SithLordExarKun wrote...
And by the way, grow up. Theres no "rogue class" in real life, so it doesn't matter what your build is or how you train.
Modifié par KLUME777, 14 août 2010 - 05:52 .
So you're basically agreeing with me. Whats your argument this time? And by the way, they're still warriors regardless of what weapon and armor they use just as you said.KLUME777 wrote...
SithLordExarKun wrote...
And by the way, grow up. Theres no "rogue class" in real life, so it doesn't matter what your build is or how you train.
In medieval times, warrior equivelants would be the sword and shield, claymore, armoured 'tank' type.
Rogue equivelents would be archers, light armoured, 'martial arts', cut throats. Light weight warriors.
There all warriors. In DAO the tanks are called warriors, and the light armored are called 'rogues'.
Modifié par SithLordExarKun, 14 août 2010 - 05:58 .
SithLordExarKun wrote...
Self ownage i guess, so you basically agree with me despite your arguments and implications that if you dont got the genetics, you aren't meant for the sport or role. Good job on arguing like a broken record by the way. And by the way, "success" is subjective. I can simply label you "succesful" when observing you picking up a piece of paper.kayrob wrote...
It doesn't make it impossible to do so, however, as the photos of your friend illustrate.Kalf, would you do me a favour and read myKalfear wrote...
Im a huge fight fan and let me tell you, when skills at the same level, the bigger guy wins 99% of the time!
And as Em23 posted, a big guy can take down a smaller skilled guy with size alone!
Anyone that watches MMA knows this. The bigger they are, the harder they hit, trained or not.
BJ
Penn is the most advanced LW fighter in the world today (for my money
anyways) but againts opponents 50 lbs heavier and more, Id be very hard
pressed to take BJ as a favorite to win any MMA fight unless hes
fighting some super green nobody with almost zero practical training!
Size
does matter and if your being told it doesnt, chance are your talking
to a smaller person.
posts properly? I never said size wasn't an advantage, i just said you
don't need to be BIG like a bodybuilder to be a fighter. Yes, size DOES
help against another smaller fighter but only if you have the skills to
fight.
I have seen with my own eyes 5'6 muay thai combatants in
thailand(140lbs) took out american bodybuilders who weighed 260lbs on
steroids rather easily, size alone don't dictate the outcome of a fight.
you have a really stupid and simplistic view of medieval timesKLUME777 wrote...
SithLordExarKun wrote...
And by the way, grow up. Theres no "rogue class" in real life, so it doesn't matter what your build is or how you train.
In medieval times, warrior equivelants would be the sword and shield, claymore, armoured 'tank' type.
Rogue equivelents would be archers, light armoured, 'martial arts', cut throats. Light weight warriors.
There all warriors. In DAO the tanks are called warriors, and the light armored are called 'rogues'.
Im not disagreeing with you Kal, size is definately an advantage.Kalfear wrote...
SithLordExarKun wrote...
Self ownage i guess, so you basically agree with me despite your arguments and implications that if you dont got the genetics, you aren't meant for the sport or role. Good job on arguing like a broken record by the way. And by the way, "success" is subjective. I can simply label you "succesful" when observing you picking up a piece of paper.kayrob wrote...
It doesn't make it impossible to do so, however, as the photos of your friend illustrate.Kalf, would you do me a favour and read myKalfear wrote...
Im a huge fight fan and let me tell you, when skills at the same level, the bigger guy wins 99% of the time!
And as Em23 posted, a big guy can take down a smaller skilled guy with size alone!
Anyone that watches MMA knows this. The bigger they are, the harder they hit, trained or not.
BJ
Penn is the most advanced LW fighter in the world today (for my money
anyways) but againts opponents 50 lbs heavier and more, Id be very hard
pressed to take BJ as a favorite to win any MMA fight unless hes
fighting some super green nobody with almost zero practical training!
