47 réponses à ce sujet

[verrall20]

I really hope not becuse I don't like the look of dragon age 2.

[bzombo]

doesn't look like golems is it. chris priestly said there'd be plenty more just before golems was announced. if we were only gettin golems, i'd hope they'd have told us this was it.

[Tirigon]

What golems?

[Zy-El]

They've just released Golems of Amgarrak. That's 3 DLC's in the last 4 months. There's still 7 months to go before Dragon Age2. At this rate, we can probably expect another 4 or 5 DLC's - maybe an expansion - to be released.

[MistySun]

Those golems...the ones that crunch your bones.

There is a Morrigan DLC that we have heard is coming.....i wonder if it is about her childhood in the wilds.

[k9medusa]

MistySun wrote...

Those golems...the ones that crunch your bones.

There is a Morrigan DLC that we have heard is coming.....i wonder if it is about her childhood in the wilds.

=)  "Me want...."

[Zy-El]

Actually, I'm hoping for a Morrigan-based expansion that will settle the whole god-baby issue. It would have to be the size of an expansion though; a DLC would be too short to do it justice. And it would be in Orlais, after all (according to the epilogue balloons about a certain mage appearing in the court of Orlais).

[Chris Priestly]

There is still more Dragon Age: Origins DLC to come. Stay tuned.

Modifié par Chris Priestly, 10 août 2010 - 08:01 .

[Ad Dugg]

Chris Priestly wrote...

There is still more Dragon Age: Origins DLC to come. Stay tuned.

LEGEND!

BTW I really loved this DLC once I was finished pulled all my hair out.  Really fun piece to play and them Achivements were just utterly cruel!

Nice work though for sure.

[TheRevanchist]

Zy-El wrote...

Actually, I'm hoping for a Morrigan-based expansion that will settle the whole god-baby issue. It would have to be the size of an expansion though; a DLC would be too short to do it justice. And it would be in Orlais, after all (according to the epilogue balloons about a certain mage appearing in the court of Orlais).

David Gaider has been quoted saying that the God Child is not canon. So a DLC about something that not everyone can do is kinda cruel to those who did not make that choice.

[Ad Dugg]

[quote]kylecouch wrote...

[quote]So a DLC about something that not everyone can do is kinda cruel to those who did not make that choice.[/quote]

I see your point but the same could be said about awakening.  Technically half the players shouldn't have been able to play that.

Modifié par Ad Dugg, 10 août 2010 - 08:45 .

[TheRevanchist]

[quote]Ad Dugg wrote...

[quote]kylecouch wrote...


[quote]So a DLC about something that not everyone can do is kinda cruel to those who did not make that choice.[/quote]

I see your point but the same could be said about awakening.  Technically half the players shouldn't have been able to play that.

[/quote]
How do you figure? You can simply create an awsomesauce Orlisan Warden. Or you can deal with Biowares ret-con of The Warden...but in all seriousness I don't consider that the same as the DR. Thats a personal choice the player makes, if a DLC about the god child was released Bioware would basicly be saying "F you Ultimate Sacrifice people!" The ret-conned Warden does not make the DR a fact in your awakenings file either. It has no explination it's simply a ret-con that makes no sense lol.

[Ad Dugg]

kylecouch wrote...



How do you figure? You can simply create an awsomesauce Orlisan Warden. Or you can deal with Biowares ret-con of The Warden...but in all seriousness I don't consider that the same as the DR. Thats a personal choice the player makes, if a DLC about the god child was released Bioware would basicly be saying "F you Ultimate Sacrifice people!" The ret-conned Warden does not make the DR a fact in your awakenings file either. It has no explination it's simply a ret-con that makes no sense lol.

The point I'm trying to make is that Awakening said

"ok ultimate people if thats how you played it, then we'll just ignore it and pretend it didn't happen and you can carry playing as the same Warden"

which is fine by me and I'm hoping a Morrigan DLC would take a similar approach of "lets pretend you did".

That way everyone can play regardless of choices made.

[TheRevanchist]

Ad Dugg wrote...

kylecouch wrote...



How do you figure? You can simply create an awsomesauce Orlisan Warden. Or you can deal with Biowares ret-con of The Warden...but in all seriousness I don't consider that the same as the DR. Thats a personal choice the player makes, if a DLC about the god child was released Bioware would basicly be saying "F you Ultimate Sacrifice people!" The ret-conned Warden does not make the DR a fact in your awakenings file either. It has no explination it's simply a ret-con that makes no sense lol.

The point I'm trying to make is that Awakening said

"ok ultimate people if thats how you played it, then we'll just ignore it and pretend it didn't happen and you can carry playing as the same Warden"

which is fine by me and I'm hoping a Morrigan DLC would take a similar approach of "lets pretend you did".

That way everyone can play regardless of choices made.

Awakenings didn't exactly ignore that choice. People were given a choice to import their Warden or make a new one. Now while I was rather hoping it would import the information rather then the character thats just not the case. Gaider said they didn't bother createing an in-game reason for an out of game decision. (refering to the import.) I see you're point when you say it that way. However it just seems like a different situation to me.

[Mr.Cousland_]

DR isnt Canon? Seriously? You have any proof he said this?



I hope the US isnt canon, my Wardens to much of a BAWSE to let some chump Dragon kill him off.

[Stoomkal]

There. Is. No. Canon.

[GithCheater]

Chris Priestly wrote...

There is still more Dragon Age: Origins DLC to come. Stay tuned.

Stay tuned?  Sorry, I am already way of key ... lah lah woo

[pumpmasterflash]

I am sorry but this is going to sound stupid. What is a canon?

[DapperDan77]

Canon is the "official" storyline of what the warden did during Origins.

e.g. Mass Effect you can play through as a femshep, but the "canon" Shephard is male. So any comics, novels etc. will always be about a male Shephard.

[KalSkirata999]

Not so sure about the comics, but in the novels it never states if Shepard is male or female.

[Drizzt ORierdan]

"Canon" are the characters and facts that remain "the same" for all players and throughout all playthroughs: ie.: The Death of the Archdemon, the night attack on Redcliffe, Flemeth's succesful rescue in the Tower of Ishal, Morrigan's flight at the end, Bann Teagan gets to survive, etc.

Shepard is a "default" character, meaning has "pre-set" characteristics by Bioware. "You" just choose some from the pool of possibilities, gender be one of them.

Modifié par Drizzt ORierdan, 11 août 2010 - 07:02 .

[Dave of Canada]

Mr.Cousland wrote...

DR isnt Canon? Seriously? You have any proof he said this?

I hope the US isnt canon, my Wardens to much of a BAWSE to let some chump Dragon kill him off.

Neither of them are canon, the choice you made is infact your own personal canon choice.

[DapperDan77]

Drizzt ORierdan wrote...

"Canon" are the characters and
facts that remain "the same" for all players and throughout all
playthroughs: ie.: The Death of the Archdemon, the night attack on
Redcliffe, Flemeth's succesful rescue in the Tower of Ishal, Morrigan's
flight at the end, Bann Teagan gets to survive, etc.

Well no, not quite. It's like I said, canon is the official story of what happened. It's possible to play a non-canon game.
Mass Effect was a bad example, so let's say Baldur's Gate. The canon party is Imoen, Khalid, Jaheira, Minsc and Dynaheir, although you by no means have to play through with that party.
Or KotOR for instance. Official Star Wars canon is that the main protaganist is male and light side.
Nothing stopping you from playing through as a female dark side jedi however.

Modifié par DapperDan77, 11 août 2010 - 07:43 .

[pumpmasterflash]

Ok! I kind of get it now! Thanks!