Aller au contenu

Photo

Your perception of Cerberus AFTER reading the "Retribution" novel.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
231 réponses à ce sujet

#51
Count Viceroy

Count Viceroy
  • Members
  • 4 095 messages

Arijharn wrote...

Count Viceroy wrote...

The book just reinforced the impression I already had. Tim is bad, and as much as he likes to think he's the only way forward for humanity, he's horribly mistaken.


Of course your perception hasn't changed... your perception wouldn't change even if TIM started an orphanage and rescued animals, you'd think "Geez, there has to be something TIM is getting out of this. What's his angle?"


There's nothing in Retribution that would shine a new light on cerberus in a good way. So i'm not sure what you were expecting.

#52
krimesh

krimesh
  • Members
  • 387 messages
Well, I am not going to quote for practical reasons, and I am not going to negate every one of Zulu_DFA's sentences. But I will point a few things out:

Cerberus is in fact an enemy of the Alliance. However the Alliance itself is highly ineffective against Cerberus, because it is strongly infiltrated by the latter. This is why Anderson and Kahlee chose to ask the Turians for help. This is explained in the book at great length.
Also obviously the Turians have decided that Cerberus is their enemy. In any case TIM knows he has a lot of enemies, and if not thats an even bigger mistake of his; So in this particular universe Cerberus did fail their Grayson implantation project, and the fact that someone tripped them up doesn't change that.

The Kahlee-Grayson-Cerberus situation: Grayson is afraid that Cerberus hurts Kahlee. So he threatens to damage Cerberus if anything should happen to her. If he would cause damage to Cerberus she would not be protected anymore. When Cerberus comes for him, Grayson thinks, that Kahlee is in danger as well, as he can no longer watch out for her. So he sends the files, and tells her to go into hiding. This too is explained in the book in detail. (So no, he couldn't have changed his mind at any time.)

Talking about ethics and the price of human life: Ethics is a complicated topic, so lets run circles around it. My argumentation does not require ethics! Firstly, Cerberus and others have shown that at the present state of scientific knowledge, no one is able to use reaper tech for their own purposes. (Derelict Reaper, Reaper IFF.. 50%, I give you that, Saren, ME1 Cerberus missions etc.) On the other hand there is evidence (Sovereign, Derelict Reaper) that reaper tech is not necessary to blow them up. Yes, of course, you can shove researchers into the Collector Base with a shovel and see what happens, but that is not very efficient.
And this leads to my next point: Yes, a human life has its value and hence, presumably, a price. Judging by how TIM uses his resources however, this price seems to be quite low; underpriced I would say. - This is what I tried to say in my original post. I would not destroy the collector base because its *evil*. Its simply neither efficient, nor wise (given the fact that so little is known, and no one would want this thing to backfire at the time when the reapers are stretching out to everything they can control from a distance.) to keep it.

The US: I don't see the US dominating Europe, or the former CCCP. The US, the CCCP and others fought to bring down germany in WWII: to bring down, not dominate. Today every war the US fights ends with a retreat, when the situation is stable (or maybe less so). Only domination there is is cultural: be free, earn money, buy stuff, consume, be happy. In other words: I don't see that analogy working.

Finally, please don't call me "son".

Modifié par krimesh, 21 août 2010 - 04:41 .


#53
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

Neuzhelin wrote...
Hitler


This should be the end of discussion.

#54
Neuzhelin

Neuzhelin
  • Members
  • 304 messages

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Neuzhelin wrote...
Hitler


This should be the end of discussion.



Yes, there are clear parrallels of experiments on humans for research, xenophobia, dominance of every other race, cult of personality, dictatorship and disregard of life as a whole when it comes to goals "for the greater good" (to name a few as there are many more you and I can think of).

Modifié par Neuzhelin, 21 août 2010 - 05:14 .


#55
krimesh

krimesh
  • Members
  • 387 messages
*A rather comical scene in which the green Asari is running around with a defibrillator trying to resurrect the Cerberus friends. Life is sad when your enemies are dead or hiding.*

#56
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages
[quote]krimesh wrote...

