DA2-A little soon?
#26
Posté 03 août 2010 - 06:52
#27
Posté 03 août 2010 - 07:25
So, if they started on it when DA:O was finished (Hell, maybe even before it was finished. Some Devs do that), it'd put about two years between the DA:O and DA2. Also, they do not have to write a load of lore, or make a new engine.
#28
Posté 04 août 2010 - 06:42
Gill Kaiser wrote...
I just hope that they're having money thrown at them in order to offset the shortened production time.
DA2 did not start last month.
#29
Posté 04 août 2010 - 06:49
Bryy_Miller wrote...
Gill Kaiser wrote...
I just hope that they're having money thrown at them in order to offset the shortened production time.
DA2 did not start last month.
He's right. This is an LOLgambit on BioWare's part, because they haven't even started yet.
Those screenshots are all Photoshopped claymation sculptures.
#30
Posté 04 août 2010 - 06:51
In short, this. I would also add they have a development team already experienced with with that lore and engine.Behindyounow wrote...
Also, they do not have to write a load of lore, or make a new engine.
#31
Posté 04 août 2010 - 07:15
Saibh wrote...
Bryy_Miller wrote...
Gill Kaiser wrote...
I just hope that they're having money thrown at them in order to offset the shortened production time.
DA2 did not start last month.
He's right. This is an LOLgambit on BioWare's part, because they haven't even started yet.
Those screenshots are all Photoshopped claymation sculptures.
You know that they are going to take this seriously.
#32
Posté 04 août 2010 - 07:30
The major weakness of Bioware was not having powerful original IPs like TES or Fallout. With DA and ME, Bioware have been successful on original IP so far, and they want to keep pushing them so they get even more popular.
For example, I don't think the weapon DLCs of ME2 make a lot of money. However, they do get Bioware and ME2 into IGN news for a day. And for larger DLCs like L's Song, IGN would give it like 2 news/preview and 1 review.
Modifié par Hulk Hsieh, 04 août 2010 - 07:42 .
#33
Posté 04 août 2010 - 12:27
we've seen how badly rushed Awakening was. very buggy (especially if you take into account all the bugs it causes in replaying Origins after installing it), numerous cut-corners and almost no plot-development (if you don't read the books you're left with pretty much no idea what's going on until the final scene) and it'd be heartbreaking to see the same thing happen with Dragon Age 2
#34
Posté 04 août 2010 - 01:55
I assume they started making the sequal after the release of the first game or before it. I for one am happy that a company is willing to bring out the sequal so quickly. Who's to say it won't be as good as dragon age orgins? Just because orgins took longer to take does not make it a better game.
No one is going to force you to buy the sequal. If you don't want to play the game simply don't buy it. But there is nothing that I can see that says working on a game 2-4 year's will make it a better game. It's also the size of the budget. How many people working on it. You can't make a game for 4 years on a lower budget then orgins.
In closing I am "happy" they choose to release it quick. Perhaps it wouldn't turned out any different if they had an extra year or perhaps it would. Truth of matter we don't know and we can't just assume more time means a better game.
It's not like they were just throwing random stuff in the sequal. They have a book based off this in detail to draw ideas and information from to turn it into an interaction on the PC
#35
Posté 04 août 2010 - 02:37
#36
Posté 04 août 2010 - 02:38
Flamesz wrote...
DA:O was completed by the end of 2008 but wasn't released until the end of 2009 because of console version development. During that time, Awakening was being created and Dragon Age 2 most likely was being talked about aswell.
Actually it was finished around March 2009, but yeah. Your point still stands.
#37
Posté 04 août 2010 - 02:50
#38
Posté 04 août 2010 - 02:53
Yeah, so from March 2009 to March 2011, thats about 2 years to develop DA2 and thats a long enough time i think.Behindyounow wrote...
Flamesz wrote...
DA:O was completed by the end of 2008 but wasn't released until the end of 2009 because of console version development. During that time, Awakening was being created and Dragon Age 2 most likely was being talked about aswell.
Actually it was finished around March 2009, but yeah. Your point still stands.
#39
Posté 04 août 2010 - 02:53
But hey its bioware, story is all that matter... So can i buy a book?
#40
Posté 04 août 2010 - 06:11
Even that assumes that the whole team has to finish with one game before moving to the next.Flamesz wrote...
Yeah, so from March 2009 to March 2011, thats about 2 years to develop DA2 and thats a long enough time i think.
The tools programmers, for example (the guys who build the design tools the other designers use to make the game) clearly could have started working on DA2 before anyone else was finished with DAO.





Retour en haut







