Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien wrote...
Erm... you are aware the same applied to ME right? Ash, Kaidan and Liara with Garrus, Tali and Wrex non-romanceable?
Choice is good. limiting choice is bad.
As for the topic, as others have stated, to me Garrus romance makes sense. He's one of the people who has stood by Shepard through both events and as Ryzaki said, it's good when 'romance' develops over time. In ME I had a FemShep who just wasn't interested in a relationship, she actually didn't like Garrus much to begin with, but he grew on her and whilst I wasn't one of the people 'hoping' he would be an LI, when I found out it was, it just made sense that she would fall for him because he's always been there... "I want someone I can trust" was a really good line in regards to this.
@Anti would you prefer someone just create a 'new' thread to discuss the same topic? That would have people complaining too, so people when they 'necro' topics as people like yourself like to put it are damned if they do and damned if they don't. Just saying
my problem with the LIs in ME2 was that it took away from building a friendship with the squadmates that could be your LI. You could converse with them up to a point and thats when you either choose to let them be an LI or they go back to "calibrations." So yes limiting choice is bad. What I would want to see is a friendship develop more and dialog created when you choose to not have them as an LI. So either you choose LI dialog path or Friendship path If bioware can do that, then I could care less if everybody is romance-able.
in regards to a necroing this thread, its still pretty relevent and its not like we have anything new to say on the Mass Effect forums.
Retour en haut
