4386 réponses à ce sujet

[uzivatel]

obie191970 wrote...

greed89 wrote...

4. it  was one of the few MS exclusives

This is the point I find most laughable.  ME1 was exclusive to the 360 for all of 6 months people.

Until they released it on Microsoft Windows.

[obie191970]

DetailedSubset wrote...

justgimmedudedammit wrote...

DetailedSubset wrote...

Except when it inevitably slows down the production of ME3.

It will not slow down production. The games all run on the same engine which is cross platform capable and will only need minor variations for each.

They still have to spend several months programming it for the unnecessarily complicated ps3.
And of course they'll delay the release of ME3 for a long while after it's finished so the 2 people who actually buy it "have a chance to finish their game".

Do you realize that Bioware has about 500 employees?  Do you think that Bioware just started on the port after the announcement yesterday or that maybe this was most likely started before ME2 even went out the door in January?

Modifié par obie191970, 18 août 2010 - 04:49 .

[greed89]

theelementslayer wrote...

greed89 wrote...

Haseeo wrote...

Don't see what the trouble is most are complaining about their bringing ME to a wider audience thats only a good thing

the trouble is

1. it might  slow down me3

2. might render me1 pointles

3. sony fanboys are  ****s

4. it  was one of the few MS exclusives

Answers: 

1. They said it wouldnt affet the ME3 release
2. They said ME3 would still be impacted by ME1
3. Not any worse then xbox fanboys are. Seriously this is the pot calling the kettle black the way you put it.
4. As was MGS4 and FF for the PS3. Oh wait they are on xbox now too.

You guys really are selfish sometimes

1 & 2. they also said MAss effect would remain exclusive

3. Iam not gonna  doubt the Xbox vfanboys cna be just as bad, but they are mostly defensive as oppsed to offensive, almost every flame war ive ever seen has been started by a sony fan boy

4. oh iam sorry i must of missed the anouncment that MSG4 was being relased on the x-box

[Rhjh20]

Fanboyism at its best, this thread makes me so sad.

[theelementslayer]

greed89 wrote...

theelementslayer wrote...

greed89 wrote...

Haseeo wrote...

Don't see what the trouble is most are complaining about their bringing ME to a wider audience thats only a good thing

the trouble is

1. it might  slow down me3

2. might render me1 pointles

3. sony fanboys are  ****s

4. it  was one of the few MS exclusives

Answers: 

1. They said it wouldnt affet the ME3 release
2. They said ME3 would still be impacted by ME1
3. Not any worse then xbox fanboys are. Seriously this is the pot calling the kettle black the way you put it.
4. As was MGS4 and FF for the PS3. Oh wait they are on xbox now too.

You guys really are selfish sometimes

1 & 2. they also said MAss effect would remain exclusive

3. Iam not gonna  doubt the Xbox vfanboys cna be just as bad, but they are mostly defensive as oppsed to offensive, almost every flame war ive ever seen has been started by a sony fan boy

4. oh iam sorry i must of missed the anouncment that MSG4 was being relased on the x-box

1&2. Ya because ME1 WAS exclusive to Microsoft. They arent giving it up.

3. People are offensive/defensive. Has nothing to do with the console. I know dicks, and awesome people alike that buy both PS3 and xboxes. Fanyboyism is sad man.

4. huh? I head that twas being released. Dunno where maybe Im wrong but sitll FF is a big one. It got released to xbox. So one for one. Why cant you just be happy for the players allowed to play a great game then just hogging it. Its not your right to say they can on cannot play.

Modifié par theelementslayer, 18 août 2010 - 04:55 .

[xODD7BALLx]

digoutyoursoul wrote...

http://www.vg247.com...luded-dlc-more/

ioWare boss Ray Muzyka, speaking in Cologne today, has told VG247 that the PS3 version of Mass Effect 2 is to include introductory content to provide a “seamless introduction” to the IP’s universe, as well as confirming the inclusion of DLC and access to the Cerburus Network.

