4386 réponses à ce sujet

[EmperorKaveje]

Ghurshog wrote...

Lolz at the crying and whining... ok that's not constructive but its what I felt at all 97 pages of it.

Bioware is in business to make money if the bean counters say it will be profitable to release a game that everyone else has had for over an year on a new platform by what right or sense of entitlement allows you to think they won't?

The fact of the matter is PS3 owners are the ones getting screwed because ME1 will never be on the PS3 because Microsoft owns the publishing rights lock, stock, and barrel.

PS3 owners are the ones that don't have a choice.

Also in the 'end' Bioware now works for EA, and EA releases its products on multi-platforms all the time. So get used to it.

The term 'exclusive' is only exclusive right up until its profitable not to be.

Life is hard... Get a helmet.

I agree 100%-IF we get screwed on DLC Deal with it-who cares

[hamtyl07]

Blk_Mage_Ctype wrote...

V0luS_R0cKs7aR wrote...

I think the main problem with many is the fact that ME1 is *not* getting ported to the PS3 as well. This means that if Bioware were to make ME3 for the PS3 as well, then there is a high chance that whatever happened/whatever choices the player made in ME1 would be rendered irrelevant, because part of the story would be made canon.

It's not about fanboys whining about Bioware betraying Microsoft. It's about Bioware screwing over Mass Effect 1.

Here's the truth, you're all being paranoid.

It's already been stated on Twitter that Bioware is adding additional content into the PS3 Version to acquaint the player with the events and story of ME1, and even if it wasn't, it's obvious.

REALITY CHECK, Bioware made the Mass Effect series to be a 3 part on-going series that connects directly and reflect the player's choices, and they wouldn't screw that up just because of one port on a console that didn't get the original game in the series.
Worst case scenario, the PS3 Version of ME3 gets toned down so that ME1's choices play a smaller role.

Here, allow me to predict the future for you all...

Ever wonder why Bioware announced a port of ME2 for PS3, but no PS3 Version of the upcoming ME3? Here's why, history is going to repeat itself. Microsoft has likely already paid EA for ME3 to be an exclusive for a year, so the PS3 Version won't come out til a year later.
So even if Bioware doesn't include some form of a save generator, a retrospective, ME Genesis, etc. Then the only version of ME3 that will be affected is the PS3 Version that won't come out until a year after the PC/360 Version, understand?

That actually make compltete logical sense

[CaptainSlow]

You guys didn't really think that Bioware's games will stay with Xbox/Windows platforms after EA took over, right? Anyway, as long as PC version exist I'm OK with that.

[V0luS_R0cKs7aR]

Blk_Mage_Ctype wrote...

Here's the truth, you're all being paranoid.

It's already been stated on Twitter that Bioware is adding additional content into the PS3 Version to acquaint the player with the events and story of ME1, and even if it wasn't, it's obvious.

REALITY CHECK, Bioware made the Mass Effect series to be a 3 part on-going series that connects directly and reflect the player's choices, and they wouldn't screw that up just because of one port on a console that didn't get the original game in the series.
Worst case scenario, the PS3 Version of ME3 gets toned down so that ME1's choices play a smaller role.

Here, allow me to predict the future for you all...

Ever wonder why Bioware announced a port of ME2 for PS3, but no PS3 Version of the upcoming ME3? Here's why, history is going to repeat itself. Microsoft has likely already paid EA for ME3 to be an exclusive for a year, so the PS3 Version won't come out til a year later.
So even if Bioware doesn't include some form of a save generator, a retrospective, ME Genesis, etc. Then the only version of ME3 that will be affected is the PS3 Version that won't come out until a year after the PC/360 Version, understand?

Save the condescension, it's not gonna get you anywhere. And a game designed and coded from the outset for the Xbox isn't going to port over easily to Sony's PS3 with all its custom crap. That means more work for Bioware. Which means they have to divert away some manpower to deal with this port. Which means:

a) Bioware gonna take some short-cuts for Mass Effect 3, such as making ME1 decisions pointless.
Mass Effect 3 will be launched in time for the Xbox 720

How long did it take for Mass Effect 2 to come out after Mass Effect 1 again? 

