Daewan wrote...
I'm pretty sure after the last 500 years, she's just wearing that armor to give herself more of a challenge. Because, if you somehow missed what happened before you recruited her, she took on an army of mercs wearing high heels and cleavage.
I did notice. Thus the joke

Modesty means different things to different cultures. Spartan women thought shirts were unnecessary and stupid. Athenian women showed off at least one breast to prove their femininity. Spartan men didn't wear armor; it only slowed them down. Roman soldiers didn't wear backplates. Armor didn't become a necessity of warfare until the Normans, and it dropped out of vogue the instant that sidearms became commonplace.
Debating modesty on an Internet thread is doomed to failure, so I'll limit that to the occasional snarky comment about camera angles.
As to armor in history:
Hoplite I for one would not enjoy wearing a 50lb breastplate into combat. But then, I wouldn't want to wear a leather speedo into combat either

Use or disuse of armor is an economic factor as much as it is a practical one. Cost/benefit analysis. You can bet an elite, highly trained (not to mention wealthy) soldier is gonna get better protection.
Modern soldiers only wear armor appropriate to the enemy they plan to fight; they don't walk around in full body armor at all times, neither do most police offiers. They wear chest armor because that's where they are most likely to get shot, because the average criminal is a damned moron who has no skill whatsoever with a gun. Most
officers are trained to shoot criminals in the extremities, where no one ever wears armor these days.
Not being trained in any sort of firearm, i won't debate this except to say I had always been under the assumption that one was trained to aim "In the center of mass" ie the chest or torso to guarantee the best chance of hitting
somethingThe reason that Humans cover their chest area is because for us, that's going to be a serious wound. Since we know nothing about Asari physiology besides "They have boobies," we have no way of knowing whether there is a heart or another major organ there.
That's actually the best arguement I've heard yet. Usually it's more along the lines of "So what? She's hot!" This is actually quite refreshing

In response, I'll simply say that given asari do have a humanoid (albiet universally female) appearance, added to the fact that all asari commandos and mercs we see have armor that fully covers their torsos, I'm still going to have to go with the idea that there is
some kind of vital organ in the mid to upper chest region. Subject to change if a proper codex entry is made.
If I worked for BioWare, I would claim that exposing that area increases an Asari's ability to use her biotics, and that's why all the Matriarchs do it.
And if Bioware said something like that I'd accept that, though at this point I'd still think it was fan service.
tl; dr: Bewbies are good.
Under the proper circumstances, yes. LI scene: good. Gunfight, not so much