Aller au contenu

Photo

Why Teyrn Loghain is the deepest character in Dragon Age


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
12857 réponses à ce sujet

#6226
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...

Ferelden is similar to England in several ways, but why not constitutionally?

Because they aren't looking to have Ferelden BE England.


I ask only that it is constitutionally correct. It's not even a specificall English custom we are talking about here.

#6227
alschemid

alschemid
  • Members
  • 478 messages

Persephone wrote...
This is just PERFECTION. :wub: Poor Anora. That must be VERY frustrating. ;)=]:innocent:

Indeed, poor Anora... but what would I give to see such books. :innocent:

Edit: and YAY!! 250 pages already!!We should have a party or something.

Modifié par alschemid, 03 décembre 2010 - 06:00 .


#6228
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18 950 messages

Wereparrot wrote...

John Beaufort, first Earl of Somerset, was indeed the first of four illegitimate children of John of Gaunt and Katherine Swinford, yet Henry IV (the first Tudor), was born of John's first wife, Blanche of Lancaster, and legitimate.


Henry IV was a Lancastrian and a Plantagenet.  Henry VII was the first tudor King, and his claim was based on his descent from the Beauforts
A bastard inheriting after the extinction of the legitimate line is pretty reasonable.  I find the throne being inherited through marriage more unlikely in real world terms - though it did happen in Cyprus, mostly I think as a pretext for the Venetians to annex the place.

Modifié par Wulfram, 03 décembre 2010 - 05:58 .


#6229
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Wulfram wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...

John Beaufort, first Earl of Somerset, was indeed the first of four illegitimate children of John of Gaunt and Katherine Swinford, yet Henry IV (the first Tudor), was born of John's first wife, Blanche of Lancaster, and legitimate.


Henry IV was a Lancastrian and a Plantagenet.  Henry VII was the first tudor King, and his claim was based on his descent from the Beauforts
A bastard inheriting after the extinction of the legitimate line is pretty reasonable.  I find the throne being inherited through marriage more unlikely in real world terms - though it did happen in Cyprus, mostly I think as a pretext for the Venetians to annex the place.


The Pope legitimised that line, which, though he would still be spawn of a bastard, is all that mattered in those days, though there were those that disputed it. Into the bargain, he userped Richard III, so he counts about as much as William I.

And in the event of a broken line, the throne would pass to a legitimate blood relative. Since there is none (as far as we know), Anora keeps the throne. 

And even if Alastair did become king, I'm pretty sure Anora would keep her title at the cost of swearing fealty; a bit like when Henry II died, the throne passed to Richard the Lionheart; yet Eleanor of Aquitaine kept her title.

Modifié par Wereparrot, 03 décembre 2010 - 08:45 .


#6230
CalJones

CalJones
  • Members
  • 3 205 messages

Esbatty wrote...

CalJones wrote...

I can't see Loghain dancing.

I can't stop seeing him dancing.

What is love? Baby don't hurt me... don't hurt me... no more.♫


You think he dances like Techno Turian?

(And I Image IPB the new Aimo strip. Heeeeelarious!)

#6231
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

alschemid wrote...

Persephone wrote...
This is just PERFECTION. :wub: Poor Anora. That must be VERY frustrating. ;)=]:innocent:

Indeed, poor Anora... but what would I give to see such books. :innocent:

Edit: and YAY!! 250 pages already!!We should have a party or something.

We're writing them!  Just not with the racy illustrations.

#6232
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Wereparrot wrote...

I've said before in the DA2 forum that I think Loghain's villany was superflous, and I stand by it for two reasons:

1. The assumption that the Warden wants to put Maric's bastard son on the throne. Bastards have not inherited the throne in any kingdom. This is a plot hole you could sail an oil tanker through if you ask me, especially since, once Alastair is king, he then turns all conservative and has to marry a noble. How ironic that in the real world these customs are reversed. Ferelden is similar to England in several ways, but why not constitutionally?

2. Loghain assumed that the Warden would go running to Orlais for support. He had no evidence to suggest and should have been working with the Warden in this respect.

