captain.subtle wrote...
Slightly off topic:
Have you read "Hitch-hiker's Guide to the Galaxy"?
Yes I have mad nerd cred.
captain.subtle wrote...
Slightly off topic:
Have you read "Hitch-hiker's Guide to the Galaxy"?
Anarya wrote...
Herr Uhl wrote...
Anarya wrote...
Anyway it seems like their efficiency would be a handicap to innovation since a lot of advances come from having to solve problems. Kind of like how evolution could not happen without genetic anomalies.
I don't think that their scientists cover the areas of confections, and that hasn't brought that much innovation to the human race either.
Well, if they plan ahead that well in their cooking I'm sure their efficiency extends to all other aspects of Qunari life. The cookie thing is just an illustration of the state of their society on the whole. I'm a big believer in the value of chance and imperfection as a driving force of innovation. Apparently "the Maker" is too or he wouldn't have made mortals to entertain him, lol.
Herr Uhl wrote...
Anarya wrote...
Herr Uhl wrote...
Anarya wrote...
Anyway it seems like their efficiency would be a handicap to innovation since a lot of advances come from having to solve problems. Kind of like how evolution could not happen without genetic anomalies.
I don't think that their scientists cover the areas of confections, and that hasn't brought that much innovation to the human race either.
Well, if they plan ahead that well in their cooking I'm sure their efficiency extends to all other aspects of Qunari life. The cookie thing is just an illustration of the state of their society on the whole. I'm a big believer in the value of chance and imperfection as a driving force of innovation. Apparently "the Maker" is too or he wouldn't have made mortals to entertain him, lol.
They improve their methods to be more efficient through mistakes. Being efficient does not mean that they aren't trying to improve. How many groundbreaking discoveries have been due to inefficiency except for Penicillin though?
Or maybe all that about the scientific method that our present society is built around was BS? It's mostly due to mistakes, yes indeed.
Modifié par captain.subtle, 03 août 2010 - 10:22 .
Herr Uhl wrote...
Anarya wrote...
Herr Uhl wrote...
Anarya wrote...
Anyway it seems like their efficiency would be a handicap to innovation since a lot of advances come from having to solve problems. Kind of like how evolution could not happen without genetic anomalies.
I don't think that their scientists cover the areas of confections, and that hasn't brought that much innovation to the human race either.
Well, if they plan ahead that well in their cooking I'm sure their efficiency extends to all other aspects of Qunari life. The cookie thing is just an illustration of the state of their society on the whole. I'm a big believer in the value of chance and imperfection as a driving force of innovation. Apparently "the Maker" is too or he wouldn't have made mortals to entertain him, lol.
They improve their methods to be more efficient through mistakes. Being efficient does not mean that they aren't trying to improve. How many groundbreaking discoveries have been due to inefficiency except for Penicillin though?
Or maybe all that about the scientific method that our present society is built around was BS? It's mostly due to mistakes, yes indeed.
The same could be said about many forum postersAnarya wrote...
The rigidity of Qunari society extends to the mindset of its people. Just look how difficult it was for Sten to wrap his mind around new concepts (women warriors for instance).
Malanek999 wrote...
The same could be said about many forum postersAnarya wrote...
The rigidity of Qunari society extends to the mindset of its people. Just look how difficult it was for Sten to wrap his mind around new concepts (women warriors for instance).
But seriously, in real life how long did it take for women to get to vote? Let alone join the millitary. I don't think humans in real history are quite as adaptive or free thinking as you believe. It is true though that the people of Thedas are more free thinking than our historical counterparts, after all it is a game where some of our modern day values are carried in.
Modifié par Anarya, 03 août 2010 - 11:26 .
tmp7704 wrote...
Since their "private names" hold the information about parentage and such, and none of them would suddenly forget both that and what their assigned job was... no, not really.Legbiter wrote...
So in theory, you could royally mess up Qunari society if you destroyed a big cache of pedigree rolls?
Legbiter wrote...
tmp7704 wrote...
Since their "private names" hold the information about parentage and such, and none of them would suddenly forget both that and what their assigned job was... no, not really.Legbiter wrote...
So in theory, you could royally mess up Qunari society if you destroyed a big cache of pedigree rolls?
I disagree. All those carefully noted down generations of selective breeding and backcrossing to fix desirable traits lost...it would be chaos.![]()
Modifié par Anarya, 03 août 2010 - 11:28 .
Yes, pretty much that. Also, i think the whole notion of "generations of crossing etc" is putting too much weight on it -- at the end of the day it's still medieval society. For comparison, the basics of genetics weren't really researched in our world until Mendel's work in late 19th century. The qunari are more likely to be just pairing strong soldiers to get more of strong soldiers and such, and for that they only need to know who already has what task, and maybe who their parents were to avoid the most obvious risks of pairing very close relatives.Anarya wrote...
