Aller au contenu

Photo

The Alistair Gush Thread: *Squee*


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
39010 réponses à ce sujet

#15601
inclemency

inclemency
  • Members
  • 1 849 messages

Lady Jess wrote...

For our Skeleton companion loving friends, I discovered a spell combo last night on Caislyn (I love those little surprises)

*snip*


Jess, that rocks! Lol, thank you :D  This will be fun!


Unwelcome events at the Landsmeet
Image IPB

Modifié par inclemency, 31 octobre 2010 - 06:20 .


#15602
LadyDamodred

LadyDamodred
  • Members
  • 5 122 messages

Costin_Razvan wrote...
And it always baffles me to a level that people just use their friendship as an excuse to kill someone.

Friends do not ask friends to kill another person.


I agree with you there.  My PCs always have plenty of reasons for killing Loghain, and the way I play, it never comes down to having that argument about killing him.

#15603
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

rak72 wrote...

If you excuse Loghain's actions because you honestly believe that he believed the GW's were trying to betray Fereldan, than that would make Log a completely insane, delusional nut case.  The GW's never did anything to indicate they were tring to overthrow Fereldan.  Why would anyone want someone with such a tenuous grasp of reality watching their back?  And having someone that was there with you the whole time, ACTUALY watching your back, executed is just cold and wrong.  Whether or not you are BFFs, or just mildly sociable.


Have you read "The Calling" or played Soldier's Peak? The Wardens were guilty of treason twice.

#15604
Maria13

Maria13
  • Members
  • 3 831 messages
I think Loghain and Acturus deserve each other. They both think they are the centre of the universe and value subordination over genuine loyalty. It will end badly.

#15605
rak72

rak72
  • Members
  • 2 299 messages

Costin_Razvan wrote...


If you excuse Loghain's actions because you honestly believe that he believed the GW's were trying to betray Fereldan, than that would make Log a completely insane, delusional nut case.


Excuse Loghain's actions? When did Knight say he was excusing them for that?

Knight didn't feel Loghain's actions needed excusing for the most part ( except for a few things ).


KoP stated that he didn't take the assasination attempts and such  personaly because Log thought he was doing what was right.  Therefore,  KoP excused the assasination attempts and such.

#15606
LadyDamodred

LadyDamodred
  • Members
  • 5 122 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

LadyDamodred wrote...

I suppose, for me, it's a personality thing. I am loyal to a fault, especially to those I love and my friends. Certain traits carry over to my PCs and that's one of them. I cannot ever conceive of killing someone I love or a friend because my image might take a hit. It just.... It's not going to happen ever. I can't wrap my head around it. I know and understand logically what you're saying, but on a deeper level, it will always leave me baffled.


A belief that you are of course perfectly entitled to have.
I see it differently. When oen forfiets their loyalty to me, I do nto feel obliged to return it.


Even if they are disloyal--and believe me, been there done that--I still wouldn't kill them.  In fact, I tend to get pretty wrathful and want them gone and to suffer a miserable life.  >.>  So...yeah, guess if I ever do spare Loghain, exile!Alistair is the perfect ending.

#15607
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

tuppence95 wrote...
How did Arcturus feel about Loghain rewarding Howe for killing your parents and claiming they were traitors?


A practical and political move. Why should Loghain make Howe an enemy, it would have been stupid. They were political bed buddies and politics often does not allow us the luxury of picking the allies we want or like.

Think of it as the Allies allying with the USSR and Stalin in WW2 who was as bad as Hitler if not worse. But they had little choice in the matter.

tuppence95 wrote...
Also, we learned right at the start of the game, and apparently it is common "knowledge" that Grey Wardens are needed to end the Blight.  Now, maybe that is just a story made up by the wardens to glorify themselves.  But with a Blight coming, would a smart person really want to take a chance on ignoring that?