If his only crime was arrogance, he could expect and recieve mercy; but his dissertion and treason at Ostagar suggest otherwise. It is to his credit that he does not deny his punishment.

The Wardens are not the only factor, rather the Bannorn and the others opposing Loghain's regency.

The issue is also not the Warden running to Orlais for support, but Orlesian chevaliers already massing at the border at the start of Origins in response to Cailan's invitation.

As for bastards inheriting, as Eamon says in-game, if they had any other choice they wouldn't even try.  As it is, you have the widow of the late king without royal blood, or the untried bastard son.  Sounds like a pretty even match-up to me and therefore plausible as a conflict set-up.

#6233
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Addai67 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...

I've said before in the DA2 forum that I think Loghain's villany was superflous, and I stand by it for two reasons:

1. The assumption that the Warden wants to put Maric's bastard son on the throne. Bastards have not inherited the throne in any kingdom. This is a plot hole you could sail an oil tanker through if you ask me, especially since, once Alastair is king, he then turns all conservative and has to marry a noble. How ironic that in the real world these customs are reversed. Ferelden is similar to England in several ways, but why not constitutionally?

2. Loghain assumed that the Warden would go running to Orlais for support. He had no evidence to suggest and should have been working with the Warden in this respect.

If his only crime was arrogance, he could expect and recieve mercy; but his dissertion and treason at Ostagar suggest otherwise. It is to his credit that he does not deny his punishment.

The Wardens are not the only factor, rather the Bannorn and the others opposing Loghain's regency.

The issue is also not the Warden running to Orlais for support, but Orlesian chevaliers already massing at the border at the start of Origins in response to Cailan's invitation.

As for bastards inheriting, as Eamon says in-game, if they had any other choice they wouldn't even try.  As it is, you have the widow of the late king without royal blood, or the untried bastard son.  Sounds like a pretty even match-up to me and therefore plausible as a conflict set-up.


The Warden did not invite the Orlesians, so I still don't get Loghain's hostility. And it seems to me the choice was already made; like I said, I'm pretty sure that with no heir and no blood relative; in the event of the monarchs death, the spouse rules.

Modifié par Wereparrot, 03 décembre 2010 - 08:53 .


#6234
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Wereparrot wrote...
The Warden did not invite the Orlesians. And it seems to me the choice was already made; like I said, I'm pretty sure that with no heir and no blood relative; in the event of the monarchs death, the spouse rules.

The point is that the Orlesians are there, which helps provoke Loghain's march back to Denerim and his seizure of the regency, setting up the civil war that the Warden then has to mediate/ bring to an end.

Queen Anora was not a ruling monarch, just a consort.  If there had been a legitimate Landsmeet at the beginning, before a challenge could be brought, she probably would have been confirmed.  As it is, there IS a blood relative to Maric, and there is a challenge to Anora's bid.

#6235
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Addai67 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...
The Warden did not invite the Orlesians. And it seems to me the choice was already made; like I said, I'm pretty sure that with no heir and no blood relative; in the event of the monarchs death, the spouse rules.

The point is that the Orlesians are there, which helps provoke Loghain's march back to Denerim and his seizure of the regency, setting up the civil war that the Warden then has to mediate/ bring to an end.

Queen Anora was not a ruling monarch, just a consort.  If there had been a legitimate Landsmeet at the beginning, before a challenge could be brought, she probably would have been confirmed.  As it is, there IS a blood relative to Maric, and there is a challenge to Anora's bid.


I have already argued that Alastairs illegitimate nature prevents him from becoming king.

#6236
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages

Wereparrot wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...
The Warden did not invite the Orlesians. And it seems to me the choice was already made; like I said, I'm pretty sure that with no heir and no blood relative; in the event of the monarchs death, the spouse rules.

The point is that the Orlesians are there, which helps provoke Loghain's march back to Denerim and his seizure of the regency, setting up the civil war that the Warden then has to mediate/ bring to an end.

Queen Anora was not a ruling monarch, just a consort.  If there had been a legitimate Landsmeet at the beginning, before a challenge could be brought, she probably would have been confirmed.  As it is, there IS a blood relative to Maric, and there is a challenge to Anora's bid.