Well, I am not going to quote for practical reasons, and I am not going to negate every one of Zulu_DFA's sentences. But I will point a few things out:
[/quote]
That' all right.

[quote]krimesh wrote...
Cerberus is in fact an enemy of the Alliance.
[/quote]
Cerberus is in fact the spawn of the Alliance. The Alliance secretly established it, secretly maintained and secretly tasked with all the horrific experiments they ran, up until Akuze. Then Kahoku blew up its cover, and the Alliance "avowed" it as enemy.

[quote]
However the Alliance itself is highly ineffective against Cerberus,
[/quote]
To the point that they deny any support to Kahoku going after Cerberus, already after it supposedly went rogue. Then, after Cerberus kills Kahoku, the Alliance announces: "natural causes".

[quote]
because it is strongly infiltrated by the latter.
[/quote]
to the point that there are "private contributors" among the Alliance staff. Yeah...

[quote]
This is why Anderson and Kahlee chose to ask the Turians for help. This is explained in the book at great length.
[/quote]
Sanders doesn't know squat about Cerberus, other that Paul Grayson was with them, but Anderson should know that the Undead Commander Shepard works for/with them to stop the Reapers... And what were exactly the "natural causes" Kahoku died of... And why it had to be "natural causes", instead of "Oh, our avowed enemy Cerberus killed our heroic admiral! Citizens! If you so much as smell Cerberus report to any Alliance or friends Turians' patrol nearby! It's everyone's responsibility to hunt down the space-nаzi bastards!!!"

But I suppose, that even in her late forties Kahlee is such a sex-bomb, that she's worth it...


[quote]
Also obviously the Turians have decided that Cerberus is their enemy.
[/quote]
Really? What a big surprize. After he First Contact War. Don't forget who the last rogue spectre was.


[quote]
In any case TIM knows he has a lot of enemies, and if not thats an even bigger mistake of his; So in this particular universe Cerberus did fail their Grayson implantation project, and the fact that someone tripped them up doesn't change that.
[/quote]
The fact that Cerberus took some damage from its enemies confirms the fact that Cerberus enemies exist, not the fact that Cerberus inflicted the damage upon itself. This particular day was bad for Cerberus. That's all right. That doesn't mean they don't have good days or they have them less than bad, because you'll never hear about their good days, because the clandestine organizations don't boast about them.

But the sheer fact that Cerberus still exists even after all those projects "blowing up in their face" suggests that it was only the tip of the iceberg.

[quote]
The Kahlee-Grayson-Cerberus situation: Grayson is afraid that Cerberus hurts Kahlee. So he threatens to damage Cerberus if anything should happen to her. If he would cause damage to Cerberus she would not be protected anymore. When Cerberus comes for him, Grayson thinks, that Kahlee is in danger as well, as he can no longer watch out for her. So he sends the files, and tells her to go into hiding. This too is explained in the book in detail. (So no, he couldn't have changed his mind at any time.)
[/quote]
Grayson-Cerberus situation: Grayson betrayed Cerberus. And threatens to damage it futher. Cerberus Command analyses the possible damage Grayson can do and makes precautions, reports to TIM, that precautions have been made. TIM authorizes retaliation against Grayson, not knowing that his staff had missed something important about Grayson. The odd thing is that Grayson isn't even properly interrogated before injecting the Reaper stuff in him (another loose writing), but let's attribute that to TIM's overconfidence in his lieutenants, and Grayson's super-resourcefulness.

Now, if Grayson had that data-package prepped to send off with one button hit, that was already a hostile action against Cerberus! What if it was not Kai Leng, that raided his appartment, but some Omega gang? Grayson would've still thought that it's Cerberus coming after him and sent the data! This "Cerburus triggured it dumsulves" argument is totally retarded. And if Grayson cared so much for Kahlee's safety, why it had to be her that he sent his data? Now he is dead and she is a potential target! Before that Cerberus didn't care if she existed. Good job, Paul!
Being a sex-bomb ain't easy, Kahlee!

