Aller au contenu

Photo

Why doesn't Zaeed work as a Fire Team Leader?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
440 réponses à ce sujet

#326
SaltBot

SaltBot
  • Members
  • 237 messages

smudboy wrote...
Right.  If the game provides around 12 or so variables to fit into roles, you have to take all the effects into account.  That was not handled or explained properly, or at least in sufficient detail, especially since this was the whole point of the plot.

It is an inconsistency in the narrative.  Character dialog is part of the narrative.  "Well, at least he knows what he's doing."  Yes, Zaeed better damn well know what he's doing.  He's been on suicide missions before.  He's lead teams before.  He is the second most experienced fellow, and the most experienced fellow on these kinds of operations.  I would also have not believed Miranda to be a leader of men, had she not volunteered to lead the second.  She's apparently second in command, but we never see her do anything in that role the entire time.  Yet she's aware that Jacob's not fast enough for being the tech expert, even though he (and every other tech expert) is fast enough.


While I agree that character dialogue is part of the narrative, I disagree that everything a character says has to be taken at face value.  It is completely within the bounds of a writer's toolset to make characters who lie, mislead, or are flat out wrong when they make a judgment call.  Everything else you say is pretty much correct, however.  If we limit the scope of our assessment to just "commands loyalty through experience", then frankly I don't think anyone on the team is qualified at all except Shepard.

In general, the whole plot is a mess.  The characters are very good and the gameplay is wickedly streamlined, but the motivation for pretty much every event throughout the course of the game is flimsy at best.  Quite frankly, if I don't throw a bit of inference into many of the stories I experience, this game especially, they are that much harder to enjoy (the cognitive dissonance someone mentioned earlier).  I'd rather enjoy the game for its merits than spend all my time focusing on the flaws.  That being said, I've come to expect a lot better from BW's script-writing teams, and I'm not going to forgive them for this one unless ME3 knocks my socks off.

In conclusion, this whole argument is the fault of the writers, who left the answer vague (either accidentally or on purpose).  It's been a slice, but now I must tip my hat to you and bid you adieu before I start to realise just how many pages I've spent babbling pointlessly about a video game.

#327
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

smudboy wrote...

It is an inconsistency in the narrative.  Character dialog is part of the narrative.  "Well, at least he knows what he's doing."  Yes, Zaeed better damn well know what he's doing.  He's been on suicide missions before.  He's lead teams before.  He is the second most experienced fellow, and the most experienced fellow on these kinds of operations.  I would also have not believed Miranda to be a leader of men, had she not volunteered to lead the second.  She's apparently second in command, but we never see her do anything in that role the entire time.  Yet she's aware that Jacob's not fast enough for being the tech expert, even though he (and every other tech expert) is fast enough.


No, it really isn't. It's MIRANDA that claims that you need to show leadership through experience.  She is wrong (and she often is in ME2).  The fact is you can be relatively inexperienced and still be a superb combat leader (as various wars in the past two centuries have proven).  Audie Murphy was one of the best small unit combat leaders in history BEFORE he got much combat experience.  He was a natural.  That's just one of many examples.

-Polaris

#328
casedawgz

casedawgz
  • Members
  • 2 864 messages
If Jacob can do it, Zaeed should be able to do it. Jacob is a tool.

#329
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

casedawgz wrote...

If Jacob can do it, Zaeed should be able to do it. Jacob is a tool.


Jacob has leadership training and recent combat leadershipo experience.  Zaeed has neither and the last true leadership position he had was twenty years ago.  Zaeed is a hot-headed lone wolf type.  Great warrior.  Horrible leader.

-Polaris

#330
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

SaltBot wrote...

If we limit the scope of our assessment to just "commands loyalty through experience", then frankly I don't think anyone on the team is qualified at all except Shepard.


I think I am going to part company with you on this.  Garrus clearly "commands loyalty through experience' as well.  His leadership skills and combat experience are well documented both in ME1 and ME2.

-Polaris

#331
InvaderErl

InvaderErl
  • Members
  • 3 884 messages
Zaeed DOES work as a team leader. He just doesn't save everyone because that's not his primary concern.

Modifié par InvaderErl, 07 août 2010 - 07:45 .


#332
SaltBot

SaltBot
  • Members
  • 237 messages

IanPolaris wrote...
I think I am going to part company with you on this.  Garrus clearly "commands loyalty through experience' as well.  His leadership skills and combat experience are well documented both in ME1 and ME2.

