Viper or Mattock for vangaurd
#1
Posté 09 août 2010 - 07:11
#2
Posté 09 août 2010 - 07:20
Modifié par Kronner, 09 août 2010 - 07:21 .
#3
Posté 09 août 2010 - 08:20
#4
Posté 09 août 2010 - 08:26
You're a Vanguard, not an Infiltrator.
Modifié par MadCat221, 09 août 2010 - 08:50 .
#5
Posté 10 août 2010 - 03:07
Viper is the better choice IMO. The times where you cannot or would not Charge are usually also the times that would best benefit from a scope.
#6
Posté 10 août 2010 - 03:20
According to the Wiki, the Mattock has the edge on RPM, which gives it a definite edge in DPS. 327.6 DPS for the Viper, versus 630 DPS for the Mattock.
And, as stated earlier, it works better in a pinch up close.
Mattock is still a better choice for Vanguard.
Modifié par MadCat221, 10 août 2010 - 03:22 .
#7
Posté 10 août 2010 - 03:28
I haven't seen any calculations so far that use realistic numbers and factor in the 50% extra headshot damage from the Viper.
In the end it doesn't make a big difference. For a vanguard, I would personally choose the Viper. I am a big fan of the Mattock, but I find that it runs out of ammo too fast if I don't use Adrenaline Rush. The Viper may have slightly less ROUNDS, but it deals much more damage per shot.
By the way, I am skeptical of those numbers. Aren't all other DPS figures on the wiki with reload times considered as well? You have to reload the Mattock every 2 seconds or so with the max RoF so you'd need to factor that in as well.
Modifié par termokanden, 10 août 2010 - 03:30 .
#8
Posté 10 août 2010 - 03:30
End of discussion.
#9
Posté 10 août 2010 - 04:07
#10
Posté 10 août 2010 - 04:10
And then there's still my point about reload times. I seem to remember them being factored into the other DPS figures, so you can't compare if you don't do that.
I am skeptical because I simply can't accept that the Mattock should be doing twice the DPS of the Viper. Just doesn't look right, and neither does 630 DPS. That's insane
#11
Posté 10 août 2010 - 04:22
Valdan777 wrote...
Which one is a better choice and why? At first I was thinking viper but then I realized that even at close range it kills things like scions faster to hip fire a viper then it does a shotgun and sniper rifles don't get range multipliers. But the mattock does get the range multiplier and I'm wondering if it would turn out to be a overall more effective choice?
I think I would argue in favour of the Mattock. Like the Viper, it offers a potent long range attack that can deal unholy punishment out a rapid rate.
Unlike the Viper, it's also quite effective up close thanks to it's potential rate of fire and damage per shot.
An arsenal of Phalanx, Locust, Scimitar and Mattock should see you through most admirably.
#12
Posté 10 août 2010 - 05:31
The Mattock is very accurate and works great at close range (unlike the viper), eg, when you're in a bad situation and switching weapons it's not an option or your shotty ran out ammo.
#13
Posté 10 août 2010 - 06:32
#14
Posté 10 août 2010 - 08:51
#15
Posté 10 août 2010 - 09:56
Note: The Mattock is a beast so I wouldn't underrate it.
#16
Posté 10 août 2010 - 10:31
Relix28 wrote...
One word: Claymore.
End of discussion.
Ha ha. However, the Eviscerator and Mattock make one helluva no-scope combo. Two of the best firing from the hip guns in the game!
#17
Posté 11 août 2010 - 12:40
#18
Posté 12 août 2010 - 12:02
#19
Posté 12 août 2010 - 12:08
yuckygeo wrote...
Can I ask why someone would take something other than the Claymore as a Vanguard? I'm on my first Vanguard playthrough and I can't wait to get that thing, even if I suck with it.
Rate of fire is terrible. On harder difficulty levels you can get owned in a hurry if not careful.
#20
Posté 12 août 2010 - 12:35
justgimmedudedammit wrote...
yuckygeo wrote...
Can I ask why someone would take something other than the Claymore as a Vanguard? I'm on my first Vanguard playthrough and I can't wait to get that thing, even if I suck with it.
Rate of fire is terrible. On harder difficulty levels you can get owned in a hurry if not careful.
I always take the Claymore. It bring's some challenge and it's incredibly satisfying when you one shot a collector with a full barrier on hardcore/insanity.
Offcourse the Eviscerator is also very effective, has better range and it's much easier to use overall, but as I said, nothing is as safisfying as a point blank one shot kill from the Claymore.
As a sidenote for anyone who wants to/is using a Claymore. Learn the reload trick, it's not that hard really.
Here's a vid showcasing the increased fire rate you get for using the reload trick.
Enjoy
Modifié par Relix28, 12 août 2010 - 12:36 .
#21
Posté 12 août 2010 - 12:44
#22
Posté 12 août 2010 - 01:05
Relix28 wrote...
justgimmedudedammit wrote...
yuckygeo wrote...
Can I ask why someone would take something other than the Claymore as a Vanguard? I'm on my first Vanguard playthrough and I can't wait to get that thing, even if I suck with it.
Rate of fire is terrible. On harder difficulty levels you can get owned in a hurry if not careful.
I always take the Claymore. It bring's some challenge and it's incredibly satisfying when you one shot a collector with a full barrier on hardcore/insanity.Plus it's practically built for Vanguards, since most of your kills after a charge are @ point blank, and that's where the Claymore shines the most.
Offcourse the Eviscerator is also very effective, has better range and it's much easier to use overall, but as I said, nothing is as safisfying as a point blank one shot kill from the Claymore.
As a sidenote for anyone who wants to/is using a Claymore. Learn the reload trick, it's not that hard really.
Here's a vid showcasing the increased fire rate you get for using the reload trick.
Enjoy
Thanks for the info. I get owned pretty often anyway since I'm pretty bad using Charge.
#23
Posté 12 août 2010 - 01:36
#24
Posté 12 août 2010 - 01:40
#25
Posté 12 août 2010 - 02:19
Modifié par OniGanon, 12 août 2010 - 02:28 .





Retour en haut