(To make it more clear, imagine: You're a Mafia hitman, and betrayed the God Father. Now the God Father is after you, but you've got a cash of cocaine in a suitcase with his monogrammed handkerchief and fingerprints in it. You are afraid that the God Father will harm your sister, who was in the same car when you stole the cocaine. So you call the God Father and tell him, that if so much as one hair falls off your little sister's head, the FBI gets the suitcase. But when the Mafia guys finally come after you, you send the suitcase... to you sister!)


[quote]
Talking about ethics and the price of human life: Ethics is a complicated topic, so lets run circles around it. My argumentation does not require ethics!
[/quote]
That's great!


[quote]
Firstly, Cerberus and others have shown that at the present state of scientific knowledge, no one is able to use reaper tech for their own purposes. (Derelict Reaper, Reaper IFF.. 50%, I give you that, Saren, ME1 Cerberus missions etc.)
[/quote]
Firstly if no attempts to decrypt the Reaper tech are taken, the scientific knowledge will never reach the state where it'll be possible.
Secondly, it's not true. Thannix Cannon.

[quote]
On the other hand there is evidence (Sovereign, Derelict Reaper) that reaper tech is not necessary to blow them up. [/quote]
But it would come in very handy if some additional tech allowed for blowing them up more efficiently, than at the ratio 1 Fleet : 1 Reaper.

[quote]
Yes, of course, you can shove researchers into the Collector Base with a shovel and see what happens, but that is not very efficient.
[/quote]
Until there is just one of them who makes a scientific break through. You know how it goes with the scientists... Especially in science fiction... Oh, scratch that last part, metagaming, metagaming!!!


[quote]
And this leads to my next point: Yes, a human life has its value and hence, presumably, a price. Judging by how TIM uses his resources however, this price seems to be quite low; underpriced I would say.
[/quote]
Hmmm. Now we getting somewhere. What we need now is to look at the Cerberus' log book and accountancy, to discern the true cost effectiveness of their operations... Maybe in ME3? What you guys think?


[quote]
- This is what I tried to say in my original post. I would not destroy the collector base because its *evil*. Its simply neither efficient, nor wise (given the fact that so little is known, and no one would want this thing to backfire at the time when the reapers are stretching out to everything they can control from a distance.) to keep it.
[/quote]
Better safe then sorry. It's a good policy, and I always roleplay it this way, even hit the retarded "the mission was to destroy the base" line, even though it wasn't. But TIM is in charge, and is quite reasonable when he explains his demand to leave the C-Base intact. He has more information and resources than I, so I have to accept his judgement.


[quote]
The US: I don't see the US dominating Europe, or the former CCCP.
[/quote]
Are you kidding? The US is the biggest fish in the pond, which is enough already to define domination. And the USSR is called now "former" because of American dominance.
But here is the latest example, that there is more to it, just from today: Sweden charged the notorious WikiLeaks owner Julian Assange with rape and molestaion. If you've followed the WikiLeaks scandal, you know whom Sweden wants to please. And it's not even a NATO member.

[quote]
The US, the CCCP and others fought to bring down germany in WWII: to bring down, not dominate.
[/quote]
To bring down to dominate. That's right.

[quote]
Today every war the US fights ends with a retreat
[/quote]
With an orderly withdrawal. Even the Vietnam War.

[quote]
, when the situation is stable (or maybe less so).
[/quote]
when the country in questinon is totally FUBARed.

[quote]
Only domination there is is cultural
[/quote]
Which is enough. Hitler wanted only cultural domination for the so called Arian race.

[quote]
: be free, earn money, buy stuff, consume, be happy.
[/quote]
Which is totally hostile to the said countries' way of life. They want to be free from American influence. They don't want to earn money for American businessmen and congressmen. They don't want to buy American stuff. They don't want to consume worthless crap. They want to beat their women to death with stones in case of adultery. That's what they want. But America comes to them whenever it sees fit and denies those freedoms to them because America dominates the world.


[quote]
In other words: I don't see that analogy working.
[/quote]
In other words, it's not an analogy. It's the law like that by which the Universe spins around. You either dominate or are dominated. It's simple as that, and there is nothing wrong with that.