Modifié par V0luS_R0cKs7aR, 19 août 2010 - 12:59 .

[Blk_Mage_Ctype]

hamtyl07 wrote...

Blk_Mage_Ctype wrote...

V0luS_R0cKs7aR wrote...

I think the main problem with many is the fact that ME1 is *not* getting ported to the PS3 as well. This means that if Bioware were to make ME3 for the PS3 as well, then there is a high chance that whatever happened/whatever choices the player made in ME1 would be rendered irrelevant, because part of the story would be made canon.

It's not about fanboys whining about Bioware betraying Microsoft. It's about Bioware screwing over Mass Effect 1.

Here's the truth, you're all being paranoid.

It's already been stated on Twitter that Bioware is adding additional content into the PS3 Version to acquaint the player with the events and story of ME1, and even if it wasn't, it's obvious.

REALITY CHECK, Bioware made the Mass Effect series to be a 3 part on-going series that connects directly and reflect the player's choices, and they wouldn't screw that up just because of one port on a console that didn't get the original game in the series.
Worst case scenario, the PS3 Version of ME3 gets toned down so that ME1's choices play a smaller role.

Here, allow me to predict the future for you all...

Ever wonder why Bioware announced a port of ME2 for PS3, but no PS3 Version of the upcoming ME3? Here's why, history is going to repeat itself. Microsoft has likely already paid EA for ME3 to be an exclusive for a year, so the PS3 Version won't come out til a year later.
So even if Bioware doesn't include some form of a save generator, a retrospective, ME Genesis, etc. Then the only version of ME3 that will be affected is the PS3 Version that won't come out until a year after the PC/360 Version, understand?

That actually make complete logical sense 

Thanks, but it'll just get buried and people will keep spitting out the same nonsense about how the game will be gimped thanks to a single port. (Cause, you know...that's happened SO MANY times in history!) 

[Blk_Mage_Ctype]

V0luS_R0cKs7aR wrote...

Blk_Mage_Ctype wrote...

Here's the truth, you're all being paranoid.

It's already been stated on Twitter that Bioware is adding additional content into the PS3 Version to acquaint the player with the events and story of ME1, and even if it wasn't, it's obvious.

REALITY CHECK, Bioware made the Mass Effect series to be a 3 part on-going series that connects directly and reflect the player's choices, and they wouldn't screw that up just because of one port on a console that didn't get the original game in the series.
Worst case scenario, the PS3 Version of ME3 gets toned down so that ME1's choices play a smaller role.

Here, allow me to predict the future for you all...

Ever wonder why Bioware announced a port of ME2 for PS3, but no PS3 Version of the upcoming ME3? Here's why, history is going to repeat itself. Microsoft has likely already paid EA for ME3 to be an exclusive for a year, so the PS3 Version won't come out til a year later.
So even if Bioware doesn't include some form of a save generator, a retrospective, ME Genesis, etc. Then the only version of ME3 that will be affected is the PS3 Version that won't come out until a year after the PC/360 Version, understand?

Save the condescension, it's not gonna get you anywhere. And a game designed and coded from the outset for the Xbox isn't going to port over easily to Sony's PS3 with all its custom crap. That means more work for Bioware. Which means they have to divert away some manpower to deal with this port. Which means:

a) Bioware gonna take some short-cuts for Mass Effect 3, such as making ME1 decisions pointless.
Mass Effect 3 will be launched in time for the Xbox 720

How long did it take for Mass Effect 2 to come out after Mass Effect 1 again? 

I missed the part where Bioware themselves said that the ME3 team would be porting the game, can you please link me to it?

I ask because it seems like an odd thing to do... I'd imagine that some team from EA would be handling the port so that it wouldn't hinder the production of ME3 and lose them money in the long run.

