Chanegade wrote...
I love pause and play. I gives me time to think about my strategy and it makes the game very rewarding. So yeah less pause and play would be a dumb idea. We don't need more action RPGs!
QFT!
Less pause and play a good thing?
Débuté par
Appolo90
, août 06 2010 07:33
#26
Posté 06 août 2010 - 02:55
TMZuk
-
- Members
- 1 066 messages
QFT!
Retour en haut
#27
Posté 06 août 2010 - 03:08
GodWood
-
- Members
- 7 954 messages
I find pause and play and turn based battle systems to be far more enjoyable then the standard hack'n'slash most people seem to enjoy.
#28
Posté 06 août 2010 - 03:11
Andat
-
- Members
- 136 messages
I like pause and play, but largely because not being able to pause when my character's low on health would make it more difficult to target that heal spell (not the type of difficulty I want in my games, personally).
It also gives me a chance to see what's going on, make sure everyone's *doing* something (because in DA the tactics handlers occasionally got stuck), make sure Alistair's not dashing off into an Inferno or Tempest, and see if there's anything more interesting going on than what I'm looking at right now.
It also gives me a chance to see what's going on, make sure everyone's *doing* something (because in DA the tactics handlers occasionally got stuck), make sure Alistair's not dashing off into an Inferno or Tempest, and see if there's anything more interesting going on than what I'm looking at right now.
Modifié par Andat, 06 août 2010 - 03:13 .
#29
Posté 06 août 2010 - 03:33
Ichika
-
- Members
- 126 messages
I like pause and play and I pause often to make sure my companions take their health poultices and use the skills I want them to. I get excessive problems with lag sometimes when I'm in battles so pausing is necessary for me.
#30
Posté 06 août 2010 - 04:29
AlanC9
-
- Members
- 35 825 messages
Appolo90 wrote...
I think I read in Game Informer that they will be concentrating more on action then pause and play in DA2.
Did anyone find any such quote? This whole thread seems to be based on a false premise.
#31
Posté 06 août 2010 - 04:31
AlanC9
-
- Members
- 35 825 messages
I never saw any such quote in the first place.
#32
Posté 06 août 2010 - 04:38
the_one_54321
-
- Members
- 6 112 messages
I'm throwing in with these guys. Pause 'n' play is awesome and we already have tons of action RPGs. We don't need more.TMZuk wrote...
QFT!Chanegade wrote...
I love pause and play. I gives me time to think about my strategy and it makes the game very rewarding. So yeah less pause and play would be a dumb idea. We don't need more action RPGs!
#33
Posté 06 août 2010 - 05:27
Appolo90
-
- Members
- 553 messages
You may be right.. that's why I said "I think" I read it.. I would re-read the article if I had it with me. I remember them saying that they're giving DA2 a "shot of adrenaline" which gave me the impression they were going for more action.AlanC9 wrote...
Appolo90 wrote...
I think I read in Game Informer that they will be concentrating more on action then pause and play in DA2.
Did anyone find any such quote? This whole thread seems to be based on a false premise.
In any case, it's still a point for discussion. Pause and play is a subject I argue over with people sometimes in real life. However, after reading through the comments.. I think I gave people the idea that I want a hack and slash. To that I say nay. Very nay. I want strategic action with less pausing. My favorite games to play are RTS games like Majesty 2, SRPGs like FF Tactics and Disgaea, and of course.. MW2. I think my favorite games represent exactly what kind of gameplay I want in DA2. I want the strategic prowess of Disgaea with the dizzying action of MW2.
I might be asking the impossible.