[quote]
Finally, please don't call me "son".
[/quote]
Sorry, couldn't resist.

I said "Hitler". This conversation is over.

Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 21 août 2010 - 06:42 .


#57
Annihilator27

Annihilator27
  • Members
  • 6 653 messages

MajesticJazz wrote...

After reading the novel, it makes my Pro-Cerberus Shepard more appealing.


Same here, I still want to take them down.

#58
krimesh

krimesh
  • Members
  • 387 messages
Again no quoting Zulu_DFA. I understand that you love commenting my sentences. But how about you counter some arguments? I don't play chess, but right now I feel like someone placed all my pieces on a separate board each, and beat them with a hole set on every board. And on some occasions simply organized a pretty dance around them. Come on, you can do better than that!



But lets do it one piece at a time: how do you make sure that the collector base dose not backfire? With the reapers seizing everything they can control, to gain a foothold in the galaxy. The Collector Base is bound to have indoctrination tech, isn't it? Any team is so going to go down in there... just like on the Derelict Reaper, only that you get a few more Graysons instead of a bunch of husks.

#59
mosor

mosor
  • Members
  • 1 372 messages

Neuzhelin wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Neuzhelin wrote...
Hitler


This should be the end of discussion.



Yes, there are clear parrallels of experiments on humans for research, xenophobia, dominance of every other race, cult of personality, dictatorship and disregard of life as a whole when it comes to goals "for the greater good" (to name a few as there are many more you and I can think of).


Human research experiments weren't just committed by xenophobes, racists and dictatorships. The liberty lovin' americans and their government have a spectuacular history of human experimentation on their own citizens without consent  until the mid 1960's.

#60
BellatrixLugosi

BellatrixLugosi
  • Members
  • 671 messages
Sometimes I think the only arguement Pro-Cerberus people have is "Because they are the only ones actively fighting the reapers", that seems to be the only valid point they have for now. But what should be stressed is this. Cerberus doesn't bother finding different options of handling things with reapers, they are mostly just going to end up as bad as the reapers in the end.

#61
FourSixEight

FourSixEight
  • Members
  • 349 messages

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Really? What a big surprize. After he First Contact War.

 
Which is over, by the way.

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Don't forget who the last rogue spectre was.


Which has absolutely no bearing on whether or not it's ethical to treat all turians like crap.


Zulu_DFA wrote...

Talking about ethics and the price of human life: Ethics is a complicated topic, so lets run circles around it. My argumentation does not require ethics!


That's great!


Cerberus doesn't seem to require ethics for pretty much anything, anyway, so it might be best to drop the subject.

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Secondly, it's not true. Thannix Cannon.


The Thanix cannon was reverse-engineered from Sovereign's weaponry. Unless you're assuming absolutely every single piece of Sovereign radiated pure indoctrination that's not really proving anything other than *some* bits of Reaper tech can be safely fiddled with.

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Until there is just one of them who makes a scientific break through. You know how it goes with the scientists... Especially in science fiction... Oh, scratch that last part, metagaming, metagaming!!!


You and Shandepared bring this up, I swear to God, every single solitary time you see an argument you don't like. If someone says they're going to give a pigeon some bread crumbs you'd say it's metagaming to assume the bird wouldn't choke.

Making a guess and seeing how things work out is not metagaming. It happens literally every day in real life. What Shepard did IRT suicide mission decision was EXACTLY  that.

You don't get to claim that every decision you don't like is metagaming just because someone's making a guess that things will work out for the best in the next game. That's what people have always done.

The galaxy is safe in ME1 regardless of whether you pick paragon or renegade. So choosing to save the Council wasn't metagaming. It was just a guess that worked out. This is no different.


Zulu_DFA wrote...

Better safe then sorry. It's a good policy, and I always roleplay it this way, even hit the retarded "the mission was to destroy the base" line, even though it wasn't. But TIM is in charge, and is quite reasonable when he explains his demand to leave the C-Base intact. He has more information and resources than I, so I have to accept his judgement.


It's retarded because it's the truth? The mission was to destroy the base. That's what they'd been saying the entire time. Hit the Omega-4 Relay and destroy the Collectors.

