104 réponses à ce sujet

[Fishy]

If the only thing he has to say =

I need to do some calibration!!!
Jacob did not have much to say either if you did not romance him.
After 3-4 dialogue it's was already the bro hug..

What i loved the most in ME1 is that you learned a lot about other culture .
Actually i'm reinstalling mass effect 1 . Haven't played it for like 1.5 years!

In me1 it's felt like you was the *alien* .. In me2 you just chase around the galaxy to clear ppl problem

Modifié par Suprez30, 15 septembre 2010 - 09:43 .

[Liec]

Do we really want Garrus back for ME3?

Yes. Yes, we do.

[GehnTheGrey]

Liec wrote...

Do we really want Garrus back for ME3?

Yes. Yes, we do.

*Nods sagely*

[Majspuffen]

One would ask; "what is Garrus without Shepard?"



If I were in Garrus' shoes, I'd never leave Shepard. He doesn't have many other options, after all.

[Ed B]

Absolutely want Garrus back! I would like to see more character development and a new side of Garrus.

[Angry Finn]

GehnTheGrey wrote...

Liec wrote...

Do we really want Garrus back for ME3?

Yes. Yes, we do.

*Nods sagely*

*Also nods in agreement*

[KendallX23]

Garrus will be the new Turian hero after the Reaper war...u heard it first here..

[freeslayer89]

I'm going to represent the dissenting opinion here.

He won't be apart of the squad. He'll somehow wind up as a Turian leader, or someone who can influence Turian politics (using either renegade or paragon means depending what you encourage) in order to gain their assistance in the fight against the reapers. Maybe he will the bodyguard of the Turian council member, or a general, and his story in ME3 will be influencing the council from that type of position

He had his time to shine as a member of your crew, he didn't shine that much in either ME1 or 2 IMO.
He can shine better if he is not part of your crew. He will still be loyal to Shep and will assist against the Reapers in some way other than fighting along side him. Garrus can become more than just Shep's side gun, his role can seem more important and intersting if Bioware does something like what I suggested in the first paragraph.

Modifié par freeslayer89, 20 octobre 2010 - 09:53 .

[KendallX23]

freeslayer89 wrote...

He won't be apart of the squad. He'll somehow wind up as a Turian leader, or someone who can influence Turian politics (using either renegade or paragon means depending what you encourage) in order to gain their assistance in the fight against the reapers.

He had his time to shine as a member of your crew, he didn't shine in either ME1 or 2 IMO.

sure he did..he nedeed guidance in both of them...now in ME3 he should be great for a leading position

[Mox Ruuga]

MadCat221 wrote...

Who's your favorite ME2 squaddie?

Luckily, they can be killed too.

Why so cranky mah boi? I'm under no obligation to worship shallow "fan favorites", no matter if half the fandom does so. I will resort to killing him and my other unfavorite, if Bioware forces them into my squad again in ME3. What's it to you?

As for my ME2 favorite? Yes, Mordin can be killed. What's your point?

[PROKNIFER69]

Even if he becomes a kasumi or zaeed I WANT HIM IN ME3! Same with Tali!

[gamestress]

Yes, and he's very popular regardless. He always ranks first or top two in any of the polls I've seen.

[Phaedon]

Yup, I think that Garrus should be there.

[ciaweth]

freeslayer89 wrote...

I'm going to represent the dissenting opinion here.

He won't be apart of the squad. He'll somehow wind up as a Turian leader, or someone who can influence Turian politics (using either renegade or paragon means depending what you encourage) in order to gain their assistance in the fight against the reapers. Maybe he will the bodyguard of the Turian council member, or a general, and his story in ME3 will be influencing the council from that type of position

He had his time to shine as a member of your crew, he didn't shine that much in either ME1 or 2 IMO.
He can shine better if he is not part of your crew. He will still be loyal to Shep and will assist against the Reapers in some way other than fighting along side him. Garrus can become more than just Shep's side gun, his role can seem more important and intersting if Bioware does something like what I suggested in the first paragraph.