-Polaris


Actually, I will fully concede this point to you.  Turian military training; C-Sec investigations; running with Shepard against Saren; leading a team of righteous vigilantes in the most lawless city in the Galaxy (i.e. Suicide Mission); with all the stories he has, I'm beginning to think Garrus would have been more interesting without a dialogue wheel.

#333
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

InvaderErl wrote...

Zaeeed DOES work as a team leader. He just doesn't save everyone because that's not his primary concern.


By that standard, everybody works as a team leader.  Zaeed's loyalty mission makes it perfectly clear that whatever merits he has as a badass soldier, he simply isn't leadership material.

-Polaris

#334
InvaderErl

InvaderErl
  • Members
  • 3 884 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

InvaderErl wrote...

Zaeeed DOES work as a team leader. He just doesn't save everyone because that's not his primary concern.


By that standard, everybody works as a team leader.  Zaeed's loyalty mission makes it perfectly clear that whatever merits he has as a badass soldier, he simply isn't leadership material.

-Polaris


That's what I'm in fact saying.

People are bringing up his combat experience as a qualifier. Yes that experience does come into play, the team makes it to their destinations - but that he doesn't seem to value the lives of those under his command or even in general means that any team under his command is likely to suffer casualties.

Modifié par InvaderErl, 07 août 2010 - 07:49 .


#335
Raxxman

Raxxman
  • Members
  • 759 messages
Which would work if it wasn't Zaeed who died on the second fire-team mission.



Except he is, so it's a poor logical deduction.

#336
Silver

Silver
  • Members
  • 1 547 messages
Zaeed is a "me first, forget about the others" kind of guy, not because of his experience through combat, but because he was a goddamn merc, and merc's always look out for themselves first.

#337
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Raxxman wrote...

Which would work if it wasn't Zaeed who died on the second fire-team mission.

Except he is, so it's a poor logical deduction.


No it's not.  It's merely a reflection of the limitations of a computer game.  The game for what should be obvious reasons distills the extremely (and subjective) consequences of putting a poor combat leader on charge of the second fireteam into a binary check.  If the leader is effective, everyone lives.  If not, the leader dies.

This last part may be simplistic and unrealistic, but it doesn't mean that Zaeed is a good leader and it doesn't mean the BW flags were incorrect in considering him an unsuitable choice.

-Polaris

#338
MonkeyKaboom

MonkeyKaboom
  • Members
  • 238 messages

MonkeyKaboom wrote...

You all are taking this way too seriously. He's not a good leader because....he was DLC content and they were lazy in programming.....

Simplest solution is usually the best


You people seriously need to find something better to do with your time....

Modifié par MonkeyKaboom, 08 août 2010 - 05:19 .


#339
SaltBot

SaltBot
  • Members
  • 237 messages

MonkeyKaboom wrote...

You people seriously need to find something better to do with your time....


But I can only watch the Stampeders cheerleaders sunbathe on the deck my yacht for so long before I begin to yearn for some real intellectual debate!  Thanks again, Internet!

#340
MonkeyKaboom

MonkeyKaboom
  • Members
  • 238 messages

SaltBot wrote...

MonkeyKaboom wrote...

You people seriously need to find something better to do with your time....


But I can only watch the Stampeders cheerleaders sunbathe on the deck my yacht for so long before I begin to yearn for some real intellectual debate!  Thanks again, Internet!


You have a yacht.  Why the hell are you watching them from there?  They should be on the yacht.  You are missing out on a golden (see what I did there?) opportunity...

#341
SaltBot

SaltBot
  • Members
  • 237 messages
You might even say they yacht to be on the boat! Ha! I love puns.

#342
Ogrek

Ogrek
  • Members
  • 37 messages

smudboy wrote...

Ogrek wrote...

He did report the events objectively

If he did that, he'd just leave everything in quotes, and describe the actions.  Also, he later wrote he didn't report events objectively.


To quote him, he said he 'added his subjective interpretations to the end' - as in the end of the statement as it was originally written.  So yes, he reported it objectively.  The subjective parts were tacked on AFTERWARDS.  You may want to reread what he wrote rather than what you think he wrote.


smudboy wrote...

- he quoted Zaeed's stories, and pointed out what happened at the Refinery - Zaeed nearly blows the place to Hell if you're a Paragon, and does blow the place up if you're going Renegade.  Given that the mission he took was to 'recapture the refinery', he failed.

Where is it shown or stated the mission is to "recapture the refinery?"