So please, may I have a link to where it says that Bioware's ME3 Dev Team are working on the port and that ME3 as a result has been delayed indefinitely?

Modifié par Blk_Mage_Ctype, 19 août 2010 - 01:06 .

[DaShadyOne]

whoa we have been at this for almost three days i belive

Modifié par DaShadyOne, 19 août 2010 - 01:34 .

[Torhagen]

hamtyl07 wrote...

Blk_Mage_Ctype wrote...

V0luS_R0cKs7aR wrote...

I think the main problem with many is the fact that ME1 is *not* getting ported to the PS3 as well. This means that if Bioware were to make ME3 for the PS3 as well, then there is a high chance that whatever happened/whatever choices the player made in ME1 would be rendered irrelevant, because part of the story would be made canon.

It's not about fanboys whining about Bioware betraying Microsoft. It's about Bioware screwing over Mass Effect 1.

Here's the truth, you're all being paranoid.

It's already been stated on Twitter that Bioware is adding additional content into the PS3 Version to acquaint the player with the events and story of ME1, and even if it wasn't, it's obvious.

REALITY CHECK, Bioware made the Mass Effect series to be a 3 part on-going series that connects directly and reflect the player's choices, and they wouldn't screw that up just because of one port on a console that didn't get the original game in the series.
Worst case scenario, the PS3 Version of ME3 gets toned down so that ME1's choices play a smaller role.

Here, allow me to predict the future for you all...

Ever wonder why Bioware announced a port of ME2 for PS3, but no PS3 Version of the upcoming ME3? Here's why, history is going to repeat itself. Microsoft has likely already paid EA for ME3 to be an exclusive for a year, so the PS3 Version won't come out til a year later.
So even if Bioware doesn't include some form of a save generator, a retrospective, ME Genesis, etc. Then the only version of ME3 that will be affected is the PS3 Version that won't come out until a year after the PC/360 Version, understand?

That actually make compltete logical sense

there it is Worst case scenario, the PS3 Version of ME3 gets toned down so that ME1's choices play a smaller role

You put that very poetically but its exactly what many other people already stated that ME1 decisions probably will not have the influence they would have had without the port its only logical that people that are with the ME from the beginning are pissed about this.

if you think that the port likely also is the reason that ME1 Decisions had practically no impact on ME2 whatsoever since the PS3 code is present in the game all along.

Do you seriously believe that only the PS3 version of ME3 would be affected ?
that is the Reason some people go a-wal here.

[aftohsix]

V0luS_R0cKs7aR wrote...

Blk_Mage_Ctype wrote...

Here's the truth, you're all being paranoid.

It's already been stated on Twitter that Bioware is adding additional content into the PS3 Version to acquaint the player with the events and story of ME1, and even if it wasn't, it's obvious.

REALITY CHECK, Bioware made the Mass Effect series to be a 3 part on-going series that connects directly and reflect the player's choices, and they wouldn't screw that up just because of one port on a console that didn't get the original game in the series.
Worst case scenario, the PS3 Version of ME3 gets toned down so that ME1's choices play a smaller role.

Here, allow me to predict the future for you all...

Ever wonder why Bioware announced a port of ME2 for PS3, but no PS3 Version of the upcoming ME3? Here's why, history is going to repeat itself. Microsoft has likely already paid EA for ME3 to be an exclusive for a year, so the PS3 Version won't come out til a year later.
So even if Bioware doesn't include some form of a save generator, a retrospective, ME Genesis, etc. Then the only version of ME3 that will be affected is the PS3 Version that won't come out until a year after the PC/360 Version, understand?

Save the condescension, it's not gonna get you anywhere. And a game designed and coded from the outset for the Xbox isn't going to port over easily to Sony's PS3 with all its custom crap. That means more work for Bioware. Which means they have to divert away some manpower to deal with this port. Which means:

a) Bioware gonna take some short-cuts for Mass Effect 3, such as making ME1 decisions pointless.
Mass Effect 3 will be launched in time for the Xbox 720

How long did it take for Mass Effect 2 to come out after Mass Effect 1 again? 

