2499 réponses à ce sujet

[HighlandBerserkr]

Captain Crash wrote...

hmmm I was hoping she would look something me like this



No fairy tales here! Shes powerful, dominant and will cut any man who get in her way! Still probably to much flesh but even if she was covered up more that image purveys an attitude I would love for her!

Thats awesome.

[Vandrayke]

namedforthemoon wrote...

Vandrayke wrote...

filetemo wrote...

It's strange some females in this forum advocate for a non "playboy cover hot" Hawke while their avatars portray faces I would call "playboy cover" worthy.

I guess our beauty ideal isn't so different

I don't think they hate playboy cover girls intrinsically- they just hate the makeup, the style, and the lack of clothes  

Mostly the lack of clothes, and the idea that so much bare skin will be turned black from frostbite in the Frostback mountains, or how easily a sword or arrow could get a kill shot.

Well the chain bikini thing is obviously stupid.  Oddly enough, most guys think plenty of women can be hot and still actually wear clothes  

[Marian Hawke]

This thread is relevant to my interests.

[Apollo Starflare]

Marian Hawke wrote...

This thread is relevant to my interests.

Can you tell us what you look like?

[Ponce de Leon]

imported_beer wrote...

Mike Laidlaw wrote...
, FemHawke is capable of melting butter from across the room.

So, FemHawke is based on me?

I can't believe I wasn't paid royalties.

I'm sorry i_b, but that can't be you... you are much better than that. 

[fchopin]

An image of lady Hawke would be nice, a 15 seconds video trailer would be even better.

[JasonPogo]

namedforthemoon wrote...

WilliamShatner wrote...

Is the reveal of feamle Hawke going to be a big event? If not I can't see why you would need to a timeline for it. Seems rather silly.

Maybe she'll be in the next DA2 trailer.

I think it will not be an event.  It will most likely be revealed in some screenshots or something.  And Mike dose not know when they are planning on showing said screenshots.  But hoping for a big event or trailer is getting your hope to high in my opinion.

[filetemo]

this thread is getting slippery

[Yalision]

Mike Laidlaw wrote...

ReinaHW wrote...
It will be nice to see her when she appears, hopefully she won't be the scantily clad kind of appearance.

No more scantily clad than the armors in origins. We don't reall go in for the chainmail bikini 'round here.

Thank god.

[ReinaHW]

The unusual thing with how some seem to think that a female warrior should wear next to nothing is how those who design that seem to think that a woman doesn't need that much protection in battle, I definitly wouldn't want to run into battle wearing little more than my underwear.



Yet for some, like Conan, only wearing a lion cloth seems to give some kind of incredible protection, must be the muscles and the chin.

I don't mind some more feminine kind of armour for the female Hawke, as long as it's reasonable, instead of having so many gaps to it that a Darkspawn could try to jump attack female Hawke and get lost somewhere down her front.

[Nerevar-as]

Mike Laidlaw wrote...

ReinaHW wrote...
It will be nice to see her when she appears, hopefully she won't be the scantily clad kind of appearance.

No more scantily clad than the armors in origins. We don't reall go in for the chainmail bikini 'round here.

And female light armor cleavage? That was a bit silly too, even if years light from  metal bikini.

Modifié par Nerevar-as, 19 août 2010 - 10:47 .

[Vandrayke]

ReinaHW wrote...

The unusual thing with how some seem to think that a female warrior should wear next to nothing is how those who design that seem to think that a woman doesn't need that much protection in battle, I definitly wouldn't want to run into battle wearing little more than my underwear.

Yet for some, like Conan, only wearing a lion cloth seems to give some kind of incredible protection, must be the muscles and the chin.
I don't mind some more feminine kind of armour for the female Hawke, as long as it's reasonable, instead of having so many gaps to it that a Darkspawn could try to jump attack female Hawke and get lost somewhere down her front.

they can make armor sexy enough without showing all kinds of skin.  They just have to make it unrealistically tight and thin, which I fully support.  

[Merci357]

Mike Laidlaw wrote...

We will show her eventually. I don't have a firm timeline, but we well.
And she is -hot-.

Good news, thanks Mike.

[filetemo]

ReinaHW wrote...

The unusual thing with how some seem to think that a female warrior should wear next to nothing is how those who design that seem to think that a woman doesn't need that much protection in battle, I definitly wouldn't want to run into battle wearing little more than my underwear.

females in fantasy look like 15 year old horny teenagers think they should look, hence bikini chainmails and stuff, now with the consolized DA2 bioware has to appeal both groups, masturbating teens and female gamers, that's why armors look less scantily clad but still ridiculously underprotecting

[steelfire_dragon]

Mike Laidlaw wrote...

ReinaHW wrote...
It will be nice to see her when she appears, hopefully she won't be the scantily clad kind of appearance.

No more scantily clad than the armors in origins. We don't reall go in for the chainmail bikini 'round here.

why not

[namedforthemoon]

steelfire_dragon wrote...

Mike Laidlaw wrote...

ReinaHW wrote...
It will be nice to see her when she appears, hopefully she won't be the scantily clad kind of appearance.

No more scantily clad than the armors in origins. We don't reall go in for the chainmail bikini 'round here.

why not

For the same reason that you don't go hunting out in the woods in nothing but your boxer shorts.

[filetemo]

namedforthemoon wrote...

steelfire_dragon wrote...

Mike Laidlaw wrote...

ReinaHW wrote...
It will be nice to see her when she appears, hopefully she won't be the scantily clad kind of appearance.

No more scantily clad than the armors in origins. We don't reall go in for the chainmail bikini 'round here.

why not

For the same reason that you don't go hunting out in the woods in nothing but your boxer shorts.

maybe he goes

[nightcobra]

steelfire_dragon wrote...

Mike Laidlaw wrote...

ReinaHW wrote...
It will be nice to see her when she appears, hopefully she won't be the scantily clad kind of appearance.

No more scantily clad than the armors in origins. We don't reall go in for the chainmail bikini 'round here.

why not

for starters, how does a bikini, even one made of chainmail protect anything?

[Patriciachr34]

Besides, Chainmail Bikinis chafe! Not fun at all.

[MKDAWUSS]

nightcobra8928 wrote...

steelfire_dragon wrote...

Mike Laidlaw wrote...

ReinaHW wrote...
It will be nice to see her when she appears, hopefully she won't be the scantily clad kind of appearance.

No more scantily clad than the armors in origins. We don't reall go in for the chainmail bikini 'round here.

why not

for starters, how does a bikini, even one made of chainmail protect anything?

Freedom of movement. + DEX bonus

[Saibh]

Patriciachr34 wrote...

Besides, Chainmail Bikinis chafe! Not fun at all.

Then you get your sores, and infection sets in...gangrene...amputation...not so hot at all...