Ce sujet est fermé
CruserBoii wrote...
No it's not dead imo, they're just advancing and going in a different direction then Baldurs Gate, because thats what Game Companys do. I wouldn't want to play the same game that's exactly like Baldurs gate with a different name.
Ahzrei wrote...RPGs are still RPGs.
When people say, "Oh man, this is delicious; I could eat this every day for the rest of my life," it's nothing but hyperbole. Just like the idea of playing the same exact game over and over with slightly better graphics would bore you to tears, no matter how blisteringly brilliant the first (and "true") game was. Companies change. They grow and expand. Most people are willing to grow with them.Gandalf-the-Fabulous wrote...
Yes Bioware is still alive and making money but the point I was trying to make is that they arent the company they were when they made the Baldur's Gate series, the old company died and the new one rose from its ashes. Perhaps I and those that share my point of view are in the minority and the majority of todays gamers prefer shallow action adventure titles, that is what I want to find out from this thread.
Ahzrei wrote...
The "old" Bioware isn't dead.
You're referring to the "young" Bioware, who has since very simply, gotten older. Times change, but RPGs are still RPGs.
Rubbish Hero wrote...
Ahzrei wrote...RPGs are still RPGs.
Except console focused and no very good.
This.Ahzrei wrote...
The "old" Bioware isn't dead.
You're referring to the "young" Bioware, who has since very simply, gotten older. Times change, but RPGs are still RPGs.
Riona45 wrote...
Gandalf-the-Fabulous wrote...
Yes Bioware is still alive and making money but the point I was trying to make is that they arent the company they were when they made the Baldur's Gate series, the old company died and the new one rose from its ashes.
The BG series is at least a decade old. Of course BioWare isn't the same as it was 10-12 years ago. And of course BioWare isn't going to make games the same way they did 10-12 years ago.
Modifié par Lomopingseph, 16 août 2010 - 05:13 .
Calla S wrote...
When people say, "Oh man, this is delicious; I could eat this every day for the rest of my life," it's nothing but hyperbole. Just like the idea of playing the same exact game over and over with slightly better graphics would bore you to tears, no matter how blisteringly brilliant the first (and "true") game was. Companies change. They grow and expand. Most people are willing to grow with them.
DA2? You don't know if its anything like ME yet, you people need to stop jumping to those conclusions. The FIRST trailer comes out tommorow, wait until then.Gandalf-the-Fabulous wrote...
CruserBoii wrote...
No it's not dead imo, they're just advancing and going in a different direction then Baldurs Gate, because thats what Game Companys do. I wouldn't want to play the same game that's exactly like Baldurs gate with a different name.
No but instead you want to play the same game that is exactly like Mass Effect with a different name?
The Edge wrote...
Rubbish Hero wrote...
Ahzrei wrote...RPGs are still RPGs.
Except console focused and no very good.
So... because it is on consoles, it is therefore "no very good"?
Gandalf-the-Fabulous wrote...
Riona45 wrote...
Gandalf-the-Fabulous wrote...
Yes Bioware is still alive and making money but the point I was trying to make is that they arent the company they were when they made the Baldur's Gate series, the old company died and the new one rose from its ashes.
The BG series is at least a decade old. Of course BioWare isn't the same as it was 10-12 years ago. And of course BioWare isn't going to make games the same way they did 10-12 years ago.
Of course I know games have to change and evolve but why get rid of the things that were so great about their older games?
Dave of Canada wrote...
Calla S wrote...
When people say, "Oh man, this is delicious; I could eat this every day for the rest of my life," it's nothing but hyperbole. Just like the idea of playing the same exact game over and over with slightly better graphics would bore you to tears, no matter how blisteringly brilliant the first (and "true") game was. Companies change. They grow and expand. Most people are willing to grow with them.
Pfft. I've beaten Mass Effect atleast 20 times, maybe more. I have around 14-15 profiles that can be uploaded from my current harddrive with another 4-5 from my old 20g. Another 200 times seems like a good challenge!
((Five of those 20 are 100% complete))
So you rather Bioware not make any of their games for consoles, so they make much less money? Then that hurts their chances of making more games, or games with a much smaller budget?.....Yeah that makes a lot of sense.Rubbish Hero wrote...
Ahzrei wrote...RPGs are still RPGs.
Except console focused and no very good.
Modifié par ShadyKat, 16 août 2010 - 05:13 .
Calla S wrote...
You no longer have a beard. Anything you say is invalid.
ShadyKat wrote...So you rather Bioware not make any of their games for consoles, so they make much less money? .
Modifié par Rubbish Hero, 16 août 2010 - 05:14 .
Rubbish Hero wrote...
ShadyKat wrote...So you rather Bioware not make any of their games for consoles, so they make much less money? .
If mean better game, yes.
No bloody nun on runs, customer.
Rubbish Hero wrote...
ShadyKat wrote...So you rather Bioware not make any of their games for consoles, so they make much less money? .
If mean better game, yes.
No bloody nun on runs, customer.
Mr.Cousland wrote...
Nun on the...runs?
Wtf are you talking about?
I'm very sorry. I do miss the beard, though. Maybe Varric will show you pity enough to give it back sometime.Dave of Canada wrote...
Blame Anarya. She didn't help wrestle me from Varric's chest hair when I pleaded for help.Calla S wrote...
You no longer have a beard. Anything you say is invalid.
Mr.Cousland wrote...
Rubbish Hero wrote...
ShadyKat wrote...So you rather Bioware not make any of their games for consoles, so they make much less money? .
If mean better game, yes.
No bloody nun on runs, customer.
Nun on the...runs?
Wtf are you talking about?
Retour en haut