And now people are plugging their ears and pretending that they went through the relay to offer the Collectors a brandy and talk it out, because TIM never lies and the Collectors weren't a threat.



Zulu_DFA wrote...

Are you kidding? The US is the biggest fish in the pond, which is enough already to define domination.


I'm not suprised to hear you say the US rules the world.


Zulu_DFA wrote...

Finally, please don't call me "son".

Sorry, couldn't resist.


Let's all try to ignore Zulu's condescension in the future, folks.

Modifié par FourSixEight, 21 août 2010 - 10:41 .


#62
BellatrixLugosi

BellatrixLugosi
  • Members
  • 671 messages
Only thing I ever can credit zulu with is his arguements about Me2>Me3 squad. But anything with Cerberus he just absolutely refuses to see anything wrong with what they do.

#63
incinerator950

incinerator950
  • Members
  • 5 617 messages
[quote]FourSixEight wrote...

[quote]Zulu_DFA wrote...

Really? What a big surprize. After he First Contact War.[/quote]
 
Which is over, by the way.

[quote]Zulu_DFA wrote...

Don't forget who the last rogue spectre was.[/quote]

Which has absolutely no bearing on whether or not it's ethical to treat all turians like crap.


[quote]Zulu_DFA wrote...

[quote]Talking about ethics and the price of human life: Ethics is a complicated topic, so lets run circles around it. My argumentation does not require ethics!
[/quote]

That's great![/quote]

Cerberus doesn't seem to require ethics for pretty much anything, anyway, so it might be best to drop the subject.

[quote]Zulu_DFA wrote...

Secondly, it's not true. Thannix Cannon.[/quote]

The Thanix cannon was reverse-engineered from Sovereign's weaponry. Unless you're assuming absolutely every single piece of Sovereign radiated pure indoctrination that's not really proving anything other than *some* bits of Reaper tech can be safely fiddled with.

[quote]Zulu_DFA wrote...

Until there is just one of them who makes a scientific break through. You know how it goes with the scientists... Especially in science fiction... Oh, scratch that last part, metagaming, metagaming!!![/quote]

You and Shandepared bring this up, I swear to God, every single solitary time you see an argument you don't like. If someone says they're going to give a pigeon some bread crumbs you'd say it's metagaming to assume the bird wouldn't choke.

Making a guess and seeing how things work out is not metagaming. It happens literally every day in real life. What Shepard did IRT suicide mission decision was EXACTLY  that.

You don't get to claim that every decision you don't like is metagaming just because someone's making a guess that things will work out for the best in the next game. That's what people have always done.

The galaxy is safe in ME1 regardless of whether you pick paragon or renegade. So choosing to save the Council wasn't metagaming. It was just a guess that worked out. This is no different.


[quote]Zulu_DFA wrote...

Better safe then sorry. It's a good policy, and I always roleplay it this way, even hit the retarded "the mission was to destroy the base" line, even though it wasn't. But TIM is in charge, and is quite reasonable when he explains his demand to leave the C-Base intact. He has more information and resources than I, so I have to accept his judgement.[/quote]

It's retarded because it's the truth? The mission was to destroy the base. That's what they'd been saying the entire time. Hit the Omega-4 Relay and destroy the Collectors.

And now people are plugging their ears and pretending that they went through the relay to offer the Collectors a brandy and talk it out, because TIM never lies and the Collectors weren't a threat.



[quote]Zulu_DFA wrote...

Are you kidding? The US is the biggest fish in the pond, which is enough already to define domination.[/quote]

I'm not suprised to hear you say the US rules the world.


[quote]Zulu_DFA wrote...

[quote]Finally, please don't call me "son".
[/quote]
Sorry, couldn't resist.[/quote]

Let's all try to ignore Zulu's condescension in the future, folks.[/quote]

Both of you shut the hell up.

#64
Dr. Peter Venkman

Dr. Peter Venkman
  • Members
  • 802 messages

incinerator950 wrote...

Both of you shut the hell up.


Image IPB

#65
krimesh

krimesh
  • Members
  • 387 messages

BellatrixLugosi wrote...