Size
does matter and if your being told it doesnt, chance are your talking
to a smaller person.
posts properly? I never said size wasn't an advantage, i just said you
don't need to be BIG like a bodybuilder to be a fighter. Yes, size DOES
help against another smaller fighter but only if you have the skills to
fight.
I have seen with my own eyes 5'6 muay thai combatants in
thailand(140lbs) took out american bodybuilders who weighed 260lbs on
steroids rather easily, size alone don't dictate the outcome of a fight.
Problem is you keep talking about a skileld fighter vrs a unskilled fighter!
Size isnt the issue there, skill is
but warriors are skilled and when two fighters are the same skill, size matters and is the difference!
Of course some skilled Muay Thai fighter beats a unskilled sloth (unless he sits on him as Muay Thia not known for their ground game), Just like a pro football player beats a fat spectator in a game of football. Skill does matter.
My point is, when your dealling with two fighters of basically the same skill set, you go with the bigger guy as size matters.
Thats why Warriors are always big, size is APART of their training. Size is a skill upon itself really!
Im not saying the smaller guy cant be skilled and even win when fighting unskilled sloths, but soon as he faces a big guy with equal training, the big guy wins most times because of size.
You use 260 lbs for you example so so will I (if you know the names)
BJ Penn is 155, world champion BJJ, World class boxer, multiple world champion MMA fighter! Been training for (lets say) 20 years
Brock Lesnar is a 265 D1 wrestling champ, pro wrestler champion, now HW champion of UFC! Been training Wrestling all his life but MMA for 5 years!
Who wins?
Ill give you 100 to 1 odds the Brock Lesnar wins by takeing BJ down (cause BJ to small to stop him) and pounding him out (because Brock to big and strong to combat).
BJ Penn is 10 times as skilled as Brock Lesnar is in MMA and probably 100 times more skilled in BJJ, But Brock wins 999 times outta 1000 because of his size and strenght and having a a basic understanding of copmbat skills.
This is like the best music for Muay ThaiSithLordExarKun wrote...
Im not disagreeing with you Kal, size is definately an advantage.Kalfear wrote...
SithLordExarKun wrote...
Self ownage i guess, so you basically agree with me despite your arguments and implications that if you dont got the genetics, you aren't meant for the sport or role. Good job on arguing like a broken record by the way. And by the way, "success" is subjective. I can simply label you "succesful" when observing you picking up a piece of paper.kayrob wrote...
It doesn't make it impossible to do so, however, as the photos of your friend illustrate.Kalf, would you do me a favour and read myKalfear wrote...
Im a huge fight fan and let me tell you, when skills at the same level, the bigger guy wins 99% of the time!
And as Em23 posted, a big guy can take down a smaller skilled guy with size alone!
Anyone that watches MMA knows this. The bigger they are, the harder they hit, trained or not.
BJ
Penn is the most advanced LW fighter in the world today (for my money
anyways) but againts opponents 50 lbs heavier and more, Id be very hard
pressed to take BJ as a favorite to win any MMA fight unless hes
fighting some super green nobody with almost zero practical training!
Size
does matter and if your being told it doesnt, chance are your talking
to a smaller person.
posts properly? I never said size wasn't an advantage, i just said you
don't need to be BIG like a bodybuilder to be a fighter. Yes, size DOES
help against another smaller fighter but only if you have the skills to
fight.
I have seen with my own eyes 5'6 muay thai combatants in
thailand(140lbs) took out american bodybuilders who weighed 260lbs on
steroids rather easily, size alone don't dictate the outcome of a fight.
Problem is you keep talking about a skileld fighter vrs a unskilled fighter!
Size isnt the issue there, skill is
but warriors are skilled and when two fighters are the same skill, size matters and is the difference!
Of course some skilled Muay Thai fighter beats a unskilled sloth (unless he sits on him as Muay Thia not known for their ground game), Just like a pro football player beats a fat spectator in a game of football. Skill does matter.
My point is, when your dealling with two fighters of basically the same skill set, you go with the bigger guy as size matters.
