But this could end up a long rabbit trail.
Modifié par Addai67, 09 août 2011 - 10:58 .
Modifié par Addai67, 09 août 2011 - 10:58 .
Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 09 août 2011 - 11:00 .
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
All of that would have been justified in my eyes, if he had a vision, a large following and a long term plan (blowing up the chantry is not that bright). Without those 3 and without sanity, he is not qualified to make such a choice.
phaonica wrote...
Arguably, Loghain "had no right" to make decisions for Ferelden, didnt' have the following to justify his authority, and ended up killing a lot of the very people he was trying to protect, and he was damned for it.
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Loghain had most nobles and the army following him. And the most experience.
What he did not have was a good plan to deal with the idiotic bannorn, due to his lack of shrewdness. And the lack of ruthlessness when it was required (killing Eamon).
Those two are what damn him in my eyes. However, there was really no one else to save the country, barring the random Warden recruit that no one could have predicted.
Loghain had enough qualifications to make what he did justified in my eyes, (especially Ostagar) barring his two big mistakes later on.
Addai67 wrote...
Mages are not a block group- treating them as such only agrees with the Chantry as to their status- and Anders damn well doesn't speak for my mages. He just made their lives a lot harder, and the same for every mage child who has to live with the consequences of people seeing mages as dangerous.
But this could end up a long rabbit trail.
phaonica wrote...
It seems like you're saying that Loghain was qualified by default, and that's why his actions are justified.
I'm just playing devil's advocate, here. I think the main reason I didn't find Anders' actions to be justified was because the game failed to convince me that the complete abandonment of mage oversight was a good idea.
Modifié par Joy Divison, 10 août 2011 - 02:31 .
phaonica wrote...
We are told that the mage underground exists too, and that Anders has their support.
So you're saying that Loghain had the support, but not the faculties to succeed (a good plan, ruthlessness).
Anders potentially had the support (if you count the mage underground), but not the faculties ( a good plan ). With Justice's help, Anders even arguably has the ruthlessness.
Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 10 août 2011 - 03:07 .
Joy Divison wrote...
This wasn't going to happen. I can't get a quote for you, but I recall reading dev posts which basically said they felt players would incline toward a pro-Mage stance and thus had stack the deck so to speak against the mages so players would side with the Templars against their predilections.
Joy Divison wrote...
I also wouldn't categorize Anders as a revolutionary; or at least, the game doesn't lead me to believe he is just a man bent on avenging perceived wrongs. Revolutionaires are thinkers, organizers, planners, and leaders. He isn't exactly Thomas Jefferson, let alone Vladimir Lenin. The game references Anders's manifesto which implies he may be a thinker, but as is much of my issue with DA2, there is a lot of telling rather than showing.
Joy Divison wrote...
While I did empathize with his plight, I was put off with his arrogant and hypocritical attitude toward Merrill and his battle cries about messing with mages got *real* repetitive. If Bethany was available as a companion for the entire game, I'm not sure Anders would have ever left his clinic in my playthroughs.
He needed a much bigger bomb.Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
Anyway, my point was that Anders forced change, even if an initially negative one. And in this scenario we are talking about, being Kirkwall, even a negative, idiot change is refreshing compared to the drawn out fiasco those 7 years were.
Joy Divison wrote...
phaonica wrote...
It seems like you're saying that Loghain was qualified by default, and that's why his actions are justified.
I'm just playing devil's advocate, here. I think the main reason I didn't find Anders' actions to be justified was because the game failed to convince me that the complete abandonment of mage oversight was a good idea.
This wasn't going to happen. I can't get a quote for you, but I recall reading dev posts which basically said they felt players would incline toward a pro-Mage stance and thus had stack the deck so to speak against the mages so players would side with the Templars against their predilections.
Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 10 août 2011 - 05:23 .
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
Thats why Anders is my favorite companion, because he (and Merril)...
Monica21 wrote...
I'm seriously considering switching teams for Isabela.
Are there people who don't like her? I bring her everywhere. She's too quirky to leave behind. Not to mention I love her banter about Andraste. "It's a good story but I think it's got some holes."Zjarcal wrote...
Yay for some Merrill appreciation.
Oh, you can chime in. I think I'm just so disappointed at what they did to Anders that nobody else comes close. I spent most of Awakening flirting with him whenever I got the chance and when I actually get the chance to romance him, he's a completely different person. I'm kind of wondering why my Warden hasn't tracked him down, because she's the type who would do that.I would chime in about how I don't think any of the LIs are shallow but.... meh.
Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 10 août 2011 - 06:16 .
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
That was before Act 3 and before they
were destroyed. We have no indication that they support him in Act 3,
if they even exist.
Considering how the Templars respond when you try to turn in Anders, how Elthina responds when you try to turn in Petrice, and Meredith's escalating madness, I'm not sure if any peaceful avenues of change were open to these mages. That's no fault of Anders', but seems to be a weakness of the plot that every single person with authority is completely incompetant and useless.And finally, because there was a clear alternative considering Meredith's incompetence.
Loghain might have made a mistake, but he was brave enough to stay in his course till the end, and not throw the weight on others and expect them to do all the hard work he forced them to do, on their own.
Modifié par phaonica, 10 août 2011 - 07:14 .

Modifié par Morwen Eledhwen, 10 août 2011 - 01:41 .
Monica21 wrote...
Are there people who don't like her? I bring her everywhere. She's too quirky to leave behind. Not to mention I love her banter about Andraste. "It's a good story but I think it's got some holes."Zjarcal wrote...
Yay for some Merrill appreciation.
Modifié par Zjarcal, 10 août 2011 - 02:28 .
Zjarcal wrote...
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...
Thats why Anders is my favorite companion, because he (and Merril)...
Yay for some Merrill appreciation.
Zjarcal wrote...
Monica21 wrote...
I'm seriously considering switching teams for Isabela.
Do it.
I would chime in about how I don't think any of the LIs are shallow but.... meh.
phaonica wrote...
The whole mage underground was destroyed? How'd I miss that?
Considering how the Templars respond when you try to turn in Anders, how Elthina responds when you try to turn in Petrice, and Meredith's escalating madness, I'm not sure if any peaceful avenues of change were open to these mages. That's no fault of Anders', but seems to be a weakness of the plot that every single person with authority is completely incompetant and useless.
I do think it was of weaker character for Anders to prematurely resign himself to martyrdom. But if you choose not to execute him, he can be passionate about fighting the Templars and continuing what he started. He is willing to follow through, given the chance.
*raises hand* Her schtick got old fast, but I really started hating her after completing her personal quests. Won't spoil for you.Monica21 wrote...
Are there people who don't like her?Zjarcal wrote...
Yay for some Merrill appreciation.