Following confirmation of a January 2011 release for a PS3 version of Mass Effect 2 in EA’s gamescom press conference yesterday, Muzyka said it was important to the studio to “bring some new things to bear” for the PS3 version.

“One of the things we’re doing is that we’re bringing a lot of the post-release downloadable content and will integrate it into the experience, so that PS3 fans can check that out and play it,” he said.

While confirming the inclusion of an introductory segment for the PS3 SKU, Muzyka was cagey on specifics, refusing to confirm whether or not new gameplay is to be included over the 360 and PS3 version.

“We’re making sure there’s a really seamless introduction to the world of Mass Effect, for players that haven’t experienced it before,” he said.

“So even though it’s Mass Effect 2 specifically, we’re making sured there’s a nice introduction experience, that provides the back-story and the things that have happened up to that point in the universe, and makes it a really seamless introduction.”

He added: “We haven’t revealed what that is yet. It’ll be something that provides a good introduction and provides a lot of the back-story and introduces you well to the story-arc, and kind of makes you feel like you’re part of it all. And then you can jump right into the action in Mass Effect 2.”

oh an actually useful and informative post, thanks dude.

[Kaiser Shepard]

AwesomeName wrote...

I'm pretty sympathetic about some ME1 decisions not having a dramatic impact in ME2, since all these variables have to trickle into ME3 - but since ME3 won't carry into anything afterwards, I expect they'll go all out and all the decisions I made in the first two games should add up to a fairly unique playthrough. I hope the PS3 situation doesn't change that.

IGN interviewing Casey Hudson wrote...

Our chat closed with talk about the challenges BioWare is facing in terms of delivering real choice to the player without letting the story spiral out of control.

"It has to be one or the either. Either you really let people's choices have repercussion. Or, the choice doesn't really affect things and then things end up coming back together. As we're doing parts one and two, we have a really difficult challenge in terms of creating very different outcomes and yet being able to continue the story. The good thing about the third one will be that we no longer have that constraint and things can diverge as far as we can make them go.

That actually will be our goal with the whole trilogy. To take all of the things you've done in Mass Effect 1 and Mass Effect 2 and then just let it go. Let it diverge into wildly different conclusions. That's the real fun of having played Mass Effect 1 and 2 and then going into the third one will be that you've set all of these things in motion and now we can let them diverge. I'm not worried that people will play it and think 'Oh well I missed all of this content that would have been different if I had made other choices' because what that does is make you interested in replaying it. The replay value of Mass Effect 1 was huge, but Mass Effect 2 is much more so and I think it just continues into the conclusion of the trilogy."

Source

Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 18 août 2010 - 04:55 .

[elitextrem3]

Bioware pulling a Lebron James move. Damn I though Bioware was better than that.



"In this fall, man this is tough. In this fall were gonna release Mass Effect 2 for the PS3 and screw all of our PC/360 fanbase by not giving them hours of extra content."

[JGDD]

DetailedSubset wrote...
They still have to spend several months programming it for the unnecessarily complicated ps3.
And of course they'll delay the release of ME3 for a long while after it's finished so the 2 people who actually buy it "have a chance to finish their game".

Complicated? If anything consoles are more standardized than the myriad pc configurations out there currently. Nice jab with the 2 people comment, I won't go there.

[KOKitten]

greed89 wrote...
3. sony fanboys are  ****s

In my time gaming I've encountered fanboys of every platform and found them all to be the same.  Xbox fanboys are just as obnoxious as Sony fanboys, who are just as obnoxious as PC fanboys, who are just as obnoxious as Mac fanboys. For every rabid fanboy you will find another person who feels that platform wars are stupid and who respects the fact that individuals have different gaming preferences.

PS3, Xbox 360, PC, Mac - there is no difference between individuals on each of these platforms.  In every facet of life you will find kind souls and rude people.  Gaming community forums may have age limitations but they do not have amusement park rules which state “you must be this mature to post.” Please note that maturity and age do not go hand-in-hand. Young people can be wise beyond their years; older people may never have grown up. 