Sometimes I think the only arguement Pro-Cerberus people have is "Because they are the only ones actively fighting the reapers", that seems to be the only valid point they have for now. But what should be stressed is this. Cerberus doesn't bother finding different options of handling things with reapers, they are mostly just going to end up as bad as the reapers in the end.


There is another one: the reaper threat is so great that everything that might help is allowed. It is then called "having the guts to do what is necessary". I certainly do not agree, but the counter-argument is quite subtle - at least if you want to convince anyone.

Modifié par krimesh, 22 août 2010 - 12:10 .


#66
Guest_Bennyjammin79_*

Guest_Bennyjammin79_*
  • Guests
I'm going to kill The Illusive Man... and Kai Leng better be an available target as well.

#67
mosor

mosor
  • Members
  • 1 372 messages

BellatrixLugosi wrote...

Sometimes I think the only arguement Pro-Cerberus people have is "Because they are the only ones actively fighting the reapers", that seems to be the only valid point they have for now. But what should be stressed is this. Cerberus doesn't bother finding different options of handling things with reapers, they are mostly just going to end up as bad as the reapers in the end.


It's a good argument because it's true:lol: Too be honest, I'm pro-cerberus because I do want to see humanity as top dog. As for options. As of now, they're limited and there is a time constraint. By the time you finish debating a course of action  the reapers would be here and you have nothing to show for it. Take the risks, learn for your mistakes, and use that info to fight the reapers. Unless you feel another option will present itself. Probably yes because it's a game and the writers will present one. However, real life, my nature is to explore every opportunity that arises.

#68
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

FourSixEight wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Better safe then sorry. It's a good policy, and I always roleplay it this way, even hit the retarded "the mission was to destroy the base" line, even though it wasn't. But TIM is in charge, and is quite reasonable when he explains his demand to leave the C-Base intact. He has more information and resources than I, so I have to accept his judgement.


It's retarded because it's the truth? The mission was to destroy the base. That's what they'd been saying the entire time. Hit the Omega-4 Relay and destroy the Collectors.


Epic fail achieved. The mission was to stop the Collectors and find out what they were up to. To that end, It was necessary to go to the Omega-4 Relay and take a look what's behind it. It was initially assumed, that there is and entire "homeworld" of Collectors, a planet. When EDI determined the coordinates, it was speculated, that probably it's something smaller and artificial... But it was still zero information about possible opposition there. So Shepard's misson was a recon. And those cool squaddies you were gathreing under the pretext of stopping the Collectors... Well, they were on TIM's list...

So you go through the Omega-4 and seen that the opposition is negligible, probably because the enemy was not expecting you at all, and is totally unprepared to put any resistance, so our small commando troop can go in and try to save any captives that might still be alive (there may be thousands of them).

So you find some surviving folks, free them, and luckily there is only a few of them, so you can extract them on the Normandy. Evereone else is dead. So, at this point, if the mission is to destroy the base, pull th hell out of there and launch thermonuclear strikes!!! Sure, TIM gave you some of those BFBs, just in case... so that you could even spare one to please Jack. But no, Shepard wants to know where are those tubes leading... Because the mission was to find out what the Collectors were up to.

So in the end you find the 3-eyed Terminator, and take it down. So the Reapers wanted the 3-eyed Terminator for some thing. All right, let's blow this place up! TIM: wait, Shep, let's study it! What would they want the 3-eyed Terminator for? You: no, "the mission was to destroy the base!" TIM: *facepalm*.



FourSixEight wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Are you kidding? The US is the biggest fish in the pond, which is enough already to define domination.


I'm not suprised to hear you say the US rules the world.


Why are you not surprised? Because that' what's they were trying to do ever since WWI, did successfully in the half of the world after WWII and have been continuing to do so in the most of the world since the downfall of the Soviet Union? The last Republican administration was pretty open about it.

#69
BellatrixLugosi

BellatrixLugosi
  • Members
  • 671 messages

mosor wrote...

BellatrixLugosi wrote...