Per the Assignment quote:

"Before he was hired by Cerberus, Zaeed had taken a mission to go to Zorya and liberate an Eldfell-Ashland refinery from the Blue Suns. Once his work there is done, he can dedicate his full attention to the mission."

Notice that he took the job of 'liberating a refinery from the Blue Suns'.  Not "go to Zorya and kill Vido Santiago".  In other words, his job was to free the refinery from the Blue Suns and reclaim it for Eldfell-Ashland.  He either blows the place up, or nearly blows it up until Paragon Shepard tells him to stop playing maverick and to do what he was hired to do.

smudboy wrote...

He let a personal grudge against Vido override his mission and lost sight of the goals.  He handily kicked ass much of the way through the mission, but didn't accomplish it - Paragon Shepard DOES reclaim the refinery from the Blue Suns, even if it's massively damaged and will need millions of credits to repair.

"Seems he recently captured an Eldfell-Ashland refinery on Zorya and is using their workers for slave labor.  The company wants it dealt with."

Now I don't know about the Eldfell-Ashland were thinking when they hired Zaeed, but they wanted him to take care of something that requires his expertise.


They wanted their refinery back from the extortionists.  If they'd wanted it blown up, all they had to do was hire an army with an artillery piece or a ship to shell the place from orbit.  The fact they sent in a merc instead of a few dozen missiles strongly suggests they wanted the place intact; otherwise they could've just gotten someone else to blow the place up without risking failure by sending in a small band of mercenaries to clear out the place with small-arms.  There were far simpler ways to just blow their own refinery up, if that was the goal.

So yes, I'd have to say that Zaeed lost sight of his mission, which was quoted straight from the game's screens above.  They said nothing about blowing the place up in either the game quote or your own above.

smudboy wrote...

On top of that, every mission Vido talks about, he loses people - so with the goal of the Suicide Mission Team Leader being 'keep everyone alive while distracting the enemy/protecting the tech specialist'... well, he's going to lose someone on the team.  He already demonstrated on his loyalty mission that he's a hardass soldier, but he's prone to forgetting what his job is or what the objectives are when he gets angry - which he does rather easily when he feels something's personal or when a lot of killing's going on.

And what is the job?

Not every story "Zaeed" talks about involves losing people.  The Verrikan mission involves Zaeed leading and losing 5 men.  It's also the first of many suicide missions he's been on.


As he says himself during his recruitment: "Easy.  Cerberus is paying me a lot of money to help you on your mission.  That's the long and short." As he sees it, his job is to help Shepard accomplish the mission set out by Cerberus - stop the Collectors.  Not 'kill everything that moves'  - he seems to forget that sometimes, which means he acts insubordinately (see the way he triggered the Refinery fire, then argued with Shepard about Vido getting away, resulting in a punch from Shep if you took the Paragon interrupt), to the detriment of Shepard's crew or bystanders.

He knows his job is to help Shepard and Cerberus accomplish the mission he's been told about.  Like he also said the first time, "I hear we have a galaxy to save."   Also remember that the dialogue quotes usually involve someone dying on his side, or else someone losing their head/control.  Except that one time he fought that Blood Pack leader by himself, showing that he's tough enough to beat krogan.  Shows he's a hell of a soldier, but not necessarily that he's also a hell of a leader.

smudboy wrote...

Now, if you mean 'objectively' to be 'agrees wholeheartedly with your opinion because you're the smartest person on the Internet and even God is wrong if He is opposed to your plans', then no, he wasn't.  He was simply being truthful.


Objectively, as in seeing and hearing everything that's shown and told without bias or interpretation.


Then in that case, you're as guilty as saltboy and everyone else you've accused so far.

#343
Raxxman

Raxxman
  • Members
  • 759 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

Raxxman wrote...

Which would work if it wasn't Zaeed who died on the second fire-team mission.

Except he is, so it's a poor logical deduction.


No it's not.  It's merely a reflection of the limitations of a computer game.  The game for what should be obvious reasons distills the extremely (and subjective) consequences of putting a poor combat leader on charge of the second fireteam into a binary check.  If the leader is effective, everyone lives.  If not, the leader dies.

This last part may be simplistic and unrealistic, but it doesn't mean that Zaeed is a good leader and it doesn't mean the BW flags were incorrect in considering him an unsuitable choice.

-Polaris


You need to learn when the facts end and your opinion start.