I still see Blk is still fighting the good fight trying to nicely tell you what I'm going to say right now.

Pull your head out of your ass.

A. Is Ridiculous
B. All 3 will be within this gen.

Did your mommy drink a lot when she was pregnant with you or what?

[SpartenOmega117]

DaShadyOne wrote...

Blk_Mage_Ctype wrote...

V0luS_R0cKs7aR wrote...

Blk_Mage_Ctype wrote...

Here's the truth, you're all being paranoid.

It's already been stated on Twitter that Bioware is adding additional content into the PS3 Version to acquaint the player with the events and story of ME1, and even if it wasn't, it's obvious.

REALITY CHECK, Bioware made the Mass Effect series to be a 3 part on-going series that connects directly and reflect the player's choices, and they wouldn't screw that up just because of one port on a console that didn't get the original game in the series.
Worst case scenario, the PS3 Version of ME3 gets toned down so that ME1's choices play a smaller role.

Here, allow me to predict the future for you all...

Ever wonder why Bioware announced a port of ME2 for PS3, but no PS3 Version of the upcoming ME3? Here's why, history is going to repeat itself. Microsoft has likely already paid EA for ME3 to be an exclusive for a year, so the PS3 Version won't come out til a year later.
So even if Bioware doesn't include some form of a save generator, a retrospective, ME Genesis, etc. Then the only version of ME3 that will be affected is the PS3 Version that won't come out until a year after the PC/360 Version, understand?

Save the condescension, it's not gonna get you anywhere. And a game designed and coded from the outset for the Xbox isn't going to port over easily to Sony's PS3 with all its custom crap. That means more work for Bioware. Which means they have to divert away some manpower to deal with this port. Which means:

a) Bioware gonna take some short-cuts for Mass Effect 3, such as making ME1 decisions pointless.
Mass Effect 3 will be launched in time for the Xbox 720

How long did it take for Mass Effect 2 to come out after Mass Effect 1 again? 

I missed the part where Bioware themselves said that the ME3 team would be porting the game, can you please link me to it?

I ask because it seems like an odd thing to do... I'd imagine that some team from EA would be handling the port so that it wouldn't hinder the production of ME3 and lose them money in the long run.

So please, may I have a link to where it says that Bioware's ME3 Dev Team are working on the port and that ME3 as a result has been delayed indefinitely?

bioware said that they were doing the port themselves.... it around here somewere lol too many pages to look through

Bioware is kind of huge. I think they have enought staff members to make a port. How do you think they are handling ME3, Dragon age 2, and The old republic all at once?

[KingRanger]

V0luS_R0cKs7aR wrote...

GSpotFrenzy wrote...
How is it rendered irrellevant? I'm certain that Bioware will keep the ME1 choices in the game, it just means PS3 players will have less endings available.

I doubt that - then the PS3 fanboys will start complaining/boycotting the Mass Effect series as an "inferior" port of an XBox game that they may as well play on the PC.

The PS3 fanboys spent the last 2 years ****ing about how much the ME series sucks. How it being only on PC and Xbox 360 was fine because the games and 360 both sucked. Now those same fanboys are all excited.

[KingRanger]

LegendaryAvenger wrote...

jollyorigins wrote...

LegendaryAvenger wrote...

arafinwe_ingalaure wrote...

Why aren't they releasing Mass Effect 1 too ? After all that time, they could scrap the exclusivity deal with M$. After all, Microsoft got Final fantasy XIII...

Yeah. I agree but as long as M$ is still flourishing, I doubt it would happen. 

the reason why they can't release mass effect 1 is because it was published by microsoft instead of EA. Therefore EA are not allowed to port this game as well because microsoft own it, sorry, but mass effect 1 is remaining an xbox/pc exclusive

Therefore I conclude M$ is a crappy company. Even though I own an Xbox 360 and a PC with Windows Vista (Yeah, it sucks)

Does it hurt to be as dumb as you are?