I have already argued that Alastairs illegitimate nature prevents him from becoming king.

It doesn't if the Landsmeet chooses to legitimize him. Regardless of what Ferelden may be based off of, the Landsmeet clearly has the power to acknowledge a bastard and, in doing so, legitimize him since they totally do just that and even the opposition doesn't claim that the Landsmeet can't do that. Even his bastard status isn't brought up as much as the fact that there's no proof he's Maric's, he wasn't trained to do this, he'd be a weak king, he's being put up as a puppet ruler, ect.

#6237
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Wereparrot wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...
The Warden did not invite the Orlesians. And it seems to me the choice was already made; like I said, I'm pretty sure that with no heir and no blood relative; in the event of the monarchs death, the spouse rules.

The point is that the Orlesians are there, which helps provoke Loghain's march back to Denerim and his seizure of the regency, setting up the civil war that the Warden then has to mediate/ bring to an end.

Queen Anora was not a ruling monarch, just a consort.  If there had been a legitimate Landsmeet at the beginning, before a challenge could be brought, she probably would have been confirmed.  As it is, there IS a blood relative to Maric, and there is a challenge to Anora's bid.


I have already argued that Alastairs illegitimate nature prevents him from becoming king.

You may have argued this, but you have no basis to do so.  The monarch is chosen by the Landsmeet, whether he or she is "legitimate" or not.  Ferelden's monarch derives his power from the freeholders, not the other way around.

#6238
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...
The Warden did not invite the Orlesians. And it seems to me the choice was already made; like I said, I'm pretty sure that with no heir and no blood relative; in the event of the monarchs death, the spouse rules.

The point is that the Orlesians are there, which helps provoke Loghain's march back to Denerim and his seizure of the regency, setting up the civil war that the Warden then has to mediate/ bring to an end.

Queen Anora was not a ruling monarch, just a consort.  If there had been a legitimate Landsmeet at the beginning, before a challenge could be brought, she probably would have been confirmed.  As it is, there IS a blood relative to Maric, and there is a challenge to Anora's bid.


I have already argued that Alastairs illegitimate nature prevents him from becoming king.

It doesn't if the Landsmeet chooses to legitimize him. Regardless of what Ferelden may be based off of, the Landsmeet clearly has the power to acknowledge a bastard and, in doing so, legitimize him since they totally do just that and even the opposition doesn't claim that the Landsmeet can't do that. Even his bastard status isn't brought up as much as the fact that there's no proof he's Maric's, he wasn't trained to do this, he'd be a weak king, he's being put up as a puppet ruler, ect.


The ultimate decision lies not with the Landsmeet, but with you. And all I am saying is that I resent Arl Eamon pressuring to accept a bastard as king. And also, you must understand that I am not criticising the Landsmeet; I am criticising Bioware's attention to detail. And no I don't thing everything in a game should be based on reality, because all games are fantasies of the creators, yet I still think that since Bioware clearly based Ferelden on medieval England the constitution of the monarchy should be similar to that of its real world counterpart, in fact any monarchy that I can think of. 

#6239
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Addai67 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...
The Warden did not invite the Orlesians. And it seems to me the choice was already made; like I said, I'm pretty sure that with no heir and no blood relative; in the event of the monarchs death, the spouse rules.

The point is that the Orlesians are there, which helps provoke Loghain's march back to Denerim and his seizure of the regency, setting up the civil war that the Warden then has to mediate/ bring to an end.

Queen Anora was not a ruling monarch, just a consort.  If there had been a legitimate Landsmeet at the beginning, before a challenge could be brought, she probably would have been confirmed.  As it is, there IS a blood relative to Maric, and there is a challenge to Anora's bid.


I have already argued that Alastairs illegitimate nature prevents him from becoming king.

You may have argued this, but you have no basis to do so.  The monarch is chosen by the Landsmeet, whether he or she is "legitimate" or not.  Ferelden's monarch derives his power from the freeholders, not the other way around.


I have every right to argue this, as I am merely presenting my opinion that I think that Bioware should've paid more attention to the usual rights of succesion.