Legbiter wrote...
I disagree. All those carefully noted down generations of selective breeding and backcrossing to fix desirable traits lost...it would be chaos.![]()
I think what he was saying was the lineage information is probably not stored in scrolls but in the names themselves. So there would be no "database" to destroy unless you wiped out the entire Qunari people.
Guest_Puddi III_*
Modifié par filaminstrel, 04 août 2010 - 01:22 .
filaminstrel wrote...
So the first blight began in 395 ancient and lasted for a century, according to the timeline. The qunari showed up in the jungle islands of the Boeric Ocean around 6:30 Steel. If the calendar goes from 1 ancient to 1:01-1:99 Divine to 2:01-2:99 Glory to etc, that should be about a 920 year gap.
This is interesting because in the opening cinematic of DAO, Duncan says, "The dwarven kingdoms were the first to fall, and from the deep roads the darkspawn drove at us again and again until finally we neared annihilation..." Then it shows an ogre smashing his way through a barrier set up by the dwarves. "Until the Grey Wardens came." So there were ogres during the first blight.
All of the blights occurred somewhere on the continent of Thedas, as far as I'm aware, but if there were ogres during the first blight, before the qunari arrived on the continent of Thedas, does that mean there are darkspawn in the land they originally came from? Is that why they left it? It would have interesting implications regarding the origins and leadership of the darkspawn, if they afflicted a people who had nothing to do with the Magisters and if they could organize into a threat without an archdemon. Or maybe they did have archdemons on that continent? Maybe all of this "seven old gods" nonsense is just.. well, nonsense. Or incomplete.
Or perhaps ogres were simply present during the first blight because there happened to be small populations of qunari in Thedas already, not enough to constitute an arrival of a nation so much as an emigration from one.
Or perhaps there weren't ogres during the first blight at all, and the cinematic wasn't so much a portrayal of what happened as it was a portrayal of Duncan's story of what happened.
David Gaider wrote...
tez19 wrote...
mr. gaider if you please could clear up the following quote as i think it is an interesting point somebody made.
thanks in advance.
It's an interesting question. Where could they have gotten the qunari from, if there were no qunari in Thedas at the time?
Hmmm...
Guest_Puddi III_*
Guest_Capt. Obvious_*
filaminstrel wrote...
Hm, what a tease.
Malanek999 wrote...
The same could be said about many forum postersAnarya wrote...
The rigidity of Qunari society extends to the mindset of its people. Just look how difficult it was for Sten to wrap his mind around new concepts (women warriors for instance).
But seriously, in real life how long did it take for women to get to vote? Let alone join the millitary. I don't think humans in real history are quite as adaptive or free thinking as you believe. It is true though that the people of Thedas are more free thinking than our historical counterparts, after all it is a game where some of our modern day values are carried in.
Anarya wrote...
Malanek999 wrote...
The same could be said about many forum postersAnarya wrote...
The rigidity of Qunari society extends to the mindset of its people. Just look how difficult it was for Sten to wrap his mind around new concepts (women warriors for instance).
But seriously, in real life how long did it take for women to get to vote? Let alone join the millitary. I don't think humans in real history are quite as adaptive or free thinking as you believe. It is true though that the people of Thedas are more free thinking than our historical counterparts, after all it is a game where some of our modern day values are carried in.
Well again, I never said humans are paragons of free thought and equality but compared to the Qunari? Yes, they are much more free thinking. Qunari probably have them/us beat on the equality front. As for adaptivity, humans are very, very adaptive. It's kinda our thing. Compared to all three of the other fantasy races in DA humans are the most adaptive, and even in real life when compared to other species we are highly adaptive creatures. Just look how we've overrun the planet. You can find us in almost any environment.
Adaptivity is not the same as social equality, and saying humans are adaptive is also not the same as saying every member of the species is good at openmindedness and creative thought processes. You don't have to tell me about women's rights, I mean I am a female after all. Still I hope I clarified my standpoint.
edit: this is by far the most interesting thread I've seen on the forums. <3
Modifié par Saibh, 04 août 2010 - 05:44 .
Saibh wrote...
I feel like adding that clearly Thedas does not reflect medieval Europe--again, women can become warriors or strong leaders. It probably helps that the prophet of the Chantry is female, the religious leaders are all female. I always wonder if Tevinter is more strict with women, since they are male-dominated (going so far as to always select a male Black Divine/First Enchanter, despite the prerequisite should be "mage", not "male mage").
elfdwarf wrote...
what jobs do they give the mages?