Thats why Warriors are always big, size is APART of their training. Size is a skill upon itself really!
Im not saying the smaller guy cant be skilled and even win when fighting unskilled sloths, but soon as he faces a big guy with equal training, the big guy wins most times because of size.
You use 260 lbs for you example so so will I (if you know the names)
BJ Penn is 155, world champion BJJ, World class boxer, multiple world champion MMA fighter! Been training for (lets say) 20 years
Brock Lesnar is a 265 D1 wrestling champ, pro wrestler champion, now HW champion of UFC! Been training Wrestling all his life but MMA for 5 years!
Who wins?
Ill give you 100 to 1 odds the Brock Lesnar wins by takeing BJ down (cause BJ to small to stop him) and pounding him out (because Brock to big and strong to combat).
BJ Penn is 10 times as skilled as Brock Lesnar is in MMA and probably 100 times more skilled in BJJ, But Brock wins 999 times outta 1000 because of his size and strenght and having a a basic understanding of copmbat skills.
I would disagree with brock beating BJ in a fight(yes sir i do know the names), lesnars "wrestling" training was fake seeing that WWE is fake and i would personally vouch for BJ in a fight against lesnar. There is no absolutes before a fight, you can't just assume lesnar would pound BJ in a matter of seconds due to his size, being bigger and winning the fight doesn't mean being a better fighter. The problem with MMA is there are almost no rules when it comes to a brawl unlike boxing and muay thai, anyone(especially bigger guys) could easily grab them by the leg, sit on them and then beat them to a pulp.
But truth be told, MMA is probably the closest thing to a stree fight, the exception is that it has a few rules where you cant kill your opponent.
I will say it again, other than seeing the small Muay Thai fighters taking out those bodybuilders, i have seen TWICE, Muay Thai combatants who trained 10 years take out larger, more powerfully built American heavyweight boxers in a ring.
.
Some Geth wrote...
This is like the best music for Muay ThaiSithLordExarKun wrote...
Im not disagreeing with you Kal, size is definately an advantage.Kalfear wrote...
SithLordExarKun wrote...
Self ownage i guess, so you basically agree with me despite your arguments and implications that if you dont got the genetics, you aren't meant for the sport or role. Good job on arguing like a broken record by the way. And by the way, "success" is subjective. I can simply label you "succesful" when observing you picking up a piece of paper.kayrob wrote...
It doesn't make it impossible to do so, however, as the photos of your friend illustrate.Kalf, would you do me a favour and read myKalfear wrote...
Im a huge fight fan and let me tell you, when skills at the same level, the bigger guy wins 99% of the time!
And as Em23 posted, a big guy can take down a smaller skilled guy with size alone!
Anyone that watches MMA knows this. The bigger they are, the harder they hit, trained or not.
BJ
Penn is the most advanced LW fighter in the world today (for my money
anyways) but againts opponents 50 lbs heavier and more, Id be very hard
pressed to take BJ as a favorite to win any MMA fight unless hes
fighting some super green nobody with almost zero practical training!
Size
does matter and if your being told it doesnt, chance are your talking
to a smaller person.
posts properly? I never said size wasn't an advantage, i just said you
don't need to be BIG like a bodybuilder to be a fighter. Yes, size DOES
help against another smaller fighter but only if you have the skills to
fight.
I have seen with my own eyes 5'6 muay thai combatants in
thailand(140lbs) took out american bodybuilders who weighed 260lbs on
steroids rather easily, size alone don't dictate the outcome of a fight.
Problem is you keep talking about a skileld fighter vrs a unskilled fighter!
Size isnt the issue there, skill is
but warriors are skilled and when two fighters are the same skill, size matters and is the difference!
Of course some skilled Muay Thai fighter beats a unskilled sloth (unless he sits on him as Muay Thia not known for their ground game), Just like a pro football player beats a fat spectator in a game of football. Skill does matter.