I agree with you that there's a significant chance of Garrus not being a squaddie in ME3 because he's off doing Something Important to help Shepard with the Reaper issue.  I'm not convinced that it will happen as you describe above, however.  Remember that as far as turian society is concerned, Garrus is kind of a deadbeat loser.  It's not widely acknowledged, even by people who were THERE, like the Council, that he helped save the day in ME1 (provided you recruited him).  So I think that if Garrus is going to be in any position of power or leadership over turians, it'll have to be because Shepard puts him there, along the lines of "Garrus Vakarian is my liaison to the turians.  You follow his orders, or I leave you to the tender mercies of the Reapers.  What'll it be?"  And then he'd of course prove himself an able leader, worthy of merit in the eyes of his people.

It seems a bit cliched to stick him with turians just because he happens to be one himself, though.  My Shepard would rather have him leading part of her armada than let him rot as a bodyguard or part of a military bureaucracy.  I guess we'll just have to see, no? 

Modifié par ciaweth, 20 octobre 2010 - 06:07 .

[AdmiralCheez]

BRINGIN' THIS THREAD BACK FROM THE DEAD



There is always more room for character development. As for ditching your paragon molding, I agree that the choices he made are understandable. Obviously, Garrus reacted violently to the deaths of people he really cares about. I mean think about it, he'd followed Shep's advice at first, but when he lost the one person he really looked up to...



I didn't feel like I taught him the same lesson twice, though: in ME1, it was a crash-course in morality, what with either save the innocents or screw the rules. The fact that he took a little bit of both with him shows a bit of laziness on BioWare's part, but I'll let it slide since the Archangel thing was badass (my little Garrus grew up!), and even paragons had to do some renegade things (like stealing the Normandy). In ME2, it was less about constructing a general sense of morality and more about what to do with the gray areas and how to put ugly memories in the past.



But now, I think Garrus finally understands who he is and what he's going to do about it. I'm pretty sure the only thing stopping him from at least appearing in ME3 is nuking him in the Suicide mission (an easy task). He's the one guy that'll be at your side no matter what, either as a squadmate or in a support role. And, hey, there's that development opportunity you're craving: have him seriously doubt one of Shepard's orders, especially if ME3 is going to involve some uber-heavy decisions that we all hope it will. And then give Shepard the chance to betray him and watch the **** hit the fan.



Bottom line: squaddie or no, he'll be back somehow. Anything less than epic will not suffice. He's grown too much as a character and seriously has to make up for all that time he spent calibrating the main frickin' guns.

[CalJones]

I have, well, a lot of Shepards and Garrus is a romantic interest for two of them and best buddy for the rest of them. Hell yes I want him back. I would be gutted if he was reduced to a cameo or somesuch. (He also better not die).

[Evelinessa]

I need Garrus to return as a squadmate in ME3. He is my LI and I feel it won't be Mass Effect without Garrus on the squad. I also agree that I don't want him to die.

[xlavaina]

I find this entire topic offensive.

[Intensity Penguin]

Yes. We do want him for ME3. 'Nuff said

[achwas]

Intensity Penguin wrote...

Yes. We do want him for ME3. 'Nuff said

^^ This

And the simple fact that we didn't get much onboard dialogue with Tali eitheis owed to their characters and species being introduced in ME-1, ME-2 should have brought the greater story forward (ME-3 will show whether it was far enough).

If Garrus is not around or relegated to an offscreen NPC role - which would make little if no sense for, unlike Wrex with the Krogan clans - the Turian Hierachy is not much in need of a strong personality to lead them . 

[Sorrel]

There's lots of things Garrus can talk about. Turian culture, his repeated interest in coming back to fight under Shepard, etc.

Garrus and Shep certainly have a lot to talk about if you read LOTSB's entry about him, 'Unlikely to realise full leadership potential whilst under Shepard's command' because Shepard outshines everyone.

Maybe you can take 2 squaddies with you, and send 3 AI squaddies out for a mission. IDK.



I get what OP is saying, but with some effort, Garrus could be polished.

[lovgreno]

Yes. I would be less willing to buy ME3 withouth a Garrus in my squad. More dialouge would be nice but I understand that there isn't enough development time and disk space for everything I want.