Aller au contenu

Photo

Why Teyrn Loghain is the deepest character in Dragon Age


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
12857 réponses à ce sujet

#4251
TJPags

TJPags
  • Members
  • 5 694 messages
Time to catch up now.  Posted Image

Monica21 wrote...

TJ, if you would humor me, I'm curious to know why you think Celene wanted to marry Cailan and also what you think the Orlesian troops would have done if they had entered Ferelden and helped defeat the Blight.

My apologies if you've already answered this.


First, keep in mind I've never read the books.  So I don't have the background in the Orlesian occupation many of you do, so my only knowldge is what I read on here.  I'll add that they ARE actually in my house, as my wife bought them, but I have not read them, and have no actual intent to do so, although it's likely I will, eventually, grab them as I run out of things to read.  So, with that proviso:

I'm not sure, first, who's idea the marriage was - Celene's or Caillan's.  I think that somewhat matters. 

I don't doubt, from what I've heard about Celene, that she has ulterior motives.  Gaining back what her predecesor lost is a great motivation for doing things.  Handing someone larger to your heir than what you had is also a great motivator.  Doing either (or both) without bloodshed is, again, a great motivator.  If she suggested this, then I'd likely look at her in a darker light.  If it was Caillan's, then not so much.

Why?  Because the person who comes up with an idea is usually the first one to have formed a plan.  If she did, then likely she was planning something darker - a more complete takeover or assimilation, if you will.  If Caillan, then she just saw the possible advantage to herself.  This is how EVERY deal in the world is made - I suggest something to you because it will benefit me.  You agree because you can find a way it will benefit you.  Do we both always get exactly and everything we want?  No.  Usually, we both end up with less than our ideal.  How much less does, of course, depend on several things - bargaining power, ability to negotiate, etc.

Did Caillan think that the marriage might bring some benefit to Ferelden?  Likely he did.  There are benefits that I can see - greater trade opportunities, greater access to resources, safety from a military alliance, new population, new industries, etc.  These are all benefits, I think most people would agree.

Did Celene see that this would get her influence in Ferelden, regardless of whose idea it was?  Sure.  DId she want that?  Obviously, or she'd never have suggested it/entertained the idea.  Was it a short term plan?  No, I don't think it could possibly have been.  She may have envisioned one heir for both countries, but that's years in coming.  She may have envisioned herself as Caillan's heir - and him meeting with an accident - but that needs to be approved by the Landsmeet, no certainty for her.

Does any of this mean that the influence she seeks is as violent as it was in the first occupation?  Not at all.  Does it mean it wouldn't be?  No, that's not sure either.  SImply the fact that she seeks to do this without violence, however, implies to me that maybe she DOESN'T want a hostile takeover.  Maybe Ferelden citizens would be treated like Orlesian citizens.  Now, is that a great way to be treated?  Doesn't seem that way to us, or to many people in Ferelden, or even to some in Orlais.  But does CELENE see it as a bad way to live?  Does any Orlesian with power think that what they do is wrong?  Clearly not, or it would have changed.

So that's what I think the marriage was about - gaining influence in a non-violent way.

Now, the troops.  First, I think they would have fought the Darkspawn.  If they wanted to do more, or if something else was their primary goal, they wouldn't have sat at the border.

Would they have left without demanding something from Ferelden?  Likely not.  If I help you, isn't it reasonable for me to ask for something from you?  So sure, I expect they may have asked for something - maybe land, maybe money, maybe trade concessions.  I doubt they'd have actually said "we want you to give up your independance and let us rape your women".  Might there have been some atrocities?  Sure.  That happens in war, particularly in medieval times.

But then, that might have been Caillan's fault, for not setting the terms of the deal in advance - we don't know exactly what he asked, or what Celene said she'd want in return.

I don't think Celene or Orlais was doing this purely because they feel like helping.  They want to keep the Blight and the Darkspawn out of Orlais - and I have a feeling Celene listens to her Wardens more than Loghain did.  But do they also want something?  Oh, I have no doubt they do.  Does it have to be as terrible as invasion, murder, rape, destruction?  No, it doesn't.

#4252
TJPags

TJPags
  • Members
  • 5 694 messages

phaonica wrote...

Playing catch up.


Yes, actually, we WERE talking about the fact that Loghain sent troops to guard the border from what he believed was an Orlesian invasion, but which was, in actually, Orlesian troops and wardens responding to a request for aid from the King of Ferelden.  Smart on Caillan's part or not, that's what happened.

