JaegerBane wrote...
fantasypisces wrote...
Yeah YaegarBan, just shows you weren't paying attention to me in my earlier posts, and you have now been arguing against me for a while, when I stated "That way instead of locust I can take Tempest which has far more damage for the times I'm getting close to enemies" in my very first post.
Oh please, let's not pull out the old 'read my post' chestnut. Shockingly enough, I am well aware of what your argument is. While I recognise that the Mattock gives a good longer-range option, you seem to be sticking to this rigid dogma of 'Tempest for short range, tempest for short range'.
Kronner is absolutely right in his assessment - it's slightly better at short range, I've never disputed that. My point is that slight improvement carries with it an array of punishing penalties. It's a literally a matter of a few points of DPS for the requirement that you need to be practically headbutting your opponents.
The Mattock cannot simply handle all situations on it's own, it doesn't have the ammo for it. Either you pick that and the Mattock and accept that you'll always have to eventually close in regardless of your situation, in order to use your backup, or you take another option which sacrifices a measly few DPS for the ability to fight at any range you want. It doesn't somehow 'stop' your ability to fight at short range, nor does it somehow give you a huge boost against shields as you claim - all it actually ahs in it's favour is the distinction that the numbers are higher. The fact that the numbers are higher by a *tiny* margin, you don't seem to consider.
As for the 'wash my hands blah blah blah'... Really, If you're just going to spit your dummy out and go home in the huff, fine. All I was ever doing was challenging your stats that you were basing your argument on - if you can't handle criticism, don't make tall claims. Geez
Actually, Ive been following this whole thing, and I completely agree with Fantasy.
You clearly have been skimming over Fantasy's posts, and simply posting what you think, regardless of how logical Fantasy's responses are.
Modifié par Ch40sFox, 17 août 2010 - 08:00 .
Retour en haut
