115 réponses à ce sujet

[ExtremeOne]

xlavaina wrote...

Everyone wants their own preferences which is why I support getting the entire, at least ME2 team, back in ME3. See personally, ExtremeOne, I don't know if I could honestly play ME3 without Thane, Mordin and especially Tali, as they are all some of my favorites. My point is not that you're incorrect, rather that everyone has their own opinions and should be catered to appropriately. Therefore, the decisions you make in ME2 should directly impact who you play with in ME3.

   


I understand that you are a fan of Thane and Mordin and Tali. but the one way Bioware could fix this issue and thats allow us the player decide who want on the team with no restrictions. I mean you have to recruit Tali and get the shield enhancement .  there could have been another way to get that. 

[ExtremeOne]

crimzontearz wrote...

ExtremeOne wrote...

crimzontearz wrote...

ExtremeOne wrote...

crimzontearz wrote...

ExtremeOne wrote...

Shadow_broker wrote...

Miranda, Legion and grunt are all i need to return
Mordin and thane need to be written off well
Garrus/tali cameo
Jack maybe if she gets revamp
Rest can never be mentioned again for all i care

  


good thinking though. I would say tali , thane and mordin as well jack can all go back to where ever they come from. Miranda , Grunt , Legion , Garrus , Jacob , Samara and Zaeed as well kasumi is all I need for ME 3. oh and joker as well edi. 

Those are YOUR prefences, everyone else should have them shoved down their throats in ME3. Bioware should bring back everyone, if people killed off their squad then they should be made to deal with the consequences of such and therefore with less content

at that point everyone is happy aside for the immensely small minority of those who played a ****** poor run and never bothered to try and improve it (aka the meathead casual gamers)

  


ME 3 with out tali. mordin , jack, thane would be fine by me. and if bioware says if you kill squad mates in the final mission then they will not be in your ME 3 then thats all good for me. if others like those useless characters then fine. but I will not be shedding any tears over those losses. I do not need some whiny quarian little girl screaming shepard i trusted you crap while I am kicking the reapers's butt in ME 3 

and I do not need a moronic brit mercenary bringing on his own brand of sociopathy in ME3 since I mostly play Paragon, you do not see me advocating the removal of Zaeed tho do you?

  


I am not advocating anything I am simply giving my view on the ones I would like back in ME 3. thats nice you play as a do gooder in ME 2. but Tali and jack as well thane and mordin can all jump in a lake for all i care. 

to further specify

that should extend to backstory as well, yet, if Bioware felt magnanimous they could allow for a quick "intro" at the beginning of the game alloowing the grass green new players to estsablish SOME backstory

  


I agree with that idea for new players in ME 3 

[i love lamp x3]

i just want to say i hate people who hate tali or thane

[ExtremeOne]

i love lamp x3 wrote...

i just want to say i hate people who hate tali or thane

  


Oh I do not hate Thane he is just not a interesting character in my opinion. now Tali on the other hand yeah I strongly dislike her  

[guacamayus]

I hope all companions are back in ME3, there is no reason for them to be excluded of the game (maybe Thane because of his illness). If you play ME2 the right way ALL of them are really loyal to you, I dont think they would leave before the final fight

Modifié par guacamayus, 29 août 2010 - 01:54 .

[xlavaina]

i love lamp x3 wrote...

i just want to say i hate people who hate tali or thane

These are the kinds of posts that cause threads to be locked. I like Tali and Thane too, but I'm not going to force my opinion down other peoples' throats. Or troll them for that matter. 

[mosor]

I don't get people who cry and say they won't play ME3 if "insert favorite character here" doesn't make the cut. This is Shepard's story. As long as that story is good and the antagonist is great, I'll play,

[xlavaina]

mosor wrote...

I don't get people who cry and say they won't play ME3 if "insert favorite character here" doesn't make the cut. This is Shepard's story. As long as that story is good and the antagonist is great, I'll play,

First of all the whole "this is Shepard's story" is total BS. No offense to you in particular, but the game is made amazing and worth it by the characters. I stand by my opinion that if Bioware takes out the characters I love, I will probably not play. Garrus, Tali, Mordin, Thane, Wrex, Legion, Kasumi. They all make the game worthwhile to play. I wouldn't fight the Reapers without them. And I definitely won't buy the game if they make the current 12 into cameos, and give me a new 12, that would be ridiculous. 

Also, responding to your point, I believe that the characters will need to be deeper than ever, because there probably wont be a tangible antagonist like Saren was in ME1. The Reapers are coming and I doubt they're going to want to talk. I'm not trying to be antagonistic, just hopeful I guess... 

[mosor]

xlavaina wrote...

mosor wrote...

I don't get people who cry and say they won't play ME3 if "insert favorite character here" doesn't make the cut. This is Shepard's story. As long as that story is good and the antagonist is great, I'll play,

First of all the whole "this is Shepard's story" is total BS. No offense to you in particular, but the game is made amazing and worth it by the characters. I stand by my opinion that if Bioware takes out the characters I love, I will probably not play. Garrus, Tali, Mordin, Thane, Wrex, Legion, Kasumi. They all make the game worthwhile to play. I wouldn't fight the Reapers without them. And I definitely won't buy the game if they make the current 12 into cameos, and give me a new 12, that would be ridiculous. 

