DIrishB wrote...
I accused you of playing the victim, not being one. There's a difference--which I feel is important to point out, since apparently we're resorting to insulting each other's intelligence. And true observers are silent...which you certainly aren't.
But, just to make it clear, I understand very well whats going on here: you're desperate for attention. You're always one of the most out-spoken complainers. And thats your right, its also just tiring. For someone who claims to be a realist, your cynical nature betrays you. My God, I still remember the big stink you helped start concerning the "canon" Shepard in the ME comic awhile back. All your worries and complaints about that really panned out, huh? Though the comic sucked, you're cynical assumptions about Bioware "canonizing" Shepard were way off the mark.
The basis of your argument is that the Liara romance content should have been included in the actual ME2 game, not just as DLC. Here's why that didn't happen:
Liara wasn't in ME2 as a squadmate for a reason (other than just being reserved for this DLC...see, I knew your cynical mind would jump right to that). The reason is solely so that she couldn't or wouldn't take part in the suicide mission which made up ME2's plot, thus leaving her absolutely alive and well at the end of ME2 so she could appear as a squadmate and/or love interest in ME3. If she'd been on the crew for the suicide mission and chance was against you (even if you'd completed all Loyalty missions and Normandy upgrades), she could have ended up dead...which would've put a damper on Bioware's plans for her in ME3, and your plans for continuing your love interest with Liara post-ME2.
The reasoning is there and logic is there, so why don't you understand this? Granted...the execution and final product was admittedly disappointing in comparison to ME1, but I understand Bioware's decision to keep Liara in the background for ME2 so as to guarantee her a spot in ME3.
Garrus and Tali are crew members in ME2, but they weren't potential Love Interests in ME2, so there's no "carry-over" the developers have to worry about like with Liara.
A) I'm not playing a victim. I'm pointing out flaws as I see them and calling them into question.

Where does it say that a "true observer" is silent? XD Just because I voice my observations I'm automatically not an observer? You have an interesting definition of observer.
C) Actually, I very rarely post in the forums anymore. Every once in a while I will venture in andmake a statement, maybe participate in a debate or discussion. It's easiest to debate things with which you find fault, and I'm not afraid to make my opinions known. My opinions and thoughts on canonizing a Shepard are valid. Back in the comic announcement topic I was voicing concerns about a distinct possibility. I never said canonizing was
definitely what the comic was going to do. I was explaining why such a thing would have been a bad idea, and I stand by that wholeheartedly.
D) The fact that you think I'm desperate for attention is
hilarious. You thought I was insulting your intelligence before? Well, this comment of yours proves without a shred of doubt that you have no idea what is going on. XD
Sorry if that offends you, but, seriously.
E) Oh, okay, so Liara doesn't have any romance content in ME2 because she's not on the squad. She doesn't talk about her relationship with Shepard at all because the devs want to keep her alive for ME3. Yep, that makes perfect sense.
Wait, what?! That doesn't make any sense at all! "Keeping her in the background" because she's not a squaddy is completely different from ignoring her altogether and making her a gigantic out-of-character hole in the plot.