I was perfectly happy for you to have your opinion, I still am, even though you cherry pick facts to suit your cause and ignore ones that weaken it. However you also either blatantly lie about, or are woefuly unaware of what actually happens in the game. This, ontop of your condescending attitude makes it very hard to take anything you say as more than overly opinonated garbage.

Then you come tottering in and say that even though the game doesn't support your arguement, it's okay, because you say so. It's quite sad really.

#344
smudboy

smudboy
  • Members
  • 3 058 messages

Ogrek wrote...
To quote him, he said he 'added his subjective interpretations to the end' - as in the end of the statement as it was originally written.  So yes, he reported it objectively.  The subjective parts were tacked on AFTERWARDS.  You may want to reread what he wrote rather than what you think he wrote.

So first objective, then subjective?  Still biased.

Per the Assignment quote:

"Before he was hired by Cerberus, Zaeed had taken a mission to go to Zorya and liberate an Eldfell-Ashland refinery from the Blue Suns. Once his work there is done, he can dedicate his full attention to the mission."

Notice that he took the job of 'liberating a refinery from the Blue Suns'.  Not "go to Zorya and kill Vido Santiago".  In other words, his job was to free the refinery from the Blue Suns and reclaim it for Eldfell-Ashland.  He either blows the place up, or nearly blows it up until Paragon Shepard tells him to stop playing maverick and to do what he was hired to do.

And where is this in the game?

They wanted their refinery back from the extortionists.  If they'd wanted it blown up, all they had to do was hire an army with an artillery piece or a ship to shell the place from orbit.  The fact they sent in a merc instead of a few dozen missiles strongly suggests they wanted the place intact; otherwise they could've just gotten someone else to blow the place up without risking failure by sending in a small band of mercenaries to clear out the place with small-arms.  There were far simpler ways to just blow their own refinery up, if that was the goal.

So yes, I'd have to say that Zaeed lost sight of his mission, which was quoted straight from the game's screens above.  They said nothing about blowing the place up in either the game quote or your own above.

Speculation.
1) If they don't know Zaeed's reputation, they don't know what they're getting into.
2) Maybe they did think about sending in missiles?  Maybe they did think that Zaeed would blow the place up?  Either way, they want the problem dealt with.

Again, where does Zaeed lose sight of the mission, and where does it say the mission parameters?

As he says himself during his recruitment: "Easy.  Cerberus is paying me a lot of money to help you on your mission.  That's the long and short." As he sees it, his job is to help Shepard accomplish the mission set out by Cerberus - stop the Collectors.  Not 'kill everything that moves'  - he seems to forget that sometimes, which means he acts insubordinately (see the way he triggered the Refinery fire, then argued with Shepard about Vido getting away, resulting in a punch from Shep if you took the Paragon interrupt), to the detriment of Shepard's crew or bystanders.

Not understanding what you're saying here.

He knows his job is to help Shepard and Cerberus accomplish the mission he's been told about.  Like he also said the first time, "I hear we have a galaxy to save."   Also remember that the dialogue quotes usually involve someone dying on his side, or else someone losing their head/control.  Except that one time he fought that Blood Pack leader by himself, showing that he's tough enough to beat krogan.  Shows he's a hell of a soldier, but not necessarily that he's also a hell of a leader.

If he's lead teams before to success, he's a successful leader.  He's responsible for his team, but we don't know what caused the deaths of his team.  It's like saying Shepard is a bad leader because they got Ash/Kaidan/Wrex killed, yet without knowing what caused their deaths.

Then in that case, you're as guilty as saltboy and everyone else you've accused so far.

Feel free to address a particular point I've made that has been biased then.  I'm sure I've made them.  I'd be happy to renounce and restate the pros and cons.

#345
smudboy

smudboy
  • Members
  • 3 058 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

smudboy wrote...

It is an inconsistency in the narrative.  Character dialog is part of the narrative.  "Well, at least he knows what he's doing."  Yes, Zaeed better damn well know what he's doing.  He's been on suicide missions before.  He's lead teams before.  He is the second most experienced fellow, and the most experienced fellow on these kinds of operations.  I would also have not believed Miranda to be a leader of men, had she not volunteered to lead the second.  She's apparently second in command, but we never see her do anything in that role the entire time.  Yet she's aware that Jacob's not fast enough for being the tech expert, even though he (and every other tech expert) is fast enough.