[KingRanger]

DaShadyOne wrote...

LJScribes wrote...

who cares what platform it goes on, let them make their games for whoever, the only people who benefits from console wars and multiplatform games is us the gamers, as we have a broader choice of where we'd like to play the game and thanks to a broader distribution on the market to multiple platforms, more money is made by the companies who work hard to make these games. If they are good companies like Bioware....(not EA, which has no soul) we can all assume that the quality of future games from BW will improve.

i would agree with you but microsoft is losing it.. they only got reach and GeOW 3 left
while sony gets microsoft's (timed)"exclusives" with extra content and still has alot of exclusives themselves
exclusives are what keep Devs in a constant competition with others and motivated to be better
with the ps3 in the lead xbox players feel cheated... or robbed and will most likely switch over for a better expirience thus rendering 360 obsolete and sony will have no one to compete with.. leaving them to cheat us anyway they see fit.

im seeing this as a gamer who wants equal great expiriences from both ends not just one

and no im no fanboy so please do not start 

Keep saying that to yourself maybe it will become true in your deluded mind. And yeah, you are a fanboy.

[Kusy]

Shut up you guys and get Onlive.
/trollface.

[KingRanger]

arafinwe_ingalaure wrote...

Why aren't they releasing Mass Effect 1 too ? After all that time, they could scrap the exclusivity deal with M$. After all, Microsoft got Final fantasy XIII...

Are you guys that keep saying this stuff stupid, dense, or just complete morons? I mean really? Is it so freaking hard to grasp that MS paid for ME1. They OWN the rights to it. DO you get it? Is it clear? I mean good god... Also those of you that use M$ are just douche bags. you might as well spell sony as $ony. ALL companies are out to make a profit.

[Blk_Mage_Ctype]

DaShadyOne wrote...

Blk_Mage_Ctype wrote...

V0luS_R0cKs7aR wrote...

Blk_Mage_Ctype wrote...

Here's the truth, you're all being paranoid.

It's already been stated on Twitter that Bioware is adding additional content into the PS3 Version to acquaint the player with the events and story of ME1, and even if it wasn't, it's obvious.

REALITY CHECK, Bioware made the Mass Effect series to be a 3 part on-going series that connects directly and reflect the player's choices, and they wouldn't screw that up just because of one port on a console that didn't get the original game in the series.
Worst case scenario, the PS3 Version of ME3 gets toned down so that ME1's choices play a smaller role.

Here, allow me to predict the future for you all...

Ever wonder why Bioware announced a port of ME2 for PS3, but no PS3 Version of the upcoming ME3? Here's why, history is going to repeat itself. Microsoft has likely already paid EA for ME3 to be an exclusive for a year, so the PS3 Version won't come out til a year later.
So even if Bioware doesn't include some form of a save generator, a retrospective, ME Genesis, etc. Then the only version of ME3 that will be affected is the PS3 Version that won't come out until a year after the PC/360 Version, understand?

Save the condescension, it's not gonna get you anywhere. And a game designed and coded from the outset for the Xbox isn't going to port over easily to Sony's PS3 with all its custom crap. That means more work for Bioware. Which means they have to divert away some manpower to deal with this port. Which means:

a) Bioware gonna take some short-cuts for Mass Effect 3, such as making ME1 decisions pointless.
Mass Effect 3 will be launched in time for the Xbox 720

How long did it take for Mass Effect 2 to come out after Mass Effect 1 again? 

I missed the part where Bioware themselves said that the ME3 team would be porting the game, can you please link me to it?

I ask because it seems like an odd thing to do... I'd imagine that some team from EA would be handling the port so that it wouldn't hinder the production of ME3 and lose them money in the long run.