I have absolutely no idea which platform was utilized by the person who threatened to release anthrax into BioWare's offices during the Kasumi DLC delay, by the person who wished DA developers' families would die in a horrible car wreck, or by the person who spammed the forums with grotesque photos after the lockdown of the Tali thread and I don’t care. A person’s words and actions, not platform of choice, form my opinion of him/her. Polite, respectful people garner respect.  Rude, immature people garner disdain. 

[ianmcdonald]

Oh no! More people get to experience a fantastic game! That SUCKS!!



Seriously, you people need to stop being so dramatic. It's a video game.

[DetailedSubset]

 

obie191970 wrote...

DetailedSubset wrote...

justgimmedudedammit wrote...

DetailedSubset wrote...

Except when it inevitably slows down the production of ME3.

It will not slow down production. The games all run on the same engine which is cross platform capable and will only need minor variations for each.

They still have to spend several months programming it for the unnecessarily complicated ps3.
And of course they'll delay the release of ME3 for a long while after it's finished so the 2 people who actually buy it "have a chance to finish their game".

Do you realize that Bioware has about 500 employees?  Do you think that Bioware just started on the port after the announcement yesterday or that maybe this was most likely started before ME2 even went out the door in January?

The Mass Effect series will never go to PS3 - Chris Priestly. 
↑
This was said a while back after the release of ME2 and considering it won't be released until 2011 on PS3  I'd be guessing they started programming a couple of months ago. 
It doesn't matter how many employees they have they must still take employees off ME3, DA2 and whatever other projects they've got going

[tr3y300]

Give me the ME1 setup,So i'll program it for playstation free i got my own unreal,modo and hardware.I see ME being good on any setup,playstation,xbox,ect. The game is a great game,so it needs to be played. Everybody feels that xbox is better or pc is better cause thats what you got it for. Not everyone can get a pc,xbox and ps3. So they have to get one or the other.

[cerberus1701]

"So my general guess what the PS3 is getting, is the expanded intro to cover some ME1 details as provided by link above. and probably not any of the DLC, they'll make us get it seperate which I can live with"



It has already been confirmed that they will get the DLC.

[theelementslayer]

KOKitten wrote...

greed89 wrote...
3. sony fanboys are  ****s

In my time gaming I've encountered fanboys of every platform and found them all to be the same.  Xbox fanboys are just as obnoxious as Sony fanboys, who are just as obnoxious as PC fanboys, who are just as obnoxious as Mac fanboys. For every rabid fanboy you will find another person who feels that platform wars are stupid and who respects the fact that individuals have different gaming preferences.

Wait, wait. There are enough people who play on Mac that they have their own fanboys? Wow I have never actually met anyone who plays games on a mac. Cool I learn something new every day:happy:

[JGDD]

DetailedSubset wrote...
It doesn't matter how many employees they have they must still take employees off ME3, DA2 and whatever other projects they've got going

They have already mentioned hiring more people. Next.

[Torhagen]

theelementslayer wrote...

greed89 wrote...

Haseeo wrote...

Don't see what the trouble is most are complaining about their bringing ME to a wider audience thats only a good thing

the trouble is

1. it might  slow down me3

2. might render me1 pointles

3. sony fanboys are  ****s

4. it  was one of the few MS exclusives

Answers: 

1. They said it wouldnt affet the ME3 release
2. They said ME3 would still be impacted by ME1
3. Not any worse then xbox fanboys are. Seriously this is the pot calling the kettle black the way you put it.
4. As was MGS4 and FF for the PS3. Oh wait they are on xbox now too.

You guys really are selfish sometimes

Bioware said a lot over time and quite a bit of it is BS in the present

[chestersmurf]

Ok seriously people it is not going to significantly effect ME3. Think about it January is only 5 months away, and it is probably a different team working on it, AND there was already PS3 code found in the xbox and PC versions of ME3 so the engine is clearly already multiplatform. So worst case scenario it would cost it a few months AT MOST.

