Why Teyrn Loghain is the deepest character in Dragon Age
#8976
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:19
No one in Thedas uses it mostly because they have magic.
The Dwarves use lyrium based ones but they are poisonous and weak compared to Qunari powder.
#8977
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:21
But eh, even if it isn't, Arcturus will be getting what he wants and the banns there are going to fall in line with some nice incentives.
EDIT: and yes, he'd steal the explosives.
But he'd be investing in Lyrium technology. It may catch even the qunari off-guard.
Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 31 mars 2011 - 05:22 .
#8978
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:23
No more idiotic banns, a perfect excuse to build a fleet with no complaints, and you get to set off a really big explosion!
What more can you want?
#8979
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:24
#8980
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:28
Giggles_Manically wrote...
Or you could just blow up the landsmeet with some stolen Qunari powder, then say that the Qunari did it and justify expanding the entire fleet.
No more idiotic banns, a perfect excuse to build a fleet with no complaints, and you get to set off a really big explosion!
What more can you want?
I'm planning on some troublesome Banns "disappearing", tragedies that of course, would be blamed on rival banns, complete with "overwhelming evidence" of their crimes, in which said Banns, by Ferelden law, would give up their armies, titles, and lands to the crown, to be redistributed to more "law abiding" individuals. Minus the armies. Anora gets to keep those.
Of course, the disappeared Banns would now be "volunteers" for Avernus' experiments.
#8981
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:31
Giggles_Manically wrote...
Or you could just blow up the landsmeet with some stolen Qunari powder, then say that the Qunari did it and justify expanding the entire fleet.
No more idiotic banns, a perfect excuse to build a fleet with no complaints, and you get to set off a really big explosion!
What more can you want?
Since Ferelden probably doesn't have a substantial bureaucracy (I presume), that would risk creating a power vacuum.
But a "Qunari attack" on *some* banns that I happen to think are more stupid than average would be an interesting pretext. Actually, Redcliffe Castle would be a nice target, if I can think of a reason why the qunari would attack that and how believable it would be.
#8982
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:37
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Giggles_Manically wrote...
Or you could just blow up the landsmeet with some stolen Qunari powder, then say that the Qunari did it and justify expanding the entire fleet.
No more idiotic banns, a perfect excuse to build a fleet with no complaints, and you get to set off a really big explosion!
What more can you want?
Since Ferelden probably doesn't have a substantial bureaucracy (I presume), that would risk creating a power vacuum.
But a "Qunari attack" on *some* banns that I happen to think are more stupid than average would be an interesting pretext. Actually, Redcliffe Castle would be a nice target, if I can think of a reason why the qunari would attack that and how believable it would be.
Easy. Just have one of their sacred artifacts end up in Eamon's private colelction.
#8983
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:38
Have them meet in Denerim in a warehouse then destroy it.
Say that they were buying Qunari powder to over throw the monarch.
Things went bad, then exploded.
Then you have the problem that their family would take over the Bann by default, but you could simply court the heirs to make them loyal and get them on your side.
I think the Bannorn is a somewhat good idea in that in can check an overly abusive king like the one Sophia Dryden fought against, but it does create many problems.
#8984
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:46
Giggles_Manically wrote...
I think the Bannorn is a somewhat good idea in that in can check an overly abusive king like the one Sophia Dryden fought against, but it does create many problems.
Which is why I am reluctant to completely destroy it. Just restructure it so that it does not become a constant nuisance to the stability and peace of the country. A major part of this, I think, lies in large scale demilitarization of the Banns, as their armies are half their power.
And since they can't be trusted to look out for their people and their nation more than their petty squabbles, their armies are put to better use to defend Ferelden's borders and bolster its weak crown.
I think a number of Banns, however, would have to be eliminated. There's too many small time Banns, some of them should be consolidated into a larger ones. You really don't need that many uncontrollable idiots with power.
#8985
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:47
Giggles_Manically wrote...
I think the Bannorn is a somewhat good idea in that in can check an overly abusive king like the one Sophia Dryden fought against, but it does create many problems.
That can be done much better with an actual parliament with "commoners" that earn their place. And with laws. Not overglorified landowners. But since I'm envisioning a bicameral system in Ferelden, the banns can have the upper house.
@ Skadi.
lol yea that could work.
Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 31 mars 2011 - 05:48 .
#8986
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 08:25
As a blood mage, he knew that he would never be allowed to take a role in government with the Chantry having such a strong hold on Fereldens people and the government..... so the Chantry is the first thing that needs to go in my world.