It isn't. It's folk tale with little eivdence.
I agree that Loghain should not have completely ruled out the Wardens and should have considered it more. But that's not a reason for me to execute him.

tuppence95 wrote...
Again, I say, if Loghain had been successful, he would have been responsible for the destruction of Ferelden.  My warden knew that.  She felt his continued attempts showed that he was not rational.  Even Cauthrien admitted he was not in his right mind.  To my warden, that didn't make him a trustworthy candidate and good warden material.


Arcturus didn't know that actually, until Riordan told him. Before that, he didn't know.
So that's hindesight logic that my character could not have used.

Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 31 octobre 2010 - 06:25 .


#15608
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

rak72 wrote...
KoP stated that he didn't take the assasination attempts and such  personaly because Log thought he was doing what was right.  Therefore,  KoP excused the assasination attempts and such.


No, I said I didn't take them personally. Different.
They were not a strong enough reason for me to want to execute him.

#15609
rak72

rak72
  • Members
  • 2 299 messages

Persephone wrote...

rak72 wrote...

If you excuse Loghain's actions because you honestly believe that he believed the GW's were trying to betray Fereldan, than that would make Log a completely insane, delusional nut case.  The GW's never did anything to indicate they were tring to overthrow Fereldan.  Why would anyone want someone with such a tenuous grasp of reality watching their back?  And having someone that was there with you the whole time, ACTUALY watching your back, executed is just cold and wrong.  Whether or not you are BFFs, or just mildly sociable.


Have you read "The Calling" or played Soldier's Peak? The Wardens were guilty of treason twice.


I'm talking about Ostagar, Log drew up the plans, the GW's were all fighting where they were suppose to be. How does Log get off saying that the GW's were in some conspiracy there.  What did they do in Ostagar that justified Log hunting Al & PC down like dogs for 2 yrs?

#15610
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

rak72 wrote...
I'm talking about Ostagar, Log drew up the plans, the GW's were all fighting where they were suppose to be. How does Log get off saying that the GW's were in some conspiracy there.  What did they do in Ostagar that justified Log hunting Al & PC down like dogs for 2 yrs?


Grey Wardens amassing at the borders with 4 legions of chevaliers is one reason.

#15611
rak72

rak72
  • Members
  • 2 299 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

rak72 wrote...
I'm talking about Ostagar, Log drew up the plans, the GW's were all fighting where they were suppose to be. How does Log get off saying that the GW's were in some conspiracy there.  What did they do in Ostagar that justified Log hunting Al & PC down like dogs for 2 yrs?


Grey Wardens amassing at the borders with 4 legions of chevaliers is one reason.


And they were obviously needed since Log quit the field sincee didn't have the manpower himself to defeat the DS.  Just would have been nice if he told everyone else that he wasn't going to be sticking around.

#15612
Lady Jess

Lady Jess
  • Members
  • 6 376 messages
to Add to KoP's points about the order, later you find this, tucked in a book in your Vigil's Keep throne room...



Image IPB

#15613
tuppence95

tuppence95
  • Members
  • 3 085 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

tuppence95 wrote...
Again, I say, if Loghain had been successful, he would have been responsible for the destruction of Ferelden.  My warden knew that.  She felt his continued attempts showed that he was not rational.  Even Cauthrien admitted he was not in his right mind.  To my warden, that didn't make him a trustworthy candidate and good warden material.


Arcturus didn't know that actually, until Riordan told him. Before that, he didn't know.
So that's hindesight logic that my character could not have used.


Ok, I'm willing to buy the fact that your warden believed the answers you gave me in my other questions.  But even though we did now know how to kill an archdemon, we knew that our one purpose was to defeat the blight.  At least my wardens didn't believe that it was an old wives tale that Duncan told for entertainment value.  We believed that was our sole purpose.  And we knew that Loghain made one move after another that would prevent us from doing that.  Maybe his withdrawal from Ostagar could have been chalked up to a tactical decision, but his lying about the wardens being responsible and his attempts to have us killed were not.  

