[quote]krimesh wrote...
[quote]Zulu_DFA wrote...
4.3. Xenophobia was never rational. In the ME universe TIM does not want to alienate himself and Humanity from the aliens. He wants to dominate them. Rule them. For the betterment of the greater hole. Not rational intent either, just social instinct. (All puns intended.)
5. You can spin the facts around all you want. Blaming TIM instead of Anderson for another Cerberus failure now with Reaper technology is like blaming the Reapers for Saren's treason as it was Saren's free will that sealed his fate. Cerberus pissed off the Council races except the Alliance, that Anderson can not trust in his anti-Cerberus quest and started paying for it the price, that TIM is willing to pay as many times as necessary to achieve his goals. The fact remains: another successful Cerberus project that cost a lot of collateral damage due to another Alliance admiral's treason/idiocy.[/quote]
Ad 4.3.: So how is dominating the other races "for the betterment of the greater hole"?
[/quote]
How is US dominating the world good? We have no nаzism and very little communism, that's how.
[quote]krimesh wrote...
Ad 5.: First of all, after reading it over and over again, an Alliance Soldier cannot, by definition, commit treason against Cerberus.
[/quote]
But he can commit treason against the Alliance.
[quote]krimesh wrote...
That said, causing damage to your enemy isn't idiocy.
[/quote]
Cerberus isn't Alliance's enemy. Or else the Alliance would take proactive action against Cerberus, and Anderson (and earlier Kahoku) could easily rely on the Alliance's support.
[quote]krimesh wrote...
In any case there is no point in blaming anyone for letting Grayson escape.
[/quote]
Yes there is. Without Anderson's interference, there is a good chance that Grayson would be promptly terminated and all would go smooth and neat.
[quote]krimesh wrote...
The question is if implanting Grayson with reaper tech was right or wrong. I question both, the *Grayson*, and the *implanting with reaper tech* part.
[/quote]
Yes and yes. Both were right. "Unethical" science is ethical, because it advances our knowledge of the world we live in, giving us greater understanding of it and power manipulate it to our convinience. The subjects for the "unethical" science's experiments should be the wretches like Paul Grayson, who put his passions ahead of his duty in a critical moment. You forgot about the third question: who should engage in such activities? And the answer is: right, the organizations like Cerberus, with the guts to do what's necessary, and provide plausible deniability to the parties that have to maintain their public image before millions of "paragon" citizens.
[quote]krimesh wrote...
First, Grayson did not seem to pose a threat to Cerberus, while left alone.
[/quote]
But he did. Because he could change his mind any time.
[quote]krimesh wrote...
He wasn't going to harm Cerberus, fearing for Kahlee.
[/quote]
Yet, he harmed Cerberus in spite of his fear for Kahlee. Moreover, he involved her, and now, that he doesn't care being dead, she is in a world of trouble, being a possible abduction target for the next Cerberus experiment.
[quote]krimesh wrote...
On the other hand he did warn TIM that he would be a danger if Cerberus caused trouble. Which they did, basically for vengeance, putting the hole organization at risk. It seems to me, that using Grayson wasn't that smart after all.
[/quote]
It wasn't smart not to eliminate all security risks associated with Grayson after his defection, but it looks like Grayson managed to outplay Cerberus, which, I repeat, is to his credit. It's not to Drew Karpyshyn's credit, however, that he skipped the part about how Grayson managed to do it.
[quote]krimesh wrote...
Second, it is clear that in war there will be causalities. But what Cerberus does is different. They sacrifice people at every corner. Be it using a child as cannon fodder, or Grayson as a test tube. If a human life is sacrificed it should be made sure that it is really, really worth it; but Cerberus does it so often and so easily and without even thinking about it that too me it seems, that they are not treating humanity with even a small part of the respect they themselves claim it deserves.
[/quote]
Son, that may be a shock to you, but there is no sanctity to anything in this world, including an individual's life. Unlike sanctity, the pricetag is there to everything in this world. Including each individual's life. Ever heard the expression: "It's nothing personal, just business"?
[quote]krimesh wrote...
Besides, Cerberus is an organization at war and it's operations should not be viewed in a "what if the enemy would not have interfered" kind of way.
[/quote]
As far as I know, Cerberus never took any hostile action against any Turian asset. Even that Kurt Weisman's plan in Earthborn Shepard's exclusive quest, that may be speculated as having a Cerberus connection was foiled, and it may be speculated that not without it having been planned to be foiled in the first place. Hence, the Turian action can be classified as "pre-emptive" at best, and "unprovoked" in Cerberus propaganda. That's not the first time, that the Turians take preemptive/unprovoked action against the Humans...
[quote]krimesh wrote...
With this in mind, how was Grayson "another successful Cerberus project", when a lot of Cerberus assets where destroyed and while Cerberus gained information on the reapers, the reapers gained information on the Ascension project?[/quote]
The project was successful. It provided a lot of insight into the indoctrination process, and the records of it will be used in time to secure Human dominance against the Reapers and beyond.
A lot of Cerberus assets were compromised and the Repears got the information on the Ascension project as the result of the hostile action of the Turians, facilitated by Rear Admiral David Anderson's high treason.
Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 21 août 2010 - 03:36 .