My point is, when your dealling with two fighters of basically the same skill set, you go with the bigger guy as size matters.
Thats why Warriors are always big, size is APART of their training. Size is a skill upon itself really!
Im not saying the smaller guy cant be skilled and even win when fighting unskilled sloths, but soon as he faces a big guy with equal training, the big guy wins most times because of size.
You use 260 lbs for you example so so will I (if you know the names)
BJ Penn is 155, world champion BJJ, World class boxer, multiple world champion MMA fighter! Been training for (lets say) 20 years
Brock Lesnar is a 265 D1 wrestling champ, pro wrestler champion, now HW champion of UFC! Been training Wrestling all his life but MMA for 5 years!
Who wins?
Ill give you 100 to 1 odds the Brock Lesnar wins by takeing BJ down (cause BJ to small to stop him) and pounding him out (because Brock to big and strong to combat).
BJ Penn is 10 times as skilled as Brock Lesnar is in MMA and probably 100 times more skilled in BJJ, But Brock wins 999 times outta 1000 because of his size and strenght and having a a basic understanding of copmbat skills.
I would disagree with brock beating BJ in a fight(yes sir i do know the names), lesnars "wrestling" training was fake seeing that WWE is fake and i would personally vouch for BJ in a fight against lesnar. There is no absolutes before a fight, you can't just assume lesnar would pound BJ in a matter of seconds due to his size, being bigger and winning the fight doesn't mean being a better fighter. The problem with MMA is there are almost no rules when it comes to a brawl unlike boxing and muay thai, anyone(especially bigger guys) could easily grab them by the leg, sit on them and then beat them to a pulp.
But truth be told, MMA is probably the closest thing to a stree fight, the exception is that it has a few rules where you cant kill your opponent.
I will say it again, other than seeing the small Muay Thai fighters taking out those bodybuilders, i have seen TWICE, Muay Thai combatants who trained 10 years take out larger, more powerfully built American heavyweight boxers in a ring.
Oh no you make Adon sadSithLordExarKun wrote...
Some Geth wrote...
This is like the best music for Muay ThaiSithLordExarKun wrote...
Im not disagreeing with you Kal, size is definately an advantage.Kalfear wrote...
SithLordExarKun wrote...
Self ownage i guess, so you basically agree with me despite your arguments and implications that if you dont got the genetics, you aren't meant for the sport or role. Good job on arguing like a broken record by the way. And by the way, "success" is subjective. I can simply label you "succesful" when observing you picking up a piece of paper.kayrob wrote...
It doesn't make it impossible to do so, however, as the photos of your friend illustrate.Kalf, would you do me a favour and read myKalfear wrote...
Im a huge fight fan and let me tell you, when skills at the same level, the bigger guy wins 99% of the time!
And as Em23 posted, a big guy can take down a smaller skilled guy with size alone!
Anyone that watches MMA knows this. The bigger they are, the harder they hit, trained or not.
BJ
Penn is the most advanced LW fighter in the world today (for my money
anyways) but againts opponents 50 lbs heavier and more, Id be very hard
pressed to take BJ as a favorite to win any MMA fight unless hes
fighting some super green nobody with almost zero practical training!
Size
does matter and if your being told it doesnt, chance are your talking
to a smaller person.
posts properly? I never said size wasn't an advantage, i just said you
don't need to be BIG like a bodybuilder to be a fighter. Yes, size DOES
help against another smaller fighter but only if you have the skills to
fight.
I have seen with my own eyes 5'6 muay thai combatants in
thailand(140lbs) took out american bodybuilders who weighed 260lbs on
steroids rather easily, size alone don't dictate the outcome of a fight.
Problem is you keep talking about a skileld fighter vrs a unskilled fighter!
Size isnt the issue there, skill is
but warriors are skilled and when two fighters are the same skill, size matters and is the difference!
Of course some skilled Muay Thai fighter beats a unskilled sloth (unless he sits on him as Muay Thia not known for their ground game), Just like a pro football player beats a fat spectator in a game of football. Skill does matter.