His daughter tells us he is obsessed.  She tells us he might have had her killed.  She and Cauthrien both tell us he is not rational.  His daughter tells the landsmeet that this man is no longer the Hero of River Dane.  All these things are not hindsight.  They happen before we must make a decision about Loghain's fate at LM.  For my wardens, these things all chalk up to a person who is not a person I would want watching my back.

Modifié par tuppence95, 31 octobre 2010 - 06:33 .


#15614
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

rak72 wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

rak72 wrote...
I'm talking about Ostagar, Log drew up the plans, the GW's were all fighting where they were suppose to be. How does Log get off saying that the GW's were in some conspiracy there.  What did they do in Ostagar that justified Log hunting Al & PC down like dogs for 2 yrs?


Grey Wardens amassing at the borders with 4 legions of chevaliers is one reason.


And they were obviously needed since Log quit the field sincee didn't have the manpower himself to defeat the DS.  Just would have been nice if he told everyone else that he wasn't going to be sticking around.


Were they? I surely never used them. And the decision to retreat was not made in advance. (As confirmed by David Gaider)

#15615
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

tuppence95 wrote...
Ok, I'm willing to buy the fact that your warden believed the answers you gave me in my other questions.  But even though we did now know how to kill an archdemon, we knew that our one purpose was to defeat the blight. 


Our purpose yes. Did we know that only we could do it?
I didn't. I was told that, but I didn't know. 

tuppence95 wrote...
His daughter tells us he is obsessed.  She tells us he might have had her killed.  She and Cauthrien both tell us he is not rational.  His daughter tells the landsmeet that his man is no longer the Hero of River Dane.  All these things are not hindsight.  They happen before we must make a decision about Loghain's fate at LM.  For my wardens, these things all chalk up to a person who is not a person I would want watching my back.


Anora wants you as an ally and as such would rather show herself as firmly against Loghain.
And yes, they say that. Eamon on the otherhand also speaks highly of Loghain. So there are arguments for both cases and both are valid.

I am not suggesting that those who do not trust Loghain are idiots.

#15616
tuppence95

tuppence95
  • Members
  • 3 085 messages
And btw, I think KoP already knows this, but Costin and Persephone, I have no hard feelings about your ingame choices differing from mine. I enjoy a good debate, and I'm not going to take anything personally. :-)


#15617
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

tuppence95 wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

tuppence95 wrote...
Again, I say, if Loghain had been successful, he would have been responsible for the destruction of Ferelden.  My warden knew that.  She felt his continued attempts showed that he was not rational.  Even Cauthrien admitted he was not in his right mind.  To my warden, that didn't make him a trustworthy candidate and good warden material.


Arcturus didn't know that actually, until Riordan told him. Before that, he didn't know.
So that's hindesight logic that my character could not have used.


Ok, I'm willing to buy the fact that your warden believed the answers you gave me in my other questions.  But even though we did now know how to kill an archdemon, we knew that our one purpose was to defeat the blight.  At least my wardens didn't believe that it was an old wives tale that Duncan told for entertainment value.  We believed that was our sole purpose.  And we knew that Loghain made one move after another that would prevent us from doing that.  Maybe his withdrawal from Ostagar could have been chalked up to a tactical decision, but his lying about the wardens being responsible and his attempts to have us killed were not.  

His daughter tells us he is obsessed.  She tells us he might have had her killed.  She and Cauthrien both tell us he is not rational.  His daughter tells the landsmeet that his man is no longer the Hero of River Dane.  All these things are not hindsight.  They happen before we must make a decision about Loghain's fate at LM.  For my wardens, these things all chalk up to a person who is not a person I would want watching my back.



Well, my Wardens did wonder just WHY they were needed. Alistair did not provide them with much information and how can I expect Loghain to know something even they don't until Riordan spills the beans?