Sometimes I think the only arguement Pro-Cerberus people have is "Because they are the only ones actively fighting the reapers", that seems to be the only valid point they have for now. But what should be stressed is this. Cerberus doesn't bother finding different options of handling things with reapers, they are mostly just going to end up as bad as the reapers in the end.


It's a good argument because it's true:lol: Too be honest, I'm pro-cerberus because I do want to see humanity as top dog. As for options. As of now, they're limited and there is a time constraint. By the time you finish debating a course of action  the reapers would be here and you have nothing to show for it. Take the risks, learn for your mistakes, and use that info to fight the reapers. Unless you feel another option will present itself. Probably yes because it's a game and the writers will present one. However, real life, my nature is to explore every opportunity that arises.


Im pretty sure a Paragon shepard who blew up the base in the last game will find a way to do it better.......its a video game surprise!

#70
mosor

mosor
  • Members
  • 1 372 messages

BellatrixLugosi wrote...

mosor wrote...

BellatrixLugosi wrote...

Sometimes I think the only arguement Pro-Cerberus people have is "Because they are the only ones actively fighting the reapers", that seems to be the only valid point they have for now. But what should be stressed is this. Cerberus doesn't bother finding different options of handling things with reapers, they are mostly just going to end up as bad as the reapers in the end.


It's a good argument because it's true:lol: Too be honest, I'm pro-cerberus because I do want to see humanity as top dog. As for options. As of now, they're limited and there is a time constraint. By the time you finish debating a course of action  the reapers would be here and you have nothing to show for it. Take the risks, learn for your mistakes, and use that info to fight the reapers. Unless you feel another option will present itself. Probably yes because it's a game and the writers will present one. However, real life, my nature is to explore every opportunity that arises.


Im pretty sure a Paragon shepard who blew up the base in the last game will find a way to do it better.......its a video game surprise!


Depends on what you define better as,:D

#71
BellatrixLugosi

BellatrixLugosi
  • Members
  • 671 messages

mosor wrote...

BellatrixLugosi wrote...

mosor wrote...

BellatrixLugosi wrote...

Sometimes I think the only arguement Pro-Cerberus people have is "Because they are the only ones actively fighting the reapers", that seems to be the only valid point they have for now. But what should be stressed is this. Cerberus doesn't bother finding different options of handling things with reapers, they are mostly just going to end up as bad as the reapers in the end.


It's a good argument because it's true:lol: Too be honest, I'm pro-cerberus because I do want to see humanity as top dog. As for options. As of now, they're limited and there is a time constraint. By the time you finish debating a course of action  the reapers would be here and you have nothing to show for it. Take the risks, learn for your mistakes, and use that info to fight the reapers. Unless you feel another option will present itself. Probably yes because it's a game and the writers will present one. However, real life, my nature is to explore every opportunity that arises.


Im pretty sure a Paragon shepard who blew up the base in the last game will find a way to do it better.......its a video game surprise!


Depends on what you define better as,:D


Screwing over the least people possible, then not leaving the galaxy in bad hands after the threat

#72
mosor

mosor
  • Members
  • 1 372 messages

BellatrixLugosi wrote...

Screwing over the least people possible, then not leaving the galaxy in bad hands after the threat


That's so boring. Screwing em over is the biggest source of  lulz in ME. Terran Empire FTW! :devil:

Modifié par mosor, 22 août 2010 - 03:18 .


#73
Arijharn

Arijharn
  • Members
  • 2 850 messages

Count Viceroy wrote...

Arijharn wrote...

Count Viceroy wrote...

The book just reinforced the impression I already had. Tim is bad, and as much as he likes to think he's the only way forward for humanity, he's horribly mistaken.


Of course your perception hasn't changed... your perception wouldn't change even if TIM started an orphanage and rescued animals, you'd think "Geez, there has to be something TIM is getting out of this. What's his angle?"


There's nothing in Retribution that would shine a new light on cerberus in a good way. So i'm not sure what you were expecting.


My expectation was that yours wouldn't change. My point being that it would have taken an incredible even perhaps OOC event for you to change your opinion on Cerberus/TIM.

This isn't just limited to you of course but to everyone.