#6240
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Wereparrot wrote...
The ultimate decision lies not with the Landsmeet, but with you. And all I am saying is that I resent Arl Eamon pressuring to accept a bastard as king. And also, you must understand that I am not criticising the Landsmeet; I am criticising Bioware's attention to detail. And no I don't thing everything in a game should be based on reality, because all games are fantasies of the creators, yet I still think that since Bioware clearly based Ferelden on medieval England the constitution of the monarchy should be similar to that of its real world counterpart, in fact any monarchy that I can think of. 

Eamon has his reasons.  You don't have to side with him in the end, but no, even though the Landsmeet defers to the Warden, the authority still lies in them.

If what you're asking is why we can't side with Loghain rather than Eamon from the beginning, I guess my question back would be:  Why should Loghain work with you?  The Warden only becomes a political force after you've gathered your armies and have a nobleman sponsoring your challenge to Loghain's regency.  And as Eamon says, he needs a challenge that Loghain can't ignore.  Maric's son is that challenge.

Ferelden is only loosely based on medieval Britain.  In fact I've heard it actually compared to medieval Scotland, but with many Germanic elements in it as well.  Historical bits are only used as inspiration, there is no one to one correlation.

P.S. Naturally you have a right to argue it, but you have to base your argument on the established lore, not on some historical correlation that may or may not apply.

Modifié par Addai67, 03 décembre 2010 - 09:19 .


#6241
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18 950 messages
Constitutionally, Ferelden makes me think of Poland-Lithuania more than anywhere else.

#6242
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Addai67 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...
The ultimate decision lies not with the Landsmeet, but with you. And all I am saying is that I resent Arl Eamon pressuring to accept a bastard as king. And also, you must understand that I am not criticising the Landsmeet; I am criticising Bioware's attention to detail. And no I don't thing everything in a game should be based on reality, because all games are fantasies of the creators, yet I still think that since Bioware clearly based Ferelden on medieval England the constitution of the monarchy should be similar to that of its real world counterpart, in fact any monarchy that I can think of. 

Eamon has his reasons.  You don't have to side with him in the end, but no, even though the Landsmeet defers to the Warden, the authority still lies in them.

If what you're asking is why we can't side with Loghain rather than Eamon from the beginning, I guess my question back would be:  Why should Loghain work with you?  The Warden only becomes a political force after you've gathered your armies and have a nobleman sponsoring your challenge to Loghain's regency.  And as Eamon says, he needs a challenge that Loghain can't ignore.  Maric's son is that challenge.

Ferelden is only loosely based on medieval Britain.  In fact I've heard it actually compared to medieval Scotland, but with many Germanic elements in it as well.  Historical bits are only used as inspiration, there is no one to one correlation.


Well, if I play as a human noble, I am a political force anyway after the death of Bryce and unknown status (at that point) of Fergus. I, as acting Teryn of Highever, dispute Alistair's claim on the aforementioned basis.
 
Loghain should at least try to figure me out because I am an unknown quantity.

And I don't care if it is loosely based on the Faroe Islands; the issue would be the same.

Modifié par Wereparrot, 03 décembre 2010 - 09:27 .


#6243
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18 950 messages
Howe would block any deals between Loghain and a Cousland, even if Loghain wasn't convinced that the wardens were Orlesian puppets.

#6244
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Wulfram wrote...

Howe would block any deals between Loghain and a Cousland, even if Loghain wasn't convinced that the wardens were Orlesian puppets.


Howe's voice would be irrelevant in the face of two higher nobles.

Arl=Earl
Teryn=Duke

#6245
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18 950 messages

Wereparrot wrote...

Wulfram wrote...

Howe would block any deals between Loghain and a Cousland, even if Loghain wasn't convinced that the wardens were Orlesian puppets.


Howe's voice would be irrelevant in the face of two higher nobles.

Arl=Earl
Teryn=Duke


Howe has control of Highever and a considerable armed force under his control, while Cousland is an outlaw.
Plus Loghain for some bizarre reason seems to rely on and even trust Howe

#6246
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Wulfram wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...

Wulfram wrote...

Howe would block any deals between Loghain and a Cousland, even if Loghain wasn't convinced that the wardens were Orlesian puppets.