So please, may I have a link to where it says that Bioware's ME3 Dev Team are working on the port and that ME3 as a result has been delayed indefinitely?

bioware said that they were doing the port themselves.... it around here somewere lol too many pages to look through

Did they say it was ME3's Team? Because I'll seriously LMAO if they did. Bioware is a HUGE developer with a bunch of teams. The same team that's doing ME3 isn't doing DA2 or SWTOR, so I'd be extremely surprised if the ME3 Dev Team dropped ME3 to go work on a port.

[V0luS_R0cKs7aR]

aftohsix wrote...
I still see Blk is still fighting the good fight trying to nicely tell you what I'm going to say right now.

Pull your head out of your ass.

A. Is Ridiculous
B. All 3 will be within this gen.

Did your mommy drink a lot when she was pregnant with you or what?

You're so cool. But let's see you speak like that in real life to a total stranger who would prooooobably try to kick your **** afterwards.

But kudos to you. Courage on an internet forum is courage nonetheless.

[AventuroLegendary]

KingRanger wrote...

LegendaryAvenger wrote...

jollyorigins wrote...

LegendaryAvenger wrote...

arafinwe_ingalaure wrote...

Why aren't they releasing Mass Effect 1 too ? After all that time, they could scrap the exclusivity deal with M$. After all, Microsoft got Final fantasy XIII...

Yeah. I agree but as long as M$ is still flourishing, I doubt it would happen. 

the reason why they can't release mass effect 1 is because it was published by microsoft instead of EA. Therefore EA are not allowed to port this game as well because microsoft own it, sorry, but mass effect 1 is remaining an xbox/pc exclusive

Therefore I conclude M$ is a crappy company. Even though I own an Xbox 360 and a PC with Windows Vista (Yeah, it sucks)

Does it hurt to be as dumb as you are?

Get off my back 

[GSpotFrenzy]

KingRanger wrote...

V0luS_R0cKs7aR wrote...

GSpotFrenzy wrote...
How is it rendered irrellevant? I'm certain that Bioware will keep the ME1 choices in the game, it just means PS3 players will have less endings available.

I doubt that - then the PS3 fanboys will start complaining/boycotting the Mass Effect series as an "inferior" port of an XBox game that they may as well play on the PC.

The PS3 fanboys spent the last 2 years ****ing about how much the ME series sucks. How it being only on PC and Xbox 360 was fine because the games and 360 both sucked. Now those same fanboys are all excited.

And now the 360/PC fanboys are lamenting how ME3 will suck now that it's cross platform.

[DaShadyOne]

KingRanger wrote...

DaShadyOne wrote...

LJScribes wrote...

who cares what platform it goes on, let them make their games for whoever, the only people who benefits from console wars and multiplatform games is us the gamers, as we have a broader choice of where we'd like to play the game and thanks to a broader distribution on the market to multiple platforms, more money is made by the companies who work hard to make these games. If they are good companies like Bioware....(not EA, which has no soul) we can all assume that the quality of future games from BW will improve.

i would agree with you but microsoft is losing it.. they only got reach and GeOW 3 left
while sony gets microsoft's (timed)"exclusives" with extra content and still has alot of exclusives themselves
exclusives are what keep Devs in a constant competition with others and motivated to be better
with the ps3 in the lead xbox players feel cheated... or robbed and will most likely switch over for a better expirience thus rendering 360 obsolete and sony will have no one to compete with.. leaving them to cheat us anyway they see fit.

im seeing this as a gamer who wants equal great expiriences from both ends not just one

and no im no fanboy so please do not start 

Keep saying that to yourself maybe it will become true in your deluded mind. And yeah, you are a fanboy.

 

im a fanboy?? for what system exactly or are you just insulting cuz you have nothing better to say?

[KOKitten]

DaShadyOne wrote...
exclusives are what keep Devs in a constant competition with others and motivated to be better

What should keep Devs in constant competition with each other is the desire to create better games regardless of platform or exclusivity.