My point is, when your dealling with two fighters of basically the same skill set, you go with the bigger guy as size matters.
Thats why Warriors are always big, size is APART of their training. Size is a skill upon itself really!
Im not saying the smaller guy cant be skilled and even win when fighting unskilled sloths, but soon as he faces a big guy with equal training, the big guy wins most times because of size.
You use 260 lbs for you example so so will I (if you know the names)
BJ Penn is 155, world champion BJJ, World class boxer, multiple world champion MMA fighter! Been training for (lets say) 20 years
Brock Lesnar is a 265 D1 wrestling champ, pro wrestler champion, now HW champion of UFC! Been training Wrestling all his life but MMA for 5 years!
Who wins?
Ill give you 100 to 1 odds the Brock Lesnar wins by takeing BJ down (cause BJ to small to stop him) and pounding him out (because Brock to big and strong to combat).
BJ Penn is 10 times as skilled as Brock Lesnar is in MMA and probably 100 times more skilled in BJJ, But Brock wins 999 times outta 1000 because of his size and strenght and having a a basic understanding of copmbat skills.
I would disagree with brock beating BJ in a fight(yes sir i do know the names), lesnars "wrestling" training was fake seeing that WWE is fake and i would personally vouch for BJ in a fight against lesnar. There is no absolutes before a fight, you can't just assume lesnar would pound BJ in a matter of seconds due to his size, being bigger and winning the fight doesn't mean being a better fighter. The problem with MMA is there are almost no rules when it comes to a brawl unlike boxing and muay thai, anyone(especially bigger guys) could easily grab them by the leg, sit on them and then beat them to a pulp.
But truth be told, MMA is probably the closest thing to a stree fight, the exception is that it has a few rules where you cant kill your opponent.
I will say it again, other than seeing the small Muay Thai fighters taking out those bodybuilders, i have seen TWICE, Muay Thai combatants who trained 10 years take out larger, more powerfully built American heavyweight boxers in a ring.
Naw i personally prefer the traditional thai music they play before a match.
![=]](https://lvlt.forum.bioware.com/public/style_emoticons/default/sideways.png)
.
SithLordExarKun wrote...
Im not disagreeing with you Kal, size is definately an advantage.Kalfear wrote...
SithLordExarKun wrote...
Self ownage i guess, so you basically agree with me despite your arguments and implications that if you dont got the genetics, you aren't meant for the sport or role. Good job on arguing like a broken record by the way. And by the way, "success" is subjective. I can simply label you "succesful" when observing you picking up a piece of paper.kayrob wrote...
It doesn't make it impossible to do so, however, as the photos of your friend illustrate.Kalf, would you do me a favour and read myKalfear wrote...
Im a huge fight fan and let me tell you, when skills at the same level, the bigger guy wins 99% of the time!
And as Em23 posted, a big guy can take down a smaller skilled guy with size alone!
Anyone that watches MMA knows this. The bigger they are, the harder they hit, trained or not.
BJ
Penn is the most advanced LW fighter in the world today (for my money
anyways) but againts opponents 50 lbs heavier and more, Id be very hard
pressed to take BJ as a favorite to win any MMA fight unless hes
fighting some super green nobody with almost zero practical training!
Size
does matter and if your being told it doesnt, chance are your talking
to a smaller person.
posts properly? I never said size wasn't an advantage, i just said you
don't need to be BIG like a bodybuilder to be a fighter. Yes, size DOES
help against another smaller fighter but only if you have the skills to
fight.
I have seen with my own eyes 5'6 muay thai combatants in
thailand(140lbs) took out american bodybuilders who weighed 260lbs on
steroids rather easily, size alone don't dictate the outcome of a fight.
Problem is you keep talking about a skileld fighter vrs a unskilled fighter!
Size isnt the issue there, skill is
but warriors are skilled and when two fighters are the same skill, size matters and is the difference!