How do I say this. You make it sound like the fact that they were invited automatically means that it couldn't be called an invasion. Like... if I let a stranger into my house, it's not technically trespassing. And that's fair enough. But just because I invited them in, and they aren't technically trespassing, that doesn't mean they aren't going to try to steal anything, or use the opportunity to case the place.

Maybe if it was worded differently, such as to say... Cailan invited in the Orlesian armies, but he didn't technically invite them to take over. Loghain thinks that they will use the invitation as an opportunity to take over.

Would I say Loghain was definitively right about Orlais wanting to take over? No.

Do I think there is enough support for Loghain's speculation against Orlais to justify his actions to defend against them? Yes.


If I invite you into my house, you're not trespassing.  If The President of the United States invites the Mexican army into Texas, it's not an invasion.

I didn't read ahead so I didn't see that you'd said this. :P

Hypothetically, given the scenario you just described, if the Mexican Army, after being invited into Texas *did* attack, if you didn't call it an invasion, what would you call it?

 


If I invite you into my home, you're not trespassing.  If you then steal, you ARE stealing.  If you don't leave when I ask you to, now you ARE trespassing.

I never suggest you shouldn't be careful about who you invite into your home, or limit them to, say, the living room, not the bedroom.  But if I invite you in, I can't go yelling "INVASION!!"  At least, not until you do something.

Then again, if the house is on fire, you may not be so concerned about someone stealing the silver, if they put the fire out while there.

#4253
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages
Celene was the one who suggested Orlesian aid to Cailan:

"To his Majesty, King Cailan of Ferelden:

My Warden-Commander assures me that we face a Blight. This thing threatens us both, and we must work together to fight it, lest it devour all. Our two nations have not had a happy history, but that is all it is -- history. It is the future that is at stake now. Let us put aside our father's disagreements so that we may secure a future for both our countries.

My Chevaliers stand ready and will accompany the Grey Wardens of Orlais to Ferelden. At your word the might of Orlais will march to reinforce the Ferelden forces.

Sincerely, Empress Celene I"

So I have little doubt she was the one who came up with the marriage plan. Or led Cailan into proposing it first via hints and suggestions. Considering her intelligence, I think she planned this from before. She would benefit a lot from this, and considering Cailan's intelligence (or lack thereof), I doubt he seriously had Ferelden's good in his mind (that's a man who hopes for a blight for his own glory afterall).

Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 14 octobre 2010 - 12:24 .


#4254
TJPags

TJPags
  • Members
  • 5 694 messages
Okay, I know everyone will yell bloody murder at this, but that letter is vague to me about who suggested it. Yes, it tends to indicate that she did, yet she may be responding to something he said. The first line reads, to me, almost like she's continuing a discussion. But it's equally likely, perhaps a bit more so, that she did suggest it.

However, suggesting one does not mean suggesting the other. I have no idea how intelligent she is, or why everyone thinks she IS so intelligent. I assume it's from the books, since there's really nothing about her in the game.

*edit  - and also, if you call me up and ask if you can come over my house, and I say yes, you're still not trespassing, even though you suggested it.

Modifié par TJPags, 14 octobre 2010 - 01:10 .


#4255
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages
She outmaneuvered her uncle and three cousins for the throne. When she was 17. And she's been compared to Catherine the Great by the writers.

http://dragonage.wik...m/wiki/Celene_I

While there is no evidence that she did do all this (because if there was, she'd be a bad schemer). But it's highly suggested. And comparing her to Catherine the Great is somewhat revealing. But other than that, we know little of her.

Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 14 octobre 2010 - 01:15 .


#4256
tool_bot

tool_bot
  • Members
  • 536 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

While there is no evidence that she did do all this (because if there was, she'd be a bad schemer). But it's highly suggested. And comparing her to Catherine the Great is somewhat revealing. But other than that, we know little of her.


I'd like to more about how she actually governs Orlais especially how she treats the nobility. My biggest issue with Ferelden is how much power the Banns have over the King and how much authority it grants the Chantry (what the **** was that Revered Mother doing at Ostagar and just why would the Chantry get a vote at the Landsmeet?) I have this image of her slowly eroding the nobility's power and unifying the armies under her specifically instead of under several lesser lords which were supposedly her vassals.

But it's equally possible that was all she was ever good at, taking power and now has no idea what to do with it.

#4257
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages
Do the nobles have all that much relative power to begin with? It seems like they're nice and preoccupied with their 'Game.'

