J4N3_M3 wrote...
i don't see what people are
complaining about. *looks around* where I'm from, I'm used to getting
paid for my work. Maybe that's different in other countries but still,
is it only me who finds it weird that so many people expect to get
EVERYTHING for free? wtf?
@thanks for the videos prince:
took some time for me to load them so I could watch. They look really
sweet. Can't wait to try them out myself.
Let me ask you. IN ME3.
All weapons are cut out, all armor is cut out.
Only thing you got left is the casual clothing, and a predator pistol to pass the game.
Their excuse "we just thought it was easier to get rid of em all together"
To
our surprise.. Bioware is generoues enough to give us back, the armor,
and weapons they cut out from ME2... that should obviously have been in
ME3... but they say you know "we worked hard...very hard to bring em
back"....so we are going to sell you, everything back....
Different Example:
Are you fan of gears?....maybe Halo?... or how about.... what other game, assassin's creed?
IN
the next gears, you have nothing but a knife... and the developers of
gears will sell you back the lancer and every other weapon because they
are working "hard" and being "generous"... makes sense?
HAlo
reach... they take out shields, grenades, rifles, and leave only with
melee, only to sell you back every single other gameplay mechanic...
because they are "working hard" and being 'generous'.....still makes
sense?
Or assassin's creed... they remove the hidden knife...
little sakcs of hay toe scape... there is no counter attacks.... lets
see.... no wya to ride a horse... you can't grab from ledges... and you
can't use the jump button..... but fear not, they will sell you back
every single one of those features... for a "reasonable" price. After
all they are working very "hard" to bring you back what ....was
obviously too much to carry over from the previous instalment.
If
those, obviously exagerated, yet similar examples of the main idea
Bioware is using right now... and i it all seems "reasonable" for a
fee.... then ... well then I guess we have to agree to disagree because
our definition of "reasonable" is very different.
I see "reasonable" as, any
'new' content, not previousl seen, in this installment or those before, that
is considered obviously an innovative idea, that is to be package and
sold, as it should be in exchange for their hard work.
For me though "previously" seen content,
obviously ommited to be repackage and sold to us as "new content" for a "reasonable" fee... isn't a good definition.
Modifié par Spartas Husky, 04 août 2010 - 01:47 .