counting the expansions? I agree that TW was a promising start and that TW2 is looking great, but hey, only time will tell if they'll be able to achieve what Bio has achieved.

Modifié par Pedrak, 19 septembre 2010 - 05:07 .


#1489
DarthCaine

DarthCaine
  • Members
  • 7 175 messages

Pedrak wrote...

vilnii wrote...

CD Projekt Red is truly putting up a challenge to Bioware in the RPG world.


I wouldn't go that far. Image IPB CD Projekt made one very good CRPG. BioWare made, how many? 7-8, not counting the expansions? I agree that TW was a promising start and that TW2 is looking great, but hey, only time will tell if they'll be able to achieve what Bio has achieved.

One very good RPG that's better than most BioWare games (except KOTOR and ME2). CD Projekt RED are a much smaller studio and made their first game in 2007, while BioWare made their first RPG in 1998

Modifié par DarthCaine, 19 septembre 2010 - 05:23 .


#1490
Faz432

Faz432
  • Members
  • 429 messages

EEmotion wrote...

i found the witcher awful the combat system was just.... awful... and since you in combat 1/4 of the game probably i gave up after 2hours...


You gave up after 2 hours??? omfg!!

I've just got into Vizima now and I can say hands down this game has the potential to be the best RPG I've ever played!

Modifié par Faz432, 19 septembre 2010 - 05:50 .


#1491
Rzepik2

Rzepik2
  • Members
  • 467 messages

DarthCaine wrote...

Pedrak wrote...

vilnii wrote...

CD Projekt Red is truly putting up a challenge to Bioware in the RPG world.


I wouldn't go that far. Image IPB CD Projekt made one very good CRPG. BioWare made, how many? 7-8, not counting the expansions? I agree that TW was a promising start and that TW2 is looking great, but hey, only time will tell if they'll be able to achieve what Bio has achieved.

One very good RPG that's better than most BioWare games (except KOTOR and ME2). CD Projekt RED are a much smaller studio and made their first game in 2007, while BioWare made their first RPG in 1998

No extremely subjective opinions, please? It's not good for the discussion. (KOTOR sucks, BG2 4evar!)

Anyway, if CD Projekt Red will become a serious competitor for Bioware... oh boy, it can be a true rebirth for cRPGs. Nothing better for evolution than good rivalry.

I'm not a big fan of TW1 but I must admit - they definitely have potential and a lot of new ideas.

Modifié par Rzepik2, 19 septembre 2010 - 06:06 .


#1492
Wyndham711

Wyndham711
  • Members
  • 467 messages
No doubt a great year coming for PC RPG-fans. Huge titles like Dragon Age 2, Witcher 2, Guild Wars 2, The Old Republic and Diablo 3 (possibly/probably). In addition there are some smaller, more uncertain titles like Torchlight 2, Dungeon Siege 3 and the new Neverwinter game.

And to the ones bashing Diablo 3, based on everything I know of it, it's going to have a much stronger focus on story and characters than the predecessors had, and discounting that it's still a very unorthodox fantasy setting which is something worth supporting.

#1493
SirShreK

SirShreK
  • Members
  • 855 messages

Wyndham711 wrote...

 the new Neverwinter game.


.



WHAT!!!!!!!!???????????????????? 

#1494
Guest_vilnii_*

Guest_vilnii_*
  • Guests

SirShreK wrote...

Wyndham711 wrote...

 the new Neverwinter game.


.



WHAT!!!!!!!!???????????????????? 



@Sis for your reading pleasure

http://pc.ign.com/ar.../1119900p1.html

#1495
SirShreK

SirShreK
  • Members
  • 855 messages

vilnii wrote...

SirShreK wrote...

Wyndham711 wrote...

 the new Neverwinter game.


.



WHAT!!!!!!!!???????????????????? 



@Sis for your reading pleasure

http://pc.ign.com/ar.../1119900p1.html

Its an MMO. I think I am going to vomit. :sick:

#1496
Rzepik2

Rzepik2
  • Members
  • 467 messages

SirShreK wrote...

vilnii wrote...

SirShreK wrote...

Wyndham711 wrote...

 the new Neverwinter game.


.



WHAT!!!!!!!!???????????????????? 



@Sis for your reading pleasure

http://pc.ign.com/ar.../1119900p1.html

Its an MMO. I think I am going to vomit. :sick:

Rather some kind of MMO-ish co-op.
Nothing new for the series :P The very first Neverwinter was an MMO.

Modifié par Rzepik2, 19 septembre 2010 - 06:48 .


#1497
saruman31

saruman31
  • Members
  • 161 messages

SirShreK wrote...

hangmans tree wrote...

ErichHartmann wrote...

Diablo III will crush both games combined in sales.

I've seen this comment already...are you a bot by any chance? =]


Does not change the possibility that it may be right.


Guildwars2 will outsell Diablo3.

#1498
saruman31

saruman31
  • Members
  • 161 messages

Wyndham711 wrote...

No doubt a great year coming for PC RPG-fans. Huge titles like Dragon Age 2, Witcher 2, Guild Wars 2, The Old Republic and Diablo 3 (possibly/probably). In addition there are some smaller, more uncertain titles like Torchlight 2, Dungeon Siege 3 and the new Neverwinter game.
And to the ones bashing Diablo 3, based on everything I know of it, it's going to have a much stronger focus on story and characters than the predecessors had, and discounting that it's still a very unorthodox fantasy setting which is something worth supporting.

Yes but i sincerely hope that D3 won`t be a huge disappointment like sc2 was. You just cant add 4 more pixels per unit and call it a new game worthy of 2010.

#1499
SirShreK

SirShreK
  • Members
  • 855 messages

saruman31 wrote...

Yes but i sincerely hope that D3 won`t be a huge disappointment like sc2 was. You just cant add 4 more pixels per unit and call it a new game worthy of 2010.


Are you sure that's what all they did? Or its just a "I hate the game hence its bad" campaign like I do?

#1500
ErichHartmann

ErichHartmann
  • Members
  • 4 440 messages

saruman31 wrote...

SirShreK wrote...

hangmans tree wrote...

ErichHartmann wrote...

Diablo III will crush both games combined in sales.

I've seen this comment already...are you a bot by any chance? =]


Does not change the possibility that it may be right.


Guildwars2 will outsell Diablo3.


Maybe, if ArenaNet can deliver what they are promising.  Plus they have the added pressure of being an online game and all the potential nightmares that go along with that.  Diablo III's Achilles heel is how die hard fans of the series will react.  I don't see that being a major issue though.