Of course some skilled Muay Thai fighter beats a unskilled sloth (unless he sits on him as Muay Thia not known for their ground game), Just like a pro football player beats a fat spectator in a game of football. Skill does matter.
My point is, when your dealling with two fighters of basically the same skill set, you go with the bigger guy as size matters.
Thats why Warriors are always big, size is APART of their training. Size is a skill upon itself really!
Im not saying the smaller guy cant be skilled and even win when fighting unskilled sloths, but soon as he faces a big guy with equal training, the big guy wins most times because of size.
You use 260 lbs for you example so so will I (if you know the names)
BJ Penn is 155, world champion BJJ, World class boxer, multiple world champion MMA fighter! Been training for (lets say) 20 years
Brock Lesnar is a 265 D1 wrestling champ, pro wrestler champion, now HW champion of UFC! Been training Wrestling all his life but MMA for 5 years!
Who wins?
Ill give you 100 to 1 odds the Brock Lesnar wins by takeing BJ down (cause BJ to small to stop him) and pounding him out (because Brock to big and strong to combat).
BJ Penn is 10 times as skilled as Brock Lesnar is in MMA and probably 100 times more skilled in BJJ, But Brock wins 999 times outta 1000 because of his size and strenght and having a a basic understanding of copmbat skills.
I would disagree with brock beating BJ in a fight(yes sir i do know the names), lesnars "wrestling" training was fake seeing that WWE is fake and i would personally vouch for BJ in a fight against lesnar. There is no absolutes before a fight, you can't just assume lesnar would pound BJ in a matter of seconds due to his size, being bigger and winning the fight doesn't mean being a better fighter. The problem with MMA is there are almost no rules when it comes to a brawl unlike boxing and muay thai, anyone(especially bigger guys) could easily grab them by the leg, sit on them and then beat them to a pulp.
But truth be told, MMA is probably the closest thing to a stree fight, the exception is that it has a few rules where you cant kill your opponent.
I will say it again, other than seeing the small Muay Thai fighters taking out those bodybuilders, i have seen TWICE, Muay Thai combatants who trained 10 years take out larger, more powerfully built American heavyweight boxers in a ring.
Ok. Im sorry that i'm not as smart as you.thebrah wrote...
Brock Lesnar wrestled in college you idiot.
SithLordExarKun wrote...
So you're basically agreeing with me. Whats your argument this time? And by the way, they're still warriors regardless of what weapon and armor they use just as you said.KLUME777 wrote...
SithLordExarKun wrote...
And by the way, grow up. Theres no "rogue class" in real life, so it doesn't matter what your build is or how you train.
In medieval times, warrior equivelants would be the sword and shield, claymore, armoured 'tank' type.
Rogue equivelents would be archers, light armoured, 'martial arts', cut throats. Light weight warriors.
There all warriors. In DAO the tanks are called warriors, and the light armored are called 'rogues'.
This alone debunks your half assed assertions that "if you wannabe a roughe you need tis genetic, u wanna be warrior, u need tat genetic".
Hey I am not angry!mynameisdanza wrote...
Everyone is so angry!
But on topic, I'm gonna go ahead and be the minority and say I would looove a more petite human. I felt like a monster in DA:O!
I understand the best of the best blah blah blah stuff, but hey, I want a narrow shouldered, short, thin human! So, uh, an elf I suppose
mynameisdanza wrote...
Everyone is so angry!
But on topic, I'm gonna go ahead and be the minority and say I would looove a more petite human. I felt like a monster in DA:O!
I understand the best of the best blah blah blah stuff, but hey, I want a narrow shouldered, short, thin human! So, uh, an elf I suppose
Tirigon wrote...
Eorion_Moonwing wrote...