BioWare is known for RPG's.  BioWare should be in constant competition with other studios known for RPG's, such as Bethesda, to create the best quality RPG.  If I'm a consumer and I'm only going to purchase one RPG during a given time period, BioWare (or any other game studio) should be working to ensure my purchase is their game because it's better than the competition's, not because it's exclusive to my platform. 

BioWare, and other game studios, should also be in competition with their past games.  Developers should constantly challenge themselves to improve on their games and not churn out formulaic drivel just because "the last one sold well." 

I don't buy games based on exclusivity.  An exclusive game with a boring story and poor design is just an exclusive piece of garbage.  I buy games based on what they have to offer. 

[Blk_Mage_Ctype]

GSpotFrenzy wrote...

KingRanger wrote...

V0luS_R0cKs7aR wrote...

GSpotFrenzy wrote...
How is it rendered irrellevant? I'm certain that Bioware will keep the ME1 choices in the game, it just means PS3 players will have less endings available.

I doubt that - then the PS3 fanboys will start complaining/boycotting the Mass Effect series as an "inferior" port of an XBox game that they may as well play on the PC.

The PS3 fanboys spent the last 2 years ****ing about how much the ME series sucks. How it being only on PC and Xbox 360 was fine because the games and 360 both sucked. Now those same fanboys are all excited.

And now the 360/PC fanboys are lamenting how ME3 will suck now that it's cross platform.

Don't forget that they're immune to logic and almost seem like they want ME3 to suck just so they can say they're right.

[DaShadyOne]

KingRanger wrote...

DaShadyOne wrote...

LJScribes wrote...

who cares what platform it goes on, let them make their games for whoever, the only people who benefits from console wars and multiplatform games is us the gamers, as we have a broader choice of where we'd like to play the game and thanks to a broader distribution on the market to multiple platforms, more money is made by the companies who work hard to make these games. If they are good companies like Bioware....(not EA, which has no soul) we can all assume that the quality of future games from BW will improve.

i would agree with you but microsoft is losing it.. they only got reach and GeOW 3 left
while sony gets microsoft's (timed)"exclusives" with extra content and still has alot of exclusives themselves
exclusives are what keep Devs in a constant competition with others and motivated to be better
with the ps3 in the lead xbox players feel cheated... or robbed and will most likely switch over for a better expirience thus rendering 360 obsolete and sony will have no one to compete with.. leaving them to cheat us anyway they see fit.

im seeing this as a gamer who wants equal great expiriences from both ends not just one

and no im no fanboy so please do not start 

Keep saying that to yourself maybe it will become true in your deluded mind. And yeah, you are a fanboy.

ooooh big tough guy came to insult ooooh man i guess ill go cry in a corner

 your ****ing lame dude

[Torhagen]

GSpotFrenzy wrote...

KingRanger wrote...

V0luS_R0cKs7aR wrote...

GSpotFrenzy wrote...
How is it rendered irrellevant? I'm certain that Bioware will keep the ME1 choices in the game, it just means PS3 players will have less endings available.

I doubt that - then the PS3 fanboys will start complaining/boycotting the Mass Effect series as an "inferior" port of an XBox game that they may as well play on the PC.

The PS3 fanboys spent the last 2 years ****ing about how much the ME series sucks. How it being only on PC and Xbox 360 was fine because the games and 360 both sucked. Now those same fanboys are all excited.

And now the 360/PC fanboys are lamenting how ME3 will suck now that it's cross platform.

Blk_Mage_Ctype's wrote..
there it is Worst case scenario, the PS3 Version of ME3 gets toned down so that ME1's choices play a smaller role

You
put that very poetically but its exactly what many other people already
stated that ME1 decisions probably will not have the influence they
would have had without the port its only logical that people that are
with the ME from the beginning are pissed about this.

if you
think that the port likely also is the reason that ME1 Decisions had
practically no impact on ME2 whatsoever since the PS3 code is present in
the game all along.

Do you seriously believe that only the PS3 version of ME3 would be affected ?
that is the Reason some people go a-wal here.