#4258
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

tool_bot wrote...
But it's equally possible that was all she was ever good at, taking power and now has no idea what to do with it.


Well except she is ushering a cultural renaissance. I think she knows exactly what she is doing, domesitcally and externally. If her comparision to Catherine the Great holds any truth, which it should as it's the writers who said so.

#4259
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...

Do the nobles have all that much relative power to begin with? It seems like they're nice and preoccupied with their 'Game.'


That's the point of the system. Drakon made nobles focus much on titles and fighting over his blessing that they are not that relevent. Many have titles, but no actual power IIRC. 

#4260
TJPags

TJPags
  • Members
  • 5 694 messages
"Within her country, some claim that" she did what you say.  Which means either it's not clear, or the writers were hedging.  Hell, her uncles and cousins could have been as smart as Caillan for all we know.  Posted Image

True, comparing her to Catherine the Great is telling.  But besides that, how much of her do we see in the books?  You know how I feel about about vague mentions by writers about what they think of a character in the absence of something in the actual work.

#4261
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

TJPags wrote...

If I invite you into my home, you're not trespassing.  If you then steal, you ARE stealing.  If you don't leave when I ask you to, now you ARE trespassing.

I never suggest you shouldn't be careful about who you invite into your home, or limit them to, say, the living room, not the bedroom.  But if I invite you in, I can't go yelling "INVASION!!"  At least, not until you do something.

Then again, if the house is on fire, you may not be so concerned about someone stealing the silver, if they put the fire out while there.


What about this? Let's say my husband's brother has spent some time in jail for being a thief. He's been out of jail for a while, but he did spend quite a lot of time in jail for being a thief. He had even stolen from my husband, on occasion. At some point my husband tells his brother that it's okay for the brother to come over to our house and do some odd jobs. If I say that that's not okay, because I don't want a thief in my house, am I being unreasonable? If my husband, against my wishes, invites the brother over anyway, and I lock all my doors so the brother can't get in, am I being completely unreasonable?

#4262
tool_bot

tool_bot
  • Members
  • 536 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

tool_bot wrote...
But it's equally possible that was all she was ever good at, taking power and now has no idea what to do with it.


Well except she is ushering a cultural renaissance. I think she knows exactly what she is doing, domesitcally and externally. If her comparision to Catherine the Great holds any truth, which it should as it's the writers who said so.


Is she? Didn't know that.

Anyway that still doesn't mean she's a brilliant governor. It might be she has a passion for the arts and sciences and (Orlais being as fashionable as it is) her passion has lead to many other nobles adopting similar tastes which trickled down from there.

#4263
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Sarah1281 wrote...

Do the nobles have all that much relative power to begin with? It seems like they're nice and preoccupied with their 'Game.'


That's the point of the system. Drakon made nobles focus much on titles and fighting over his blessing that they are not that relevent. Many have titles, but no actual power IIRC. 

Do the nobles realize this and are okay with it? 

#4264
TJPags

TJPags
  • Members
  • 5 694 messages

phaonica wrote...

TJPags wrote...

If I invite you into my home, you're not trespassing.  If you then steal, you ARE stealing.  If you don't leave when I ask you to, now you ARE trespassing.

I never suggest you shouldn't be careful about who you invite into your home, or limit them to, say, the living room, not the bedroom.  But if I invite you in, I can't go yelling "INVASION!!"  At least, not until you do something.

Then again, if the house is on fire, you may not be so concerned about someone stealing the silver, if they put the fire out while there.


What about this? Let's say my husband's brother has spent some time in jail for being a thief. He's been out of jail for a while, but he did spend quite a lot of time in jail for being a thief. He had even stolen from my husband, on occasion. At some point my husband tells his brother that it's okay for the brother to come over to our house and do some odd jobs. If I say that that's not okay, because I don't want a thief in my house, am I being unreasonable? If my husband, against my wishes, invites the brother over anyway, and I lock all my doors so the brother can't get in, am I being completely unreasonable?


Nope, not at all.  BUT, if you came home and your brother in law was in your house, because your husband let him in, he wouldn't be trespassing.  Posted Image


Although I have no doubt your husband would be in a WORLD of trouble. . . . Posted Image

Modifié par TJPags, 14 octobre 2010 - 01:33 .


#4265
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

tool_bot wrote...
Anyway that still doesn't mean she's a brilliant governor. It might be she has a passion for the arts and sciences and (Orlais being as fashionable as it is) her passion has lead to many other nobles adopting similar tastes which trickled down from there.