Howe's voice would be irrelevant in the face of two higher nobles.

Arl=Earl
Teryn=Duke


Howe has control of Highever and a considerable armed force under his control, while Cousland is an outlaw.
Plus Loghain for some bizarre reason seems to rely on and even trust Howe


I'm pretty sure that if Loghain would deal with a Cousland, Highever would be part of the bargain.

#6247
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Wereparrot wrote...
Well, if I play as a human noble, I am a political force anyway after the death of Bryce and unknown status (at that point) of Fergus. I, as acting Teryn of Highever, dispute Alistair's claim on the aforementioned basis.
 
Loghain should at least try to figure me out because I am an unknown quantity.

And I don't care if it is loosely based on the Faroe Islands; the issue would be the same.

Your political clout as a Cousland is vastly diminished as of game time.  You're the youngest child of a family that's been discredited as traitors and whose armies have been wiped out.  Howe occupies Highever, and without an army to challenge him you can only win back your teyrnir if the Landsmeet discredits him and renews it.  Even Cailan says that he needs an army to uproot Howe.  That's why Loghain confirms Howe as the new teyrn of Highever.  He really has no choice if he wants his military support.

Loghain doesn't think you're an unknown quantity.  He has had dealings with the Grey Wardens before (in The Calling), and they weren't positive ones.  Plus, the Wardens are his scapegoats of choice after Ostagar and so he has absolutely no reason to deal with you.

Even if he did, with a son of Maric still alive, Eamon could still bring his challenge (assuming he gets revived).  The lore is what it is.  The lore says that a bastard can inherit if the Landsmeet approves.  The Theirin dynasty is important enough to Ferelden that some people want to preserve it whether the heir is a legitimate one or not.

#6248
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Addai67 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...
Well, if I play as a human noble, I am a political force anyway after the death of Bryce and unknown status (at that point) of Fergus. I, as acting Teryn of Highever, dispute Alistair's claim on the aforementioned basis.
 
Loghain should at least try to figure me out because I am an unknown quantity.

And I don't care if it is loosely based on the Faroe Islands; the issue would be the same.

Your political clout as a Cousland is vastly diminished as of game time.  You're the youngest child of a family that's been discredited as traitors and whose armies have been wiped out.  Howe occupies Highever, and without an army to challenge him you can only win back your teyrnir if the Landsmeet discredits him and renews it.  Even Cailan says that he needs an army to uproot Howe.  That's why Loghain confirms Howe as the new teyrn of Highever.  He really has no choice if he wants his military support.

Loghain doesn't think you're an unknown quantity.  He has had dealings with the Grey Wardens before (in The Calling), and they weren't positive ones.  Plus, the Wardens are his scapegoats of choice after Ostagar and so he has absolutely no reason to deal with you.

Even if he did, with a son of Maric still alive, Eamon could still bring his challenge (assuming he gets revived).  The lore is what it is.  The lore says that a bastard can inherit if the Landsmeet approves.  The Theirin dynasty is important enough to Ferelden that some people want to preserve it whether the heir is a legitimate one or not.


I have just said that if Loghain were to deal with Warden-Cousland, Highever would undoubtedly be part of the bargain.

I haven't read the books, so I admit my ignorance; I am just going by the game.

And as for your last point; a bastard accesion to the throne in the real world would bring shame on the monarchy and the previous monarch. A bastard can't help being a bastard after all, it's the predecessor who has shown irresponsibility.

#6249
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages

I, as acting Teryn of Highever, dispute Alistair's claim on the aforementioned basis.

Yeah, no you're not. Maybe you SHOULD be but Howe conquered Highever by force and took the teynir, thus it has to be restored to you at the coronation. Your only political support are vague 'Hey, we'll help you become a Teyrn again once the Blight is over' and as the Blight isn't over, it's not your teynir anymore.

#6250
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages
You know, the situation with the HN has always reminded me of an exiled prince after a revolution or something like that. You can declare that you're the rightful ruler all you want but you can't really say that you're the acting monarch as your country is being controlled by someone else. Until someone else steps in and helps you retake power, you're not really in a very strong position no matter HOW much everyone loves your magical bloodline.