No, it really isn't. It's MIRANDA that claims that you need to show leadership through experience.  She is wrong (and she often is in ME2).  The fact is you can be relatively inexperienced and still be a superb combat leader (as various wars in the past two centuries have proven).  Audie Murphy was one of the best small unit combat leaders in history BEFORE he got much combat experience.  He was a natural.  That's just one of many examples.

-Polaris

It's not important who's saying what.  The narrative is telling me something.  "We need x and they need to be y."  If Miranda's such a good leader, why would she lie about this, the very thing she's trying to sell herself as, after she just got shot down by Jack/Garrus on volunteering to be a leader?  I understand her and Jacob being gung-ho, but this isn't making sense.

Miranda: "I'm really a moron and I'm potentialy lying to you."

When in reality she's effetive at being a leader, yet we have nothing to point to Miranda's military experience to prove she is, aside from her self-appointed second in command status.

As for your real life example, 1) meaningless within the context, 2) and I could beat my family at chess at age 5.  Doesn't mean I'm naturally good at taking down expert chess players or higher skilled players.

#346
Raxxman

Raxxman
  • Members
  • 759 messages
Yo, Smud, it's gives the mission brief in the loadscreen of Zaeeds loyalty mission. You are their to deal with the refinery.

Reguardless, Zaeed will fall in line and you can save the refinery no bother. It's also the only time Zaeed does something reckless in the entire game. Additionally, all the evidence in the game suggests that Garrus would do the same thing if sidonous was on the otherside of the gate (based on several interactions with Garrus in ME1 and ME2, he's not bothered about cauing civilian casulaties to get what he considered justices).

Heck even ren shep would do that, I get the impression Ren shep is just pissed off he didnt think of that first(although that in itself is subjective :) )

#347
smudboy

smudboy
  • Members
  • 3 058 messages

Raxxman wrote...

Yo, Smud, it's gives the mission brief in the loadscreen of Zaeeds loyalty mission. You are their to deal with the refinery.

Reguardless, Zaeed will fall in line and you can save the refinery no bother. It's also the only time Zaeed does something reckless in the entire game. Additionally, all the evidence in the game suggests that Garrus would do the same thing if sidonous was on the otherside of the gate (based on several interactions with Garrus in ME1 and ME2, he's not bothered about cauing civilian casulaties to get what he considered justices).

Heck even ren shep would do that, I get the impression Ren shep is just pissed off he didnt think of that first(although that in itself is subjective :) )

Ah, thanks.  Did it say how?

I just saw a playthrough of Paragaon/Renegade of the mission.  I didn't see anything reckless about it.  I did find it a rather violent way to enter the refinery, nor do I see how blowing up an entry blows up the entire place, but that's what happened.  Interesting, a Renegade interrupt occurs in the same way on Mordin's mission.  Now would that make Renegade Shepard a bad leader?  Would that be jeopardizing the "save Mordin's assistant" mission?

#348
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

smudboy wrote...

I just saw a playthrough of Paragaon/Renegade of the mission.  I didn't see anything reckless about it.  I did find it a rather violent way to enter the refinery, nor do I see how blowing up an entry blows up the entire place, but that's what happened.  Interesting, a Renegade interrupt occurs in the same way on Mordin's mission.  Now would that make Renegade Shepard a bad leader?  Would that be jeopardizing the "save Mordin's assistant" mission?


If you didn't see anything reckless about Zaeed than you weren't paying attention.  As for Mordin's mission, it happened IN A KROGAN HOSPITAL which Mordin explains as you entered is about as well fortified as a missile silo.  That means in such a place with multiple redundant safety systems, Shepard was NOT endangering the mission even with his renegade interrupt.

There is a difference between starting a fire in a place designed to resist fire and a freakiing refinery.

-Polaris

Edit:  As for the Miranda and the narrative regarding her leadership, we agree.  That doesn't apply to Zaeed though.

Modifié par IanPolaris, 08 août 2010 - 04:47 .


#349
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

smudboy wrote...
As for your real life example, 1) meaningless within the context, 2) and I could beat my family at chess at age 5.  Doesn't mean I'm naturally good at taking down expert chess players or higher skilled players.


Leadership is a skill but it isn't a skill like chess.  There are some people that are naturally good leader even in combat situations with virtually no experience.  Look up Audie Murphy.  The point is that while experience helps give cred, it doesn't make you a good leader.  Miranda is simply wrong.

-Polaris

#350
Chim3ra

Chim3ra
  • Members
  • 479 messages
Wow this is ridiculous. He doesn't work get over it.



WHO FLIPPIN CARES... God.