She's been compared to Catherine the Great. For now, seeing as this is the only info we have from the "Gods", it will have to do as an indicator of how good a ruler she is.

@ Sarah. I don't know. I really want to know more about Orlais. 

#4266
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

TJPags wrote...
Nope, not at all.  BUT, if you came home and your brother in law was in your house, because your husband let him in, he wouldn't be trespassing.  Posted Image

Although I have no doubt your husband would be in a WORLD of trouble. . . . Posted Image


Ok, assume that her husband died (God forbids!). Would it be unreasonable for her to ban him from entry? And would it be unreasonable for her to be afraid if that brother in law didn't turn around and go, but decided to camp outside her door?

I'd be scared like a little girl :D

Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 14 octobre 2010 - 01:36 .


#4267
TJPags

TJPags
  • Members
  • 5 694 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

TJPags wrote...
Nope, not at all.  BUT, if you came home and your brother in law was in your house, because your husband let him in, he wouldn't be trespassing.  Posted Image

Although I have no doubt your husband would be in a WORLD of trouble. . . . Posted Image


Ok, assume that her husband died (God forbids!). Would it be unreasonable for her to ban him from entry? And would it be unreasonable for her to be afraid if that brother in law didn't turn around and go, but decided to camp outside her door?

I'd be scared like a little girl :D


No, not unreasonable for her to ban him entry.  Not unreasonable to do so even if her husband was simply not home when the brother showed up.

As for him camping out, it would depend on why.  If he waited for the husband to get home, nothing wrong with that.  If he waited simply in an effort to get her to talk to him, not so unreasonable.  If he attempted to force entry, yes, I'd be very worried at that point.

But if he camped out on the property after she told him to leave, he'd be trespassing.

#4268
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

TJPags wrote...
As for him camping out, it would depend on why.


She is not sure why (because she can't know) and she doesn't trust him. Is it unreasonable?

Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 14 octobre 2010 - 01:45 .


#4269
TJPags

TJPags
  • Members
  • 5 694 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

TJPags wrote...
As for him camping out, it would depend on why.


She is not sure why (because she can't know) and she doesn't trust him. Is it unreasonable?


Understandable?  Yes.  How she reacts to it may not be rational, however.

#4270
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

TJPags wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

TJPags wrote...
As for him camping out, it would depend on why.


She is not sure why (because she can't know) and she doesn't trust him. Is it unreasonable?


Understandable?  Yes.  How she reacts to it may not be rational, however.


If she goes out and attacks him? Not that rational.
Keep watch as he may break through the window when you aren't looking? Perfectly rational, imo.

#4271
TJPags

TJPags
  • Members
  • 5 694 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

TJPags wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

TJPags wrote...
As for him camping out, it would depend on why.


She is not sure why (because she can't know) and she doesn't trust him. Is it unreasonable?


Understandable?  Yes.  How she reacts to it may not be rational, however.


If she goes out and attacks him? Not that rational.
Keep watch as he may break through the window when you aren't looking? Perfectly rational, imo.


And if she stares out that window and ignores her 3 month old child while doing so?  not rational.

btw, phaonica - I do hope you don't mind us taking liberties with your example.  Any resemblance to actual events (and I hope there is none at all!!!!) is purely coincidental.  Posted Image

#4272
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

TJPags wrote...
And if she stares out that window and ignores her 3 month old child while doing so?  not rational.


If she didn't ignore him, but didn't fully attend to his needs because she sees that man outside as a threat to both of them. Irrational?

#4273
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

TJPags wrote...

btw, phaonica - I do hope you don't mind us taking liberties with your example.  Any resemblance to actual events (and I hope there is none at all!!!!) is purely coincidental.  Posted Image


It's okay. If we have a good example to work with, that's all that matters. Said example bears no resemblance to real life, so don't worry about that. Posted Image

Modifié par phaonica, 14 octobre 2010 - 02:04 .


#4274
tool_bot

tool_bot
  • Members
  • 536 messages
Why doesn't she just call the cops?

#4275
TJPags

TJPags
  • Members
  • 5 694 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

TJPags wrote...
And if she stares out that window and ignores her 3 month old child while doing so?  not rational.


If she didn't ignore him, but didn't fully attend to his needs because she sees that man outside as a threat to both of them. Irrational?


If he fell out of his crib and broke his arm while she was staring out the window?  Yes.