Mecha Tengu wrote...
The maker is a reaper
Hence the Commander Hawke deal.
Mecha Tengu wrote...
The maker is a reaper
captain.subtle wrote...
There are Sooooooooooo many reapers...
Anyway.
There may or may not be a Maker, but there could have been Fen'Harel. He is still seen/heard by the Elves in their dreams you know...
Plus considering how trickster-godish he is, he may be the main villain of the story after all. I doubt if he can be killed, well... what God is God that can be killed? That's why Old God is a strange term.... I just want to know what are the thoughts of the Elves on the Old Gods... I mean the current Archdemons who may or may no be Old Gods....
Modifié par captain.subtle, 07 août 2010 - 04:25 .
captain.subtle wrote...
hmm... I recently read some posts by Sirshrek who made such speculations like,
Arlathan = Golden city or equivalent
Old Gods = Forgotten Ones
Seems to have some substance....
What I want o know is what the Elves think about Archdemons.... What is their lore on them? Surely they buy the old God crap.. They have their own lore on Flemeth.. They call her something that translates as "Woman of many years"....
captain.subtle wrote...
There are Sooooooooooo many reapers...
Anyway.
There may or may not be a Maker, but there could have been Fen'Harel. He is still seen/heard by the Elves in their dreams you know...
Plus considering how trickster-godish he is, he may be the main villain of the story after all. I doubt if he can be killed, well... what God is God that can be killed? That's why Old God is a strange term.... I just want to know what are the thoughts of the Elves on the Old Gods... I mean the current Archdemons who may or may no be Old Gods....
captain.subtle wrote...
I think, Uldred = Baroness, except that the Pride demon possessing the baroness was stronger... So She did not BECOME a demon... The demon only ovecome her will, like it says in the scrolls of Banastor...
Modifié par DaerogTheDhampir, 07 août 2010 - 10:49 .
Flemeth needs to the Wardens alive to end the Blight in Ferelden and potentially/possibly provide Morrigan with her God Baby. She was going easy on you.Isabelle Mortello wrote...
I really don't think that is the case. She wasn't born that long ago. Besides the "Witch of the Wilds" makes perfect sense to me and If you can kill a semi-god like Andraste....there is something seriously wrong.
captain.subtle wrote...
Actually No. The names are pretty accurate. Conobar WAS a teyrn to Highever. FLEMETH WAS the name of his wife.... Its all there in the Cousland history page which need not lie about anything....
Marbazoid wrote...
captain.subtle wrote...
Actually No. The names are pretty accurate. Conobar WAS a teyrn to Highever. FLEMETH WAS the name of his wife.... Its all there in the Cousland history page which need not lie about anything....
Historical Account = Flemeth was Conobars wife and she ran off with a bard named Osen.
Flemeths Account = Osen was Flemeths husband, and Conobar offered money in exchange for Flemeth, which Osen accepted. Conobar then murdered Osen and took Flemeth as his wife.
It seems the Couslands may have some reason to lie.
Modifié par captain.subtle, 08 août 2010 - 06:34 .
Modifié par captain.subtle, 08 août 2010 - 09:43 .
captain.subtle wrote...
Conobar was not a Cousland. The first Teyrn Cousland was his guard-captain. When Flemeth killed Conobar he became the de facto leader. This happned 700 years ago in the Tower's Age.
Batman90 wrote...
While I doubt that they're the same character, I'd like a future Dragon Age title to reveal a cynical-yet-liberating ultimate truth about the Chantry. I want to see Dragon Age's equivalent of Nietzsche proclaim that "the Maker is dead" and bring an end to the dogma that is the Chantry.
Zevais wrote...
This is just speculation. I believe it is quite a possibility. Deception and high profile lover's quarrals and problems with governments seem to be a trend both share. Flemeth does give off the vibe that she likes to have things planned out, and people are often creatures of habit... perhaps so much to keep getting into similar situations... perhaps even on purpose. She may enjoy the grandeur; I definitely believe so from her attitude and strut.
I am making this topic with the expectation that it will probably get flamed or bashed. I am just curious to see actual responses.
Arijharn wrote...
You know what? I disagree. If for no other reason that even if the Chantry was built on a scaffold of lies and deceit, it still managed to bring an immense amount of happiness and even comfort to the people of Thedas. Besides, killing off the Chantry just seems so... anti-climatic really.
DaerogTheDhampir wrote...
Arijharn wrote...
You know what? I disagree. If for no other reason that even if the Chantry was built on a scaffold of lies and deceit, it still managed to bring an immense amount of happiness and even comfort to the people of Thedas. Besides, killing off the Chantry just seems so... anti-climatic really.
While I disagree with bashing/destroying the Chantry, it would actually be very climatic, on the Qun side of things, since as soon as Thedas loses its faith in the Chantry, that really opens up the doors for the qunari to smash on in and take over. The only reason the qunari lost last time was from the Exalted Marches declared on the qunari in order to unite all the human kingdoms. So, hope everyone likes losing their individuality after throwing out the "oppressive" Chantry.