Stormer90 wrote...
NICKjnp wrote...
obie191970 wrote...
Arkeshen wrote...
I don't hate there owners either, my cousins have one; I just hate the console itself. It doesn't have very good online capabilities, due to the fact its online service is completely free. It being free means the have no extra revenue coming in to help upgrade the online play unlike Microsoft and The Xbox 360.
The fact that it's free has nothing to do with the online capabilities. Playstation made PSN a pass through service as opposed to end all destination like Live. And the "it doesn't have good online capabilities" argument is getting as tired as the "it doesn't have any games" argument of two years ago.
Damn people, wake up and realize that both systems have their strengths and weaknesses. Just because you may not be fortunate enough to own both does not mean that the one you own is king and the other one is absolute crap.
I have both consoles and played online with both of them... and I can tell you that the PSN is inferior to Live. I've found lag to be more prominent on the PSN and exclusive games on the PS3 with online capabilities are always awful (even the so called "Halo Killers"). For those who are saying the disc switch wont be on the PS3... you are right. Instead you will have to waite 5 minutes every time it installs a new mission on the system.
Do you have anything to back up that the Playstation Network is just full of lag? The only labeled "Halo Killer" was Killzone 1. Just because a game system has an exclusive FPS doesn't mean it is competing with the rival console's FPS.
And the only time you had to wait 5 minuets in between missions was in Metal Gear Solid 4.
You 360 fanboys need to get your facts strait, cause when the PS3 Only owners start coming in here, they will chew you out.
I WAS a PS3 only owner until 2 months ago; when I bought the Xbox 360 and ME 1 and 2.
AT LEAST I WON'T MISS OUT ON THE "BONUS CONTENT".
Modifié par tj987654321, 21 août 2010 - 07:57 .





Retour en haut