Also, responding to your point, I believe that the characters will need to be deeper than ever, because there probably wont be a tangible antagonist like Saren was in ME1. The Reapers are coming and I doubt they're going to want to talk. I'm not trying to be antagonistic, just hopeful I guess... 

Most of these characters don't have 5 minutes of talk time. If anything, they're a distraction, After the first playthrough, it's spacebar, spacebar, spacebar to get through these inane converations I have to have with them. And considering that all the characters have a possibility of dying, I'd rather have bioware concentrate on great concrete stories available to everyone.  Sorry, I prefer more galactic story and less introspective stuff in the next game.  ME1 had a better balance.

Modifié par mosor, 29 août 2010 - 04:05 .

[FsDxRAGE]

BioWare has a lot of work cut out for them, that is for sure

[xlavaina]

mosor wrote...

xlavaina wrote...

mosor wrote...

I don't get people who cry and say they won't play ME3 if "insert favorite character here" doesn't make the cut. This is Shepard's story. As long as that story is good and the antagonist is great, I'll play,

First of all the whole "this is Shepard's story" is total BS. No offense to you in particular, but the game is made amazing and worth it by the characters. I stand by my opinion that if Bioware takes out the characters I love, I will probably not play. Garrus, Tali, Mordin, Thane, Wrex, Legion, Kasumi. They all make the game worthwhile to play. I wouldn't fight the Reapers without them. And I definitely won't buy the game if they make the current 12 into cameos, and give me a new 12, that would be ridiculous. 

Also, responding to your point, I believe that the characters will need to be deeper than ever, because there probably wont be a tangible antagonist like Saren was in ME1. The Reapers are coming and I doubt they're going to want to talk. I'm not trying to be antagonistic, just hopeful I guess... 

Most of these characters don't have 5 minutes of talk time. If anything, they're a distraction, After the first playthrough, it's spacebar, spacebar, spacebar to get through these inane converations I have to have with them. And considering that all the characters have a possibility of dying, I'd rather have bioware concentrate on great concrete stories available to everyone.  Sorry, I prefer more galactic story and less introspective stuff in the next game.  ME1 had a better balance.

Eh. This is true. But the fact that there were 12 of them and they were all diverse compensated enough for me, but I agree with you. However, I still want the ME2 squad to be the ME3 squad because then it will have real consequences in the third game. Bioware should go all out on character development, and then if you lost that squad member in ME2, you mis out in 3.  

[AresXX7]

xlavaina wrote...

mosor wrote...

Most of these characters don't have 5 minutes of talk time. If anything, they're a distraction, After the first playthrough, it's spacebar, spacebar, spacebar to get through these inane converations I have to have with them. And considering that all the characters have a possibility of dying, I'd rather have bioware concentrate on great concrete stories available to everyone.  Sorry, I prefer more galactic story and less introspective stuff in the next game.  ME1 had a better balance.

Eh. This is true. But the fact that there were 12 of them and they were all diverse compensated enough for me, but I agree with you. However, I still want the ME2 squad to be the ME3 squad because then it will have real consequences in the third game. Bioware should go all out on character development, and then if you lost that squad member in ME2, you mis out in 3.  

what boggles my mind, is why Bioware spent the time & effort, to put such an emphasis on characters in ME2 and make them all expendable, when they had to know people were going to get attached to certain characters
(12 recruitments + 12 loyalty missions vs 5 "main" missions followed by 12 possible deaths)

and since so many people play the game differently, it just leads to way too many scenarios for them to successfully satisfy everyone in ME3

unless they have one hell of a rabbit up their sleeve

but, I guess we'll just have to wait & see, when the third chapter of this little saga comes out

I know I'm just repeating what so many others have said, but it feels good to vent, once and a while

[gunswordfist]

I don't. I believe if Bioware can put so much dialogue, cutscene time, etc. for a near the end of the game optional character like Legion, then I think they can take it to the next level with a sequel.

[gunswordfist]

Pr3ying M4nt15 360 wrote... I mean that's something people don't

consider. Half of the ME 2 team do have

excuses that could get them out of ME 3,

some of them always maintain a degree of

detachment. The ones that seem to get most

directly involved in the story so the player could get attached are also ones that have the

major normandy upgrades connected to them

or the player is simply forced to recruit them

(like mordin). For example how many people

won't recruit Tali knowing that you need the

normandy's shield upgrade. Not to mention that ME 2 is designed that you can recruit

characters after the end game and then

import from that. It's like theres so many

ways you could experience the characters I

don't know why people think Bioware will

cater to a few people who managed to get nearly everyone killed.

Whoa, you can avoid recruiting Tali? I thought hearing how you don't have to recruit Wrex and Garrus in ME1 was shocking enough.

[AresXX7]

gunswordfist wrote...

Whoa, you can avoid recruiting Tali? I thought hearing how you don't have to recruit Wrex and Garrus in ME1 was shocking enough.

I do believe it applies to anyone, after Horizon

[crimzontearz]

I wonder just how much things would have been different if Bioware had not been bought by EA.

Half of the reasons behind these situations can be explained with "well if they do this then they make more money"