Wishpig wrote...
What!?!?! I really don't get the bolded line. Who says the second time is when it's overused.
It's important to keep in mind that a lot of assuming is going on.
If the purpose of the first exaggerated section is to establish Varric as an unreliable narrator, then that first section will permanently establish him as an unreliable narrator. To that end, no additional such sections will be needed. It is unknown if -- but probable that -- there will be more than one section where we will have to replay the "real" story, which raises the question of why Varric chose to lie at first. It is a fair assumption that Varric comprehends Cassandra's lack of tolerance for BS, so to continue lying to her he must either have a Good Reason™ (like being suspicious of her motives and trying to throw her off); be deliberately annoying her; or be accidentally annoying her. If he is deliberately or accidentally annoying her it is a (rather less charming) character trait, and to understand this trait the player does not have to personally play through Varric's stories. I argue that doing so will seem like forcefully extending the game's length without adding to the story (any more than a cutscene would). If Varric does have a Good Reason™, then -- for a basic example -- the player might learn something in Varric's exaggerated version they would not have learned with only the real version.
It is not unlike rogues having lockpicking so they can unlock chests that exist to provide a use for the lockpicking skill.
Wishpig wrote...
Sandal was a joke. He just said ENCHANTMENT. I got many laughs and entertainment out of it... but eventually it just stopped being entertainment.
And then you could stop talking to him. Or mute the game. Or just suffer those two seconds. At least one of these super-stories is obligatory and I expect that to be the case for all of them.
leonia42 wrote...
I don't know what you two hope to acheive on the "how does the exaggerated portion of the framed narrative work exactly" conversation but it's erring on being off-topic.
It stopped erring some time ago. I got my answer, anyway. Or, as much of one as I expected.