sylvanaerie wrote...
Perhaps it can reform. Perhaps (Whomever) takes over once Bhelen is gone might be able to maintain the reforms and build on them. Make them for the good of Orzammar. In that I CAN see hope for the city. I see it taking several generations though if it does. The dwarves revere their ancestors and 'the stone' for good reason, as many of their traditions (and personalities) seem to be as if they were carved in stone.
It is said "an ill wind blows no good" and not even Bhelen (unlike Harrowmont) is that.
Yea definitely, I personally favor slow but steady reforms anyways. Volatile reforms (often associated with revolutionary beliefs) usually do not bring the change needed and are hard to maintain.
That's what I like about Bhelen. He didn't abolish the caste system, but loosened it. He didn't redistribute wealth to the casteless and gave them rights all of a sudden, but gave them an opportunity to earn them. He didn't base his legitimacy on populism, but on House Aeducan. He didn't massacre the nobility, but abolished the assembly (Which only represents a few noble houses, and only after they tried to assassinate him several times). For all we know, Bhelen can re-institute the assembly after he passed the reforms and laws he needed (the Assembly was afterall brought back when it was first disolved). He isn't a revolutionary. He is a reformer.
And even in the future, if Bhelen's regime does collapse (and no regime stays forever), whatever comes next will have a hard time reversing all this and they would be better served to expand on Bhelen's reforms.





Retour en haut