#8987
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 08:27
Put Anora on the throne... and everyone is cool with that.
Also I am starting my young Loghain Hawke for DA2 tonight.
Sword and Sheild Warrior, with mostly serious responses, and just a bit of that good old Loghain snark.
#8988
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 08:29
Who will mostly be diplomatic, but with some snark and seriousness at the end.
#8989
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 08:53
#8990
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 08:56
Still though male Hawke has a nice voice.
#8991
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 10:00
Giggles_Manically wrote...
Its funny that Fereldan does not seem to take nobility all that seriously.
Put Anora on the throne... and everyone is cool with that.
Well, it's actually part of a weird dichotomy in Fereldan attitudes IMO. On the one hand, they're proud of the fact that their sovereigns are chosen by the Bannorn and have to "earn" their status rather than being born to it, but on the other hand there are a number of nobles who are willing to give the throne to an untried king in a time of crisis just because he has some Theirin blood in him. Also, when you talk to Ser Bryant in Lothering about Loghain making himself Regent, he admits that a number of the Banns have a problem with that and when you ask him why, the first reason he gives is that Loghain is a commoner.
Modifié par Morwen Eledhwen, 31 mars 2011 - 10:00 .
#8992
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 10:52
#8993
Posté 01 avril 2011 - 03:04
It's not that different than the Carolingian kings, who were ethnically Germanic and had those traditions but who self-consciously adopted the Roman emperor model and the mantle of holiness they thought it would give them to distinguish themselves from the competition (and they were right about that). Their instincts were the old Germanic ways, but the structure and conceits they adopted were borrowed from Rome. Fereldans are imitating empire nations like Orlais while still trying to retain some of their native Avvar traditions.Morwen Eledhwen wrote...
Giggles_Manically wrote...
Its funny that Fereldan does not seem to take nobility all that seriously.
Put Anora on the throne... and everyone is cool with that.
Well, it's actually part of a weird dichotomy in Fereldan attitudes IMO. On the one hand, they're proud of the fact that their sovereigns are chosen by the Bannorn and have to "earn" their status rather than being born to it, but on the other hand there are a number of nobles who are willing to give the throne to an untried king in a time of crisis just because he has some Theirin blood in him. Also, when you talk to Ser Bryant in Lothering about Loghain making himself Regent, he admits that a number of the Banns have a problem with that and when you ask him why, the first reason he gives is that Loghain is a commoner.
#8994
Posté 01 avril 2011 - 03:05
Boulton is good, but Templeman would be epic.Giggles_Manically wrote...
Also I am starting my young Loghain Hawke for DA2 tonight.
Sword and Sheild Warrior, with mostly serious responses, and just a bit of that good old Loghain snark.
Hawke to all the Kirkwall nutters: We must attend to reality!
#8995
Posté 01 avril 2011 - 05:26
The only one worse than him is that fraud rat Bhelen.
Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 01 avril 2011 - 05:31 .
#8996
Posté 01 avril 2011 - 05:31
#8997
Posté 01 avril 2011 - 05:32
Morwen Eledhwen wrote...
And he was totally going to have his daughter killed, too. His own daughter! Nothing was beyond the scope of his madness and lust for power.
Actually, that would have been a redeeming quality, if he succeeded.
Anora was a b**** who was holding Cailan back. Ferelden would have been in ruins if she ruled on her own without Cailan being the voice of reason and understanding.
#8998
Posté 01 avril 2011 - 05:35
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Actually, that would have been a redeeming quality, if he succeeded.
Anora was a b**** who was holding Cailan back. Ferelden would have been in ruins if she ruled on her own without Cailan being the voice of reason and understanding.
That's a good point. And she was barren as well. I was so hoping that Cailan would marry Empress Celene. I do so love a royal wedding. And Wynne was right --at least there would have been peace.
#8999
Posté 01 avril 2011 - 05:39
And yes, peace, love and equality without distracting material considerations that are the focus of evil people only, should be the goal of any reasonable brilliant leader. Cailan was truly ahead of his time. Almost like Maric.
#9000
Posté 01 avril 2011 - 05:43
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Her uterus was obviously under-developed and incapable of carrying Cailan's glorious seed.
I think it was the Maker's judgment, personally. No common Mac Tir blood to sully the glorious Theirin line!
Modifié par Morwen Eledhwen, 01 avril 2011 - 05:44 .





Retour en haut




