Rubbish Hero wrote...
I would much rather Bioware used it for DLC than this "Bioware 250 points" nonsense, but it wont happen.
Steam has nothing to do with BioWare Points.
Rubbish Hero wrote...
I would much rather Bioware used it for DLC than this "Bioware 250 points" nonsense, but it wont happen.
MKDAWUSS wrote...
Up next: Pay for patches!
... you know, somebody ought to try that one of these days and see how well that fares.
Rubbish Hero wrote...
Sylvius the Mad wrote...
That is just patently false.Rubbish Hero wrote...
Practically sounds vaguely similar to factual, which makes me factually correct.
It's pretty apparent you are completely bias towards steam, making any argument on this comment bias and thus an unreliable source.
Modifié par Dave of Canada, 13 août 2010 - 07:05 .
Saibh wrote... Point out these facts to me. The number of users Steam has?
Saibh wrote...Would you like me to compare it with the number of gamers Steam doesn't have
Modifié par Rubbish Hero, 13 août 2010 - 07:12 .
Bryy_Miller wrote...Steam has nothing to do with BioWare Points.
Dave of Canada wrote... And you're obviously biased towards it,.
Modifié par Rubbish Hero, 13 août 2010 - 07:14 .
Rubbish Hero wrote...
Saibh wrote... Point out these facts to me. The number of users Steam has?
I already did, scroll up. Or jump back a page, or e.t.c...Saibh wrote...Would you like me to compare it with the number of gamers Steam doesn't have
No, that would be an extremely vague speculative argument as there are far too many factors as opposed to one in context that can be specified.
The argument is already over, what exactly are you attempting to argue now? That Steam Isn't popular? That there is more than 25 million people out there who feel it is intrusive and terrible?
Saibh wrote... If the argument is so over, and you so won, why do you keep coming back?
Saibh wrote...Regardless, you're attempting to prove that Steam's method is best because they're "popular".
Modifié par Rubbish Hero, 13 août 2010 - 07:30 .
AlanC9 wrote...I don't have any particular feelings about Steam one way or the other, though. Would millions of indifferent people like me make Steam "popular"?
Modifié par Rubbish Hero, 13 août 2010 - 07:36 .
Rubbish Hero wrote...
Saibh wrote... If the argument is so over, and you so won, why do you keep coming back?
Deep down I just want to loved. My father use to beat me.
And occasionally use the boston crab.
Saibh wrote...Regardless, you're attempting to prove that Steam's method is best because they're "popular".
Please flip back and read the whole thread , examples and explanations were given. Attempting to discredit "popular" as worthless while previously attempting to inadvertently make an argument of "un-popular" in order to discredit is rather contradictory and certantly highly inferior to my own excellent factually backed up points. Once again it appears I have triumphed over ignorance.
Please cease arguing, it's apparent you have little invested and are purely arguing because you can.
This is juvenile, we are moving on.
Rubbish Hero wrote...
AlanC9 wrote...I don't have any particular feelings about Steam one way or the other, though. Would millions of indifferent people like me make Steam "popular"?
Perhaps 23 of those 25 million are into Human League?
David Gaider wrote...
Making money is clearly evil?Bryy_Miller wrote...
What's so bad about them wanting to combat re-sales?
Either that or Rubbish Hero has a daily bitterness quota to achieve. I can't decide.