#74
Dr. Peter Venkman

Dr. Peter Venkman
  • Members
  • 802 messages
This is getting quite laughable. Zulu should apply to be Cerberus' spin doctor.

Zulu_DFA wrote...

How is US dominating the world good? We have no nаzism and very little communism, that's how.


Instead we have rampant inflation, world recession, consumerism, grosse consumption, child obesity and diabetes, disproportionate wealth, etc.

But he can commit treason against the Alliance.


Giving away intel that Cerberus agents would have access to given their infilitration of Alliance would be a problem. Good thing Anderson did NOT do that.

Yes
there is. Without Anderson's interference, there is a good chance that
Grayson would be promptly terminated and all would go smooth and neat.


Theorycraft and besides the point. Anderson interfering does not excuse the kind of experiments Cerberus is conducting.



Yes and yes. Both were right. "Unethical" science
is ethical, because it advances our knowledge of the world we live in,
giving us greater understanding of it and power manipulate it to our
convinience. The subjects for the "unethical" science's experiments
should be the wretches like Paul Grayson, who put his passions ahead of
his duty in a critical moment. You forgot about the third question: who
should engage in such activities? And the answer is: right, the
organizations like Cerberus, with the guts to do what's necessary, and
provide plausible deniability to the parties that have to maintain their
public image before millions of "paragon" citizens.


Cerberus
isn't Alliance's enemy. Or else the Alliance would take proactive
action against Cerberus, and Anderson (and earlier Kahoku) could easily
rely on the Alliance's support.


Cerberus is a ROGUE faction of the Alliance. Nice try there. And the guts to do what is right? Lets see:

1) Abducting and/or murdering alliance personnel (including an Admiral) and civilians through various experiments on multiple counts:

- Akuze
- Chasca
- Feros (Zhu's Hope)
- Depot Stigma-23

2) Abducting and experimenting on children
4) Interfering with the Ascension project
- Experimentation on Gillian
- Attempted abduction of Gillian
6) Murder of Quarian military personnel


But he did. Because he could change his mind any time.


Doesn't matter, Cerberus shouldn't be doing what they are anyways.



Son,
that may be a shock to you, but there is no sanctity to anything in
this world, including an individual's life. Unlike sanctity, the
pricetag is there to everything in this world. Including each
individual's life. Ever heard the expression: "It's nothing personal,
just business"?


Intangible garbage. Cerberus is breaking every known law on the books, in additional to practicing horrible ethics. Rights violations abound. They don't get a free pass just because you think they can.



As
far as I know, Cerberus never took any hostile action against any
Turian asset. Even that Kurt Weisman's plan in Earthborn Shepard's
exclusive quest, that may be speculated as having a Cerberus connection
was foiled, and it may be speculated that not without it having been
planned to be foiled in the first place. Hence, the Turian action can be
classified as "pre-emptive" at best, and "unprovoked" in Cerberus
propaganda. That's not the first time, that the Turians take
preemptive/unprovoked action against the Humans...


Given a known terrorist organization conducting highly illegal experiments with claims of putting humanity on top (and their track record), pre-emptive strikes are completely within their rights, especiall given it was under the advice of Anderson.



The project was successful. It
provided a lot of insight into the indoctrination process, and the
records of it will be used in time to secure Human dominance against the
Reapers and beyond.


Speculative. You have zero knowledge about the outcome of the research experiment, and neither do I. Doesn't change the fact that it is still illegal and unethical.


A lot of Cerberus assets were compromised
and the Repears got the information on the Ascension project as the
result of the hostile action of the Turians, facilitated by Rear Admiral
David Anderson's high treason


A high-ranking Alliance diplomat coordinating an attack on a rogue terrorist group constitutes treason? You're delirious. Play the games and read the books before posting again.

tl;dr Zulu_DFA doesn't know what he's talking about.

Modifié par Dr. Peter Venkman, 22 août 2010 - 07:33 .


#75
ollec92

ollec92
  • Members
  • 61 messages
People like cerbeus almost makes me want the reapers to convert all of humanity. Mostly do to the book but also the DLC overlord.