kane_1371 wrote...
you really aren't going to question ps3's price again and try to hide your lack of info with a link are you?
because only in your world ps3 is overpriced.
otherwise we now that first ps3 versions brought no profit for sony, for the simple fact that they were sold cheaper than what they had cost sony.
and you say ps3 is a mess, and many designers said ps3 is horrible to design on, but guess what?
now they admit they were wrong.
GamerZines bring you some new information about Homefront, including PS3 chosen as lead platform on console development for “quality reasons”
Scott Steinberg even goes further, and says making the PS3 lead platform will make the Xbox 360 games look “even better.”
Platinum Games confirming that the PS3 is the development lead this time around. "We're leading development on PS3," says director Shinji Mikami. "Obviously each console has its own unique requirements and limitations, but we feel if we can create a good enough presentation on PS3, we'll be off to a good start."
Lets prove how uniformed you are.
1. Price and if it's to high or low depends on the person and how much money they have.
2. The PS3 system itself still brings no profit to sony.
3. No developers said the PS3 was a horrible to make games for. They just said it was harder. They still think this, but sony has made it easier for them to make games on the PS3 with better dev kits.
4. Quality reasons from a game maker or magazine are all based on opinion.
5. People can say what they want. That guy you quote speaks of his PERSONAL OPINION. Not fact.
6. Platinum games needs to stop worrying about which system is better or worse, and concentrate on not making so much crap.