Edit: Also we already know they have 3 to 4 teams, likely going to expand because of EA resources AND dragon age 2 will be finishing in the next few months, giving them more people if needed. It is also possible that the ME2 dlc will be done soon in which case that team can move over to either the PS3 or ME3 team.

Modifié par chestersmurf, 18 août 2010 - 05:09 .

[obie191970]

DetailedSubset wrote...
The Mass Effect series will never go to PS3 - Chris Priestly. 
↑
This was said a while back after the release of ME2 and considering it won't be released until 2011 on PS3  I'd be guessing they started programming a couple of months ago. 
It doesn't matter how many employees they have they must still take employees off ME3, DA2 and whatever other projects they've got going

Obviously, we don't know about the release exclusivity deal that Bioware had with Microsoft, but I would bet that Bioware not even opening the door to speculation on a PS3 release was part of it.  Either way, this is something that has been in the works for long time.  Hell, Ray even says in that VG247 interview that they have been working on it for a long time.

[uzivatel]

DetailedSubset wrote...

The Mass Effect series will never go to PS3 - Chris Priestly. 
↑
This was said a while back after the release of ME2 and considering it won't be released until 2011 on PS3  I'd be guessing they started programming a couple of months ago.

Except Jay spilled the beans in Poland prior the ME2 release ... Chris just did his usual doublespeak and his statement is technically right since ME1 (as standalone game) is not going to be released on PS3.

Modifié par uzivatel, 18 août 2010 - 05:08 .

[LejCumar]

Personally, I'm glad to hear that Mass Effect 2 is coming to PS3. That said, I sincerely hope they find a way to bring ME1 to PS3. Having your decisions carry over from the previous game is one of the things I like about this game.

I have it for the PC, but my laptop barely runs it and I can't just run out and buy a new PC or an XBox 360 (my PS3 was a gift). I'm thinking, having it in on the PS3 means I don't have to worry about system requirements.

I don't like this idea of exclusives anyway. Why should anyone be forced to buy a particular console to enjoy a great game? Your preference and the quality of the hardware should determine which console you have, not your desire to play a game that only plays on one console.

My 2 cents, for what it's worth.

[aftohsix]

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

AwesomeName wrote...

I'm pretty sympathetic about some ME1 decisions not having a dramatic impact in ME2, since all these variables have to trickle into ME3 - but since ME3 won't carry into anything afterwards, I expect they'll go all out and all the decisions I made in the first two games should add up to a fairly unique playthrough. I hope the PS3 situation doesn't change that.

IGN interviewing Casey Hudson wrote...

Our chat closed with talk about the challenges BioWare is facing in terms of delivering real choice to the player without letting the story spiral out of control. 

"It has to be one or the either. Either you really let people's choices have repercussion. Or, the choice doesn't really affect things and then things end up coming back together. As we're doing parts one and two, we have a really difficult challenge in terms of creating very different outcomes and yet being able to continue the story. The good thing about the third one will be that we no longer have that constraint and things can diverge as far as we can make them go. 

That actually will be our goal with the whole trilogy. To take all of the things you've done in Mass Effect 1 and Mass Effect 2 and then just let it go. Let it diverge into wildly different conclusions. That's the real fun of having played Mass Effect 1 and 2 and then going into the third one will be that you've set all of these things in motion and now we can let them diverge. I'm not worried that people will play it and think 'Oh well I missed all of this content that would have been different if I had made other choices' because what that does is make you interested in replaying it. The replay value of Mass Effect 1 was huge, but Mass Effect 2 is much more so and I think it just continues into the conclusion of the trilogy."

Source

WAIT!!  NO NO NO!

What you didn't see is that Casey had his fingers crossed when he said this.  He's lying.

ME3 will be a real time strategy.  Did you hear they're re-designing Shepard to look more like Cloud Strife to appease those who thought ME2 was enough of an RPG.  These are facts.  You can't debate them.  These are facts even though I just made them up.

Modifié par aftohsix, 18 août 2010 - 05:10 .

[Liec]

 So when they said that "something far-reaching is coming from Mass Effect in early 2011" they weren't talkin about this... were they?