Anora is a politician. Loghain never wanted her dead but, as he confirms later if you use Ejoslin's Loghain patch, Howe did. Anora also slanders her father to gain the throne, if you do not support her and/or tell her that you plan to murder her father, she'll tell a very different tale. (Understandably) And once he has taken the Joining and understood about the Blight, what would he stand to gain by murdering you except his own death, life as a fugitive and the destruction of Ferelden? The man isn't a fool obsessed with vengeance going that deeply.

#15618
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

tuppence95 wrote...

And btw, I think KoP already knows this, but Costin and Persephone, I have no hard feelings about your ingame choices differing from mine. I enjoy a good debate, and I'm not going to take anything personally. :-)


Oh, I know. I am glad that we are having this discussion and that it is so civilized and insighful. Many of the differing points are food for thought to me. :happy:

#15619
Costin_Razvan

Costin_Razvan
  • Members
  • 7 010 messages

tuppence95 wrote...

And btw, I think KoP already knows this, but Costin and Persephone, I have no hard feelings about your ingame choices differing from mine. I enjoy a good debate, and I'm not going to take anything personally. :-)


Well that's good to know at least. :)

#15620
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

Lady Jess wrote...

to Add to KoP's points about the order, later you find this, tucked in a book in your Vigil's Keep throne room...


Yes, it's clear the Wardens are not as politically neutral as they like us to believe.

#15621
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Lady Jess wrote...

to Add to KoP's points about the order, later you find this, tucked in a book in your Vigil's Keep throne room...


Yes, it's clear the Wardens are not as politically neutral as they like us to believe.


Yep. Soldier's Peak illustrated that rather nicely. I love taking Loghain along for this. His comment to Leliana about Maric and his compliment to my Warden once the Keep is secure are awesome. :P

#15622
rak72

rak72
  • Members
  • 2 299 messages

Persephone wrote...

rak72 wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

rak72 wrote...
I'm talking about Ostagar, Log drew up the plans, the GW's were all fighting where they were suppose to be. How does Log get off saying that the GW's were in some conspiracy there.  What did they do in Ostagar that justified Log hunting Al & PC down like dogs for 2 yrs?


Grey Wardens amassing at the borders with 4 legions of chevaliers is one reason.


And they were obviously needed since Log quit the field sincee didn't have the manpower himself to defeat the DS.  Just would have been nice if he told everyone else that he wasn't going to be sticking around.


Were they? I surely never used them. And the decision to retreat was not made in advance. (As confirmed by David Gaider)

Again, I am refering to Ostagar.  If you believe Log's good intentions, he retreated because he did not have the manpower at Ost to defeat th DS. The extra GWs would have come in very handy there.  It was Logs decision not to let them in, then it was HIS decision to leave when he was out numbered.  Where is the logic in blaming ANY of the GWs, let alone PC & Al, for any of what happened?

#15623
tuppence95

tuppence95
  • Members
  • 3 085 messages
Heading out to visit family and take my dog on a playdate, so I'll miss the rest of this discussion.

But we haven't had enough Alistair in the past couple pages!  Posting a pic on my way out.

Image IPB

#15624
Lady Jess

Lady Jess
  • Members
  • 6 376 messages
Ya know what's creepy? playing this warden who HAS spared Loghain, and looking at her...and looking at him...bad BAD plot bunny in my head >.<



Image IPB

Image IPB

#15625
tuppence95

tuppence95
  • Members
  • 3 085 messages

Persephone wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Lady Jess wrote...

to Add to KoP's points about the order, later you find this, tucked in a book in your Vigil's Keep throne room...


Yes, it's clear the Wardens are not as politically neutral as they like us to believe.


Yep. Soldier's Peak illustrated that rather nicely. I love taking Loghain along for this. His comment to Leliana about Maric and his compliment to my Warden once the Keep is secure are awesome. :P


Ohh, I've never tried that.  I only took him along for RtO.  I wonder if there are any youtube videos with his dialogue?

Rushing out!  It's been interesting!  :)