tj987654321 wrote...
ME 1 and ME 2 are both excellent games!
Next, ME 2 gives you FAR more conversation options. Remember yesterday's discussion about Tali? ME 1 didn't have the same use of and language as ME 2. Could you comfort a weeping mother in ME 1? In Tali's situation alone, you have seven different choices that lead to different endings. (I will offer an explanation if you need it)
Additionally, any party character in ME 2 (excluding Joker) can die, which in turn, will greatly affect ME 3
What fort said is true. ME2 has more "dialogue" but it's broken up over more characters. That means you ahve fewer conversations with each person and as a result the vast majority of them are underdeveloped.
As far as "more options" go, you're right in a way. Tali's mission does have a lot of variables, but there's nothing that indicates those things will matter. The way Shepard can approach the topic of war and whether or not Tali gets exiled can very easily be ignored in ME3.
And that's doubly true since all these characters in ME2 can die. They can not possibly have an important, vital role in ME3. If they did then they would not have died. ME3 will probably not be vastly different based on choices like that; it's just not efficient for the devs.
ME3 will have a consistent plot that covers all angles, and all these variables will merely provide "color" for the background and sidequests, much like the Council does in ME2.
IMO ME2 is not a great game, merely a decent one. I give it about a 7/10. ME1 was great. ME2 just has too many faults. The only thing ME2 really did better was the shooting (not counting the character skills because ME1 was much better in character skills). That said, I do not play ME for the combat.