Archontor wrote...
are there anydwarves living with the qunari?
and if so do they have horns too?
Archontor wrote...
are there anydwarves living with the qunari?
Modifié par Archontor, 03 août 2010 - 10:05 .
Mary Kirby wrote...
A qunari's personal name isn't what you think of as a name. It's more like a social security number. It's information that the Tamassrans use to keep track of breeding. It's not something they ever call one another. What a qunari thinks of as their name is their job title.
SDNcN wrote...
The wiki says this:Kadan: Term for something one values highly. Or sometimes the center of the chest. (Literally, "where the heart lies.")
http://dragonage.wikia.com/wiki/Qunari
Anarya wrote...
I really want to ask this but I don't
think you'll be able to answer: I'm curious what Qunari culture looks
like. As in architecture, art, clothing and decorative objects, things
of that sort. Do you have a real-world culture that you are inspired by
when imagining Par Vollen and its people? Is this even something the
writers would handle or is that art department stuff? In Origins they
just seemed to wear/use the same thing Fereldans did but I have a
feeling that was due to convenience and not design.
Aratham Darksight wrote...
Risax wrote...
No wonder some Qunari become Tal'Vashot, on a diffrent note I think David Gaider said that Qunari that abandon the Qun remover their horns, why do they do that?
My guess would be that it's a symbolic gesture. Hornless qunari are thought to have been born for a special destiny. By removing your own, you're essentially saying "I make my own destiny".
Risax wrote...
Aratham Darksight wrote...
Risax wrote...
No wonder some Qunari become Tal'Vashot, on a diffrent note I think David Gaider said that Qunari that abandon the Qun remover their horns, why do they do that?
My guess would be that it's a symbolic gesture. Hornless qunari are thought to have been born for a special destiny. By removing your own, you're essentially saying "I make my own destiny".
Hmm... That makes a lot of sense, thanks Aratham!
I think Mr. Gaider said something like that, Qunari that go in expeditions outside Par Vollen are usually hornless.captain.subtle wrote...
Risax wrote...
Aratham Darksight wrote...
Risax wrote...
No wonder some Qunari become Tal'Vashot, on a diffrent note I think David Gaider said that Qunari that abandon the Qun remover their horns, why do they do that?
My guess would be that it's a symbolic gesture. Hornless qunari are thought to have been born for a special destiny. By removing your own, you're essentially saying "I make my own destiny".
Hmm... That makes a lot of sense, thanks Aratham!
I would imagine that the Qunari concept of destiny is based on practicality than any belief in a higher-purpose.
It is more practical to have hornless diplomats when communicating with Humans, right?
Reminds me of Plato's Republic, somewhat. Are the similarities intentional? Either way, it's interesting.Mary Kirby wrote...
Kimarous wrote...
How exactly do the Qunari ultimately determine their role in life? Are there a series of tests to determine their strongest aptitute? Did Sten take the G.O.A.T. or something?
The Tamassrans raise all the children, give them their general education, and evaulate them. Qunari are officially assigned their roles when they are twelve years old. The Tamassrans have some tests, but nothing requiring a #2 pencil. They also have something of a head start on the process, since they are the ones who control the Qunari selective breeding program.
Modifié par Ulicus, 03 août 2010 - 01:41 .
Anarya wrote...
Huh. Then what happens in a situation where there are more than one Qunari with the same job in a setting? For example, the infantry soldiers under Sten's command. Would they all have the same name or would they be further differentiated by fighting style or weapon? I mean I guess it would be the same as a human named Steve happening to work with 2 other guys named Steve but we tend to resort to appending a last initial or coming up with a nickname. I'd think it would get confusing if you habitually traveled with a group of 3+ guys who all had the same name, if you needed to address one in particular.
Modifié par nightcobra8928, 03 août 2010 - 03:38 .
nightcobra8928 wrote...
a beresaad, a vanguard
due to his initial skills i'd say, first swordsman
Sten only gave you part of his name/designation simply because he knew the rest of it was meaningless to you. It's something that differentiates him from the rest of the stens in his kith-- something you don't need to do.nightcobra8928 wrote...
a beresaad, a vanguard
due to his initial skills i'd say, first swordsman
.Does he go join a new group when he comes back?I am guessing so since they do not waste people.David Gaider wrote...
Sten only gave you part of his name/designation simply because he knew the rest of it was meaningless to you. It's something that differentiates him from the rest of the stens in his kith-- something you don't need to do.nightcobra8928 wrote...
a beresaad, a vanguard
due to his initial skills i'd say, first swordsman
Arttis wrote...
Does he go join a new group when he comes back?I am guessing so since they do not waste people.
David Gaider wrote...
Arttis wrote...
Does he go join a new group when he comes back?I am guessing so since they do not waste people.
Sten probably faces a lengthy debriefing with the Ben-Hassrath. He's been off gallavanting with bas for quite some time. Contamination is a risk, you see.
I think if they are very good at something whatever gender it is they become that gender.Of course I am probably wrong.Corker wrote...
I've always wondered why a culture that otherwise seems very ability-focused has such rigid gender roles. If a child displays strong talent and competence in an opposite-sex ability (art, management, breaking skulls), why is that not accommodated? Is it just a peculiar blind spot in their philosophy?
hmmm, how would you know that someone is good at something from the oposite gender? if someones only swinging a sword for his whole life, hell propably never learn to appreciate arts, and if he did, he would know that he never could be an artist and would drop the art-idea. besides, sten says something about "you cant choose what you are, wether youre male or female" or something. so, i guess, even if some kind of gender untypical abbility occurs in the qun, its just ignored....Arttis wrote...
I think if they are very good at something whatever gender it is they become that gender.Of course I am probably wrong.Corker wrote...
I've always wondered why a culture that otherwise seems very ability-focused has such rigid gender roles. If a child displays strong talent and competence in an opposite-sex ability (art, management, breaking skulls), why is that not accommodated? Is it just a peculiar blind spot in their philosophy?
iTomes wrote...
hmmm, how would you know that someone is good at something from the oposite gender?