Hmm..all females have large breasts (HUGE in the case of elven female) , full, small mouth and wide hips. All males have broad holders. This is definitely not so different in the shape department. Elven female should be flat chested and her hips should be narrow as well as male shoulders. At least elven ears are horse-like (like they were on the sithe or alfs-not Lotro elves) , and they have narrow, long faces with exotic eyes and nose.
DAO elves were humans with the pointy ears-and fans do not helped it making round faced, small eared, snub-nosed- "little human girls".
Well, actually elves look like humans, only with pointy ears, more slim and infinitely more beautiful.
I wish only one game would ever get this right......
Lotro elves-yes. Because they were meant to look like beautiful humans with leaf shaped ears. Iw you surch them try lotro-based game like lorto online or soon to be released War of the North (www.gamer.ru/system/attached_images/images/000/214/541/original/e3_SS_02.jpg) . But elves exist before the lotro and they were inhuman. Beautiful but strangely, alien beautiful.Tirigon wrote...
Well, actually elves look like humans, only with pointy ears, more slim and infinitely more beautiful.
I wish only one game would ever get this right......
females are in general weak and inferior to men so it makes sense.KLUME777 wrote...
Anyway i started my first comment on this argument because other people were complaining that Human Female Warrior is slim, and not enough muscle, and doesn't fit the bill for warriors. So i said, "lets make three different bodies for the three classes so it fits, and then everyone is happy".
Eorion_Moonwing wrote...
Lotro elves-yes. Because they were meant to look like beautiful humans with leaf shaped ears. Iw you surch them try lotro-based game like lorto online or soon to be released War of the North (www.gamer.ru/system/attached_images/images/000/214/541/original/e3_SS_02.jpg) . But elves exist before the lotro and they were inhuman. Beautiful but strangely, alien beautiful.Tirigon wrote...
Well, actually elves look like humans, only with pointy ears, more slim and infinitely more beautiful.
I wish only one game would ever get this right......
KLUME777 wrote...
Anyway i started my first comment on this argument because other people were complaining that Human Female Warrior is slim, and not enough muscle, and doesn't fit the bill for warriors. So i said, "lets make three different bodies for the three classes so it fits, and then everyone is happy".
it would be rad for u since you could live out your fantasy of being athletic.mynameisdanza wrote...
KLUME777 wrote...
Anyway i started my first comment on this argument because other people were complaining that Human Female Warrior is slim, and not enough muscle, and doesn't fit the bill for warriors. So i said, "lets make three different bodies for the three classes so it fits, and then everyone is happy".
This would be rad if it was just 3 diff bodies period. Not restricted to class.
thebrah wrote...
it would be rad for u since you could live out your fantasy of being athletic.mynameisdanza wrote...
KLUME777 wrote...
Anyway i started my first comment on this argument because other people were complaining that Human Female Warrior is slim, and not enough muscle, and doesn't fit the bill for warriors. So i said, "lets make three different bodies for the three classes so it fits, and then everyone is happy".
This would be rad if it was just 3 diff bodies period. Not restricted to class.
thebrah wrote...
it would be rad for u since you could live out your fantasy of being athletic.mynameisdanza wrote...
KLUME777 wrote...
Anyway i started my first comment on this argument because other people were complaining that Human Female Warrior is slim, and not enough muscle, and doesn't fit the bill for warriors. So i said, "lets make three different bodies for the three classes so it fits, and then everyone is happy".
This would be rad if it was just 3 diff bodies period. Not restricted to class.
Em23 wrote...
I don't know... I've seen some black belt whatevers undone by a bear tackle from an otherwise unskilled big guy.SithLordExarKun wrote...
Some Geth wrote...
I am not fat or big and I am not a bodybuilder but I am good at Taekwondo and my kicks can hurt.
Exactly, Im tired of ignorant and foolish people saying you need to be big to be a fighter when you don't.
Kalfear wrote...
Im a huge fight fan and let me tell you, when skills at the same level, the bigger guy wins 99% of the time!
And as Em23 posted, a big guy can take down a smaller skilled guy with size alone!
:devil:
Retour en haut
